Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) of the wrist and finger at 3T: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression images

Assessment of traumatic mandibular nerve using MR neurography sequence: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic mandibular nerve damage resulting from oral surgeries and dental procedures is painful and a formidable challenge for patients and oral surgeons alike, mainly because the absence of objective and quantitative methods for diagnosing nerve damage renders treatment and compensation ambiguous while often leading to medico-legal disputes. The aim of this study was to examine discriminating factors of traumatic mandibular nerve within a specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol and to suggest tangible diagnostic criteria for peripheral trigeminal nerve injury.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with ipsilateral mandibular nerve trauma underwent T2 Flex water, 3D short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired by periodically rotating overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) pulse sequences; 26 injured nerves were thus compared with contra-lateral healthy nerves at anatomically corresponding sites. T2 Flex apparent signal to noise ratio (FSNR), T2 Flex apparent nerve-muscle contrast to noise ratio (FNMCNR) 3D STIR apparent signal to noise ratio (SSNR), 3D STIR apparent nerve-muscle contrast to noise ratio (SNMCNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and area of cross-sectional nerve (Area) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mixed model analysis revealed FSNR and FNMCNR to be the dual discriminators for traumatized mandibular nerve (p < 0.05). Diagnostic performance of both parameters was also determined with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC for FSNR = 0.712; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5660, 0.8571 / AUC for FNMCNR = 0.7056; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.011, 1.112).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in FSNR and FNMCNR within our MRI sequence seems to be accurate indicators of the presence of traumatic nerve. This prospective study may serve as a foundation for sophisticated model diagnosing trigeminal nerve trauma within large patient cohorts.

Feasibility of salt pads to improve fat suppression in low-field MRI systems

INTRODUCTION

Fat-suppressed images are essential in clinical practice but are often affected by magnetic field inhomogeneity, resulting in poor image quality. We hypothesized that salt (99% sodium chloride [NaCl]) could be used as a magnetic field uniformity assist pad and verified whether salt pads improve magnetic field uniformity and the fat suppression effect in low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems.

METHODS

We conducted a small clinical study where coronal 2D fast spin-echo T2-weighted MRI with fat suppression was performed. The subjects were 10 healthy volunteers (six men and four women) with no surgical history, with a mean age of 20.5 years (range, 20-30 years). In the clinical study, we performed physical and visual evaluation by imaging a subject's knee with and without salt pads.

RESULTS

The results of the clinical study indicated that the use of salt pads improved the magnetic field uniformity, thus increasing the fat suppression effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Salt pads improved the homogeneity of the magnetic field and the fat suppression effect in low-field MRI systems.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The use of salt pads in low-field MRI systems could provide more accurate fat suppression images.

[Regional iterative phase extraction Dixon water-lipid separation method based on second order differential quality weighting]

OBJECTIVE

To propose a regional iterative phase extraction Dixon method based on second order difference quality weighting (SOD-RIPE) for improving water-lipid separation in heterogeneous magnetic field.

OBJECTIVE

The in-phase angle of the asymmetric in-phase and opposite phase image matrix was eliminated using the Dixon's signal model to obtain J1 and J2, from which the possible water signal magnitude (B, S) and in-phase and opposite phase difference (P1, P2) was derived using the Cosine law. The phase quality map R of J2 was calculated using the second-order difference, and the phase difference was weighted to obtain (Pv, Pu). The Pv and Pu were iteratively selected to obtain the Pf. The water-fat separation diagram (W, F) was obtained using the least square method to bring the Pf into the Dixon signal model.

OBJECTIVE

Water-lipid separation was performed using 1000 pairs of in- and opposite-phase images on a Philips in Genia II 3.0T magnetic resonance scanner. The SOD-RIPE algorithm achieved better separation and stability than the automatic growth method and RIPE in all the parts of the body and in the stability test, and had a similar performance to mDixon-XD algorithm.

OBJECTIVE

SOD-RIPE can achieve robust water-fat separation with a good stability and can be used as a general Dixon water-fat separation method.

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water- and fat-only images to assess osteitis and erosions according to RAMRIS in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement between readers using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water- and fat-only images and OMERACT-recommended sequences for the scoring of osteitis and erosions according to the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) in hands of patients with early RA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both hands of 24 patients (16 women, 8 men; mean age, 45.7±14.5 [SD] years; age range: 25-70 years) with early RA were prospectively imaged with fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences, non-Dixon T1-weighted imaging prior to contrast material injection and T1-weighted Dixon imaging after contrast material injection at 1.5T. There were Two radiologists separately quantified osteitis and erosions according to RAMRIS using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water-only and fat-saturated T2-weighted images for osteitis and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon fat-only and T1-weighted images prior to contrast material injection for erosions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-technique, intra-observer and inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

Mean ICC for the agreement between Dixon and non-Dixon images ranged from 0.68 (95%CI: 0.20-0.90) to 0.99 (95%CI: 0.95-1.00) for the scoring of osteitis and from 0.77 (95%CI: 0.38-0.93) to 0.99 (95%CI: 0.95-1.00) for the scoring of erosions. Mean ICC for the agreement between first and second readings ranged from 0.94 (95%CI: 0.81-0.98) to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91-0.99) for the scoring of osteitis using Dixon and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.72-0.97) to 0.98 (95%CI: 0.92-0.99) using non-Dixon images and from 0.80 (95%CI: 0.45-0.94) to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91-0.99) for the scoring of erosions using Dixon and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.29-0.91) to 0.98 (95%CI: 0.92-0.99) using non-Dixon images.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water- and fat-only images can serve as an alternative to fat-saturated T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI sequences for the assessment of osteitis and erosions according to the RAMRIS scoring system in hands of patients with early RA.

Applications of the Dixon technique in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system

The acquisition of images with suppression of the fat signal is very useful in clinical practice and can be achieved in a variety of sequences. The Dixon technique, unlike other fat suppression techniques, allows the signal of fat to be suppressed in the postprocessing rather than during acquisition, as well as allowing the visualization of maps showing the distribution of water and fat. This review of the Dixon technique aims to illustrate the basic physical principles, to compare the technique with other magnetic resonance imaging sequences for fat suppression or fat quantification, and to describe its applications in the study of diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Many variants of the Dixon technique have been developed, providing more consistent separation of the fat and water signals, as well as allowing correction for many confounding factors. It allows homogeneous fat suppression, being able to be acquired in combination with several other sequences, as well as with different weightings. The technique also makes it possible to obtain images with and without fat suppression from a single acquisition. In addition, the Dixon technique can be used as a quantitative method, allowing the proportion of tissue fat to be determined, and, in more updated versions, can quantify tissue iron.

Comparison between 3-point Dixon- and CHESS-based OMERACT-recommended MRI protocols in hands of patients with suspicion of early rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To compare fat suppression effectiveness, image quality and disease activity scores between MRI protocols based on the Dixon method and the Chemical Shift Selective (CHESS) technique in hands of patients with suspicion of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHOD

Both hands of 28 patients (19 women; mean age 45.2 years old) with suspicion of early RA were prospectively imaged with Dixon- and CHESS-based OMERACT recommended protocols at 1.5 T including fat-suppressed T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Two radiologists (R1/R2) separately assessed effectiveness of fat suppression and determined RAMRIS scores woth the Dixon- and CHESS-based protocols. R1 repeated the RAMRIS scoring and measured contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) on Dixon and CHESS images. Statistics included 2-way ANOVA test for the comparison of CNRs and Bland-Altman methodology for inter-technique and intra-observer agreement (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Fat suppression failure occurred in up to 1 patient with the Dixon- and 25 patients with the CHESS-based protocols. CNRs were significantly higher on T1-weighted and lower on T2-weighted Dixon images than on the corresponding CHESS images (p ≤ 0.042). Median bias of the difference between Dixon- and CHESS-based RAMRIS scores was not significantly different from 0 (-0.8 to +1.0 and -1.1 to +1.4 for R1/R2). Median bias of the difference between RAMRIS scores at first and second readings was significantly different from 0 with the CHESS-based protocols (-0.8 to +1.7) but not with the Dixon-based protocols (+0.0 to +1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Dixon sequences yield more effective fat suppression and more reproducible RAMRIS scoring than CHESS sequences in hands with suspicion of early RA.

Improved fat-suppression homogeneity with mDIXON turbo spin echo (TSE) in pediatric spine imaging at 3.0 T

Background Robust fat suppression remains essential in clinical MRI to improve tissue signal contrast, minimize fat-related artifacts, and enhance image quality. Purpose To compare fat suppression between mDIXON turbo spin echo (TSE) and conventional frequency-selective and inversion-recovery methods in pediatric spine MRI. Material and Methods Images from T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) TSE sequences coupled with conventional methods and the mDIXON technique were compared in 36 patients (5.8 ± 5.4 years) at 3.0 T. Images from 42 pairs of T1W (n = 16) and T2W (n = 26) scans were acquired. Two radiologists reviewed the data and rated images using a three-point scale in two categories, including the uniformity of fat suppression and overall diagnostic image quality. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the scores. Results The Cohen's kappa coefficient for inter-rater agreement was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.83). Images from mDIXON TSE were considered superior in fat suppression ( P < 0.01) in 22 (rater 1) and 25 (rater 2) cases, respectively. In 13 (rater 1) and 11 (rater 2) cases, mDIXON TSE demonstrated improved diagnostic image quality ( P < 0.01). In three cases, fat suppression was superior using inversion-recovery and likewise in one case mDIXON had poorer image diagnostic quality. Lastly, mDIXON and conventional fat-suppression methods performed similarly in 17 (rater 1) and 14 (rater 2) cases, and yielded equal diagnostic image quality in 28 (rater 1) and 30 (rater 2) cases. Conclusion Robust fat suppression can be achieved with mDixon TSE pediatric spine imaging at 3.0 T and should be considered as a permanent replacement of traditional methods, in particular frequency-selective techniques.

Fat suppression at three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of fat suppression and the image quality of the Dixon method with those of the chemical shift-selective (CHESS) technique in hands of normal subjects at non-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both hands of 14 healthy volunteers were imaged with 3D fast spoiled gradient echo (FSPGR) T1-weighted Dixon, 3D FSPGR T1-weighted CHESS and 3D T1-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) CHESS sequences in a 1.5T MR scanner. Three radiologists scored the effectiveness of fat suppression in bone marrow (EFS^BM) and soft tissues (EFS^ST) in 20 joints per subject. One radiologist measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in 10 bones per subject. Statistical analysis used two-way ANOVA with random effects (P<0.0083), paired t-test (P<0.05) and observed agreement to assess differences in effectiveness of fat suppression, differences in SNR and interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

EFS^BM was statistically significantly higher for the 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon than for the 3D FSPGR T1-weighted CHESS sequence and the 3D FSE T1-weighted CHESS sequence (P<0.0001). EFS^ST was statistically significantly higher for the 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon than for the 3D FSPGR T1-weighted CHESS sequence (P<0.0011) and for the 3D FSE T1-weighted CHESS sequence in the axial plane (P=0.0028). Mean SNR was statistically significantly higher for 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon sequence than for 3D FSPGR T1-weighted CHESS and 3D FSE T1-weighted CHESS sequences (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The Dixon method yields more effective fat suppression and higher SNR than the CHESS technique at 3D T1-weighted MR imaging of the hands.

Effectiveness of a silicone device for foot MRI in order to obtain homogeneous fat suppression images

BACKGROUND

Incomplete fat suppression induced by magnetic field inhomogeneity is difficult to compensate for with hardware magnetic-field shimming.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a silicone device used to obtain homogeneous fat suppression during 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the foot.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-eight healthy volunteers were enrolled and examined twice, before (group A) and after (group B) the application of a silicone device. Fat-saturated, T2-weighted, fast spin-echo images were acquired using the same scanning protocol at both examinations. Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were calculated and compared in the four regions of interest (ROIs). ROI 1 and 2 were selected from toe-side bone and soft tissue, while ROI 3 and 4 were selected from proximal bone and soft tissue. Qualitative analysis using a four-point scale was performed for three categories. The categories are as follows: the overall image quality, homogeneity of the first phalange and metatarsal bone, respectively.

RESULTS

The SNR and CNR in ROI 1 and 2 were significantly higher in group A than in group B (SNR; P < 0.001, CNR; P < 0.001), and there were no significant difference in ROI 3 and 4. The qualitative score of the overall fat suppression in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.001). Homogeneity of the first phalange in group B was also significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.001). On the other hand, the homogeneity of the metatarsal bone was not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of a silicone device provides homogeneous fat suppression in 3T MRI of the foot and can significantly improve image quality.

Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system

Fat suppression is an important technique in musculoskeletal imaging to improve the visibility of bone-marrow lesions; evaluate fat in soft-tissue masses; optimize the contrast-to-noise ratio in magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography; better define lesions after administration of contrast material; and avoid chemical shift artifacts, primarily at 3-T MR imaging. High-field-strength (eg, 3-T) MR imaging has specific technical characteristics compared with lower-field-strength MR imaging that influence the use and outcome of various fat-suppression techniques. The most commonly used fat-suppression techniques for musculoskeletal 3-T MR imaging include chemical shift (spectral) selective (CHESS) fat saturation, inversion recovery pulse sequences (eg, short inversion time inversion recovery [STIR]), hybrid pulse sequences with spectral and inversion-recovery (eg, spectral adiabatic inversion recovery and spectral attenuated inversion recovery [SPAIR]), spatial-spectral pulse sequences (ie, water excitation), and the Dixon techniques. Understanding the different fat-suppression options allows radiologists to adopt the most appropriate technique for their clinical practice.