The "6 A's": A risk manager's guide to emergency cesarean delivery

The "30-minute rule" for expedited delivery: fact or fiction?

Initially developed from hospital feasibility data from the 1980s, the "30-minute rule" has perpetuated the belief that the decision-to-incision time in an emergency cesarean delivery should be <30 minutes to preserve favorable neonatal outcomes. Through a review of the history, available data on delivery timing and associated outcomes, and consideration of feasibility across several hospital systems, the use and applicability of this "rule" are explored, and its reconsideration is called for. Moreover, we have advocated for balanced consideration of maternal safety with rapidity of delivery, encouraged process-based approaches, and proposed standardization of terminology regarding delivery urgency. Furthermore, a standardized 4-tier classification system for delivery urgency, from class I, for a perceived threat to maternal or fetal life, to class IV, a scheduled delivery, and a call for further research with a standardized structure to facilitate comparison have been proposed.

Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial to Compare Transfer Procedures for Emergency Cesarean

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that capping intravenous and epidural lines would reduce time to transfer women in labor to the operating room and time to readiness for general anesthesia for emergency cesarean. The secondary purpose was to identify latent threats to patient safety.

DESIGN

Mixed methods analysis of a randomized, controlled, in situ simulation trial.

SETTING

Labor and delivery unit at high-risk referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen interprofessional teams that included labor and delivery nurses and anesthesiology residents.

METHODS

Immediately before simulation, we randomized bedside nurses and anesthesiology residents to one of two groups: usual transfer or the cap and run procedure. Simulation scenarios started with fetal heart rate decelerations that necessitated position changes followed by emergency cesarean. An embedded simulated obstetrician announced the decision for cesarean; completion of an OR checklist confirmed team readiness to induce general anesthesia. Postsimulation debriefing was focused on teamwork and opportunities to improve safety, and we used qualitative analysis to synthesize results.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant difference in the overall time from decision for cesarean to readiness for general anesthesia between the two groups (usual transfer median = 445 seconds [interquartile range, 425-465] vs. cap and run 390 seconds [interquartile range, 383-443], p = .12). The time in the operating room was less in the cap and run group than in the usual transfer group (median = 300 seconds vs. 250 seconds, p = .038). Qualitative analysis of the debriefing data indicated advantages of the capping procedure, including better bed maneuverability and fewer tangled lines.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of decreased overall time from decision for cesarean to readiness for general anesthesia based on whether the nurse capped the intravenous and epidural lines or pushed the intravenous pole alongside the bed. However, nurses perceived improved patient safety with the cap and run procedure.