Correlation between manual 0.2T MRI assessment of synovitis and EULAR-OMERACT scores of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Automated assessment of synovitis in 0.2T magnetic resonance images of the wrist

According to the current recommendations in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of wrist joints are used to evaluate three main types of lesions: synovitis, bone edema and bone erosions. In the clinical practice, the RA-related lesions seen in MR images are assessed manually with the semi-quantitative RAMRIS scoring system. In this paper we present an automated method for inflamed synovial membrane volume determination, based on the analysis of pre- and post-contrast MR images and segmentation of wrist bones seen in MR images. We found that the correlation between the automatically quantified volume of synovitis and RAMRIS scores was in the range from 0.76 to 0.87 for the total RAMRIS synovitis score. This can be compared with the correlation between the manually quantified volume of synovitis and RAMRIS scores which was in the range from 0.75 to 0.81 for the total synovitis score. The results of the study demonstrate that computer assisted methods for assessment of synovitis have great potential for clinical applications.

Polish Medical Society of Radiology and Polish Society of Rheumatology Recommendations for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Rheumatology

This document presents the recommendations of the Polish Medical Society of Radiology (PLTR) and the Polish Society of Polish Society of Rheumatology (PTR) regarding the standards of collaboration between radiologists and rheumatologists so as to optimize the diagnostics and treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases of the musculoskeletal system, including rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies.

Diagnostic capability of low- versus high-field magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar degenerative disease

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic capability of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with high-field MRI for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Low-field MRI has several advantages over high-field magnetic resonance systems (easier installation, lower purchase, and maintenance cost). The diagnostic capability of low-field MRI for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine has not been compared with that of high-field MRI.

METHODS

Hundred patients (mean age: 56.3 yr, range: 32-80; F:M = 59:41) with neurogenic claudication or sciatica were studied. All patients underwent MRI of the lumbar spine on both low-field (0.25T) and high-field (1.5T or 3.0T) magnetic resonance systems. Intervertebral disc herniation, central canal, lateral recess, and exit foraminal stenosis as well as nerve root compression at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 were evaluated by 2 radiologists for both low- and high-field systems using established reliable grading systems.

RESULTS

There was excellent agreement between low- and high- field MRI with regard to grading the presence and severity of disc herniation (r = 0.92-0.94; P < 0.05), central canal stenosis (r = 0.89-0.91; P < 0.05), lateral recess stenosis (r = 0.81-0.87; P < 0.05), and exit foramen stenosis (r = 0.81-0.89; P < 0.05). Descending or exiting nerve root compression occurred in 52% of patients at L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 levels, with good agreement between low-field and high-field MRI (r = 0.71-0.76; P < 0.05) for nerve root compression.

CONCLUSION

Excellent reliability between low- and high- field MRI was found for most features of lumbar disc degeneration, with good agreement for nerve root compression. 0.25T MRI was more susceptible to motion artifact, probably due to longer scanning time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.