Enhanced fat suppression technique for breast imaging

Aliphatic and Olefinic Fat Suppression in the Orbit Using Polarity-altered Spectral and Spatial Selective Acquisition (PASTA) with Opposed Phase

PURPOSE

Fatty acid composition of the orbit makes it challenging to achieve complete fat suppression during orbit MR imaging. Implementation of a fat suppression technique capable of suppressing signals from saturated (aliphatic) and unsaturated (olefinic or protons at double-bonded carbon sites) fat would improve the visualization of an optical nerve. Furthermore, the ability to semi-quantify the fractions of aliphatic and olefinic fat may potentially provide valuable information in assessing orbit pathology.

METHODS

A phantom study was conducted on various oil samples on a clinical 3 Tesla scanner. The imaging protocol included three 2D fast spin echo (FSE) sequences: in-phase, polarity-altered spectral and spatial selective acquisition (PASTA), and a combination of PASTA with opposed phase in olefinic and aliphatic chemical shift. The results were validated against high-resolution 11.7T NMR and compared with images acquired with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) and chemical shift selective (CHESS) fat suppression techniques. In-vivo data were acquired on eight healthy subjects and were compared with the prior histological studies.

RESULTS

PASTA with opposed phase achieved complete suppression of fat signals in the orbits and provided images of well-delineated optical nerves and muscles in all subjects. The olefinic fat fraction in the olive, walnut, and fish oil phantoms at 3T was found to be 5.0%, 11.2%, and 12.8%, respectively, whereas 11.7T NMR provides the following olefinic fat fractions: 6.0% for olive, 11.5% for walnut, and 12.6% for fish oils. For the in-vivo study, on average, olefinic fat accounted for 9.9% ± 3.8% of total fat while the aliphatic fat fraction was 90.1% ± 3.8%, in the normal orbits.

CONCLUSION

We have introduced a new fat suppression technique using PASTA with opposed phase and applied it to human orbits. The purposed method achieves an excellent orbital fat suppression and the quantification of aliphatic and olefinic fat signals.

Effect of Phase Encoding Direction on Image Quality in Single-Shot EPI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast

BACKGROUND

In breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), distortion and physiologic artifacts affect clinical interpretation. Image quality can be optimized by addressing the effect of phase encoding (PE) direction on these artifacts.

PURPOSE

To compare distortion artifacts in breast DWI acquired with different PE directions and polarities, and to discuss their clinical implications.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Eleven healthy volunteers (median age: 47 years old; range: 22-74 years old) and a breast phantom.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Single-shot echo planar DWI and three-dimensional fast gradient echo sequences at 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

All DWI data were acquired with left-right, right-left, posterior-anterior, and anterior-posterior PE directions. In phantom data, displacement magnitude was evaluated by comparing the location of landmarks in anatomical and DWI images. Three breast radiologists (5, 17, and 23 years of experience) assessed the presence or absence of physiologic artifacts in volunteers' DWI datasets and indicated their PE-direction preference.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Analysis of variance with post-hoc tests were used to assess differences in displacement magnitude across DWI datasets and observers. A binomial test and a chi-squared test were used to evaluate if each in vivo DWI dataset had an equal probability (25%) of being preferred by radiologists. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using Gwet's AC1 agreement coefficient. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, median displacement was the significantly largest in posterior-anterior data. While the displacement in the anterior-posterior and left-right data were equivalent (P = 0.545). In the in vivo data, there were no physiological artifacts observed in any dataset, regardless of PE direction. In the reader study, there was a significant preference for the posterior-anterior datasets which were selected 94% of the time. There was good agreement between readers (0.936).

DATA CONCLUSION

This study showed the impact of PE direction on distortion artifacts in breast DWI. In healthy volunteers, the posterior-to-anterior PE direction was preferred by readers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, carrying a significant socioeconomic burden. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with 4 major subtypes identified. Each subtype has unique prognostic factors, risks, treatment responses, and survival rates. Advances in targeted therapies have considerably improved the 5-year survival rates for primary breast cancer patients largely due to widespread screening programs that enable early detection and timely treatment. Imaging techniques are indispensable in diagnosing and managing breast cancer. While mammography is the primary screening tool, MRI plays a significant role when mammography results are inconclusive or in patients with dense breast tissue. MRI has become standard in breast cancer imaging, providing detailed anatomic and functional data, including tumor perfusion and cellularity. A key characteristic of breast tumors is angiogenesis, a biological process that promotes tumor development and growth. Increased angiogenesis in tumors generally indicates poor prognosis and increased risk of metastasis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI measures tumor perfusion and serves as an in vivo metric for angiogenesis. DCE-MRI has become the cornerstone of breast MRI, boasting a high negative-predictive value of 89% to 99%, although its specificity can vary. This review presents a thorough overview of magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in breast cancer, focusing on the role of DCE-MRI in clinical applications and exploring emerging MR perfusion imaging techniques.

A novel spectrally selective fat saturation pulse design with robustness to B0 and B1 inhomogeneities: A demonstration on 3D T1-weighted breast MRI at 3 T

PURPOSE

Spectrally selective fat saturation (FatSat) sequence is commonly used to suppress signal from adipose tissue. Conventional SINC-shaped pulses are sensitive to B₀ off-resonance and B₁⁺ offset. Uniform fat saturation with large spatial coverage is especially challenging for the body and breast MRI. The aim of this study is to develop spectrally selective FatSat pulses that offer more immunity to B₀/B₁⁺ field inhomogeneities than SINC pulses and evaluate them in bilateral breast imaging at 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Optimized composite pulses (OCP) were designed based on the optimal control theory with robustness to a targeted B₀/ B₁⁺ conditions. OCP pulses also allows flexible flip angles to meet different requirements. Comparisons with the vendor-provided SINC pulses were conducted by numerical simulation and in vivo scans using a 3D T₁-weighted (T₁w) gradient-echo (GRE) sequence with coverage of the whole-breast.

RESULTS

Simulation revealed that OCP pulses yielded almost half of the transition band and much less sensitivity to B₁⁺ inhomogeneity compared to SINC pulses with B₀ off-resonance within ±200 Hz and B₁⁺ scale error within ±0.3 (P < 0.001). Across five normal subjects, OCP FatSat pulses produced 25-41% lower residual fat signals (P < 0.05) with 27-36% less spatial variation (P < 0.05) than SINC.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to conventional SINC-shaped pulses, the newly designed OCP FatSat pulses mitigated challenges of wide range of B₀/ B₁⁺ field inhomogeneities and achieved more uniform fat suppression in bilateral breast T₁w imaging at 3 T.

Quantitative Measurement of Breast Density Using Personalized 3D-Printed Breast Model for Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Despite the development and implementation of several MRI techniques for breast density assessments, there is no consensus on the optimal protocol in this regard. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate MRI protocols for the quantitative assessment of breast density using a personalized 3D-printed breast model. The breast model was developed using silicone and peanut oils to simulate the MRI related-characteristics of fibroglandular and adipose breast tissues, and then scanned on a 3T MRI system using non-fat-suppressed and fat-suppressed sequences. Breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, and percentage of breast density from these imaging sequences were objectively assessed using Analyze 14.0 software. Finally, the repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to examine the differences between the quantitative measurements of breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, and percentage of breast density with respect to the corresponding sequences. The volume of fibroglandular tissue and the percentage of breast density were significantly higher in the fat-suppressed sequences than in the non-fat-suppressed sequences (p < 0.05); however, the difference in breast volume was not statistically significant (p = 0.529). Further, a fat-suppressed T2-weighted with turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) imaging sequence was superior to the non-fat- and fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted sequences for the quantitative measurement of breast density due to its ability to represent the exact breast tissue compositions. This study shows that the fat-suppressed sequences tended to be more useful than the non-fat-suppressed sequences for the quantitative measurements of the volume of fibroglandular tissue and the percentage of breast density.

Fat Suppressed Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T: Comparison of Image Quality Between Spectrally Adiabatic Iversion Recovery and the Multiecho Dixon Technique in Imaging of the Prostate

Objective

To compare the quality of fat suppression and image quality between multiecho Dixon technique (mDixon) and spectrally adiabatic iversion recovery (SPAIR) in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.

Methods

This prospective study assigned thirty consecutive patients to scanning with SPAIR technique (SPAIR protocol) and another consecutive 30 patients to scanning with mDixon technique (mDixon protocol). We calculated the contrast, signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and the coefficient of variation between the 2 protocols. Two readers compared homogeneity of fat suppression, image noise, image contrast, and image sharpness between the two protocols.

Results

The SNR, CNR, and contrast of mDixon protocol were significantly higher than those of the SPAIR protocol (SNR: 14.7 ± 4.1 vs 11.0 ± 2.6; P < 0.05; CNR: 6.3 ± 1.6 vs 0.5 ± 1.5; P < 0.01; contrast: 4.4 ± 1.4 vs 1.3 ± 0.5; P < 0.01), whereas the coefficient of variation of mDixon protocol was significantly lower than that of SPAIR protocol (34.7 ± 15.5 vs 43.7 ± 23.1, P < 0.01). In qualitative image analysis, the image scores for the homogeneity of fat suppression, image noise, and image sharpness were significantly higher with mDixon protocol than those with SPAIR protocol (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in image contrast between 2 fat suppression protocols (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

In dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate, mDixon technique improved the homogeneity of fat suppression without degrade of image quality compared with SPAIR technique.