• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4641089)   Today's Articles (4158)   Subscriber (50406)
For: Moelker A, Maas RAJJ, Vogel MW, Ouhlous M, Pattynama PMT. Importance of bone-conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:163-9. [PMID: 15971178 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Glans A, Wilén J, Lindgren L, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Hansson B. Health effects related to exposure of static magnetic fields and acoustic noise-comparison between MR and CT radiographers. Eur Radiol 2022;32:7896-7909. [PMID: 35674823 PMCID: PMC9668766 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08843-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
2
Yamashiro T, Morita K, Nakajima K. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise reduction technology by magnetic gradient waveform control. Magn Reson Imaging 2019;63:170-177. [PMID: 31425801 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
3
Acoustic noise reduction in T 1- and proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2015;29:5-15. [DOI: 10.1007/s10334-015-0502-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
4
Acoustic-noise-optimized diffusion-weighted imaging. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2015;28:511-21. [DOI: 10.1007/s10334-015-0492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2014] [Revised: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
5
Reduction of MRI acoustic noise achieved by manipulation of scan parameters – A study using veterinary MR sequences. Radiography (Lond) 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2012.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
6
Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise. Neuroimage 2009;49:3027-38. [PMID: 19948232 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2009] [Revised: 11/10/2009] [Accepted: 11/19/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]  Open
7
Li M, Lim TC, Lee JH. Simulation study on active noise control for a 4-T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:393-400. [PMID: 18060719 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2007] [Revised: 07/26/2007] [Accepted: 08/08/2007] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA