Cerebral blood flow estimation in vivo using local tissue reference functions

Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review

Cerebral perfusion, also referred to as cerebral blood flow (CBF), is one of the most important parameters related to brain physiology and function. The technique of dynamic-susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is currently the most commonly used MRI method to measure perfusion. It relies on the intravenous injection of a contrast agent and the rapid measurement of the transient signal changes during the passage of the bolus through the brain. Central to quantification of CBF using this technique is the so-called arterial input function (AIF), which describes the contrast agent input to the tissue of interest. Due to its fundamental role, there has been a lot of progress in recent years regarding how and where to measure the AIF, how it influences DSC-MRI quantification, what artefacts one should avoid, and the design of automatic methods to measure the AIF. The AIF is also directly linked to most of the major sources of artefacts in CBF quantification, including partial volume effect, bolus delay and dispersion, peak truncation effects, contrast agent non-linearity, etc. While there have been a number of good review articles on DSC-MRI over the years, these are often comprehensive but, by necessity, with limited in-depth discussion of the various topics covered. This review article covers in greater depth the issues associated with the AIF and their implications for perfusion quantification using DSC-MRI.

Application of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion in temporal lobe epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Accurately locating the epileptogenic focus in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is important in clinical practice. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron-emission tomography (PET) have been widely used in the lateralization of TLE, but both have limitations. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging can accurately and reliably reflect differences in cerebral blood flow and volume.

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic value of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the lateralization of the epileptogenic focus in TLE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conventional MRI and DSC-MRI scanning was performed in 20 interictal cases of TLE and 20 healthy volunteers. The relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the bilateral mesial temporal lobes of the TLE cases and healthy control groups were calculated. The differences in the perfusion asymmetry indices (AIs), derived from the rCBV and rCBF of the bilateral mesial temporal lobes, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the control group, there were no statistically significant differences between the left and right sides in terms of rCBV (left 1.55 ± 0.32, right 1.57 ± 0.28) or rCBF (left 99.00 ± 24.61, right 100.38 ± 23.46) of the bilateral mesial temporal lobes. However, in the case group the ipsilateral rCBV and rCBF values (1.75 ± 0.64 and 96.35 ± 22.63, respectively) were markedly lower than those of the contralateral side (2.01 ± 0.79 and 108.56 ± 26.92; P < 0.05). Both the AI of the rCBV (AI(rCBV); 13.03 ± 10.33) and the AI of the rCBF (AI(rCBF); 11.24 ± 8.70) of the case group were significantly higher than that of the control group (AI(rCBV) 5.55 ± 3.74, AI(rCBF) 5.12 ± 3.48; P < 0.05). The epileptogenic foci of nine patients were correctly lateralized using the 95th percentile of the AI(rCBV) and AI(rCBF) of the control group as the normal upper limits.

CONCLUSION

In patients with TLE interictal, both rCBV and rCBF of the ipsilateral mesial temporal lobe were markedly lower than that of healthy control subjects. DSC-MRI can provide lateralization for TLE.