Safety characteristics of gadobenate dimeglumine: Clinical experience from intra- and interindividual comparison studies with gadopentetate dimeglumine

Characterization of high- and low-risk hepatocellular adenomas by magnetic resonance imaging in an animal model of glycogen storage disease type 1A

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are benign tumors, of which the most serious complications are hemorrhage and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Among the various subtypes of HCA, the β-catenin-activated subtype (bHCA) is associated with greatest risk of malignant transformation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool to differentiate benign and malignant hepatic lesions, and preclinical experimental approaches may help to develop a method to identify MRI features associated with bHCA. HCAs are associated with various pathologies, including glycogen storage disease 1a (GSD1a). Here, we utilized a mouse model for GSD1a that develops HCA and HCC, and analyzed the mice in order to distinguish low-risk from high-risk tumors. Animals were scanned by MRI using a hepato-specific contrast agent. The mice were sacrificed after MRI and their lesions were classified using immunohistochemistry. We observed that 45% of the animals developed focal lesions, and MRI identified four different patterns after contrast administration: isointense, hyperintense and hypointense lesions, and lesions with peripheral contrast enhancement. After contrast administration, only bHCA and HCC were hypointense in T1-weighted imaging and mildly hyperintense in T2-weighted imaging. Thus, high-risk adenomas display MRI features clearly distinguishable from those exhibited by low-risk adenomas, indicating that MRI is a reliable method for early diagnosis and classification of HCA, necessary for correct patient management.

Delayed reaction following gadolinium-based contrast agent application

Both iodinated contrast media and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) can induce immediate hypersensitivity reactions. In addition, iodinated contrast media have been shown to be responsible for delayed or non-immediate reactions that occur 1 h up to several days following iodinated contrast medium-injection. Here we for the first time present a female patient who acquired a delayed reaction after the application of a gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Immediate Reactions

Since their clinical introduction in 1988, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have demonstrated an excellent safety profile with a reported acute adverse reaction rate ranging from 0.01% to 2%. By comparison, the acute adverse reaction rate of low osmolar nonionic computed tomography contrast agents (CTCs) ranges from 0.7% to 3.1%. Many of the risk factors associated with CTC reactions (drug allergies, asthma, atopy, prior contrast reaction) also point toward an increased incidence of acute adverse events to GBCAs. With CTCs, an increased adverse event rate was associated with ionic preparations and high osmolality. In response to concerns for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, GBCAs are now selected for their augmented chemical stability. These agents possess some combination of macrocyclic chelates or ionic preparations. With their improved chemical stability, these agents also possess higher osmolality and the increased potential to elicit an acute adverse reaction. In light of these concerns, researchers are now focusing greater efforts on reexamining acute adverse reactions to GBCAs and whether there is an increased association with certain agents. In addition to hypersensitivity reactions, this article will also discuss contrast extravasations, safety of GBCAs for pregnant and nursing patients, and the potential nephrotoxic effects of GBCAs.

Interpreting body MRI cases: what you need to know to get started

Interpreting body MRI cases can seem overwhelming to an uninitiated radiologist. The standard study includes a variety of pulse sequences, the names of which vary depending on the MR vendor. Pulse sequences may be displayed haphazardly on the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), frequently not synchronized with the imaging protocol. Adding to the complexity is the use of different gadolinium-based contrast agents, which may affect the timing and diagnostic yield of each sequence. The following introductory primer for interpreting body MRI cases is meant to create a basic framework for efficiently reviewing body MRI cases to provide high quality interpretations, fully utilizing the diagnostic information of the modality. There are 4 components that need to be mastered when interpreting body MRI cases including: (1) recognizing the key sequences in a basic body MRI protocol, (2) learning how to best display the key pulse sequences on PACS, (3) understanding the technique and clinical utility of each sequence and learning how to utilize sequences to be an "MR Pathologist", and (4) understanding the key features of the different gadolinium based contrast agents.

Assessment of rates of acute adverse reactions to gadobenate dimeglumine: review of more than 130,000 administrations in 7.5 years

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with gadobenate dimeglumine over 7.5 years in a major hospital system consisting of both academic and community hospitals.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

As part of a regular and continuous prospective quality assurance project, MRI technologists contemporaneously recorded all gadolinium-based contrast administrations and any associated adverse reactions, including type of reaction and treatment rendered, between August 1, 2005, and March 14, 2013. Weekly data review was performed by the director of MRI services, who evaluated data both by individual site and by comparison among the participating hospitals and sites within the hospital system. Comparison between reaction rates at different sites was performed with a chi-square test.

RESULTS

Over 7.5 years, 132,252 doses of gadobenate dimeglumine were administered, and 236 reactions were recorded (0.18% of contrast-enhanced examinations). Of these, 133 (56.4% of all adverse reactions) required treatment and 12 (5.1%) qualified as serious. Reaction rates were significantly different between academic (0.23%) and community (0.07%) hospitals (p<0.001). Reaction rates were higher in the initial years of the study, tapering to a lower baseline rate, which was maintained over more than 5 years. The findings were consistent with the Weber and Lalli effects reported in the literature on other pharmaceutical agents.

CONCLUSION

Rates of adverse reactions to gadobenate dimeglumine recorded over 7.5 years were comparable to those reported for other gadolinium-based contrast agents examined over smaller time ranges and populations. The findings reinforce the relatively robust safety profile of this agent.

Gadobenate-dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatic lesions in children

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging enhanced by hepatocyte-specific contrast media has been found useful to characterize liver lesions in adults and children.

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI for evaluation of focal liver lesions in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed gadobenate-dimeglumine-enhanced MR images obtained for evaluation of suspected hepatic lesions in 30 children. Signal characteristics on various sequences including 45- to 60-min hepatobiliary phase images were noted by two radiologists. Chart review identified relevant clinical details including history of cancer treatment, available pathology and stability of lesion size on follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

Of the 30 children who had gadobenate-enhanced MRI, 26 showed focal lesions. Diagnoses in 26 children were focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in 15, hemangiomas in 3, regenerating nodules in 3, focal fatty infiltration in 2, indeterminate lesions in 3, and one patient each with adenomas, hepatoblastoma and metastasis. Two patients had multiple diagnoses. All FNH lesions (39), all regenerative nodules (19) and an indeterminate lesion were iso- or hyperintense on hepatobiliary-phase images while all other lesions (28) were hypointense to hepatic parenchyma. The average follow-up period was 21.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Our experience with gadobenate-enhanced MRI indicates potential utility of gadobenate in the evaluation of pediatric hepatic lesions in differentiating FNH and regenerating nodules from other lesions.

Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence

SUMMARY

The aim of this article was to review the properties of the various gadolinium-based contrast agents used for CNS imaging along with the clinical evidence and published data that highlight the impact these different properties can have on diagnostic performance. In addition, approaches to optimizing image acquisition that take into account the different properties of specific gadolinium-based contrast agents and an extensive review of the safety profiles of the various agents are presented.

Gadolinium contrast agent selection and optimal use for body MR imaging

Proper selection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) for body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cases requires understanding the indication for the MRI exam, the key features of the different GBCAs, and the effect that the GBCA has on the selected imaging protocol. The different categories of GBCAs require timing optimization on postcontrast sequences and adjusting imaging parameters to obtain the highest T1 contrast. Gadoxetate disodium has many advantages when evaluating liver lesions, although there are caveats and limitations that need to be understood. Gadobenate dimeglumine, a high-relaxivity GBCA, can be used for indications when stronger T1 relaxivity is needed.

Safety and adverse effects during 24 hours after contrast-enhanced MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in children

BACKGROUND

Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents have long been considered safe for routine diagnostic imaging. However, the advent of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) among certain patients with severe renal insufficiency has brought the issue of safety into question. Nowhere is safety of greater concern than among children who frequently require multiple contrast-enhanced MRI examinations over an extended period of time.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the safety of gadobenate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI across a range of indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred pediatric inpatients (age: 4 days to 15 years) underwent CE MRI as part of clinical routine. The children received a gadobenate dimeglumine dose of either 0.05 mmol/kg body weight (liver, abdominal imaging, musculoskeletal imaging, brain and other rare indications) or 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight (cardiovascular imaging, MR-urography). Young (< 8 years) children with congenital heart disease were intubated and underwent MRA evaluation with controlled ventilation. Monitoring for adverse events was performed for at least 24 h after each gadobenate dimeglumine injection. Depending on clinical necessity, laboratory measurements and, in some cases, vital sign and ECG determinations were made before and after contrast injection. Safety was evaluated by age group, indication and dose administered.

RESULTS

No clinically adverse events were reported among children who had one MRI scan only or among children who had several examinations. There were no changes in creatinine or bilirubin levels even in very young children.

CONCLUSIONS

No adverse events were recorded during the first 24 h following administration of gadobenate dimeglumine in 200 children.

Effect of abrupt substitution of gadobenate dimeglumine for gadopentetate dimeglumine on rate of allergic-like reactions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of abruptly substituting gadobenate dimeglumine for gadopentetate dimeglumine on allergic-like reactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved and waived patient consent for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Allergic-like reactions related to gadolinium-based contrast media were assessed 2 years before and 3.5 years after gadobenate dimeglumine was substituted for gadopentetate dimeglumine. Reaction rates and severity were compared by using χ(2) tests, Fisher exact tests, odds ratios (ORs), and confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Allergic-like reactions (137 mild, 19 moderate, and six severe) occurred in 162 (0.15%) of 105 607 injections of gadolinium-based contrast media (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 31 540; gadobenate dimeglumine, 66 152; other, 7915). Gadobenate dimeglumine was associated with significantly more overall (0.19% [123 of 66 152] vs 0.08% [24 of 31 540]; OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.6, 3.8; P < .0001) and mild (0.16% [107 of 66 152] vs 0.06% [18 of 31 540]; OR, 2.8; 95% CI: 1.7, 4.7; P < .0001) allergic-like reactions than was gadopentetate dimeglumine. The reaction rate for gadobenate dimeglumine peaked (maximum per quarter, 0.38% [16 of 4262]; minimum per quarter, 0.07% [three of 4237]) in the 2nd year after it replaced gadopentetate dimeglumine (maximum per quarter, 0.10% [four of 4122]; minimum per quarter, 0.05% [two of 4222]) and then declined in the 3rd year. The final gadobenate dimeglumine reaction rate (last 3 quarters, 0.12% [17 of 14 387]) did not significantly differ from the original baseline reaction rate with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

CONCLUSION

After gadobenate dimeglumine was substituted for gadopentetate dimeglumine, a significant transient increase occurred in the frequency of reported allergic-like reactions that demonstrated a temporal pattern suggestive of the Weber effect (a transient increase in adverse event reporting that tends to peak in the 2nd year after a new agent or indication is introduced). © RSNA, 2012.

Enhancement of the liver and pancreas in the hepatic arterial dominant phase: comparison of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast agents, gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine, on 3 and 1.5 Tesla MRI in the same patient

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative enhancement of liver, pancreas, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), pancreas-to-liver index, and FNH-to-liver index in the hepatic arterial dominant phase (HADP) after injection of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast agents, gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine, on 3 and 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI in the same patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI database was retrospectively searched to identify consecutive patients who underwent abdominal MRI at 3T and 1.5T systems, using both 0.025 mmol/kg gadoxetic acid-enhanced and 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI at the same magnetic strength field system. 22 patients were identified, 10 were scanned at 3T system and 12 at 1.5T system. The enhancement of liver, pancreas, and FNH was evaluated quantitatively on MR images.

RESULTS

The relative enhancement of liver in HADP in the gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced group in all subjects was significantly higher than that in gadoxetic acid-enhanced group (P = 0.023). The gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced group in HADP had better relative enhancement of pancreas and FNH, pancreas-to-liver index, and FNH-to-liver index than gadoxetic acid-enhanced group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced abdominal MRI studies at 3T and 1.5T MR systems are superior in relative enhancement of the liver in HADP to 0.025 mmol/kg gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. This type of assessment may provide comparative effectiveness data.

MRI of Focal Liver Lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI has more advantages than ultrasound, computed tomography, CT, positron emission tomography, PET, or any other imaging modality in diagnosing focal hepatic masses. With a combination of basic T1 and T2 weighted sequences, diffusion weighted imaging, DWI, and hepatobiliary gadolinium contrast agents, that is gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) and gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB), most liver lesions can be adequately diagnosed. Benign lesions, as cyst, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, FNH or adenoma, can be distinguished from malignant lesions. In a non-cirrhotic liver, the most common malignant lesions are metastases which may be hypovascular or hypervascular. In the cirrhotic liver hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, is of considerable importance. Besides, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and other less common malignancies has to be assessed. In this review, the techniques and typical MRI features are presented as well as the new algorithm issued by American Association for the Study of the Liver Diseases (AASLD).

Gd-DOTA administration at MRI in children younger than 18 months of age: immediate adverse reactions

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of evidence with regard to the safety of contrast medium administration at MRI in neonates and infants.

PURPOSE

To assess immediate adverse reactions in children younger than 18 months of age during routine clinical utilization of gadoteric acid (Gd-DOTA) in a cohort of patients with nonselected indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and four neonates and infants were enrolled in a postmarketing survey with Gd-DOTA (Dotarem, Guerbet, Roissy, France) from a single pediatric hospital. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect the patient information.

RESULTS

All included children, ages 3 days to 18 months, received one injection of Gd-DOTA (volume 0.6-4 ml). No immediate adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSION

This postmarketing study involving neonates and infants suggests a favorable safety profile of Gd-DOTA in routine practice.

Acute adverse reactions to gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine: experience with 32,659 injections

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency, manifestations, and severity of acute adverse reactions associated with administration of two gadolinium-based contrast agents to patients who underwent MRI at a single large academic institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from continuous quality assurance records on the number of administrations of and acute adverse reactions to gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine at our institution October 2007 to December 2008 were tabulated and analyzed. During the investigation period, 32,659 administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents were performed for MRI examinations. Of these, 27,956 administrations were gadopentetate dimeglumine, and 4,703 administrations were gadobenate dimeglumine. Data were collected on the frequency and severity of acute adverse reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 51 acute adverse reactions occurred in 50 patients (16 men, 34 women; mean age, 48 years), accounting for 0.16% of all administrations (51/32,659). Thirty-eight reactions (38/27,956, 0.14%) were associated with gadopentetate dimeglumine, and 13 (13/4,703, 0.28%) were associated with gadobenate dimeglumine. Forty-three reactions were mild, six were moderate, and two were severe. The severe reactions occurred with the use of gadobenate dimeglumine.

CONCLUSION

The rates of acute adverse reactions to gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine were 0.14% and 0.28%, respectively. The overall adverse reaction rate was 0.16% in our patient sample. Direct comparison of adverse reaction rates of the two agents was not possible because of the retrospective uncontrolled study design.

Contrast-enhanced MRA of the renal and aorto-iliac-femoral arteries: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Dedicated contrast agents are now available for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA). This study retrospectively compares the safety and diagnostic performance data from Phase III regulatory trials performed to evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance(®)) and gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist®)) for renal and peripheral CE-MRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Similar examination and blinded assessment methodology was utilized in all studies to determine the safety and diagnostic performance of the agents for detection of significant (>50%) steno-occlusive disease. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) was used as the standard of truth. Diagnostic performance data (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values [PVs], and likelihood ratios [LRs]) were compared (Chi-square test).

RESULTS

CE-MRA with gadobenate dimeglumine was more specific (92.4% vs. 80.5%, p < 0.0001) and accurate (83.6% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.022) than CE-MRA with gadofosveset in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis. The average sensitivity was higher for gadofosveset (74.4% vs. 67.3%, p = 0.011) in peripheral vessels although gadobenate dimeglumine was more specific (93.0% vs. 88.2%, p < 0.0001) with no difference in accuracy (86.6% vs. 86.3%, p = 0.66). PPVs were higher (p < 0.0001) for gadobenate dimeglumine in both vascular territories. Pre- to post-test shifts in the probability of detecting significant disease were greater after gadobenate dimeglumine. Adverse events in the renal and peripheral studies were reported by 9.2% and 7.7% of patients after gadobenate dimeglumine compared with 30.3% and 22.1% of patients after gadofosveset.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of CE-MRA for the detection of significant steno-occlusive disease is similar with gadofosveset and gadobenate dimeglumine although the rate of adverse events appears higher with gadofosveset.

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 tesla

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare 0.1 mmol/kg doses of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced MRI of brain lesions at 3 Tesla (T).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six randomized patients underwent a first examination with gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 23) or gadopentetate dimeglumine (n = 23) and then, after 2-7 days, a second examination with the other agent. Contrast administration (volume, rate), sequence parameters (T1wSE; T1wGRE), and interval between injection and image acquisition were identical for examinations in each patient. Three blinded neuroradiologists evaluated images qualitatively (lesion delineation, lesion enhancement, global preference) and quantitatively (lesion-to-brain ratio [LBR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR], % lesion enhancement). Differences were assessed using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Reader agreement was determined using kappa (kappa) statistics.

RESULTS

There were no demographic differences between groups. The three readers preferred gadobenate dimeglumine globally in 22 (53.7%), 21 (51.2%), and 27 (65.9%) patients, respectively, compared with 0, 1, and 0 patients for gadopentetate dimeglumine. Similar significant (P < 0.001) preference was expressed for lesion border delineation and enhancement. Reader agreement was consistently good (kappa = 0.48-0.64). Significantly (P < 0.05) higher LBR (+43.5- 61.2%), CNR (+51.3-147.6%), and % lesion enhancement (+45.9-49.5%) was noted with gadobenate dimeglumine.

CONCLUSION

Brain lesion depiction at 3T is significantly improved with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine.

Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the complex stability and Gd3+ dissociation rate of all marketed gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents (GBCA) in human serum at pH 7.4 and 37 degrees C.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The kinetic profiles of Gd3+ dissociation of GBCAs were determined by incubation for 15 days in human serum from healthy volunteers at a concentration of 1 mmol/L, pH 7.4, and 37 degrees C. The initial rates of Gd3+ release and the amounts of Gd3+ released after 15 days were established by HPLC-ICP-MS analysis. In an attempt to simulate the situation in patients with end-stage renal disease who often have elevated serum phosphate levels, the influence of 10 mmol/L phosphate on Gd3+ dissociation was also investigated.The GBCAs were grouped and ranked in the following order according to their stabilities in native human serum at pH 7.4 and 37 degrees C [% Gd release after 15 days and initial rate (%/d) (95% confidence interval) in brackets]. NONIONIC LINEAR GBCAS: Optimark [21 (19-22) %, 0.44 (0.40-0.51) %/d) and Omniscan [20 (17-20) %, 0.16 (0.15-0.17) %/d]. IONIC LINEAR GBCAS: Magnevist [1.9 (1.2-2.0) %, 0.16 (0.12-0.36) %/d], Multihance [1.9 (1.3-2.1) %, 0.18 (0.13-0.38) %/d], Vasovist [1.8 (1.4-1.9) %, 0.12 (0.11-0.18) %/d], and Primovist [1.1 (0.76-1.2) %, 0.07 (0.05-0.08) %/d]. MACROCYCLIC GBCAS: Gadovist, Prohance, and Dotarem (all < limit of quantification of 0.1%, <0.007%/d).In the presence of additional 10 mmol/L phosphate in serum, the initial Gd release rates of the nonionic linear GBCAs, Omniscan, and Optimark increased about 100-fold, and, after 15 days, the amount of Gd3+ released from these agents was more than 75% higher than in native serum. The initial rates found for the ionic linear GBCAs increased about 12- to 30-fold, but, despite this, increase in the initial rate, the amount of Gd3+ released after 15 days was comparable to that in native serum. The elevated phosphate level did not lead to any measurable release of Gd3+ from the 3 macrocyclic GBCAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The release of Gd from all linear Gd3+ complexes in human serum was several orders of magnitude greater than predicted by the conditional stability constants. After 15 days, release of Gd3+ from the nonionic linear GBCAs was about 10 times higher than from the ionic linear GBCAs. Elevated serum phosphate levels accelerated the release of Gd3+ from nonionic linear GBCAs and, to a lesser degree, from the ionic linear GBCAs. All 3 macrocyclic GBCAs remained stable in human serum at both normal and elevated phosphate levels.

Assessment of adverse reaction rates to a newly approved MRI contrast agent: review of 23,553 administrations of gadobenate dimeglumine

OBJECTIVE

With the introduction of a newly approved MR contrast agent across a health care system encompassing 13 hospitals and associated imaging centers, the opportunity arose to compare the rates of adverse reactions in seven of these facilities with reactions reported in the literature. Data were collected to assess the relative risk of using gadobenate dimeglumine compared with published data for other approved agents and for this agent in preclinical testing.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

As part of regular quality assurance procedures, technologists recorded contrast administrations and related adverse reactions, including the type of reaction and treatments rendered, on log sheets. All data were reviewed weekly by the institutional director of MR services and were evaluated globally and by site.

RESULTS

Over 13 months, 23,553 doses of gadobenate dimeglumine were administered. One hundred seventy-eight reactions were recorded (0.76% of contrast-enhanced examinations), of which 22 required treatment (13% of reactions) and eight (5% of reactions) qualified as serious.

CONCLUSION

With the introduction of the most recent MR contrast agent approved for use in the United States, our interest in its substantial potential clinical benefits that would result from its increased relaxivity was balanced by concern that the rate of adverse effects may increase. This concern has been ameliorated with the findings of rates of adverse reactions that are comparable to those published for other MR contrast agents.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents and their potential role in the pathogenesis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: the role of excess ligand

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of excess ligand present in gadolinium (Gd) -based contrast agents in the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Using a dosing regimen to simulate the exposure seen in patients with severe renal impairment, we investigated the effect of excess ligand on Gd-deposition and the depletion of endogenous ions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gadodiamide and gadoversetamide were formulated with 0%, 5%, and 10% excess ligand. Forty-two, healthy, male Hannover Wistar rats received daily intravenous injections of each formulation over a period of 20 days. At the end of the study, histopathological analysis of the skin was performed and the concentrations of Gd, Zn, and Cu were measured in several tissues. The levels of Zn in the urine were also measured.

RESULTS

The most severe skin lesions were observed after injection of formulations containing 0% free ligand and in those animals with the highest Gd concentrations in the skin. There were no significant reductions in the levels of Zn or Cu observed in the skin; however, the levels of Zn in the urine were elevated following administration of formulations with the highest amount of excess ligand.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that there is an inverse correlation between the amount of excess ligand present in Gd-containing contrast agents and the amount of Gd in the tissue, and further underline the importance of the inherent stability of these agents in the development of NSF.

Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions

Recent reports suggest that nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is associated with the administration of gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and in particular with the stability of the Gd-complex. The aim of this investigation was to compare GBCAs and their potential to trigger NSF. Forty-two healthy male rats received repeated intravenous injections of six different GBCAs at high doses to simulate the exposure seen in patients with severe renal dysfunction. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of the skin was performed, and the concentrations of Gd, zinc and copper were measured in several tissues by inductive coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Macroscopic and histological skin changes similar to those seen in NSF patients were only observed in rats receiving Omniscan. In addition, very high concentrations of Gd were observed in the animals treated with Omniscan, and, to a lesser extent, in animals treated with OptiMARK. Significantly lower levels of Gd were found after the treatment with ionic linear agents and even less after the treatment with macrocyclic agents. The data in this investigation strongly suggest that the stability of the Gd-complex is a key factor for the development of NSF-like symptoms in this experimental setting.

Preclinical safety evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist)

OBJECTIVES

Gadoxetic acid [gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA); Primovist] is a liver specific contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. For risk assessment of the single diagnostic use the toxicity of this compound was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies into acute, repeated-dose, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and local tolerance, contact sensitizing, and genotoxic potential were performed.

RESULTS

Lethality was observed after a single intravenous administration at doses 2 orders of magnitude higher than the clinical dose. The no observed adverse effect levels after repeated administration markedly exceeds the single diagnostic dose in humans and no unexpected organ toxicity was observed. No indications of reproductive and developmental toxicity, potential contact allergenic, and genotoxic effects were observed. Gd-EOB-DTPA was well tolerated after intravenous administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-EOB-DTPA was well tolerated with high safety margins between the single diagnostic dose and the doses showing adverse effects in animal studies.

Biochemical safety profiles of gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

Gadolinium (Gd)-based paramagnetic contrast agents are relatively safe when used in clinically recommended doses. However, with the rapidly expanding body of literature linking Gd-based paramagnetic contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), awareness of the potential side effects and adverse reactions from Gd is now an important requirement for practicing radiologists. In addition to the ongoing accumulation and analyses of clinical NSF data, it is also essential for the practicing radiologist to understand the biochemical characteristics of the extracellular Gd-chelates. The purpose of this review is to consolidate and update the available information on known side effects, adverse reactions, and toxicity of the Gd chelates, with particular emphasis on the potential mechanisms of NSF.

A serial dilution study of gadolinium-based MR imaging contrast agents

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With the approval of gadobenate dimeglumine, higher relaxivity MR contrast agents were introduced into the clinical environment, and multiple in vivo studies compared the efficacy and safety with the previously approved agents. An in vitro study was conducted to demonstrate differences between the various agents to confirm published values and for imaging-sequence optimization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A contrast phantom was made with serial dilutions of commercially available formulations of 5 US Food and Drug Administration-approved gadolinium-based MR imaging contrast agents in human serum substitute. Dilution factors ranging from 1:8 to 1:4096 were included in the phantom. Spin-echo sequences were performed at 1.5T and 3T with varying TRs and TEs.

RESULTS

At physiologic concentrations and by using short TRs and TEs, gadobenate demonstrated the highest signal intensities, confirming greater R1 relaxivity. At higher concentrations and with longer TR and TE values, the greatest signal intensity loss was appreciated for gadobenate, confirming greater R2 relaxivity.

CONCLUSION

Using rigorous in vitro methodology and serial dilution techniques, this study confirms the reported higher R1 and R2 relaxivities of gadobenate relative to the other agents at 1.5T and 3T.

Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography

PURPOSE

To assess the gadolinium-based macromolecular intravascular contrast agent P792 for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at magnetic field strengths of 3.0 T, in comparison to 1.5 T, in rabbits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven female New Zealand rabbits of the same age served as the animal model. Dose relationship testing was performed with 2 doses (13 and 25 micromol/kg; n = 4 per group) of P792 as compared with a single dose (100 micromol/kg; n = 3) of gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA). All animals underwent contrast-enhanced MRA of the abdominal aorta and its branches on 2 occasions separated by 72 hours. The particular doses were administered in random order. Contrast-enhanced MRA was performed on 3.0 and 1.5 T whole-body MR systems, using a fast 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence. Data acquisition was performed before and up to 10 minutes after administration of intravenous contrast material. Image quality was judged on a 4-point-Likert scale. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise measurements were performed; statistical differences (P < 0.05) between the groups were determined.

RESULTS

P792 and Gd-DOTA yielded high-quality MR angiograms in rabbits in all cases. Although image quality within the first 3 minutes after contrast material administration was equal for both agents, P792 at a dose of 25 micromol/kg was considered superior to Gd-DOTA at the later time points. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise values of the higher dose of P792 were statistically significantly higher than those of Gd-DOTA in the post-bolus phase.

CONCLUSIONS

P792 seems to be well suited for high-quality early phase and equilibrium phase MRA in rabbits at a field strength of 3.0 T, on the basis of this initial evaluation in an animal model.

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) with four doses of gadobenate dimeglumine for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease of the carotid, renal, and pelvic vasculature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients with suspected disease of the renal (n = 16), pelvic (n = 41), or carotid (n = 27) arteries underwent CE-MRA (3D-spoiled gradient-echo sequences) at 1.5T. CE-MRA was performed with gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg (23, 24, 19, and 18 patients, respectively) administered at 2 mL/sec. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) for detection of significant disease (>50% stenosis or occlusion for renal/pelvic arteries; >70% stenosis or occlusion for carotid arteries) was determined by three fully blinded, independent radiologists using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard. All comparisons were tested statistically (ANOVA, chi-square, and Mantel-Haenszel tests as appropriate) and reader agreement (kappa) was assessed.

RESULTS

Values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV on CE-MRA were consistently higher for 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (accuracy = 95.2-97.3%, sensitivity = 84.2% (all readers), specificity = 96.9-99.2%, PPV = 80.0-94.1%, NPV = 97.6-97.7%). The greater accuracy of the 0.1 mmol/kg dose was significant (P < 0.01, all readers) compared to all other dose groups. Agreement between the three readers was good for all dose groups (kappa >/=0.58), with the highest percent agreement (85.7%) noted for the 0.1 mmol/kg dose.

CONCLUSION

Significantly better diagnostic performance on CE-MRA of the renal, pelvic, and carotid arteries is achieved with a gadobenate dimeglumine dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight.