Intrapatient Comparison of the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in the Differentiation of Hepatocellular Adenoma From Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

ACG Clinical Guideline: Focal Liver Lesions

Focal liver lesions (FLLs) have become an increasingly common finding on abdominal imaging, especially asymptomatic and incidental liver lesions. Gastroenterologists and hepatologists often see these patients in consultation and make recommendations for management of multiple types of liver lesions, including hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, and hepatic cystic lesions including polycystic liver disease. Malignancy is important to consider in the differential diagnosis of FLLs, and healthcare providers must be familiar with the diagnosis and management of FLLs. This American College of Gastroenterology practice guideline uses the best evidence available to make diagnosis and management recommendations for the most common FLLs.

Beta-Catenin-Mutated Hepatocellular Adenomas at Hepatobiliary Phase MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Beta-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (β-HCAs) can appear iso- to hyperintense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given the relatively lower prevalence of β-HCAs, prior studies had limited power to show statistically significant differences in the HBP signal intensity between different subtypes.

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of HBP MRI to discriminate β-HCA from other subtypes.

STUDY TYPE

Systemic review and meta-analysis.

POPULATION

Ten original studies were included, yielding 266 patients with 397 HCAs (9%, 36/397 β-HCAs and 91%, 361/397 non-β-HCAs).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 T and 3.0 T, HBP.

ASSESSMENT

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2023, for all articles reporting HBP signal intensity in patients with histopathologically proven HCA subtypes. QUADAS-2 was used to assess risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Heterogeneity estimates were assessed with I2 heterogeneity index. Meta-regression (mixed-effect model) was used to test for differences in the prevalence of HBP signal between HCA groups. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

HBP iso- to hyperintensity was associated with β-HCAs (pooled prevalence was 72.3% in β-HCAs and 6.3% in non-β-HCAs). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 72.3% (95% confidence interval 54.1-85.3) and 93.7% (93.8-97.7), respectively. Specificity had substantial heterogeneity with I2 of 83% due to one study, but not for sensitivity (I2  = 0). After excluding this study, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% (59.6-88.8) and 94.1% (88.9-96.9), with no substantial heterogeneity. One study had high risk of bias for patient selection and two studies were rated unclear for two domains.

DATA CONCLUSION

Iso- to hyperintensity at HBP MRI may help to distinguish β-HCA subtype from other HCAs with high specificity. However, there was heterogeneity in the pooled estimates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Diagnostic value of color parametric imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the differential diagnostic value of computer-aided color parametric imaging (CPI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (wHCC).

METHOD

A total of 38 patients who underwent CEUS and were pathologically diagnosed with HCA (10 cases) and wHCC (28 cases) were reviewed retrospectively. The differences between the radiological features of HCA and wHCC were compared by two readers, blinded to the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

(a) Sonographic features: on gray-scale ultrasound, halo sign was more common in wHCC than in HCA (60.7% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.009). On CEUS, hyper- or isoenhancement was more common in HCA in the portal phase (90.0% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.022). On CPI mode, HCA was inclined toward centripetal enhancement (60.0% vs. 14.3% p = 0.010). HCA was characterized by the presence of pseudocapsule enhancement (50.0% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.036). Quantitative analysis showed that the arrival time of HCA was earlier than that of wHCC (12.4 ± 3.7 s vs. 15.9 ± 3.2 s; p = 0.006). (b) Interobserver agreement was improved by using CPI compared with CEUS. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination were 80.0%, 85.7%, and 84.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS combined with CPI can provide effective information for the differential diagnosis of HCA and wHCC, especially for the non-experienced radiologists.

Imaging Diagnosis of HCC: Future directions with special emphasis on hepatobiliary MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer entity that can be noninvasively diagnosed using imaging modalities without pathologic confirmation. In 2018, several major guidelines for HCC were updated to include hepatobiliary contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as major imaging modalities for HCC diagnosis. HBA-MRI enables the achievement of high sensitivity in HCC detection using the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). CEUS is another imaging modality with real-time imaging capability, and it is reported to be useful as a second-line modality to increase sensitivity without losing specificity for HCC diagnosis. However, until now, there is an unsolved discrepancy among guidelines on whether to accept “HBP hypointensity” as a definite diagnostic criterion for HCC or include CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC diagnosis. Furthermore, there is variability in terminology and inconsistencies in the definition of imaging findings among guidelines; therefore, there is an unmet need for the development of a standardized lexicon. In this article, we review the performance and limitations of HBA-MRI and CEUS after guideline updates in 2018 and briefly introduce some future aspects of imaging-based HCC diagnosis.

Transient Respiratory-motion Artifact and Scan Timing during the Arterial Phase of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging: The Benefit of Shortened Acquisition and Multiple Arterial Phase Acquisition

Purpose:

To investigate whether shortened acquisition or multiple arterial phase acquisition improves image quality of the arterial phase compared with conventional protocol.

Methods:

This retrospective study was approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board. A total of 615 consecutive patients who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI including one of the following three sequences in three different periods were included: (i) conventional liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA) (between October 2014 and January 2015, n = 149), (ii) Turbo-LAVA (between March and August 2016, n = 216), and (iii) differential sub-sampling with Cartesian ordering (DISCO) (between January and September 2015, n = 250). We monitored the respiratory bellows waveform during breath holding for each patient and recorded breath-hold fidelity of the patients. Two radiologists independently evaluated the degree of respiratory artifact and scan timing on the arterial phase and compared them between the three protocols (i.e., conventional LAVA, Turbo-LAVA, and DISCO), with conventional LAVA as control.

Results:

The ratio of patients with breath-hold failure was not significantly different among the three protocols (P = 0.6340 and 0.1085). Respiratory artifact was significantly lower in DISCO than in conventional LAVA (P = 0.0424), while there was no significant difference between Turbo-LAVA and conventional LAVA (P = 0.2593). The ratio of adequate scan timing and diagnosable image defined as no or mild artifact and adequate scan timing were higher in DISCO than in conventional LAVA (P = 0.0025 and 0.0019), while there was no significant difference between Turbo-LAVA and conventional LAVA (P = 0.0780 and 0.0657).

Conclusion:

Compared with conventional protocol, multiple arterial phase acquisition (DISCO) obtained a higher number of diagnosable images by reducing respiratory motion artifact and optimizing the scan timing of arterial phase.

Diagnostic value of morphological enhancement patterns in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to distinguish focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe the different morphological enhancement patterns of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI) and to determine their added value in their differential diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of imaging findings in 185 benign hepatocellular lesions (154 FNH; 31 HCA) in 108 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was performed by two independent reviewers. Six patterns on HBP were recorded: 1) homogeneous enhancement; 2) peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense central core; 3) peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core; 4) central core enhancement with hypointense periphery; 5) heterogeneous enhancement; and 6) the absence of enhancement.

RESULTS

Peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense central core and peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core showed the highest specificity for the diagnosis of FNH (100% and 96.8%, respectively). The absence of enhancement and central core enhancement with hypointense periphery were only present in 0.6% and 1.9% of FHN, respectively. All other patterns were observed with similar frequencies in FNH (22.1% to 26.6%). Six HCA showed contrast uptake on the HBP: homogeneous (6.5%), peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core (3.2%) and heterogeneous (9.7%).

CONCLUSION

Both FNH and HCA may demonstrate enhancement in the HBP of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, limiting its specificity. A significant improvement in specificity can be achieved by the evaluation of morphological enhancement patterns: Peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense or hyperintense central core was highly specific for FNH diagnosis. On the other hand, the absence of HBP enhancement makes the diagnosis of FNH unlikely.

Value of discrepancy of the central scar-like structure between dynamic CT and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI in differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma

PURPOSE

To identify the value of discrepancies in the central scar (CS)-like structure between dynamic CT and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for differentiating FNH from HCA.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 113 patients with pathologically-diagnosed FNH (n = 80) or HCA (n = 37). CS-like structures were evaluated on arterial phase (AP) CT and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MRI. Presence of the CS-like structure, its discrepancy in visibility or size between AP CT and HBP MRI and between AP and HBP MRI, and features of non-scarred tumor portion were evaluated by two radiologists. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted kappa. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression and ROC analysis were performed to explore features differentiating FNH from HCA.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement was moderate-to-excellent (ICCs≥0.74, kappa≥0.65). On univariable analysis, presence of CS-like structures (P < 0.001), discrepancy of the CS-like structures between AP CT and HBP MRI (73.8 % in FNH; 16.2 % in HCA, P < 0.001) and between AP and HBP MRI (70.0 % in FNH; 16.2 % in HCA, P < 0.001), and the features of non-scarred tumor portion (P ≤ 0.011) were significantly different between FNH and HCA. On multivariable analysis, the discrepancy of CS-like structures between AP CT and HBP MRI, and the absence of low SI of the non-scarred tumor portion on HBP MRI, were suggestive of FNH (P = 0.036 and P < 0.001, respectively; area under the ROC curve, 0.96 [95 % CI, 0.93-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of discrepancy in the visibility or size of CS-like structures between dynamic CT and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI may facilitate the differentiation of FNH from HCA.

Hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase can be used as a biomarker of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images to detect marked activation of the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs).

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective IRB-approved study included all patients with a pathologically proven HCA who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI with HBP. Tumor signal intensity on HBP was first assessed visually, and lesions were classified into three distinct groups-hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense-according to the relative signal intensity to liver. Uptake was then quantified using the lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER). Finally, the accuracy of HBP analysis in depicting marked β-catenin activation in HCA was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 124 HCAs were analyzed including 12 with marked β-catenin activation (HCA B+). Visual analysis classified 94/124 (76%), 12/124 (10%), and 18/124 (14%) HCAs as being hypointense, isointense, and hyperintense on HBP, respectively. Of these, 1/94 (1%), 3/12 (25%), and 8/18 (44%) were HCA B+, respectively (p < 0.001). The LLCER of HCA B+ was higher than that of HCA without marked β-catenin activation in the entire cohort (means 4.9 ± 11.8% vs. - 19.8 ± 11.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). A positive LLCER, i.e., LLCER ≥ 0%, had 75% (95% CI 43-95%) sensitivity and 97% (95% CI 92-99%) specificity, with a LR+ of 28 (95% CI 8.8-89.6) for the diagnosis of HCA B+.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatospecific contrast uptake on hepatobiliary phase is strongly associated with marked activation of the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular adenoma, and its use might improve hepatocellular adenoma subtyping on MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Tumor uptake on hepatobiliary phase in both the visual and quantitative analyses had a specificity higher than 90% for the detection of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma. • However, the sensitivity of visual analysis alone is inferior to that of LLCER quantification on HBP due to the high number of HCAs with signal hyperintensity on HBP, especially those developed on underlying liver steatosis.

New insights in the management of Hepatocellular Adenoma

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are benign liver tumours that may be complicated by haemorrhage or malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma. Epidemiological data are fairly outdated, but it is likely to assume that the incidence has increased over the past decades as HCA are more often incidentally found due to the more widespread use of imaging techniques and the increased incidence of obesity. Various molecular subgroups have been described. Each of these molecular subgroups are defined by specific gene mutations and pathway activations. Additionally, they are all related to specific risk factors and show a various biological behaviour. These molecular subgroups may be identified using immunohistochemistry and molecular characterization. Contrast-enhanced MRI is the recommended imaging modality to analyse patients with suspected hepatocellular adenoma allowing to determine the subtype in up to 80%. Surgical resection remains to be the golden standard in treating HCA, although resection is deemed unnecessary in a large number of cases, as studies have shown that the majority of HCA will regress over time without complications such as haemorrhage or malignant transformation occurring. It is preferable to treat patients with suspected HCA in high volume centres with combined expertise of liver surgeons, hepatologists, radiologists and (molecular) pathologists.

Response to Letter: Intrapatient Comparison of the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in the Differentiation of HCA From FNH

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1281-1282.

Reply to "Intrapatient Comparison of the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in the Differentiation of Hepatocellular Adenoma From Focal Nodular Hyperplasia"

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

None. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1279-1280.

Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography Versus MRI With a Liver-Specific Contrast Agent for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Adenoma and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) with sulfur hexafluoride with MRI with the liver-specific contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine in the diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in a cohort of consecutive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients referred to a tertiary center for hepatobiliary disease who had suspected HCA or FNH on MRI performed with an extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agent underwent a prospective workup including CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent. Diagnosis was definite when the findings of CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent were concordant; histopathologic examination (HPE) was performed for cases with discordant findings. Descriptive statistics and the association between categoric variables were presented as numbers and percentages and were assessed using the Fisher exact test. The primary analysis was patient based. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC and predictive values for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH were calculated separately for CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent. RESULTS. A total of 181 patients were selected for the first analysis. Findings from CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent were concordant for 132 patients (73%) and discordant for 49 (27%). HPE was performed for 26 of the 49 patients with discordant findings (53%), with findings indeterminate for two of these patients, the findings of MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent correct for 21 of the remaining 24 patients (87.5%), and the findings of CEUS correct for three of these 24 patients (12.5%) (p < 0.05). For further analysis, 156 patients with concordant findings or HPE-proven cases were included. For CEUS, the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH were 85% and 87%, respectively; the ROC AUC value was 0.856; and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 79% and 90%, respectively. For MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent, the sensitivity and specificity were 95% each, the ROC AUC value was 0.949, and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 92% and 97%, respectively, for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH. CONCLUSION. The findings of CEUS and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent showed fair agreement for the diagnosis of HCA and FNH. MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent is diagnostically correct significantly more often than CEUS in cases with discordant findings that are HPE proven.

Enhancement pattern of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on MR imaging performed with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus other Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs): An intraindividual comparison

PURPOSE

To conduct an intraindividual comparison of the enhancement pattern of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on dynamic MRI study obtained following the injection of Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and other gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).

METHOD

This is a retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study conducted in a single institution. A search of medical records between 2008 and 2017 revealed 17 patients (all females) with at least one pathologically-proven HCA who underwent liver MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA and another GBCA within 1 year. Enhancement of each lesion on hepatic arterial (HAP), portal venous (PVP), 2 min and 4-5 minutes phases was subjectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists. Lesions were categorized as hyper-, iso- or hypointense compared to the surrounding liver parenchyma. The presence of a peripheral pseudocapsule was also recorded. The differences in lesion enhancement were assessed using the McNemar Test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final population included 35 HCAs (83% inflammatory subtype). There was no significant difference in lesion size (P = 0.708) and enhancement on HAP (P = 0.625) or PVP (P = 0.125). HCAs showed more frequently hypointensity on 2 min (13/35 vs. 1/35, P < 0.001) and 4-5 minutes (P < 0.001) images obtained after injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA compared to those obtained after other GBCAs. A pseudocapsule was more frequently noted after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA (13/35 vs 1/35, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement pattern of HCA differs significantly after the injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA compared to other GBCAs. Lesion hypointensity on 2 min and 4-5 minutes images is more frequent when using Gd-EOB-DTPA.