Seeking impact: Global perspectives on outcome measure selection for translational and clinical research for primary mitochondrial disorders

Conformational fingerprinting with Raman spectroscopy reveals protein structure as a translational biomarker of muscle pathology

Neuromuscular disorders are a group of conditions that can result in weakness of skeletal muscles. Examples include fatal diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and conditions associated with high morbidity such as myopathies (muscle diseases). Many of these disorders are known to have abnormal protein folding and protein aggregates. Thus, easy to apply methods for the detection of such changes may prove useful diagnostic biomarkers. Raman spectroscopy has shown early promise in the detection of muscle pathology in neuromuscular disorders and is well suited to characterising the conformational profiles relating to protein secondary structure. In this work, we assess if Raman spectroscopy can detect differences in protein structure in muscle in the setting of neuromuscular disease. We utilise in vivo Raman spectroscopy measurements from preclinical models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the myopathy Duchenne muscular dystrophy, together with ex vivo measurements of human muscle samples from individuals with and without myopathy. Using quantitative conformation profiling and matrix factorisation we demonstrate that quantitative 'conformational fingerprinting' can be used to identify changes in protein folding in muscle. Notably, myopathic conditions in both preclinical models and human samples manifested a significant reduction in α-helix structures, with concomitant increases in β-sheet and, to a lesser extent, nonregular configurations. Spectral patterns derived through non-negative matrix factorisation were able to identify myopathy with a high accuracy (79% in mouse, 78% in human tissue). This work demonstrates the potential of conformational fingerprinting as an interpretable biomarker for neuromuscular disorders.

Gene therapy for mitochondrial disorders

In this review, we detail the current state of application of gene therapy to primary mitochondrial disorders (PMDs). Recombinant adeno-associated virus-based (rAAV) gene replacement approaches for nuclear gene disorders have been undertaken successfully in more than ten preclinical mouse models of PMDs which has been made possible by the development of novel rAAV technologies that achieve more efficient organ targeting. So far, however, the greatest progress has been made for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, for which phase 3 clinical trials of lenadogene nolparvovec demonstrated efficacy and good tolerability. Other methods of treating mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disorders have also had traction, including refinements to nucleases that degrade mtDNA molecules with pathogenic variants, including transcription activator-like effector nucleases, zinc-finger nucleases, and meganucleases (mitoARCUS). rAAV-based approaches have been used successfully to deliver these nucleases in vivo in mice. Exciting developments in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology have achieved in vivo gene editing in mouse models of PMDs due to nuclear gene defects and new CRISPR-free gene editing approaches have shown great potential for therapeutic application in mtDNA disorders. We conclude the review by discussing the challenges of translating gene therapy in patients both from the point of view of achieving adequate organ transduction as well as clinical trial design.

MELAS: Phenotype Classification into Classic-versus-Atypical Presentations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

An increased number of pathogenic variants have been described in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy lactic acidosis and strokelike episodes (MELAS). Different imaging presentations have emerged in parallel with a growing recognition of clinical and outcome variability, which pose a diagnostic challenge to neurologists and radiologists and may impact an individual patient's response to therapeutic interventions. By evaluating clinical, neuroimaging, laboratory, and genetic findings, we sought to improve our understanding of the sources of potential phenotype variability in patients with MELAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included individuals who had confirmed mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants and a diagnosis of MELAS and whose data were reviewed from January 2000 through November 2021. The approach included a review of clinical, neuroimaging, laboratory, and genetic data, followed by an unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis looking for sources of phenotype variability in MELAS. Subsequently, experts identified "victory-variables" that best differentiated MELAS cohort clusters.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a diagnosis of mitochondrial DNA-based MELAS (median age, 12 years; interquartile range, 7-24 years; 24 female) were eligible for this study. Fifty-three discrete variables were evaluated by an unsupervised cluster analysis, which revealed that two distinct phenotypes exist among patients with MELAS. After experts reviewed the variables, they selected 8 victory-variables with the greatest impact in determining the MELAS subgroups: developmental delay, sensorineural hearing loss, vision loss in the first strokelike episode, Leigh syndrome overlap, age at the first strokelike episode, cortical lesion size, regional brain distribution of lesions, and genetic groups. Ultimately, 2-step differentiating criteria were defined to classify atypical MELAS.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 2 distinct patterns of MELAS: classic MELAS and atypical MELAS. Recognizing different patterns in MELAS presentations will enable clinical and research care teams to better understand the natural history and prognosis of MELAS and identify the best candidates for specific therapeutic interventions.

The Role of Primary Mitochondrial Disorders in Hearing Impairment: An Overview

Background. Defects of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) involved in the function of the mitochondrial electron transport chain can result in primary mitochondrial diseases (PMDs). Various features can influence the phenotypes of different PMDs, with relevant consequences on clinical presentation, including the presence of hearing impairment. This paper aims to describe the hearing loss related to different PMDs, and when possible, their phenotype. Methods. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline until December 2022. A total of 485 papers were identified, and based on specified criteria, 7 were included in this study. Results. A total of 759 patients affected by PMDs and hearing loss were included. The age of patients ranged from 2 days to 78 years old, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.3:1. The percentage of subjects affected by hearing loss was 40.8%, (310/759), and in most cases, hearing impairment was described as sensorineural, bilateral, symmetrical, and progressive, with different presentations depending on age and syndrome severity. Conclusions. PMDs are challenging conditions with different clinical phenotypes. Hearing loss, especially when bilateral and progressive, may represent a red flag; its association with other systemic disorders (particularly neuromuscular, ocular, and endocrine) should alert clinicians, and confirmation via genetic testing is mandatory nowadays.

Leigh syndrome

Leigh syndrome, or subacute necrotizing encephalomyelopathy, was initially recognized as a neuropathological entity in 1951. Bilateral symmetrical lesions, typically extending from the basal ganglia and thalamus through brainstem structures to the posterior columns of the spinal cord, are characterized microscopically by capillary proliferation, gliosis, severe neuronal loss, and relative preservation of astrocytes. Leigh syndrome is a pan-ethnic disorder usually with onset in infancy or early childhood, but late-onset forms occur, including in adult life. Over the last six decades it has emerged that this complex neurodegenerative disorder encompasses more than 100 separate monogenic disorders associated with enormous clinical and biochemical heterogeneity. This chapter discusses clinical, biochemical and neuropathological aspects of the disorder, and postulated pathomechanisms. Known genetic causes, including defects of 16 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genes and approaching 100 nuclear genes, are categorized into disorders of subunits and assembly factors of the five oxidative phosphorylation enzymes, disorders of pyruvate metabolism and vitamin and cofactor transport and metabolism, disorders of mtDNA maintenance, and defects of mitochondrial gene expression, protein quality control, lipid remodeling, dynamics, and toxicity. An approach to diagnosis is presented, together with known treatable causes and an overview of current supportive management options and emerging therapies on the horizon.

Psychometric performance of the Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptom Assessment (PMMSA) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in subjects with mitochondrial disease

BACKGROUND

The Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptom Assessment (PMMSA) is a 10-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure designed to assess the severity of mitochondrial disease symptoms. Analyses of data from a clinical trial with PMM patients were conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PMMSA and to provide score interpretation guidelines for the measure.

METHODS

The PMMSA was completed as a daily diary for approximately 14 weeks by individuals in a Phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous injections of elamipretide in patents with mitochondrial disease. In addition to the PMMSA, performance-based assessments, clinician ratings, and other PRO measures were also completed. Descriptive statistics, psychometric analyses, and score interpretation guidelines were evaluated for the PMMSA.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 30) had a mean age of 45.3 years, with the majority of the sample being female (n = 25, 83.3%) and non-Hispanic white (n = 29, 96.6%). The 10 PMMSA items assessing a diverse symptomology were not found to form a single underlying construct. However, four items assessing tiredness and muscle weakness were grouped into a "general fatigue" domain score. The PMMSA Fatigue 4 summary score (4FS) demonstrated stable test-retest scores, internal consistency, correlations with the scores produced by reference measures, and the ability to differentiate between different global health levels. Changes on the PMMSA 4FS were also related to change scores produced by the reference measures. PMMSA severity scores were higher for the symptom rated as "most bothersome" by each subject relative to the remaining nine PMMSA items (most bothersome symptom mean = 2.88 vs. 2.18 for other items). Distribution- and anchor-based evaluations suggested that reduction in weekly scores between 0.79 and 2.14 (scale range: 4-16) may represent a meaningful change on the PMMSA 4FS and reduction in weekly scores between 0.03 and 0.61 may represent a responder for each of the remaining six non-fatigue items, scored independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Upon evaluation of its psychometric properties, the PMMSA, specifically the 4FS domain, demonstrated strong reliability and construct-related validity. The PMMSA can be used to evaluate treatment benefit in clinical trials with individuals with PMM. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02805790; registered June 20, 2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02805790 .

Research priorities for mitochondrial disorders: Current landscape and patient and professional views

Primary mitochondrial disorders encompass a wide range of clinical presentations and a spectrum of severity. They currently lack effective disease-modifying therapies and have a high mortality and morbidity rate. It is therefore essential to know that competitively funded research designed by academics meets the core needs of people with mitochondrial disorders and their clinicians. Priority setting partnerships are an established collaborative methodology that brings patients, carers and families, charity representatives and clinicians together to try to establish the most pressing and unanswered research priorities for a particular disease. We developed a web-based questionnaire, requesting all patients affected by primary mitochondrial disease, their carers and clinicians to pose their research questions. This yielded 709 questions from 147 participants. These were grouped into overarching themes including basic biology, causation, health services, clinical management, social impacts, prognosis, prevention, symptoms, treatment and psychological impact. Following the removal of "answered questions", the process resulted in a list of 42 discrete, answerable questions. This was further refined by web-based ranking by the community to 24 questions. These were debated at a face-to-face workshop attended by a diverse range of patients, carers, charity representatives and clinicians to create a definitive "Top 10 of unanswered research questions for primary mitochondrial disorders". These Top 10 questions related to understanding biological processes, including triggers of disease onset, mechanisms underlying progression and reasons for differential symptoms between individuals with identical genetic mutations; new treatments; biomarker discovery; psychological support and optimal management of stroke-like episodes and fatigue.

Community Consensus Guidelines to Support FAIR Data Standards in Clinical Research Studies in Primary Mitochondrial Disease

Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMD) are genetic disorders with extensive clinical and molecular heterogeneity where therapeutic development efforts have faced multiple challenges. Clinical trial design, outcome measure selection, lack of reliable biomarkers, and deficiencies in long-term natural history data sets remain substantial challenges in the increasingly active PMD therapeutic development space. Developing "FAIR" (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) data standards to make data sharable and building a more transparent community data sharing paradigm to access clinical research metadata are the first steps to address these challenges. This collaborative community effort describes the current landscape of PMD clinical research data resources available for sharing, obstacles, and opportunities, including ways to incentivize and encourage data sharing among diverse stakeholders. This work highlights the importance of, and challenges to, developing a unified system that enables clinical research structured data sharing and supports harmonized data deposition standards across clinical consortia and research groups. The goal of these efforts is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of drug development and improve understanding of the natural history of PMD. This initiative aims to maximize the benefit for PMD patients, research, industry, and other stakeholders while acknowledging challenges related to differing needs and international policies on data privacy, security, management, and oversight.

Pediatric single large-scale mtDNA deletion syndromes: The power of patient reported outcomes

There is a limited understanding of system-level clinical outcomes and interventions associated with single large-scale mitochondrial DNA deletion syndromes (SLSMDS). Additionally, no research exists that describes patient reported outcomes (PROs) of children with SLSMDS. A global and observational registry was established to understand the multi-systemic course of SLSMDS and track clinical outcomes. The development and design of the registry is described. Demographic characteristics, history and diagnoses, and system level prevalence of problems and interventions are reported for 42 children. System level problems and interventions include information on the following body systems: audiology, cardiac, endocrine, gastrointestinal (including pancreatic and hepatobiliary system), hematological, metabolic, neurological (including autonomic, mobility, & learning), ophthalmic, psychiatric, renal, and respiratory. Results emphasize the need of patient registries and suggest that the diagnostic odyssey and burden of disease for children with SLSMDS is significant. System-level findings may help families and clinical providers with diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. A multidisciplinary team of clinical experts with a central coordinating specialist for children with SLSMDS is recommended.