Characterization of molecularly imprinted polymers using a new polar solvent titration method

Molecularly imprinted polymers-A closer look at the control polymer used in determining the imprinting effect: A mini review

Molecular recognition displayed by naturally occurring receptors has continued to inspire new innovations aimed at developing systems that can mimic this natural phenomenon. Since 1930s, a technology called molecular imprinting for producing biomimetic receptors has been in place. In this technology, tailor made binding sites that selectively bind a given target analyte (also called template) are incorporated in a polymer matrix by polymerizing functional monomers and cross-linking monomers around a target analyte followed by removal of the analyte to leave behind cavities specific to the analyte. The success of the imprinting process is defined by two main figures of merit, that is, the imprinting factor, and selectivity, which are determined by comparing the amount of target analyte or structural analogue bound by the molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) and the nonimprinted polymer (NIP). NIP is a control synthesized alongside the MIP but in the absence of the template. However, questions arise on whether these figures of merit are reliable measures of the imprinting effect because of the significant differences between the MIP and the NIP in terms of their physical and chemical characteristics. Therefore, this review critically looks into this subject, with a view of defining the best approaches for determining the imprinting effect.

Comparison of Four Adsorption Isotherm Models for Characterizing Molecular Recognition of Individual Phenolic Compounds in Porous Tailor-Made Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Films

A molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) film using catechol as the template was designed for adsorption of a range of phenols from water. Four different isotherm models (Langmuir (LI), Freundlich (FI), Langmuir-Freundlich (L-FI), and Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET)) were used to study the MIP adsorption of five phenolic compounds: phenol (Ph), 2-methylphenol (2-MP), 3-methylphenol (3-MP), 2-chlorophenol (2-CP), and 4-teroctylphenol (4-OP). Each model was evaluated for its fit with the experimental data, and key parameters, including a number of binding sites and binding site energies, were compared. Though the LI, L-FI, and BET models showed good agreement for estimation of the number of binding sites and affinity for most adsorbates, no single model was suitable for all. The LI and L-FI models gave the best fitting statistics for the Ph, 2-MP, 3-MP, and 2-CP. The recognition of 4-OP, which has much higher binding affinities than the smaller phenolic compounds not attributable to hydrophobicity alone, was explained only by the BET model, which indicates the formation of multilayers. The BET model failed only with phenol. MIPs also showed higher adsorption capacities and improved homogeneity over the analogous non-imprinted polymers.

Design and synthesis of supramolecular functional monomers bearing urea and norbornene motifs

Three sets of functional monomers namely urea-based, 2-ureido-4[1H]-primidone (UPy)-based and norbornene based functional monomers were designed and synthesized. These functional monomers (FM) were obtained in decent yields using amine and isocyanate/norbornene as starting materials. Methacrylate and styrene isocyanate with 1,4-diaminobutane/tris(2-aminoethyl)amine were chosen for the synthesis of symmetrical, asymmetrical and three-branched urea-functional monomers, respectively. UPy-based FMs were synthesized with isocyanate and 2-amino-4-hydroxy-6-methylpyrimidine. The synthesis of these monomers feature short reaction times, mild reaction conditions and no need for column chromatographic purification. Furthermore, the norbornene based FM was used for preparing molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) by Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization (ROMP). Results showed that these synthetic routes represent a convenient and useful approach for synthesis of novel functional monomers.

Characterization of the Binding Properties of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

The defining characteristic of the binding sites of any particular molecularly imprinted material is heterogeneity: that is, they are not all identical. Nonetheless, it is useful to study their fundamental binding properties, and to obtain average properties. In particular, it has been instructive to compare the binding properties of imprinted and non-imprinted materials. This chapter begins by considering the origins of this site heterogeneity. Next, the properties of interest of imprinted binding sites are described in brief: affinity, selectivity, and kinetics. The binding/adsorption isotherm, the graph of concentration of analyte bound to a MIP versus concentration of free analyte at equilibrium, over a range of total concentrations, is described in some detail. Following this, the techniques for studying the imprinted sites are described (batch-binding assays, radioligand binding assays, zonal chromatography, frontal chromatography, calorimetry, and others). Thereafter, the parameters that influence affinity, selectivity and kinetics are discussed (solvent, modifiers of organic solvents, pH of aqueous solvents, temperature). Finally, mathematical attempts to fit the adsorption isotherms for imprinted materials, so as to obtain information about the range of binding affinities characterizing the imprinted sites, are summarized.