Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant gallbladder lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of gallbladder lesions remains challenging. The efficacy of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with high b-values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of computed DWI with high b-values and the combination of computed DWI and ADC in differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions.

METHODS

Sixty patients (comprising 30 malignant and 30 benign lesions) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for gallbladder lesions were included in this retrospective study. Qualitative evaluations were performed using conventional DWI with b1000, computed DWI with b1500, b1000 DWI/ADC, and computed b1500 DWI/ADC, and their diagnostic performances were compared.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of computed b1500 DWI/ADC were 90% (27/30), 80% (24/30), and 85% (51/60), respectively. The accuracy of computed b1500 DWI/ADC was higher than that of conventional b1000 DWI (52%, 31/60, p < 0.001), computed b1500 DWI (72%, 43/60, p = 0.008), and b1000 DWI/ADC (78%, 47/60, p = 0.125). The specificity of computed b1500 DWI/ADC was also higher than that of conventional b1000 DWI (7%, 2/30, p < 0.001), computed b1500 DWI (47%, 14/30, p = 0.002), and b1000 DWI/ADC (67%, 20/30, p = 0.125). No significant difference was observed in the sensitivity between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that computed DWI with high b-values combined with ADC can improve diagnostic performance when differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions. Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions. *Computed DWI with b1500 combined with ADC can improve diagnostic performance when differentiating gallbladder lesions compared with conventional methods (b1000 DWI).

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of standard diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue tumors (STTs).

Materials and methods: A thorough search was carried out to identify suitable studies published up to September 2020. The quality of the studies involved was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated using bivariate mixed effects models. A subgroup analysis was also performed to explore the heterogeneity.

Results: Eighteen studies investigating 1319 patients with musculoskeletal STTs (malignant, n=623; benign, n=696) were enrolled. Thirteen standard DWI studies using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) showed that the pooled SEN and SPE of ADC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) calculated from the SROC curve was 0.806. The subgroup analysis indicated that the percentage of myxoid malignant tumors, magnet strength, study design, and ROI placement were significant factors affecting heterogeneity. Four IVIM studies showed that the AUCs calculated from the SROC curves of the parameters ADC and D were 0.859 and 0.874, respectively. The AUCs for the IVIM parameters pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) calculated from the SROC curve were 0.736 and 0.573, respectively. Two DKI studies showed that the AUCs of the DKI parameter mean kurtosis (MK) were 0.97 and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion: The DWI-derived ADC value and the IVIM DWI-derived D value might be accurate tools for discriminating musculoskeletal STTs, especially for non-myxoid SSTs, using more than two b values, with maximal b value ranging from 600 to 800 s/mm², additionally, a high-field strength (3.0 T) optimizes the diagnostic performance.

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the malignant potential in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas.

Methods

A systematic search of articles investigating the diagnostic performance of DWI for prediction of malignant potential in IPMNs was conducted from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1997 to 10 February 2020. QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the study quality. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was then plotted, and meta-regression was also performed to explore the heterogeneity.

Results

Five articles with 307 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DWI were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.82) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.99), in evaluating the malignant potential of IPMNs. The PLR was 13.5 (95% CI: 3.1, 58.7), the NLR was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.37), and DOR was 50.0 (95% CI: 11.0, 224.0). The area under the curve (AUC) of SROC curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.87). The meta-regression showed that the slice thickness of DWI (p = 0.02) and DWI parameter (p= 0.01) were significant factors affecting the heterogeneity.

Conclusions

DWI is an effective modality for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant IPMNs. The slice thickness of DWI and DWI parameter were the main factors influencing diagnostic specificity.

Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy

Background

The diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder lesions is sometimes difficult. The objective of this study is to assess whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can be an accurate method for detecting gallbladder malignancy and to determine which imaging signs can be indicative of malignancy.

Methods

A study search of PubMed, Elsevier, and Sciencedirect was performed in May 2019. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were used to examine the accuracy of CEUS and CH-EUS.

Results

Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of CEUS and CH-EUS were 0.81 (0.75–0.86) and 0.92 (0.86–0.95); the specificities were 0.94 (0.90–0.96) and 0.89 (0.69–0. 97); the DORs were 64 (32–127) and 89 (22–354); and the area under the SROC curves were 0.90 (0.87–0.92) and 0.92 (0.90–0.94). On CEUS, the diagnostic criterion for gallbladder malignancy according to four features were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.65–0.83) and 0.98 (0.85–1.00) for integrity of gallbladder wall; 0.69 (0.55–0.81) and 0.89 (0.77–0.95) for heterogeneous enhancement; 0.81 (0.71–0.88) and 0.88 (0.76–0.94) for irregular vessels; and 0.81 (0.66–0.91) and 0.75 (0.59–0.86) for washout time within 28 s. On CH-EUS, heterogeneous enhancement could be indicative of malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 0.94 (0.85–0.97); and the specificity was 0.92 (0.71–0.98).

Conclusions

CEUS and CH-EUS are promising and reliable imaging modalities with a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy. CH-EUS might be more sensitive than CEUS with a higher sensitivity. In addition, irregular tralesional vessels and washout time within 28 s on CEUS and heterogeneous enhancement on CH-EUS are indicative of malignancy. However, larger scale and well-designed studies are warranted to verify our results.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Oncology: An Update

To date, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is included in routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for several cancers. The real additive role of DWI lies in the "functional" information obtained by probing the free diffusivity of water molecules into intra and inter-cellular spaces that in tumors mainly depend on cellularity. Although DWI has not gained much space in some oncologic scenarios, this non-invasive tool is routinely used in clinical practice and still remains a hot research topic: it has been tested in almost all cancers to differentiate malignant from benign lesions, to distinguish different malignant histotypes or tumor grades, to predict and/or assess treatment responses, and to identify residual or recurrent tumors in follow-up examinations. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview on the application of DWI in oncology.