Pregnancy outcome in women with Gaucher disease type 1 who had unplanned pregnancies during eliglustat clinical trials

Long-Term Outcomes of Disease Modifying Therapies in Gaucher Disease

OBJECTIVES

To study clinical response to treatment with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and substrate reduction therapy (SRT) in a cohort of Gaucher disease.

METHODS

Retrospective data of 8 patients of Gaucher disease was compiled. The treatment included all three currently available enzyme replacement therapies as well as substrate reduction therapy with Eliglustat. The relevant blood investigations were done in follow-up visits. The assessment of the effects of long-term treatment over varying periods up to 13 y was done with various issues related to the course of therapy documented.

RESULTS

Improvement in hematological parameters was seen in all patients. Reduction of spleen size occurred in 7 of 8 patients (87.5%). One patient had 2 successful pregnancies while on therapy. A distinct patient with type 3 Gaucher disease developed complication in the form of Gaucheroma within the spleen.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness about the disease and the efficacy of the therapies amongst pediatricians will help in early diagnosis and better outcomes. The available therapies have changed the outcome of the patients and improved the quality of life in patients with Gaucher disease. The data of Indian patients is important at this juncture when under Rare Disease Policy, government funding has become available for ERT for Gaucher disease patients in India.

Recommendations for oral treatment for adult patients with type 1 Gaucher disease

This work is a review of the scientific evidence on the oral treatment of adult patients with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) with a clinical guideline format according to the Agree II regulations. It describes the main differences between the two oral treatments currently available for treating this disease (miglustat and eliglustat). This review reminds us that the criteria for starting oral treatment in patients with GD1 must be assessed individually. Although miglustat and eliglustat are both glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) enzyme inhibitors, they have different mechanisms of action and pharmacological properties and should never be considered equivalent. Miglustat is indicated in patients with non-severe GD1 who cannot receive other first-line treatments, while eliglustat is indicated as first-line treatment for patients with GD1 of any severity without the need for prior stabilization with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). It is important to emphasize that in order to start treatment with eliglustat, we must know the CYP2D6 metabolic phenotype and its association with drugs metabolized through the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 cytochromes-or alternatively those that use P-Glycoprotein must be evaluated on an individual basis. During pregnancy, the use of eliglustat should be avoided; only ERT can be used. Unlike miglustat, whose adverse effects have limited its use, eliglustat has not only demonstrated similar efficacy to ERT but has also been shown to improve the quality of life of patients with GD1.

Long-term eliglustat treatment of Gaucher patients over up to 10 years in Vienna

Gaucher disease has been the first lysosomal storage disorder for which an enzyme replacement therapy has been approved in the 1990s and was the first to receive approval for a first-line substrate reduction therapy in 2015. Eliglustat treatment has been started in Austria in patients recruited to a clinical trial, followed by its long-term extension and prescription treatment overall covering up to 10 years. In this case series the experience of treating Gaucher patients with eliglustat in Vienna is summarized. Patients were either switched from enzyme replacement therapy or were therapy naïve. Significant improvements were shown in hematological (thrombocytes, hemoglobin) and visceral (spleen volume) manifestations as well as in biomarkers (chitotriosidase, glucosylsphingosine [lyso-GL1], angiotensin converting enzyme) in a routine setting in a therapy-naïve patient. Stability was found in switch patients with slight improvement in bone density. Eliglustat was generally very well tolerated. Patient selection and regular monitoring is required to ensure effective and safe use.

Polypharmacy in chronic neurological diseases: Multiple sclerosis, dementia and Parkinson's disease

Polypharmacy is an important aspect of medication management and particularly affects elderly and chronically ill people. Patients with dementia, Parkinson's disease (PD) or multiple sclerosis (MS) are at high risk for multimedication due to their complex symptomatology. Our aim was to provide an overview of different definitions of polypharmacy and to present the current state of research on polypharmacy in patients with dementia, PD or MS. The most common definition of polypharmacy in the literature is the concomitant use of ≥5 medications (quantitative definition approach). Polypharmacy rates of up to >50% have been reported for patients with dementia, PD or MS, although MS patients are on average significantly younger than those with dementia or PD. The main predictor of polypharmacy is the complex symptom profile of these neurological disorders. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), drug-drug interactions, poor treatment adherence, severe disease course, cognitive impairment, hospitalisation, poor quality of life, frailty and mortality have been associated with polypharmacy in patients with dementia, PD or MS. For patients with polypharmacy, either the avoidance of PIM (selective deprescribing) or the substitution of PIM with more suitable drugs (appropriate polypharmacy) is recommended to achieve a more effective therapeutic management.