Implementation of a mortality prediction rule for real-time decision making: feasibility and validity

Impact of infectious diseases consultation for hospitalized patients with Clostridioides difficile infection

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study described outcomes associated with mandatory infectious diseases (ID) consultation in hospitalized patients with CDI. ID consultation was associated with increased appropriate concomitant antibiotic use, however longer courses of concomitant antibiotics were administered.

Development and Validation of an Integrated Suite of Prediction Models for All-Cause 30-Day Readmissions of Children and Adolescents Aged 0 to 18 Years

IMPORTANCE

Readmission is often considered a hospital quality measure, yet no validated risk prediction models exist for children.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a tool identifying patients before hospital discharge who are at risk for subsequent readmission, applicable to all ages.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based prognostic analysis used electronic health record-derived data from a freestanding children's hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. All-cause 30-day readmission was modeled using 3 years of discharge data. Data were analyzed from June 1 to November 30, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Three models were derived as a complementary suite to include (1) children 6 months or older with 1 or more prior hospitalizations within the last 6 months (recent admission model [RAM]), (2) children 6 months or older with no prior hospitalizations in the last 6 months (new admission model [NAM]), and (3) children younger than 6 months (young infant model [YIM]). Generalized mixed linear models were used for all analyses. Models were validated using an additional year of discharges.

RESULTS

The derivation set contained 29 988 patients with 48 019 hospitalizations; 50.1% of these admissions were for children younger than 5 years and 54.7% were boys. In the derivation set, 4878 of 13 490 admissions (36.2%) in the RAM cohort, 2044 of 27 531 (7.4%) in the NAM cohort, and 855 of 6998 (12.2%) in the YIM cohort were followed within 30 days by a readmission. In the RAM cohort, prior utilization, current or prior procedures indicative of severity of illness (transfusion, ventilation, or central venous catheter), commercial insurance, and prolonged length of stay (LOS) were associated with readmission. In the NAM cohort, procedures, prolonged LOS, and emergency department visit in the past 6 months were associated with readmission. In the YIM cohort, LOS, prior visits, and critical procedures were associated with readmission. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 83.1 (95% CI, 82.4-83.8) for the RAM cohort, 76.1 (95% CI, 75.0-77.2) for the NAM cohort, and 80.3 (95% CI, 78.8-81.9) for the YIM cohort.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prognostic study, the suite of 3 prediction models had acceptable to excellent discrimination for children. These models may allow future improvements in tailored discharge preparedness to prevent high-risk readmissions.

A Single-Institution Analysis of Targeted Colorectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathway Strategies That Decrease Readmissions

BACKGROUND

Decreasing readmissions is an important quality improvement strategy. Targeted interventions that effectively decrease readmissions have not been fully investigated and standardized.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to decrease readmissions after colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparison of patients before and after the implementation of interventions.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single institution dedicated enhanced recovery pathway colorectal surgery service.

PATIENTS

The study group received quality review interventions that were designed to decrease readmissions: preadmission class upgrades, a mobile phone app, a pharmacist-led pain management strategy, and an early postdischarge clinic. The control group was composed of enhanced recovery patients before the interventions. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust patient characteristics and predictors for imbalances.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits.

RESULTS

There were 1052 patients in the preintervention group and 668 patients in the postintervention group. After propensity score weighting, the postintervention cohort had a significantly lower readmission rate (9.98% vs 17.82%, p < 0.001) and emergency department visit rate (14.58% vs 23.15%, p < 0.001) than the preintervention group, and surgical site infection type I/II was significantly decreased as a readmission diagnosis (9.46% vs 2.43%, p = 0.043). Median time to readmission was 6 (interquartile 3-11) days in the preintervention group and 8 (3-17) days in the postintervention group (p = 0.21). Ileus, acute kidney injury, and surgical site infection type III were common reasons for readmissions and emergency department visits.

LIMITATIONS

A single-institution study may not be generalizable.

CONCLUSION

Readmission bundles composed of targeted interventions are associated with a decrease in readmissions and emergency department visits after enhanced recovery colorectal surgery. Bundle composition may be institution dependent. Further study and refinement of bundle components are required as next-step quality metric improvements. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B849.

ANLISIS EN UNA SOLA INSTITUCIN DE LAS CIRUGAS COLORECTALES CON VAS DE RECUPERACIN DIRIGIDA AUMENTADA QUE REDUCEN LOS REINGRESOS

ANTECEDENTES:La reducción de los reingresos es una importante estrategia de mejora de la calidad. Las intervenciones dirigidas que reducen eficazmente los reingresos no se han investigado ni estandarizado por completo.OBJETIVO:El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad de las intervenciones diseñadas para disminuir los reingresos después de la cirugía colorrectal.DISEÑO:Comparación retrospectiva de pacientes antes y después de la implementación de las intervenciones.ESCENARIO:Una sola institución dedicada al Servicio de cirugía colorrectal con vías de recuperación dirigida aumentadaPACIENTES:El grupo de estudio recibió intervenciones de revisión de calidad que fueron diseñadas para disminuir los reingresos: actualizaciones de clases previas a la admisión, una aplicación para teléfono móvil, una estrategia de manejo del dolor dirigida por farmacéuticos y alta temprana de la clínica. El grupo de control estaba compuesto por pacientes con recuperación mejorada antes de las intervenciones. Se utilizó la ponderación del puntaje de propensión para ajustar las características del paciente y los predictores de los desequilibrios.PARÁMETRO DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:El resultado primario fueron los reingresos a los 30 días. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron visitas al servicio de urgencias.RESULTADOS:Hubo 1052 pacientes en el grupo de preintervención y 668 pacientes en el grupo de posintervención. Después de la ponderación del puntaje de propensión, la cohorte posterior a la intervención tuvo una tasa de reingreso significativamente menor (9,98% frente a 17,82%, p <0,001) y una tasa de visitas al servicio de urgencias (14,58% frente a 23,15%, p <0,001) que el grupo de preintervención y la infección del sitio quirúrgico tipo I / II se redujo significativamente como diagnóstico de reingreso (9,46% frente a 2,43%, p = 0,043). La mediana de tiempo hasta la readmisión fue de 6 [IQR 3, 11] días en el grupo de preintervención y de 8 [3, 17] días en el grupo de posintervención (p = 0,21). El íleo, la lesión renal aguda y la infección del sitio quirúrgico tipo III fueron motivos frecuentes de reingresos y visitas al servicio de urgencias.LIMITACIONES:El estudio de una sola institución puede no ser generalizable.CONCLUSIÓNES:Los paquetes de readmisión compuestos por intervenciones dirigidas se asocian con una disminución en las readmisiones y las visitas al departamento de emergencias después de una cirugía colorrectal con vías de recuperación dirigida aumentada. La composición del paquete puede depender de la institución. Se requieren más estudios y refinamientos de los componentes del paquete como siguiente paso de mejora de la métrica de calidad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B849. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado).

The Impact of a Neurocritical Care and Neuropalliative Collaboration on Intensive Care Unit Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Neurocritical care (NCC) and neuropalliative care (NPC) clinicians provide care in specialized intensive care units (ICU). There is a paucity of data regarding the impact of NCC and NPC collaboration in smaller, community-focused settings.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical impact of introducing a NCC/NPC collaborative model in a mixed ICU community-based teaching hospital.

DESIGN

Retrospective pre/post cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients ≥18 years of age admitted to the ICU who received neurology and palliative care consultations between September 1, 2015 and August 31, 2017 at a 300 bed community-focused hospital were included.

INTERVENTION

The addition of a NCC/NPC collaborative model took place in September of 2016. The time periods before (9/1/2015 to 8/31/2016) and after (9/1/2016 to 8/31/2017) the addition were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 274 admissions (pre: 130, post: 144) were included. There were significantly more NCC consultations provided in the post-period (44.6% vs 57.6%; P = .03). NPC consultation increased (55.4% vs 66.7%; P = .056) Median LOS was significantly shorter after implementation of the collaborative model (11 vs 8 days; P = .01). Median ICU LOS was also shorter by 1 ICU-day in the post-period, though this was not statistically significant (P = .23). Mortality rates were similar (P = .95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest NCC/NPC collaboration in a community-focused teaching hospital was associated with more NCC consultations, as well as shorter LOS without increasing mortality. These data highlight the importance of supporting collaborative models of care in community settings. Further research is warranted.

Impact of a Mortality Prediction Rule for Organizing and Guiding Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Activities

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) surveillance at our hospital is supplemented by an internally developed surveillance database. In 2013, the database incorporated a validated, internally developed, prediction rule for patient mortality within 30 days of hospital admission. This study describes the impact of an expanded ASP review in patients at the highest risk for mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective, quasi-experimental study analyzed adults who received antimicrobials with the highest mortality risk score. Study periods were defined as 2011-Q3 2013 (historical group) and Q4 2013-2018 (intervention group). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed for confounders and analyzed using both unadjusted and propensity score weighted analyses. Interrupted time-series analyses also analyzed key outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 3282 and 5456 patients were included in the historical and intervention groups, respectively. There were significant reductions in median antimicrobial duration (5 vs 4 days; P < .001), antimicrobial days of therapy (8 vs 7; P < .001), antimicrobial cost ($96 vs $85; P = .003), length of stay (LOS) (6 vs 5 days; P < .001), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (3 vs 2 days; P < .001), total hospital cost ($10 946 vs $9119; P < .001), healthcare facility-onset vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (HO-VRE) incidence (1.3% vs 0.3%; P ≤ .001), and HO-VRE infections (0.6% vs 0.2%; P = .018) in the intervention cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in antimicrobial use, hospital and ICU LOS, HO-VRE, HO-VRE infections, and costs were associated with incorporation of a novel mortality prediction rule to guide ASP surveillance and intervention.

The 4-Hour Cairns Sepsis Model: A novel approach to predicting sepsis mortality at intensive care unit admission

BACKGROUND

Sepsis commonly causes intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, yet early identification of adults with sepsis at risk of dying in the ICU remains a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to derive a mortality prediction model (MPM) to assist ICU clinicians and researchers as a clinical decision support tool for adults with sepsis within 4 h of ICU admission.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed using 500 consecutive admissions between 2014 and 2018 to an Australian tertiary ICU, who were aged ≥18 years and had sepsis. A total of 106 independent variables were assessed against ICU episode-of-care mortality. Multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression derived an MPM, which was assessed on discrimination, calibration, fit, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values and bootstrapped.

RESULTS

The average cohort age was 58 years, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III-j severity score was 72, and the case fatality rate was 12%. The 4-Hour Cairns Sepsis Model (CSM-4) consists of age, history of renal disease, number of vasopressors, Glasgow Coma Scale, lactate, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and magnesium with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval = 0.84-0.95, p < 0.00001), a Nagelkerke R² of 0.51, specificity of 0.94, a negative predictive value of 0.98, and almost identical odds ratios during bootstrapping. The CSM-4 outperformed existing MPMs tested on our data set. The CSM-4 also performed similar to existing MPMs in their derivation papers whilst using fewer, routinely collected, and inexpensive variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSM-4 is a newly derived MPM for adults with sepsis at ICU admission. It displays excellent discrimination, calibration, fit, specificity, negative predictive value, and bootstrapping values whilst being easy to use and inexpensive. External validation is required.

Validation of a prospective mortality prediction score for hip fracture patients

PURPOSE

Although mortality prediction tools are the subject of significant interest as components of comprehensive hip fracture protocols, few have been applied or validated to prospectively inform ongoing patient management. Five regional hospitals are currently generating real-time mortality risk scores for all adults at the time of admission using available laboratory and comorbidity data (Cowen et al. J Hosp Med 9(11):720-726, 2014). Although results for aggregated conditions have been published, the primary aim of this study is to determine how well prospectively calculated scores predict mortality for hip fracture patients specifically.

METHODS

Using a five-hospital database, 1376 patients who were prospectively scored on admission were identified from January 2013 to April 2017, cross-referencing ICD9/10 diagnosis and procedure codes for AO/OTA 31A1 through 31B3 fractures. Prospective mortality scores have been previously divided into 5 risk categories to facilitate ease of clinical use. Vital status was determined from hospital data, Social Security and Michigan Death Indices.

RESULTS

Prospective scores demonstrated good mortality prediction, with AUCs of 0.80, 0.73, 0.74 and 0.74 for in hospital, 30-, 60- and 90-day mortality, respectively. Patients in the top 2 mortality risk categories represented 30% (410/1376) of the cohort and accounted for 78% (25/32) of the inpatient and 59% (57/97) of the 30 day deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of this real-time mortality risk tool is feasible and valid for the prediction of short- to medium-term mortality risk for hip fracture patients, and potentially offers valuable information to guide ongoing patient management decisions such as admitting service or level of care.

The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Guideline on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri)

Background

In South Africa (SA), administrators and intensive care practitioners are faced with the challenge of resource scarcity as well as an increasing demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services. ICU services are expensive, and practitioners in low- to middle-income countries experience the consequences of limited resources daily. Critically limited resources necessitate that rationing and triage (prioritisation) decisions are routinely necessary in SA, particularly in the publicly funded health sector.

Purpose

The purpose of this guideline is to utilise the relevant recommendations of the associated consensus meeting document and other internationally accepted principles to develop a guideline to inform frontline triage policy and ensure the best utilisation of adult intensive care in SA, while maintaining the fair distribution of available resources.

Recommendations

An overall conceptual framework for the triage process was developed. The components of the framework were developed on the basis that patients should be admitted preferentially when the likely incremental medical benefit derived from ICU admission justifies admission. An estimate of likely resource use should also form part of the triage decision, with those patients requiring relatively less resources to achieve substantial benefit receiving priority for admission. Thus, the triage system should maximise the benefits obtained from ICU resources available for the community. Where possible, practical examples of what the consensus group agreed would be considered appropriate practice under specified South African circumstances were provided, to assist clinicians with practical decision-making. It must be stressed that this guideline is not intended to be prescriptive for individual hospital or regional practice, and hospitals and regions are encouraged to develop specified local guidelines with locally relevant examples. The guideline should be reviewed and revised if appropriate within 5 years.

Conclusion

In recognition of the absolute need to limit patient access to ICU because of the lack of sufficient intensive care resources in public hospitals, this guideline has been developed to guide policy-making and assist frontline triage decision-making in SA. This document is not a complete plan for quality practice, but rather a template to support frontline clinicians, guide administrators and inform the public regarding appropriate triage decision-making.

The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Statement on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri)

Background

In South Africa (SA), intensive care is faced with the challenge of resource scarcity as well as an increasing demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services. ICU services are expensive, and practitioners in low- to middle-income countries experience daily the consequences of limited resources. Critically limited resources necessitate that rationing and triage (prioritisation) decisions are frequently necessary in SA, particularly in the publicly funded health sector.

Purpose

The purpose of this consensus statement is to examine key questions that arise when considering the status of ICU resources in SA, and more specifically ICU admission, rationing and triage decisions. The accompanying guideline in this issue is intended to guide frontline triage policy and ensure the best utilisation of intensive care in SA, while maintaining a fair distribution of available resources. Fair and efficient triage is important to ensure the ongoing provision of high-quality care to adult patients referred for intensive care.

Recommendations

In response to 14 key questions developed using a modified Delphi technique, 29 recommendations were formulated and graded using an adapted GRADE score. The 14 key questions addressed the status of the provision of ICU services in SA, the degree of resource restriction, the efficiency of resource management, the need for triage, and how triage could be most justly implemented. Important recommendations included the need to formally recognise and accurately quantify the provision of ICU services in SA by national audit; actively seek additional resources from governmental bodies; consider methods to maximise the efficiency of ICU care; evaluate lower level of care alternatives; develop a triage guideline to assist policy-makers and frontline practitioners to implement triage decisions in an efficient and fair way; measure and audit the consequence of triage; and promote research to improve the accuracy and consistency of triage decisions. The consensus document and guideline should be reviewed and revised appropriately within 5 years.

Conclusion

In recognition of the absolute need to limit patient access to ICU because of the lack of sufficient intensive care resources in public hospitals, recommendations and a guideline have been developed to guide policy-making and assist frontline triage decision-making in SA. These documents are not a complete plan for quality practice but rather the beginning of a long-term initiative to engage clinicians, the public and administrators in appropriate triage decision-making, and promote systems that will ultimately maximise the efficient and fair use of available ICU resources.

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated With Hospital-Onset Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Background

Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are common in hospitals, but the literature surrounding PVC-associated bacteremia is lacking. We describe incidence rates, risk factors, and outcomes related to PVC-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), a common cause of hospital-onset (HO) SAB.

Methods

This is a retrospective case–control study conducted at a 537-bed teaching community hospital during 2015–2016. Cases were adult inpatients with HO SAB with infectious diseases documentation of the PVC as the only source of bacteremia. Cases were matched 1:2 with controls on approximate PVC insertion date, age, mortality prediction score, and insurance type. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. PVC utilization was estimated by a point-prevalence survey from July 2017.

Results

Of 205 SAB episodes, 160 were community-onset and 45 were HO; 16 (36%) HO cases were PVC-associated. Cases (n = 16) were more likely than controls (n = 32) to have a PVC placed in the antecubital area (odds ratio [OR], 11.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–95.7; P = .02) and PVC duration ≥4 days (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1–15.2; P = .04). The point prevalence of at least 1 PVC in adult inpatients was 86%, and the incidence density of HO PVC–associated SAB was 0.15 per 1000 PVC-days. The mean length of stay for cases was 13.2 days. All cases successfully completed parenteral antibiotics with a mean treatment length of 23.6 days.

Conclusions

PVC-associated SAB is a common cause of HO SAB that results in significant morbidity. PVC placement in the antecubital area and line duration should be minimized to reduce HO SAB.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Epidural Analgesia in a Colon and Rectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathway: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Multimodal pain management is an integral part of enhanced recovery pathways. The most effective pain management strategies have not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

This is a single-institution, open-label randomized (1:1) trial.

SETTING

This study compared liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing elective open and minimally invasive colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery pathway.

PATIENTS

Two hundred were enrolled. Following randomization, allocation, and follow-up, there were 92 patients with transversus abdominis plane block and 87 patients with epidural analgesia available for analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions comprised liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were numeric pain scores and the overall benefit of analgesia scores.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the Numeric Pain Scale and Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score between groups. Time trend analysis revealed that patients with transversus abdominis plane block had higher numeric pain scores on the day of surgery, but that the relationship was reversed later in the postoperative period. Opioid use was significantly less in the transversus abdominis plane block group (206.84 mg vs 98.29 mg, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in time to GI recovery, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Cost was considerably more for the epidural analgesia group.

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted at a single institution.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized trial shows that perioperative pain management with liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block is as effective as epidural analgesia and is associated with less opioid use and less cost. These data and the more favorable risk profile suggest that liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block is a viable multimodal perioperative pain management option for this patient population in an established enhanced recovery pathway.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02591407). See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A737.

Implementation of a Novel Algorithm to Decrease Unnecessary Hospitalizations in Patients Presenting to a Community Emergency Department With Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most common dysrhythmia in the United States. Patients seen in the emergency department (ED) in rapid AFib are often started on intravenous rate-controlling agents and admitted for several days. Although underlying and triggering illnesses must be addressed, AFib, intrinsically, is rarely life-threatening and can often be safely managed in an outpatient setting. At our academic community hospital, we implemented an algorithm to decrease hospital admissions for individuals presenting with a primary diagnosis of AFib. We focused on lenient oral rate control and discharge home. Our study evaluates outcomes after implementation of this algorithm.

METHODS

Study design is a retrospective cohort analysis pre- and postimplementation of the algorithm. The primary outcome was hospital admissions. Secondary outcomes were 3- and 30-day ED visits and any associated hospital admissions. These outcomes were compared before (March 2013-February 2014) and after (March 2015-February 2016) implementation. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were run to test for significant changes in the three outcome variables.

RESULTS

A total of 1,108 individuals met inclusion criteria with 586 patients in the preimplementation group and 522 in the postimplementation group. Cohorts were broadly comparable in terms of demographics and health histories. Admissions for persons presenting with AFib after implementation decreased significantly (80.4% pre vs. 67.4% post, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.4, p < 0.001). Despite this difference there was no change in ED return rates within 3 or 30 days (adjusted ORs = 0.93 and 0.89, p = 0.91 and 0.73, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a novel algorithm to identify and treat low-risk patients with AFib can significantly decrease the rate of hospital admissions without increased ED returns. This simple algorithm could be adopted by other community hospitals and help lower costs.

Data-driven optimization methodology for admission control in critical care units

The decision of whether to admit a patient to a critical care unit is a crucial operational problem that has significant influence on both hospital performance and patient outcomes. Hospitals currently lack a methodology to selectively admit patients to these units in a way that patient health risk metrics can be incorporated while considering the congestion that will occur. The hospital is modeled as a complex loss queueing network with a stochastic model of how long risk-stratified patients spend time in particular units and how they transition between units. A Mixed Integer Programming model approximates an optimal admission control policy for the network of units. While enforcing low levels of patient blocking, we optimize a monotonic dual-threshold admission policy. A hospital network including Intermediate Care Units (IMCs) and Intensive Care Units (ICUs) was considered for validation. The optimized model indicated a reduction in the risk levels required for admission, and weekly average admissions to ICUs and IMCs increased by 37% and 12%, respectively, with minimal blocking. Our methodology captures utilization and accessibility in a network model of care pathways while supporting the personalized allocation of scarce care resources to the neediest patients. The interesting benefits of admission thresholds that vary by day of week are studied.

The risk-outcome-experience triad: Mortality risk and the hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown an association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (HCAHPS) scores and clinical quality. The mortality risk on admission predicts adverse events. It is not known if this risk also portends a suboptimal patient experience.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the admission mortality risk identifies an experience of care risk.

DESIGN

A retrospectively assembled cohort in which individual HCAHPS survey responses were linked to the admission risk of dying.

SETTING

Five community hospitals of various sizes in Michigan.

PATIENTS

There were 17,509 HCAHPS medical and surgical respondents; 2513 (14.4%) were at high risk of dying.

MEASUREMENTS

Odds ratio (OR) (high-risk patients to low-risk patients) for providing a top box score for HCAHPS dimensions, controlling for hospital and the standard HCAHPS patient mix adjustment factors.

RESULTS

High-risk respondents were less likely to provide the most favorable response (unadjusted) for all HCAHPS domains, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.09) for discharge information. Multivariable analyses indicated that high-risk patients were less likely to report a top box experience for doctor communication (OR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.94) and responsiveness of hospital staff (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.85), but were more likely to have received adequate discharge information (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at high risk of dying who completed surveys were less likely to report favorable physician communication and staff responsiveness. Further understanding of these relationships may help design a care model to improve both outcomes and experience. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:628-635. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Effect of an antimicrobial stewardship bundle for patients with Clostridium difficile infection

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to determine whether there was an improvement in compliance with recommended Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment after introduction of an institutional CDI bundle with daily antimicrobial stewardship assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluating compliance with an antimicrobial stewardship team-implemented care bundle in patients with CDI compared with historical controls. The primary outcome, compliance with overall bundle elements, was achieved when the following measures were accomplished: (i) appropriate CDI antimicrobial therapy based on the institutional treatment algorithm; (ii) discontinuation of acid-suppressant therapy in the absence of a pre-specified indication; and (iii) discontinuation of unnecessary antimicrobials. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the extent to which antimicrobial stewardship involvement affected treatment compliance and to assess trends in CDI clinical outcomes, such as mortality and readmission.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-sixty-nine patients were evaluated; 83 after implementation of the care bundle (bundle group) and 89 prior to bundle implementation (historical control group). Compliance with overall bundle endpoints was significantly higher in the bundle group versus the control group (81% versus 45%, P < 0.001). Individual bundle components that were significantly improved in the bundle group were discontinuation of non-essential acid suppressants (90% versus 18%, P < 0.001) and administration of appropriate CDI therapy (82% versus 64%, P < 0.009). No significant differences were observed in overall or CDI-related mortality or readmissions, durations of therapy or reduction of non-essential concomitant antimicrobials.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of an antimicrobial stewardship bundle for CDI significantly improved adherence to institutional treatment recommendations and overall management of patients with CDI.