1.0-M gadobutrol versus 0.5-M gadoterate for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol

OBJECTIVES

To intraindividually compare the signal-enhancing effect of 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine and 1.0 M gadobutrol in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging of the prostate.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent two 3-T MR examinations of the prostate were included in this IRB-approved retrospective uncontrolled, unrandomized study. All received two scans (mean time interval, 20.5 months) including T1-weighted DCE-MR imaging, one with 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine and one with 1.0 M gadobutrol. Equimolar doses of gadolinium (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) were administered with identical injection speed (2 mL/s), resulting in differing gadolinium delivery rate. An identical region of interest (ROI_tz) within a BPH-node was identified on both scans. The area under the time-enhancement curve of each ROI_tz from 0 to 180 s post contrast arrival and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Relative enhancement and signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios in the delayed phase at about 180 s were compared between both agents.

RESULTS

There was a significantly larger area under the time-enhancement curve (5.53 vs 4.97 p = 0.0007) and higher relative enhancement of BPH nodules (2.23 vs 1.96 p < 0.0001) with gadobutrol compared with gadoterate meglumine. There were no significant differences in SNR (44.55 vs 37.63 p = 0.12), CNR (31.22 vs 26.39 p = 0.18), and pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans (0.31 vs 0.32 p = 0.86), Ve (1.36 vs 0.98 p = 0.13), and Kep (0.34 vs 0.36 p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

At equimolar doses, increased gadolinium delivery over time using gadobutrol provides higher relative enhancement parameters in BPH nodules compared with gadoterate meglumine, but does not translate into improved SNR or CNR.

KEY POINTS

• At equal injection rate and equimolar total dose, gadobutrol compared with gadoterate meglumine provides a significantly greater relative enhancement in DCE-MR imaging of BPH over the first 180 s. • There are no significant differences in SNRs, CNRs, and pharmacokinetic parameters between the two GBCAs.

Gadobutrol Precedes Gd-DTPA in Abdominal Contrast-Enhanced MRA and MRI: A Prospective, Multicenter, Intraindividual Study

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in one-stop shop of abdominal imaging with Gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA at equimolar doses of gadolinium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective designed, multiple center, intraindividual comparison study. All volunteers underwent Gadobutrol- and Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRA and MRI in one-stop shop. Qualitative analysis for large vessels and small vessels was performed by a three-point scale, while for minute small vessels, by a five-point scale. Quantitative analysis was performed for large vessels by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Visceral organ enhancements on the equilibrium phase were also analyzed. Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative results.

RESULTS

40 volunteers were enrolled. Qualitative analyses results for large vessels, small vessels, and minute small vessels of Gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA were 20.98 ± 2.11, 6.03 ± 1.03, and 3.41 ± 1.18 and 20.01 ± 2.18, 5.28 ± 1.67, and 2.61 ± 1.40, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed Gadobutrol-enhanced MRA was superior to that of Gd-DTPA significantly for small vessels (p=0.028) and minute small vessels (p=0.007). For quantitative analysis of large vessels, no statistic difference was found. Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI had higher CNR of the liver (p=0.003), spleen (p=0.001), and pancreas (p=0.001) and higher SNR of spleen (p=0.009) than those of Gd-DTPA statistically.

CONCLUSION

Our study proved Gadobutrol was superior to Gd-DTPA in qualitative analysis of CE-MRA and quantitative analysis of visceral organ enhancement on CE-MRI in abdomen of healthy volunteers. Gadobutrol may be more suitable for abdominal one-stop examination for CE-MRA and CE-MRI.

Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

PURPOSE

Gadobutrol (GB) is reported to provide improved relaxivity and concentration compared to gadoterate (GT). This study was designed to intraindividually compare quantitative and qualitative enhancement characteristics of GB to GT in cervicocranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

Patients (n = 54) with CVD underwent two identical contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) examinations of the cervical and intracranial vasculature in randomized order, using GB and GT in equimolar dose. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were obtained by two independent neuroradiologists, blinded to the applied contrast agents. Qualitative assessment was performed using a three-point scale with a focus on M1/M2 segments.

RESULTS

One thousand and twenty-six vessel segments were analyzed. GB revealed a significantly higher SNR (p = 0.032) and CNR (p = 0.031) in all vessel segments. GB featured a significantly higher SNR and CNR in thoracic (p = 0.022; p = 0.016) and cervical vessels (p = 0.03; p = 0.038), as well as in the posterior circulation (p = 0.012; p = 0.005). In blinded qualitative assessment, overall preference was given to GB (p = 0.02), showing a significant better delineation of the M1/M2 segments (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Compared to GT, the use of GB results in a significantly higher SNR and CNR in cervical and cerebral CE-MRA, leading to a better delineation of the intracranial vasculature. Present results underline the potential of GB for improved CE-MRA assessment of vasculature in CVD patients.

Effects of gadolinium-based contrast agent concentrations (0.5 M or 1.0 M) on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging examinations: systematic review of the literature

Background To date there is no agreement as to what is the optimal concentration for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Purpose To assess whether diagnostic performance differences exist between 0.5 M and 1.0 M GBCAs used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods A PubMed literature search identified 21 clinical studies published between 2005 and 2013 which evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of both types of GBCAs. Study design, type of procedure, GBCA administration mode, imaging performances, impact on patient management, study limitations, and biases were analyzed. No statistical test was performed on pooled data. Results Sixteen comparative and five non-comparative studies were analyzed, involving 2183 patients who underwent MRI procedures for various indications. In 67% of the studies, 0.5 M and 1.0 M GBCAs were injected at equimolar gadolinium amounts per kg body weight. Only 33% applied the same molar flow rate for delivery of the GBCAs. No significant differences between GBCAs were reported for 23 out of 27 qualitative endpoints (mainly image quality, lesion, and vessel visualization) and 29 out of 40 quantitative endpoints. Three out of four studies with non-equimolar delivery rates showed better contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for 1.0 M gadobutrol, without showing an impact on diagnostic performance. Methodological biases were identified in several studies impairing the interpretation of comparisons. Conclusion Imaging differences between 0.5 M and 1.0 M GBCAs were essentially observed under non-equimolar delivery rates. However, they did not result into greater diagnostic efficacy when performed under equimolar conditions.

MR Angiography at 3 T of Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Gadoterate Meglumine and Gadobutrol

OBJECTIVE

This large-scale randomized study aimed to show the noninferiority in terms of diagnostic performance of gadoterate meglumine-enhanced versus gadobutrol-enhanced 3-T MR angiography (MRA) using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this prospective international randomized double-blind phase IV trial, 189 patients were enrolled. Of them, 156 could be included in the per-protocol population for on-site assessments and 154 for off-site readings. Subjects underwent peripheral MRA, after injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of either gadoterate meglumine or gadobutrol, and DSA within 30 days. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated and compared using a noninferiority analysis. Secondary endpoints included sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic confidence, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio evaluations.

RESULTS

The percentage agreement between MRA and DSA for stenosis detection was similar for on-site readings for both groups (mean ± SD, 80.6% ± 16.1% with gadoterate meglumine vs 77.1% ± 19.6% with gadobutrol; 3.5% difference), and the same was true for off-site readings (73.9% ± 16.9% with gadoterate meglumine vs 75.1% ± 13.8% with gadobutrol; 1.1% difference). The noninferiority of gadoterate meglumine to gadobutrol was shown for both on- and off-site readings. Sensitivity in detecting significant stenosis (> 50%) was 72.3% for gadoterate meglumine versus 70.6% for gadobutrol, whereas specificity (92.6% vs 92.3%), diagnostic confidence (87.0% vs 86.0%), signal-to-noise ratio (165.5 vs 161.0), and contrast-to-noise ratio (159.5 vs 155.3) did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Gadoterate meglumine was found to be not inferior to gadobutrol in terms of diagnostic performance in patients with PAOD undergoing 3-T contrast-enhanced MRA. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two MRA groups.

Enhancement characteristics and impact on image quality of two gadolinium chelates at equimolar doses for time-resolved 3-Tesla MR-angiography of the calf station

PURPOSE

To compare enhancement characteristics and image quality of two macrocyclic gadolinium chelates, gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol, in low-dose, time-resolved MRA of the calf station.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

100 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease (stages II-IV) were retrospectively analysed. Fifty patients were included in each group - 32 men and 18 women for gadobutrol (mean age 67 years) and 34 men, 16 women for gadoterate meglumine (mean age 64 years). 0.03 mmol/kg bw of either gadobutrol or gadoterate meglumine was injected. Gadobutrol was diluted 1 ∶ 1 with normal saline (0.9% NaCl) to provide similar injection volume and bolus geometry compared to the undiluted 0.5 M dose of gadoterate meglumine. Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and image quality were analysed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Mean SNR ranged from 83.0 ± 46.7 (peroneal artery) to 96.4 ± 64.5 (anterior tibial artery) for gadobutrol, and from 37.6 ± 13.8 (peroneal artery) to 45.3 ± 16.4 (anterior tibial artery) for the gadoterate meglumine group (p<0.0001). CNR values ranged from 30.1 ± 20.1 (peroneal artery) to 37.6 ± 26.0 (anterior tibial artery) for gadobutrol and from 14.9 ± 8.0 (peroneal artery) to 18.6 ± 16.4 (anterior tibial artery) for gadoterate meglumine (p<0.0001). No significant difference in image quality was found except for the peroneal arteries (p = 0.006 and p = 0.04). Interreader agreement was excellent (kappa 0.87-0.93).

CONCLUSION

The significantly better enhancement as assessed by SNR and CNR provided by gadobutrol compared to gadoterate meglumine does not translate into substantial differences in image quality in an equimolar, low-dose, time-resolved MRA protocol of the calves.

Multicenter, intra-individual comparison of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine and double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of the peripheral arteries (the Peripheral VALUE Study)

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare single dose gadobenate dimeglumine with double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for CE-MRA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) using an intra-individual crossover study design in which all patients received both contrast agents in otherwise identical CE-MRA examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board and regulatory approval were granted and all patients provided written informed consent. Sixty-eight patients (53M/15F; 62.4 ± 15.7 years) with mild-to-severe PAOD were enrolled for randomized 3-station CE-MRA with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine and 0.2 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine. Three blinded readers assessed images for vessel anatomical delineation, disease detection/exclusion, and global preference. Diagnostic performance for detection of ≥51% stenosis was determined for 53 patients who underwent DSA. Noninferiority was assessed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank, McNemar, and Wald tests. Quantitative enhancement was compared.

RESULTS

No differences (P ≥ 0.25) were noted for any qualitative parameter at any station. Equivalence was reported in at least 62/64 patients (93.8% 3-reader agreement) for diagnostic preference. Superiority for gadobenate dimeglumine was reported by all readers for diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 80.4-88.0% versus 75.2-85.8%; specificity: 89.8-96.0% versus 88.7-94.8%; accuracy: 87.4-91.7% versus 84.9-90.6%; PPV: 84.0-92.8% versus 82.3-90.8%; NPV: 88.5-92.4% versus 85.7-91.1%). Quantitative enhancement was similar in the pelvis but significantly (P < 0.05) greater with gadobenate dimeglumine in the thigh for two readers.

CONCLUSION

Image quality and diagnostic performance on peripheral CE-MRA with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine is at least equivalent to that with 0.2 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine.

MR angiography of carotid artery aneurysms in a porcine model at 3 Tesla: comparison of two different macrocyclic gadolinium chelates and of dynamic and conventional techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in image quality of two macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents, gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine, using time-resolved, contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) in a porcine carotid artery aneurysm model and to compare image quality between dynamic and conventional, single acquisition CE-MRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bilateral carotid aneurysms were created surgically in this Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved study. Dynamic CE-MRA studies optimized for high temporal resolution were performed at 3 Tesla. Scans using equivalently dosed (on a per mmol basis) gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine were compared qualitatively and quantitatively in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Higher spatial resolution dynamic and conventional CE-MRA were also compared.

RESULTS

N = 16 aneurysms were assessed. Qualitative evaluation of dynamic CE-MRA scans demonstrated a preference for gadobutrol over gadoterate meglumine. Significantly higher aneurysm CNR was found with gadobutrol (133 ± 44) versus gadoterate meglumine, the latter at both equivalent and double injection rates (94 ± 35 and 102 ± 38). In a blinded assessment, conventional CE-MRA was preferred qualitatively when compared with dynamic CE-MRA. However, dynamic CE-MRA was generally capable of providing diagnostic image quality.

CONCLUSION

Gadobutrol is preferred to gadoterate meglumine for high temporal resolution dynamic CE-MRA, a fact with important clinical implications for low dose CE-MRA protocols in patients at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Conventional high resolution CE-MRA provides superior image quality when compared with dynamic CE-MRA.

Prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 0.5 molar gadobenate dimeglumine and 1.0 molar gadobutrol in contrast-enhanced run-off magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities

PURPOSE

To compare image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 0.5 molar gadobenate dimeglumine and 1.0 molar gadobutrol in contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the lower extremities interindividually.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrollment in the study. We prospectively included 74 patients (21 women, 53 men; mean age ± SD: 67.9 ± 11.0 years) with suspected peripheral occlusive vascular disease. All patients underwent a contrast-enhanced MRA of both lower extremities with either 0.1 mL/kg body weight gadobutrol or gadobenate dimeglumine. Image quality, stenosis grade, and artifacts were assessed by two blinded, independent investigators. Signal intensity (SI), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured by a third investigator. Contrast agent groups were compared to each other using a two-sided Student's t-test.

RESULTS

The results did not show significant differences for SI, SNR, or CNR. Both investigators were in significant accordance (P < 0.05) with regard to stenosis detection.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that application of standard clinical doses (0.1 mL/kg body weight) of both contrast agents provides similar diagnostic results and gadolinium dose could be reduced by the application of a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine for CE run-off MRA.

Evaluation of gadobutrol, a macrocyclic, nonionic gadolinium chelate in a brain glioma model: comparison with gadoterate meglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine at 1.5 T, combined with an assessment of field strength dependence, specifically 1.5 versus 3 T

PURPOSE

To evaluate in a rat brain glioma model intraindividual tumor enhancement at 1.5 T using gadobutrol (Gadovist), a nonionic, macrocyclic chelate currently in clinical trials in the United States, in comparison with both an ionic macrocyclic chelate, gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem), and an ionic linear chelate, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), and to compare the degree of tumor enhancement with gadobutrol at 1.5 and 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 rats, divided into three groups with n = 8 animals per group, were evaluated. Animals in group 1 received injections of gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine, whereas those in group 2 received gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine. Injections were performed in random order and separated by 24 hours. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed immediately following each contrast injection with a 1.5 T MR system. Animals in group 3 received gadobutrol injections using the same protocol but with scans performed at 1.5 and 3 T. In all examinations, T1-weighted images were acquired precontrast, 1 minute postcontrast, and at 4 consecutive 2-minute intervals thereafter. A contrast dose of 0.1 mmol/kg was used in all instances.

RESULTS

In groups 1 and 2, tumor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were higher for gadobutrol compared to both other agents at each timepoint postcontrast injection. The improvement in tumor CNR with gadobutrol, depending on time, was between 12% and 40% versus gadopentetate dimeglumine, with the difference achieving statistical significance at 7 minutes. The improvement in tumor CNR with gadobutrol, depending on time, was between 15% and 27% versus gadoterate meglumine, with the difference statistically significant at 5 and 9 minutes. In group 3 the improvement in tumor SNR and CNR seen with the increase in field strength from 1.5 to 3 T for gadobutrol was statistically significant at all acquired timepoints (P < 0.002). CNR mean values ranged from 10.4 +/- 2.9 to 24.6 +/- 5.0 at 1.5 T and from 20.5 +/- 5.9 to 47.8 +/- 15.7 at 3 T depending on the timepoint postcontrast.

CONCLUSION

Consistently greater tumor enhancement was noted at all measured timepoints following contrast injection with gadobutrol compared to both gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoterate meglumine at 1.5 T. A substantial further improvement in tumor enhancement was noted using gadobutrol at 3 T.