Disparities in access to specialty care and emergency department use after hospital discharge to a skilled nursing facility

Factors Affecting Adherence in Allergic Disorders and Strategies for Improvement

Addressing patient adherence is a key element in ensuring positive health outcomes and improving health-related quality of life for patients with atopic and immunologic disorders. Understanding the complex etiologies of patient nonadherence and identifying real-world solutions is important for clinicians, patients, and systems to design and effect change. This review serves as an important resource for defining key issues related to patient nonadherence and outlines solutions, resources, knowledge gaps, and advocacy areas across five domains: health care access, financial considerations, socioenvironmental factors, health literacy, and psychosocial factors. To allow for more easily digestible and usable content, we describe solutions based on three macrolevels of focus: patient, clinician, and system. This review and interactive tool kit serve as an educational resource and call to action to improve equitable distribution of resources, institutional policies, patient-centered care, and practice guidelines for improving health outcomes for all patients with atopic and immunologic disorders.

Hospitalists Improving Transitions of Care Through Virtual Collaborative Rounding with Skilled Nursing Facilities-the HiToC SNF Study

BACKGROUND

Over one in five Medicare patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are re-hospitalized within 30 days of discharge. Poor communication between the hospital and SNF upon hospital discharge is frequently cited as the most common cause of readmission.

AIM

The goal of this program was to assess the ability of a weekly post-discharge hospitalist led virtual rounding program to augment the written discharge summary sent to SNFs.

SETTING

Two academic hospitals and six SNFs in Baltimore, MD.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalists and medical directors or directors of nursing from the partner SNF.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

During weekly encounters, the hospitalist and SNF providers discussed the clinical status, discharge medications, treatment plan, and follow-up care of all discharged patients. The intervention took place from July 2021 to December 2021.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

During the study, 544 patients were discussed in a post-discharge virtual encounter. After the discussions, hospitalists identified clinically significant errors in 124 discharge summaries. A survey of participating hospitalists and SNF medical and nursing leadership indicated the intervention was thought to improve care transitions.

DISCUSSION

Our innovation was successful in identifying errors in discharge summaries and was thought to improve the transition of care by participating SNF and hospitalist providers.

Disparities in emergency department and urgent care opioid prescribing before and after randomized clinician feedback interventions

OBJECTIVES

Racial and ethnic minorities receive opioid prescriptions at lower rates and dosages than White patients. Though opioid stewardship interventions can improve or exacerbate these disparities, there is little evidence about these effects. We conducted a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted among 438 clinicians from 21 emergency departments and 27 urgent care clinics. Our objective was to determine whether randomly allocated opioid stewardship clinician feedback interventions that were designed to reduce opioid prescriptions had unintended effects on disparities in prescribing by patient race and ethnicity.

METHODS

The primary outcome was likelihood of receiving a low-pill prescription (low ≤10 pills, medium 11-19 pills, high ≥20 pills). Generalized mixed-effects models were used to determine patient characteristics associated with low-pill prescriptions during the baseline period. These models were then used to determine whether receipt of a low-pill prescription varied by patient race or ethnicity during the intervention period between usual care and three opioid stewardship interventions: (1) individual audit feedback, (2) peer comparison feedback, and (3) combined (individual audit + peer comparison) feedback.

RESULTS

Compared with White patients, Black patients were more likely to receive a low-pill prescription during the baseline (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.31, p = 0.002) and intervention (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.07-1.91, p = 0.015). While combined feedback was associated with an overall increase in low-pill prescriptions as intended (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.28-2.78, p = 0.001), there were no significant differences in treatment effects of any of the interventions by patient race and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined individual audit and peer comparison feedback was associated with fewer opioid pills per prescription equally by patient race and ethnicity. However, the intervention did not significantly close the baseline disparity in prescribing by race.