Common myths about caring for patients with terminal illness: opportunities to improve care in the hospital setting

The sentinel hospitalization and the role of palliative care

With current healthcare reform and calls for improving care quality and safety, there is renewed emphasis on high-value care. Moreover, given the significant healthcare resource utilization for patients with chronically progressive illnesses or for patients at the end of life, innovative and efficient care delivery models are urgently needed. We propose here the concept of a sentinel hospitalization, defined as a transitional point in the patient's disease course that heralds a need to reassess prognosis, patient understanding, treatment options and intensities, and goals of care. Hospitalists are well positioned to recognize a patient's sentinel hospitalization and use it as an opportunity for active integration of palliative care that provides high-quality and cost-saving care through its patient- and family-oriented approach, its interdisciplinary nature, and its focus on symptom control and care coordination.

Opioid pain medication orders and administration in the last days of life

CONTEXT

Most patients with serious and life-limiting illness experience pain at some point in the illness trajectory.

OBJECTIVES

To describe baseline pain management practices for imminently dying patients in Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs) and examine factors associated with these processes, including presence of opioid orders at the time of death and medication administration in the last seven days, 48 hours, and 24 hours of life.

METHODS

Data on orders and administration of opioid pain medication at the end of life were abstracted from the medical records of veterans who died in six VAMC hospitals in 2005.

RESULTS

Of 1068 patient records, 686 (64.2%) had an active order for an opioid medication at the time of death. Of these, 69.8% of patients had received the medication at some time within the last seven days of life, 61.2% within the last 48 hours, and 47.0% within the last 24 hours. In multivariable models, presence of an order for opioid pain medication at the time of death and administration within the last 24 hours were both significantly associated with having a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order (P < 0.0001/0.0002), terminal condition (P < 0.0001/< 0.0001), family presence (P < 0.0001/0.0023), location of death (P = 0.003/0.0005), and having pain noted in the care plan (P = 0.0073/0.0007).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate a need for improving availability of opioids for end-of-life care in the inpatient setting. Modifiable factors, such as family presence and goals-of-care discussions, suggest potential targets for intervention to improve recognition of the dying process and proactive planning for pain control.

Evolving practice of hospital medicine and its impact on hospital throughput and efficiencies

Hospitalists are uniquely positioned to implement strategies to improve patient flow and efficiency. Hospital leaders have stated they expect hospitalists to comanage surgical patients, participate in observation units, and screen medical admissions, in addition to providing inpatient care for medical patients. We review how the hospitalists' role in acute inpatient care, surgical comanagement, short stay units, chest pain units, and active bed management has improved throughput and patient flow.

Comfort Measures Only

Despite how frequently we say “comfort measures only” (CMO) in the hospital setting, review of the medical literature yields poor representation and definition of the term. Through a survey in our hospital center, we aimed at understanding what doctors understand as CMO. A total of 176 physicians responded to the survey. We asked them about the moment in the patient care timeline when to use it and what degree of respiratory support, laboratory draws, antibiotic therapy, level of care, and code status should be a part of it. Disparities in responses were the norm, and common defining characteristics were the exception.

Palliative and end-of-life care in psychogeriatric patients

A rapidly growing number of elderly persons and their families are burdened by one or more terminal illnesses in the later years of their life. How best to support their quality of life is a major challenge for healthcare teams. Palliative and end-of-life (PEOL) care is well positioned to respond to this challenge. While the evidence of PEOL is just beginning, much of the suffering can be relieved by what is already known. PEOL care for the elderly needs to go beyond the focus on the patient and should rest on a broad understanding of the nature of suffering that includes family and professional caregivers in that experience of suffering. The dissemination of PEOL care principles should be a public health priority. This article aims to improve understanding of appropriate PEOL care in the elderly and discuss future perspectives.

Exploring physician decisions about end-of-life opiate prescribing: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Opiates are commonly used for symptoms at the end of life (EOL). Little is known about the decision-making process physicians go through when deciding to prescribe opiates for their EOL patients. The study's objective was to explore physician factors affecting EOL opiate prescribing.

METHODS

Qualitative study of 38 physicians in the Denver area in the specialties of outpatient and inpatient medicine, geriatrics, oncology, and palliative care. Semi-structured qualitative interviews by trained interviewers asked physicians about their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences in prescribing opiates, reasons for prescribing opiates, barriers to prescribing opiates, changes in prescribing habits, and perceived patient factors that influence prescribing. Interviews were analyzed using ATLAS.ti qualitative analysis software and independently coded by two reviewers.

RESULTS

We found a spectrum of beliefs ranging from the viewpoint that opiates are underused at EOL to overused. We found five key themes: practices in when and how to use opiates, barriers to prescribing, personal experiences drive prescribing, social meaning of opiates, and differences in the role of physician. Physicians interviewed described experiences, both personal and professional, that influenced their opiate-prescribing habits. All respondents expressed positive experiences with prescribing opiates in being able to ease patients' suffering at EOL and to improve their functionality and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in prescribing habits, attitudes, and experiences of physicians influence opiate prescribing, which may lead to over- and underprescribing. Knowledge, barriers, and fears about EOL opiate prescribing need to be addressed to ensure EOL patients are receiving appropriate symptom relief.

Development and evaluation of a program to strengthen first year residents' proficiency in leading end-of-life discussions

PURPOSE

Multiple interventions have been developed to teach and improve internal medicine residents' end-of-life communication skills, but have not been easily adaptable to other institutions. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a program to enhance physicians' end-of-life communication with families of dying patients using a format that could be incorporated into an existing curriculum for first-year internal medicine residents.

METHODS

An end-of-life educational program was developed and evaluated in the context of educating first-year residents at an urban academic medical center during the 2008-2009 academic year. The program consisted of three sessions including an interactive workshop flanked by pre- and post-workshop evaluations in simulated encounter and clinical vignette formats. Simulated encounters were recorded on video and residents' performances were rated by two independent observers using a 23 point checklist.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 24 (73%) of 33 residents who participated in the program. The residents' checklist scores increased significantly from a mean of 48.1 at baseline to 73.9 at follow-up. The increase in the scores on the clinical vignettes was also statistically significant, but of lesser magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

A short, focused intervention can have significant impact on residents' communication skills in the setting of an end-of-life objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

Impact of writing "comfort measures only" orders in a community teaching hospital

OBJECTIVES

We compared end-of-life care for patients with and without orders for "comfort measures only" (CMO) and evaluated whether standards for palliative medicine were met.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 40 patients, 20 with and 20 without a CMO order, who died in our community teaching hospital from October 2003 through September 2004. Appropriate use of medications and interventions and documentation of symptoms and family consultation were examined.

RESULTS

There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. Family meeting (18/20 versus 7/20, p < 0.001) and do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate (DNR/DNI) code status (20/20 versus 8/20; p < 0.001) occurred significantly more frequently in the CMO group. There were no other significant differences in prescribing medications or treatments. Notation of symptoms common at the end of life did not differ between the groups except for nausea/vomiting, which was more common in the non-CMO group. In the CMO group, opioids were significantly more available and antibiotics and routine laboratory work were significantly less common after the CMO order, but no other differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

CMO orders alone were insufficient for redirecting changes in care at the end-of-life.

Physicians' beliefs and attitudes about end-of-life care: a comparison of selected regions in Hungary and the United States

CONTEXT

Unlike primary care physicians in the U.S., it is only recently that Hungarian primary care physicians have had the educational resources for providing end-of-life care and the availability of hospice services as part of the Hungarian health care system.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess, compare, and contrast beliefs and practices of end-of-life care held by primary care physicians practicing in selected regions of the United States and Hungary.

METHODS

A 22-item questionnaire, written in English, translated to Hungarian, and pilot tested in both countries, was mailed to 339 Hungarian and 330 U.S. physicians, with response rates of 54% and 48%, respectively. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to compare the samples.

RESULTS

Over half of U.S. physicians indicated they were quite knowledgeable about hospice care and rated currently available services for the terminally ill as exceptionally good, compared to less than 10% of Hungarian physicians. The physicians' differing beliefs that discussing a terminal prognosis fosters a sense of hopelessness is consistent with disclosure beliefs and practices. The majority of U.S. physicians believe it is the patients' right to know and always tell them when the diagnosis is terminal. Hungarian physicians (44%) believe that the patient's right to know is balanced by the physician's judgment of the patient's best interest, and an additional 40% disclose only if asked.

CONCLUSION

These results illustrate some of the important differences in physicians' beliefs about the care of terminally ill patients between the two countries and can be used to guide medical education and practice.

Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?

Over years of practice, many beliefs and practices become entrenched as tried and tested, and we subconsciously believe they are based on scientific evidence. We identified nine such beliefs by interviewing orthopaedic surgeons in which studies (or lack thereof) apparently do not support such practices. These are: changing the scalpel blade after the skin incision to limit contamination; bending the patient's knee when applying a thigh tourniquet; bed rest for treatment of deep vein thrombosis; antibiotics in irrigation solution; routine use of hip precautions; routine use of antibiotics for the duration of wound drains; routine removal of hardware in children; correlation between operative time and infection; and not changing dressings on the floor before scrubbing. A survey of 186 practicing orthopaedic surgeons in academic and community settings was performed to assess their routine practice patterns. We present the results of the survey along with an in-depth literature review of these topics. Most surgeon practices are based on a combination of knowledge gained during training, reading the literature, and personal experience. The results of this survey hopefully will raise the awareness of the selected literature for common practices.