Visualizing wall enhancement over time in unruptured intracranial aneurysms using 3D vessel wall imaging

MR Imaging for Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging: Pearls and Pitfalls

Conventional vascular imaging methods have primarily focused on evaluating the vascular lumen. However, these techniques are not intended to evaluate vessel wall abnormalities where many cerebrovascular pathologies reside. With increased interest for the visualization and study of the vessel wall, high-resolution vessel wall imaging (VWI) has gained traction.Over the past two decades, there has been a rapid increase in number of VWI publications with improvements in imaging techniques and expansion on clinical applications. With increasing utility and interest in VWI, application of proper protocols and understanding imaging characteristics of vasculopathies are important for the interpreting radiologists to understand.

Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology

Vessel wall MR imaging (VW-MRI) has been introduced into clinical practice and applied to a variety of diseases, and its usefulness has been reported. High-resolution VW-MRI is essential in the diagnostic workup and provides more information than other routine MR imaging protocols. VW-MRI is useful in assessing lesion location, morphology, and severity. Additional information, such as vessel wall enhancement, which is useful in the differential diagnosis of atherosclerotic disease and vasculitis could be assessed by this special imaging technique. This review describes the VW-MRI technique and its clinical applications in arterial disease, venous disease, vasculitis, and leptomeningeal disease.

High-Resolution Vessel Wall MRI of Endovascularly Treated Intracranial Aneurysms

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and the pattern of post-procedural intracranial aneurysm contrast enhancement on high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (HR-VW MRI). We investigated the possible association between this imaging finding and factors such as time elapsed since embolization or aneurysm occlusion grade on baseline and follow-up imaging. (2) Methods: Consecutive patients presenting for follow-up after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms were included. HR-VW MRI was acquired and interpreted independently by two radiologists. (3) Results: This study included 40 aneurysms in 39 patients. Contrast enhancement was detected in 30 (75%) aneurysms. It was peripheral in 12 (30.0%), central in 9 (22.5%), and both peripheral and central in 9 (22.5%) aneurysms. The statistical analysis did not reveal any relationship between follow-up period and the presence of contrast enhancement (p = 0.277). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of contrast enhancement between aneurysms with total occlusion and those with remnant flow on follow-up MR angiography (p = 0.850) nor between aneurysms with different interval changes in the aneurysm occlusion grade (p = 0.536). Multivariate analysis did not demonstrate aneurysm size, ruptured aneurysm status, nor initial complete aneurysm occlusion to be a predictor of contrast enhancement (p = 0.080). (4) Conclusions: Post-procedural aneurysm contrast enhancement is a common imaging finding on HR-VW MRI. The clinical utility of this imaging finding, especially in the prediction of aneurysm recurrence, seems limited. The results of our study do not support routine use of HR-VW MRI in the follow-up of patients after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Comparison of 7 T and 3 T vessel wall MRI for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm wall

OBJECTIVES

To compare the visibility of intracranial aneurysm wall and thickness quantification between 7 and 3 T vessel wall imaging and evaluate the association between aneurysm size and wall thickness.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with 29 unruptured intracranial aneurysms were prospectively recruited for 3D T1-weighted vessel wall MRI at both 3 T and 7 T with 0.53 mm (3 T) and 0.4 mm (7 T) isotropic resolution, respectively. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated wall visibility (0-5 Likert scale), quantified the apparent wall thickness (AWT) using a semi-automated full-width-half-maximum method, calculated wall sharpness, and measured the wall-to-lumen contrast ratio (CR_wall/lumen).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with 24 aneurysms were included in this study. 7 T achieved significantly better aneurysm wall visibility than 3 T (3.6 ± 1.1 vs 2.7 ± 0.8, p = 0.003). AWT measured on 3 T and 7 T had a good correlation (averaged r = 0.63 ± 0.19). However, AWT on 3 T was 15% thicker than that on 7 T (0.52 ± 0.07 mm vs 0.45 ± 0.05 mm, p < 0.001). Wall sharpness on 7 T was 57% higher than that on 3 T (1.95 ± 0.32 mm^-1 vs 1.24 ± 0.15 mm^-1, p < 0.001). CR_wall/lumen on 3 T and 7 T was comparable (p = 0.424). AWT on 7 T was positively correlated with aneurysm size (saccular: r = 0.58, q = 0.046; fusiform: r = 0.67, q = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

7 T provides better visualization of intracranial aneurysm wall with higher sharpness than 3 T. 3 T overestimates the wall thickness relative to 7 T. Aneurysm wall thickness is positively correlated with aneurysm size. 7 T MRI is a promising tool to evaluate aneurysm wall in vivo.

KEY POINTS

• 7 T provides better visualization of intracranial aneurysm wall with higher sharpness than 3 T. • 3 T overestimates the wall thickness comparing with 7 T. • Aneurysm wall thickness is positively correlated with aneurysm size.

Presence of Vessel Wall Hyperintensity in Unruptured Arteriovenous Malformations on Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Pilot Study of AVM Vessel Wall "Enhancement"

Purpose: High-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) could provide a way to identify high risk arteriovenous malformation (AVM) features. We present the first pilot study of clinically unruptured AVMs evaluated by high-resolution VW-MRI.

Methods: A retrospective review of clinically unruptured AVMs with VW-MRI between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018 was performed documenting the presence or absence of vessel wall “hyperintensity,” or enhancement, within the nidus as well as perivascular enhancement and evidence of old hemorrhage (EOOH). The extent of nidal vessel wall “hyperintensity” was approximated into five groups: 0, 1–25, 26–50, 51–75, and 76–100%.

Results: Of the nine cases, eight demonstrated at least some degree of vessel wall nidus “hyperintensity.” Of those eight cases, four demonstrated greater than 50% of the nidus with hyperintensity at the vessel wall, and three cases had perivascular enhancement adjacent to nidal vessels. Although none of the subjects had prior clinical hemorrhage/AVM rupture, of the six patients with available susceptibility weighted imaging to assess for remote hemorrhage, only two had subtle siderosis to suggest prior sub-clinical bleeds.

Conclusion: Vessel wall “enhancement” occurs in AVMs with no prior clinical rupture. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the implication of these findings.

High-Resolution Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Background: We decided to investigate whether aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) on high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (HR VW-MRI) coexists with the conventional risk factors for aneurysm rupture. Methods: We performed HR VW-MRI in 46 patients with 64 unruptured small intracranial aneurysms. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded. The PHASES score was calculated for each aneurysm. Results: Of the 64 aneurysms, 15 (23.4%) showed wall enhancement on post-contrast HR VW-MRI. Aneurysms with wall enhancement had significantly larger size (p = 0.001), higher dome-to-neck ratio (p = 0.024), and a more irregular shape (p = 0.003) than aneurysms without wall enhancement. The proportion of aneurysms with wall enhancement was significantly higher in older patients (p = 0.011), and those with a history of prior aneurysmal SAH. The mean PHASES score was significantly higher in aneurysms with wall enhancement (p < 0.000). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that aneurysm irregularity and the PHASES score are independently associated with the presence of AWE. Conclusions: Aneurysm wall enhancement on HR VW-MRI coexists with the conventional risk factors for aneurysm rupture.

Lack of Baseline Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Enhancement Predicts Future Stability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies

BACKGROUND

The utility of vessel wall MR imaging in identifying unstable intracranial aneurysms has been suggested but remains controversial.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to provide further insight into the potential relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement on initial vessel wall imaging and aneurysm instability at follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

Our sources were PubMed, Scopus, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY SELECTION

We searched for English language studies that reported the presence of vessel wall enhancement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on baseline vessel wall imaging studies with longitudinal follow-up of aneurysm status.

DATA ANALYSIS

Aneurysms were grouped into "stable" and "unstable" groups at follow-up on the basis of growth, symptomatic manifestation, or rupture. The association of each group with aneurysm wall enhancement on initial vessel wall imaging was determined.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Three studies constituting 407 aneurysms were included. Aneurysms with wall enhancement were at higher risk of being unstable at follow-up (risk ratio = 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.5). The sensitivity of aneurysm wall enhancement on vessel wall imaging was 74.3% (95% CI, 56.7%-87.5%), specificity was 58.3% (95% CI, 53.1%-63.4%), positive predictive value was 14.4% (95% CI, 11.8%-17.4%), negative predictive value was 96.0% (95% CI, 93.2%-97.7%), and the overall accuracy of the test was 59.7% (95% CI, 54.8%-64.5%).

LIMITATIONS

Only 3 studies were identified for inclusion in this analysis. More longitudinal studies of vessel wall imaging and aneurysm progression are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of wall enhancement may be a predictor of aneurysm stability. The utility of vessel wall imaging in detecting unstable aneurysms requires more data.

Wall enhancement on black-blood MRI is independently associated with symptomatic status of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate whether aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) is independently associated with symptomatic status of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).

METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients (67 male, mean age 58 ± 11 years) with 79 symptomatic and 87 asymptomatic UIAs were imaged using black-blood MRI pre- and post-gadolinium contrast administration and 3D DSA. Symptoms related to aneurysms were identified including cranial nerve deficits and headache. AWE grade and area were characterized, and aneurysm size was measured on DSA. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with symptoms. Further subgroup analysis was performed for aneurysms size < 10 mm.

RESULTS

Symptomatic UIAs had significantly larger aneurysm size (11.2 ± 6.2 mm vs. 6.4 ± 3.3 mm), enhancement grade (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 0.4 ± 0.6), enhancement area (2.0 ± 0.9 vs. 0.4 ± 0.7), and higher prevalence of thick enhancement (39% vs. 3%) compared with asymptomatic UIAs, all p < 0.001. In multivariate analysis, only AWE area (odds ratio [OR] 6.9, 95% confidence interval [4.0, 11.7]) was independently associated with symptoms. AWE area had an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.888, with 72.2% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity for symptoms, which was superior to aneurysm size (AUC of 0.771, with 75.9% sensitivity and 65.5% specificity). In the subgroup analysis of aneurysms smaller than 10 mm (n = 118), AWE area (OR, 7.0, p < 0.001) remained the only independent risk factor associated with symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger AWE area is independently associated with symptomatic UIAs, which may provide additional value to guide UIA management and improve patient outcomes.

KEY POINTS

• Symptomatic intracranial aneurysms are larger and more often demonstrate significant wall enhancement than asymptomatic aneurysms. • Larger wall enhancement area is independently associated with symptomatic intracranial aneurysm.

Statin treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms study: a study protocol for a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background and purpose

A large proportion of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm (IA) are not suitable for surgical clipping and endovascular treatment. For these patients, anti-inflammatory medications are worth exploring due to inflammation of aneurysmal wall being a major factor in higher risk of rupture. Statin has been proven to reduce inflammation of atherosclerosis and maybe a suitable candidate. This study aimed to evaluate whether atorvastatin will reduce inflammatory of the aneurysm wall measured by the signal index of aneurysm wall enhancement.

Methods and analysis

The Statin Treatment for UnruptureD Intracranial anEurysms Study is a single-centre, phase 2, randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. 60 patients with unruptured IAs with aneurysm wall enhancement will be enrolled in Beijing Tiantan Hospital. The patients will be randomised to receive atorvastatin 20 mg or placebo orally per day for 12 months. The primary outcome will be the change in aneurysm wall enhancement measured by the signal index during the 12 months treatment with atorvastatin. The secondary study outcomes will be the change in aneurysm wall enhancement measured by the signal index at 3 months, the changes in aneurysmal morphology and inflammation-related factors (C reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β and interleukin-6) at 3 and 12 months. This study is the first to explore the role of atorvastatin in reducing inflammation in unruptured IA, which could lay the groundwork for future phase III trial.

Ethics and dissemination

Beijing Tiantan Hospital’s Ethics committee approved the research and written informed consents would be obtained from all participant or representative included in this study.

Trial registration number

NCT04149483

Hemodynamics of Cerebral Aneurysms: Connecting Medical Imaging and Biomechanical Analysis

In the last two decades, numerous studies have conducted patient-specific computations of blood flow dynamics in cerebral aneurysms and reported correlations between various hemodynamic metrics and aneurysmal disease progression or treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, intra-aneurysmal flow analysis has not been adopted in current clinical practice, and hemodynamic factors usually are not considered in clinical decision making. This review presents the state of the art in cerebral aneurysm imaging and image-based modeling, discussing the advantages and limitations of each approach and focusing on the translational value of hemodynamic analysis. Combining imaging and modeling data obtained from different flow modalities can improve the accuracy and fidelity of resulting velocity fields and flow-derived factors that are thought to affect aneurysmal disease progression. It is expected that predictive models utilizing hemodynamic factors in combination with patient medical history and morphological data will outperform current risk scores and treatment guidelines. Possible future directions include novel approaches enabling data assimilation and multimodality analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics.