Clinical Potential of UTE-MRI for Assessing COVID-19: Patient- and Lesion-Based Comparative Analysis

Alveolar membrane and capillary function in COVID-19 convalescents: insights from chest MRI

OBJECTIVES

To investigate potential presence and resolution of longer-term pulmonary diffusion limitation and microvascular perfusion impairment in COVID-19 convalescents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, longitudinal study was carried out between May 2020 and April 2023. COVID-19 convalescents repeatedly and age/sex-matched healthy controls once underwent MRI including hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI. Blood samples were obtained in COVID-19 convalescents for immunophenotyping. Ratios of 129Xe in red blood cells (RBC), tissue/plasma (TP), and gas phase (GP) as well as lung surface-volume ratio were quantified and correlations with CD4+/CD8+ T cell frequencies were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Signed-rank tests were used for longitudinal and U tests for group comparisons.

RESULTS

Thirty-five participants were recruited. Twenty-three COVID-19 convalescents (age 52.1 ± 19.4 years, 13 men) underwent baseline MRI 12.6 ± 4.2 weeks after symptom onset. Fourteen COVID-19 convalescents underwent follow-up MRI and 12 were included for longitudinal comparison (baseline MRI at 11.5 ± 2.7 weeks and follow-up 38.0 ± 5.5 weeks). Twelve matched controls were included for comparison. In COVID-19 convalescents, RBC-TP was increased at follow-up (p = 0.04). Baseline RBC-TP was lower in patients treated on intensive care unit (p = 0.03) and in patients with severe/critical disease (p = 0.006). RBC-TP correlated with CD4+/CD8+ T cell frequencies (R = 0.61/ - 0.60) at baseline. RBC-TP was not significantly different compared to matched controls at follow-up (p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Impaired microvascular pulmonary perfusion and alveolar membrane function persisted 12 weeks after symptom onset and resolved within 38 weeks after COVID-19 symptom onset.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

129Xe MRI shows improvement of microvascular pulmonary perfusion and alveolar membrane function between 11.5 ± 2.7 weeks and 38.0 ± 5.5 weeks after symptom onset in patients after COVID-19, returning to normal in subjects without significant prior disease.

KEY POINTS

• The study aims to investigate long-term effects of COVID-19 on lung function, in particular gas uptake efficiency, and on the cardiovascular system. • In COVID-19 convalescents, the ratio of 129Xe in red blood cells/tissue plasma increased longitudinally (p = 0.04), but was not different from matched controls at follow-up (p = 0.25). • Microvascular pulmonary perfusion and alveolar membrane function are impaired 11.5 weeks after symptom onset in patients after COVID-19, returning to normal in subjects without significant prior disease at 38.0 weeks.

Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19: Evidence-Based Approaches

Imaging has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in both the diagnosis and management of COVID-19. Depending on resources, pre-test probability, and risk factors for severe disease progression, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing may be followed by chest radiography (CXR) or chest computed tomography (CT) to further aid in diagnosis or excluding COVID-19 disease. SARS-CoV-2 has been shown not only to pathologically impact the pulmonary system, but also the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurological systems to name a few. Imaging has again proven useful in further investigating and managing extrapulmonary disease, with the use of echocardiogram, CT angiography of the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular structures, MRI of the brain, as well as ultrasound of the abdomen and CT of the abdomen and pelvis proving particularly useful. Research in artificial intelligence and its application in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and disease severity prediction is underway, and point-of-care ultrasound is an emerging bedside technique that may allow for more efficient and timely diagnosis of COVID-19.

Longitudinal Lung Function Assessment of Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Using 1H and 129Xe Lung MRI

BACKGROUND

Microvascular abnormalities and impaired gas transfer have been observed in patients with COVID-19. The progression of pulmonary changes in these patients remains unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do patients hospitalized with COVID-19 without evidence of architectural distortion on structural imaging exhibit longitudinal improvements in lung function measured by using 1H and 129Xe MRI between 6 and 52 weeks following hospitalization?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia underwent a pulmonary 1H and 129Xe MRI protocol at 6, 12, 25, and 51 weeks following hospital admission in a prospective cohort study between November 2020 and February 2022. The imaging protocol was as follows: 1H ultra-short echo time, contrast-enhanced lung perfusion, 129Xe ventilation, 129Xe diffusion-weighted, and 129Xe spectroscopic imaging of gas exchange.

RESULTS

Nine patients were recruited (age 57 ± 14 [median ± interquartile range] years; six of nine patients were male). Patients underwent MRI at 6 (n = 9), 12 (n = 9), 25 (n = 6), and 51 (n = 8) weeks following hospital admission. Patients with signs of interstitial lung damage were excluded. At 6 weeks, patients exhibited impaired 129Xe gas transfer (RBC to membrane fraction), but lung microstructure was not increased (apparent diffusion coefficient and mean acinar airway dimensions). Minor ventilation abnormalities present in four patients were largely resolved in the 6- to 25-week period. At 12 weeks, all patients with lung perfusion data (n = 6) showed an increase in both pulmonary blood volume and flow compared with 6 weeks, although this was not statistically significant. At 12 weeks, significant improvements in 129Xe gas transfer were observed compared with 6-week examinations; however, 129Xe gas transfer remained abnormally low at weeks 12, 25, and 51.

INTERPRETATION

129Xe gas transfer was impaired up to 1 year following hospitalization in patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia, without evidence of architectural distortion on structural imaging, whereas lung ventilation was normal at 52 weeks.

Which sequence should be used in the thorax magnetic resonance imaging of COVID-19: a comparative study

Background and aim

To evaluate and compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences that could potentially be used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Materials and methods

Included in the study were 42 patient who underwent thorax computed tomography (CT) for COVID-19 pneumonia and thorax MRI for any reason within 24 h after CT. The T2-weighted fast spin echo periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) (T2W-FSE-P), fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition, T2 fat-saturated FSE, axial T1 liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA) and single-shot FSE images were compared in terms of their ability to show COVID-19 findings.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 47.2 ± 24 years. Of the patients, 22 were male (52.4%) and 20 (47.6%) were female. The interobserver intraclass coefficient (ICC) for the image quality score was the highest in the T2W-FSE-P sequence and lowest in the T1 LAVA sequence. All of the lesion-based evaluations of the interobserver agreement were statistically significant, with the kappa value varying between 0.798 and 0.998.

Conclusion

All 5 sequences evaluated in the study were successful in showing the parenchymal findings of COVID-19. Since the T2W-FSE-P sequence had the best scores in both interobserver agreement and ICC for the image quality score, it was considered that it can be included in thorax MRI examinations to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19.

4D lung MRI with high-isotropic-resolution using half-spoke (UTE) and full-spoke 3D radial acquisition and temporal compressed sensing reconstruction

Objective. To develop a respiratory motion-resolved four-dimensional (4D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with high-isotropic-resolution (1.1 mm) using 3D radial sampling, camera-based respiratory motion sensing, and temporal compressed sensing reconstruction for lung cancer imaging.Approach. Free-breathing half- and full-spoke 3D golden-angle radial acquisitions were performed on eight healthy volunteers and eight patients with lung tumors of varying size. A back-and-forth k-space ordering between consecutive interleaves of the 3D radial acquisition was performed to minimize eddy current-related artifacts. Data were sorted into respiratory motion states using camera-based motion navigation and 4D images were reconstructed using temporal compressed sensing to reduce scan time. Normalized sharpness indices of the diaphragm, apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lung tumor (patients only), liver, and aortic arch were compared between half- and full-spoke 4D MRI images to evaluate the impact of respiratory motion and image contrast on 4D MRI image quality. Respiration-induced changes in lung volumes and center of mass shifts were compared between half- and full-spoke 4D MRI measurements. In addition, the motion measurements from 4D MRI and the same-day 4D CT were presented in one of the lung tumor patients.Main results. Half-spoke 4D MRI provides better visualization of the lung parenchyma, while full-spoke 4D MRI presents sharper diaphragm images and higher aSNR and CNR in the lung tumor, liver, and aortic arch. Lung volume changes and center of mass shifts measured by half- and full-spoke 4D MRI were not statistically different. For the patient with 4D MRI and same-day 4D CT, lung volume changes and center of mass shifts were generally comparable.Significance. This work demonstrates the feasibility of a motion-resolved 4D MRI technique with high-isotropic-resolution using 3D radial acquisition, camera-based respiratory motion sensing, and temporal compressed sensing reconstruction for treatment planning and motion monitoring in radiotherapy of lung cancer.

Making the invisible visible-ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging: Technical developments and applications

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses a large magnetic field and radio waves to generate images of tissues in the body. Conventional MRI techniques have been developed to image and quantify tissues and fluids with long transverse relaxation times (T2s), such as muscle, cartilage, liver, white matter, gray matter, spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid. However, the body also contains many tissues and tissue components such as the osteochondral junction, menisci, ligaments, tendons, bone, lung parenchyma, and myelin, which have short or ultrashort T2s. After radio frequency excitation, their transverse magnetizations typically decay to zero or near zero before the receiving mode is enabled for spatial encoding with conventional MR imaging. As a result, these tissues appear dark, and their MR properties are inaccessible. However, when ultrashort echo times (UTEs) are used, signals can be detected from these tissues before they decay to zero. This review summarizes recent technical developments in UTE MRI of tissues with short and ultrashort T2 relaxation times. A series of UTE MRI techniques for high-resolution morphological and quantitative imaging of these short-T2 tissues are discussed. Applications of UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal, nervous, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular systems of the body are included.

COVID-19 pneumonia: lessons learned, challenges, and preparing for the future

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral disease that causes life-threatening health problems during acute illness, causing a pandemic and millions of deaths. Although computed tomography (CT) was used as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19 in the early period of the pan demic due to the inaccessibility or long duration of the polymerase chain reaction tests, cur rent studies have revealed that CT scan should not be used to diagnose COVID-19. However, radiologic findings are vital in assessing pneumonia severity and investigating complications in patients with COVID-19. Long-term symptoms, also known as long COVID, in people recovering from COVID-19 affect patients' quality of life and cause global health problems. Herein, we aimed to summarize the lessons learned in COVID-19 pneumonia, the challenges in diagnosing the disease and complications, and the prospects for future studies.

Low-field 0.55 T MRI for assessment of pulmonary groundglass and fibrosis-like opacities: Inter-reader and inter-modality concordance

PURPOSE

To evaluate detection and characterization of groundglass and fibrosis-like opacities imaged by non-contrast 0.55 Tesla MRI, and versus clinically-acquired chest CT images, in a cohort of post-Covid patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

64 individuals (26 women, mean age 53 ± 14 years, range 19-85) with history of Covid-19 pneumonia were recruited through a survivorship registry, with 106 non-contrast low-field 0.55 T cardiopulmonary MRI exams acquired from 9/8/2020-9/28/2021. MRI exams were obtained at an average interval of 9.5 ± 4.5 months from initial symptom report (range 1-18 months). Of these, 20 participants with 22 MRI exams had corresponding clinically-acquired CT chest imaging obtained within 30 days of MRI (average interval 18 ± 9 days, range 0-30). MR and CT images were reviewed and scored by two thoracic radiologists, for presence and extent of lung opacity by quadrant, opacity distribution, and presence versus absence of fibrosis-like subpleural reticulation and subpleural lines. Scoring was performed for each of four lung quadrants: right upper and middle lobe, right lower lobe, left upper lobe and lingula, and left lower lobe. Agreement between readers and modalities was assessed with simple and linear weighted Cohen's kappa (k) coefficients.

RESULTS

Inter-reader concordance on CT for opacity presence, opacity extent, opacity distribution, and presence of subpleural lines and reticulation was 99%, 78%, 97%, 99%, and 94% (k 0.96, 0.86, 0.94, 0.97, 0.89), respectively. Inter-reader concordance on MR, among all 106 exams, for opacity presence, opacity extent, opacity distribution, and presence of subpleural lines and reticulation was 85%, 48%, 70%, 86%, and 76% (k 0.57, 0.32, 0.46, 0.47, 0.37), respectively. Inter-modality agreement between CT and MRI for opacity presence, opacity extent, opacity distribution, and presence subpleural lines and reticulation was 86%, 52%, 79%, 93%, and 76% (k 0.43, 0.63, 0.65, 0.80, 0.52).

CONCLUSION

Low-field 0.55 T non-contrast MRI demonstrates fair to moderate inter-reader concordance, and moderate to substantial inter-modality agreement with CT, for detection and characterization of groundglass and fibrosis-like opacities.

Post-acute COVID syndrome (long COVID): What should radiographers know and the potential impact for imaging services

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic caused an unprecedented health crisis resulting in over 6 million deaths worldwide, a figure, which continues to grow. In addition to the excess mortality, there are individuals who recovered from the acute stages, but suffered long-term changes in their health post COVID-19, commonly referred to as long COVID. It is estimated there are currently 1.8 million long COVID sufferers by May 2022 in the UK alone. The aim of this narrative literature review is to explore the signs, symptoms and diagnosis of long COVID and the potential impact on imaging services.

KEY FINDINGS

Long COVID is estimated to occur in 9.5% of those with two doses of vaccination and 14.6% if those with a single dose or no vaccination. Long COVID is defined by ongoing symptoms lasting for 12 or more weeks post acute infection. Symptoms are associated with reductions in the quality of daily life and may involve multisystem manifestations or present as a single symptom.

CONCLUSION

The full impact of long COVID on imaging services is yet to be realised, but there is likely to be significant increased demand for imaging, particularly in CT for the assessment of lung disease. Educators will need to include aspects related to long COVID pathophysiology and imaging presentations in curricula, underpinned by the rapidly evolving evidence base.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Symptoms relating to long COVID are likely to become a common reason for imaging, with a particular burden on Computed Tomography services. Planning, education and updating protocols in line with a rapidly emerging evidence base is going to be essential.

Nichtinvasive funktionelle Lungenbildgebung mit hyperpolarisiertem Xenon

Hintergrund

Die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) ist ein nichtinvasives Verfahren mit hervorragendem Weichteilkontrast. Aufgrund der geringen Protonendichte und vielen Luft-Gewebe-Übergängen ist die Anwendung in der Lunge jedoch eingeschränkt, so dass hier häufig röntgenbasierte Methoden eingesetzt werden (mit den bekannten Nachteilen ionisierender Strahlung).

Fragestellung

In dieser Übersichtsarbeit wird die Lungen-MRT mit hyperpolarisiertem Xenon-129 (Xe-MRT) dargestellt. Die Xe-MRT erlaubt einzigartige wertvolle Einblicke in die Mikrostruktur und Funktion der Lunge, einschließlich des Gasaustauschs mit roten Blutkörperchen – Parameter, die mit klinischen Standardmethoden nicht zugänglich sind.

Material und Methoden

Durch die magnetische Markierung, die Hyperpolarisierung, wird das Signal von Xenon-129 um bis zu 100.000-fach verstärkt. Hierbei werden die Elektronen von Rubidium mittels Laserlicht zunächst auf 100 % polarisiert und dann durch Stöße auf Xenon übertragen. Danach wird das hyperpolarisierte Gas in einem Beutel zum Patienten gebracht und eingeatmet, kurz bevor die MRT-Aufnahmen beginnen.

Ergebnisse

Durch spezielle Programmierungen (Sequenzen) in der MRT kann die Ventilation, Mikrostruktur oder der Gasaustausch der Lunge in 3‑D dargestellt werden. Dies ermöglicht z. B. die quantitative Darstellung von Belüftungsdefekten, der Größe der Alveolen, der Gasaufnahme im Gewebe und des Gastransfers ins Blut.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Xe-MRT liefert einzigartige Informationen über den Zustand der Lunge – nichtinvasiv, in vivo und in weniger als einer Minute.

Dynamic pulmonary MRI using motion-state weighted motion-compensation (MostMoCo) reconstruction with ultrashort TE: A structural and functional study

PURPOSE

To improve the quality of structural images and the quantification of ventilation in free-breathing dynamic pulmonary MRI.

METHODS

A 3D radial ultrashort TE (UTE) sequence with superior-inferior navigators was used to acquire pulmonary data during free breathing. All acquired data were binned into different motion states according to the respiratory signal extracted from superior-inferior navigators. Motion-resolved images were reconstructed using eXtra-Dimensional (XD) UTE reconstruction. The initial motion fields were generated by registering images at each motion state to other motion states in motion-resolved images. A motion-state weighted motion-compensation (MostMoCo) reconstruction algorithm was proposed to reconstruct the dynamic UTE images. This technique, termed as MostMoCo-UTE, was compared with XD-UTE and iterative motion-compensation (iMoCo) on a porcine lung and 10 subjects.

RESULTS

MostMoCo reconstruction provides higher peak SNR (37.0 vs. 35.4 and 34.2) and structural similarity (0.964 vs. 0.931 and 0.947) compared to XD-UTE and iMoCo in the porcine lung experiment. Higher apparent SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio are achieved using MostMoCo in the human experiment. MostMoCo reconstruction better preserves the temporal variations of signal intensity of parenchyma compared to iMoCo, shows reduced random noise and improved sharpness of anatomical structures compared to XD-UTE. In the porcine lung experiment, the quantification of ventilation using MostMoCo images is more accurate than that using XD-UTE and iMoCo images.

CONCLUSION

The proposed MostMoCo-UTE provides improved quality of structural images and quantification of ventilation for free-breathing pulmonary MRI. It has the potential for the detection of structural and functional disorders of the lung in clinical settings.

Assessment of lung density in pediatric patients using three-dimensional ultrashort echo-time and four-dimensional zero echo-time sequences

Purpose

Lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using conventional sequences is limited due to strong signal loss by susceptibility effects of aerated lung. Our aim is to assess lung signal intensity in children on ultrashort echo-time (UTE) and zero echo-time (ZTE) sequences. We hypothesize that lung signal intensity can be correlated to lung physical density.

Materials and methods

Lung MRI was performed in 17 children with morphologically normal lungs (median age: 4.7 years, range 15 days to 17 years). Both lungs were manually segmented in UTE and ZTE images and the average signal intensities were extracted. Lung-to-background signal ratios (LBR) were compared for both sequences and between both patient groups using non-parametric tests and correlation analysis. Anatomical region-of-interest (ROI) analysis was performed for the normal cohort for assessment of the anteroposterior lung gradient.

Results

There was no significant difference between LBR of normal lungs using UTE and ZTE (p < 0.05). Both sequences revealed a LBR age-dependency with a high negative correlation for UTE (R_s =  – 0.77; range 2.98–1.41) and ZTE (R_s =  – 0.82; range 2.66–1.38)). Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were age-dependent for both sequences. SNR was higher for children up to 2 years old with 3D UTE Cones while for the rest it was higher with 4D ZTE. CNR was similar for both sequences. Posterior lung areas exhibited higher signal intensity compared to anterior ones (UTE 9.4% and ZTE 12% higher), both with high correlation coefficients (R²_UTE = 0.94, R²_ZTE = 0.97).

Conclusion

The ZTE sequence can measure signal intensity similarly to UTE in pediatric patients. Both sequences reveal an age- and gravity-dependency of LBR.

Chest imaging in patients with acute respiratory failure because of coronavirus disease 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to explore the different imaging modalities, such as chest radiography (CXR), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, PET/CT scan, and MRI to describe the main features for the evaluation of the chest in COVID-19 patients with ARDS.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article includes a systematic literature search, evidencing the different chest imaging modalities used in patients with ARDS from COVID-19. Literature evidences different possible approaches going from the conventional CXR and CT to the LUS, MRI, and PET/CT.

SUMMARY

CT is the technique with higher sensitivity and definition for studying chest in COVID-19 patients. LUS or bedside CXR are critical in patients requiring close and repeated monitoring. Moreover, LUS and CXR reduce the radiation burden and the risk of infection compared with CT. PET/CT and MRI, especially in ARDS patients, are not usually used for diagnostic or follow-up purposes.

Inter-Observer Agreement between Low-Dose and Standard-Dose CT with Soft and Sharp Convolution Kernels in COVID-19 Pneumonia

Computed tomography (CT) has been an essential diagnostic tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to develop an optimal CT protocol in terms of safety and reliability. For this, we assessed the inter-observer agreement between CT and low-dose CT (LDCT) with soft and sharp kernels using a semi-quantitative severity scale in a prospective study (Moscow, Russia). Two consecutive scans with CT and LDCT were performed in a single visit. Reading was performed by ten radiologists with 3–25 years’ experience. The study included 230 patients, and statistical analysis showed LDCT with a sharp kernel as the most reliable protocol (percentage agreement 74.35 ± 43.77%), but its advantage was marginal. There was no significant correlation between radiologists’ experience and average percentage agreement for all four evaluated protocols. Regarding the radiation exposure, CTDI_vol was 3.6 ± 0.64 times lower for LDCT. In conclusion, CT and LDCT with soft and sharp reconstructions are equally reliable for COVID-19 reporting using the “CT 0-4” scale. The LDCT protocol allows for a significant decrease in radiation exposure but may be restricted by body mass index.

Simultaneous Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Articular Cartilage and Cortical Bone of Human Knee Joint Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences

BACKGROUND

It is of great clinical importance to assess the microstructure of the articular cartilage and cortical bone of the human knee joint. While quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a promising tool for investigating the knee joint, however, previous QSM studies using conventional gradient recalled echo sequences or ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences only focused on mapping the magnetic susceptibility of the articular cartilage or cortical bone, respectively. Simultaneously mapping the underlying susceptibilities of the articular cartilage and cortical bone of human in vivo has not been explored and reported.

METHOD

Three-dimensional multi-echo radial UTE sequences with the shortest TE of 0.07 msec and computed tomography (CT) were performed on the bilateral knee joints of five healthy volunteers for this prospective study. UTE-QSM was reconstructed from the local field map after water-fat separation and background field removal. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between the magnetic susceptibility and CT values in 158 representative regions of interest of cortical bone.

RESULT

The susceptibility properties of the articular cartilage and cortical bone were successfully quantified by UTE-QSM. The laminar structure of articular cartilage was characterized by the difference of susceptibility value in each layer. Susceptibility was mostly diamagnetic in cortical bone. A significant negative correlation (r=-0.43, p<0.001) between the susceptibility value and CT value in cortical bone was observed.

CONCLUSION

UTE-QSM enables simultaneous susceptibility mapping of the articular cartilage and cortical bone of human in vivo. Good association between susceptibility and CT values in cortical bone suggests the potential of UTE-QSM for bone mapping for further clinical application.

The role of imaging techniques in understanding and evaluating the long-term pulmonary effects of COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Limited data exist regarding the long-term pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19. Identifying features utilizing multiple imaging modalities engenders a clearer picture of the illness's long-term consequences.

AREAS COVERED

This review encompasses the common pulmonary findings associated with different imaging modalities during acute and late remission stages of COVID-19 pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

Chest x-ray, a common preliminary diagnostic imaging technique, is not optimal for extended care due to limited tissue contrast resolution providing suboptimal assessment of pulmonary pathology and subtle interval changes. Ultrasound may be utilized on a case-by-case basis in certain patient populations, or in countries with limited resources. Chest CT's accessibility, high tissue contrast and spatial resolution make it the foremost modality for long-term COVID-19 follow-up. While MRI can viably monitor extrapulmonary disease due to its lack of radiation and high inherent soft-tissue contrast, it has limited pulmonary utility due to motion artifact and alveolar gas decreasing lung signal. Although 18F-FDG-PET/CT is costly and has limited specificity, it can provide molecular level data and inflammation quantification. Lung perfusion scintigraphy may also explain COVID-19 induced thromboembolic events and persistent dyspnea despite normal structural imaging and testing results. Correlating the long-term pulmonary findings of COVID-19 with each imaging modality is essential in elucidating the post-recovery course.

The Role and Challenges of Clinical Imaging During COVID-19 Outbreak

Objective:

The Radiology department played a crucial role in detecting and following up with the COVID-19 disease during the pandemic. The purpose of this review was to highlight and discuss the role of each imaging modality, in the radiology department, that can help in the current pandemic and to determine the challenges faced by staff and how to overcome them.

Materials and Methods:

A literature search was performed using different databases, including PubMed, Google scholar, and the college electronic library to access 2020 published related articles.

Results:

A chest computed tomogram (CT) was found to be superior to a chest radiograph, with regards to the early detection of COVID-19. Utilizing lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS) with pediatric patients, demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity, compared to a chest radiography. In addition, lung ultrasound (LUS) showed a high correlation with the disease severity assessed with CT. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has some limiting factors with regard to its clinical utilization, due to signal loss. The reported challenges that the radiology department faced were mainly related to infection control, staff workload, and the training of students.

Conclusion:

The choice of an imaging modality to provide a COVID-19 diagnosis is debatable. It depends on several factors that should be carefully considered, such as disease stage, mobility of the patient, and ease of applying infection control procedures. The pros and cons of each imaging modality were highlighted, as part of this review. To control the spread of the infection, precautionary measures such as the use of portable radiographic equipment and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) must be implemented.

Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version

BACKGROUND

Using an effective method for evaluating Institutional Review Board (IRB) performance is essential for ensuring an IRB's effectiveness, efficiency, and compliance with applicable human research standards and organizational policies. Currently, no empirical research has yet been published in China evaluating IRB performance measures by the use of a standardized tool. This study was therefore conducted to develop a Chinese version of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool (IRB-RAT), assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese version (IRB-RAT-CV), and validate the tool for use in China.

METHODS

In this cultural adaptation, cross-sectional validation study, the IRB-RAT-CV was developed through a back-translation process and then distributed to 587 IRB staff members and researchers in medical institutions and schools in Hunan Province that review biomedical and social-behavioral research. Data from the 470 valid questionnaires collected from participants was used to evaluate the reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the IRB-RAT-CV.

RESULTS

Participants' ratings of their ideal and actual IRB as measured by the IRB-RAT-CV achieved Cronbach's alpha 0.989 and 0.992, Spearman-Brown coefficient 0.964 and 0.968, and item-total correlation values ranging from 0.631 to 0.886 and 0.743 to 0.910, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IRB-RAT-CV is a linguistically and culturally applicable tool for assessing the quality of IRBs in China.

Global research trends in COVID-19 with MRI and PET/CT: a scoping review with bibliometric and network analyses

OBJECTIVE

To identify and evaluate the indexed studies that allow us to understand the implications of imaging studies in MRI and PET/CT related to COVID-19 research.

METHODS

Scoping review. Articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) were scanned from 2019 to 2021 with COVID-19, MRI, and PET-CT as keywords. EndNote software and manual checking removed the duplicated references. Our assessment includes citation, bibliometric, keyword network, and statistical analyses using descriptive statistics and correlations. Highlighted variables were publication year, country, journals, and authorship.

RESULTS

Only 326 papers were included. The most cited article reached 669 cites; this number represented 21.71% of 3081 citations. The top-15 cited authors received 1787 citations, which represented 58% of the total cites. These authors had affiliations from ten countries (Belgium, China, France, Italy, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom (UK), and the USA). The top-30 journals were cited 2762 times, representing 89.65% of the total cites. Only five journals were cited more than 100 times; Int J Infect Dis had the most significant number of citations (674). Some of the unexpected keywords were encephalitis, stroke, microbleeds, myocarditis.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 pandemic is still spreading worldwide, and the knowledge about its different facets continues advancing. MRI and PET/CT are being used in more than 50% of the selected studies; research trends span seven categories, no only the diagnostic but others like socio-economic impact and pathogenesis Developed countries had an advantage by having hospitals with more resources, including MRI and PET/CT facilities in the same institution to supplement basic assessment in patients with COVID-19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40336-021-00460-x.

Appearance of COVID-19 pneumonia on 1.5 T TrueFISP MRI

Objective

To evaluate the performance of 1.5 T true fast imaging with steady state precession (TrueFISP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for the detection and characterization of pulmonary abnormalities caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective single-center study, computed tomography (CT) and MRI scans of 20 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were evaluated with regard to the distribution, opacity, and appearance of pulmonary lesions, as well as bronchial changes, pleural effusion, and thoracic lymphadenopathy. McNemar’s test was used in order to compare the COVID-19-associated alterations seen on CT with those seen on MRI.

Results

Ground-glass opacities were better visualized on CT than on MRI (p = 0.031). We found no statistically significant differences between CT and MRI regarding the visualization/characterization of the following: consolidations; interlobular/intralobular septal thickening; the distribution or appearance of pulmonary abnormalities; bronchial pathologies; pleural effusion; and thoracic lymphadenopathy.

Conclusion

Pulmonary abnormalities caused by COVID-19 pneumonia can be detected on TrueFISP MRI sequences and correspond to the patterns known from CT. Especially during the current pandemic, the portions of the lungs imaged on cardiac or abdominal MRI should be carefully evaluated to promote the identification and isolation of unexpected cases of COVID-19, thereby curbing further spread of the disease.

Evaluation of injuries caused by coronavirus disease 2019 using multi-nuclei magnetic resonance imaging

The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a great burden for the healthcare system in many countries because of its high transmissibility, severity, and fatality. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) play a vital role in the diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication of COVID-19. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially multi-nuclei MRI, is another important imaging technique for disease diagnosis because of its good soft tissue contrast and the ability to conduct structural and functional imaging, which has also been used to evaluate COVID-19-related organ injuries in previous studies. Herein, we briefly reviewed the recent research on multi-nuclei MRI for evaluating injuries caused by COVID-19 and the clinical ¹H MRI techniques and their applications for assessing injuries in lungs, brain, and heart. Moreover, the emerging hyperpolarized ¹²⁹Xe gas MRI and its applications in the evaluation of pulmonary structures and functional abnormalities caused by COVID-19 were also reviewed.

COVID-19 deep classification network based on convolution and deconvolution local enhancement

Computer Tomography (CT) detection can effectively overcome the problems of traditional detection of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), such as lagging detection results and wrong diagnosis results, which lead to the increase of disease infection rate and prevalence rate. The novel coronavirus pneumonia is a significant difference between the positive and negative patients with asymptomatic infections. To effectively improve the accuracy of doctors' manual judgment of positive and negative COVID-19, this paper proposes a deep classification network model of the novel coronavirus pneumonia based on convolution and deconvolution local enhancement. Through convolution and deconvolution operation, the contrast between the local lesion region and the abdominal cavity of COVID-19 is enhanced. Besides, the middle-level features that can effectively distinguish the image types are obtained. By transforming the novel coronavirus detection problem into the region of interest (ROI) feature classification problem, it can effectively determine whether the feature vector in each feature channel contains the image features of COVID-19. This paper uses an open-source COVID-CT dataset provided by Petuum researchers from the University of California, San Diego, which is collected from 143 novel coronavirus pneumonia patients and the corresponding features are preserved. The complete dataset (including original image and enhanced image) contains 1460 images. Among them, 1022 (70%) and 438 (30%) are used to train and test the performance of the proposed model, respectively. The proposed model verifies the classification precision in different convolution layers and learning rates. Besides, it is compared with most state-of-the-art models. It is found that the proposed algorithm has good classification performance. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and precision are 0.98, 0.96, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively.

Prospective Deployment of Deep Learning in MRI: A Framework for Important Considerations, Challenges, and Recommendations for Best Practices

Artificial intelligence algorithms based on principles of deep learning (DL) have made a large impact on the acquisition, reconstruction, and interpretation of MRI data. Despite the large number of retrospective studies using DL, there are fewer applications of DL in the clinic on a routine basis. To address this large translational gap, we review the recent publications to determine three major use cases that DL can have in MRI, namely, that of model-free image synthesis, model-based image reconstruction, and image or pixel-level classification. For each of these three areas, we provide a framework for important considerations that consist of appropriate model training paradigms, evaluation of model robustness, downstream clinical utility, opportunities for future advances, as well recommendations for best current practices. We draw inspiration for this framework from advances in computer vision in natural imaging as well as additional healthcare fields. We further emphasize the need for reproducibility of research studies through the sharing of datasets and software. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Imaging of COVID-19: CT, MRI, and PET

Soon after reports of a novel coronavirus capable of causing severe pneumonia surfaced in late 2019, expeditious global spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) forced the World Health Organization to declare an international state of emergency. Although best known for causing symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in mild cases and fulminant pneumonia in severe disease, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has also been associated with gastrointestinal, neurologic, cardiac, and hematologic presentations. Despite concerns over poor specificity and undue radiation exposure, chest imaging nonetheless remains central to the initial diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19 progression, as well as to the evaluation of complications. Classic features on chest CT include ground-glass and reticular opacities with or without superimposed consolidations, frequently presenting in a bilateral, peripheral, and posterior distribution. More recently, studies conducted with MRI have shown excellent concordance with chest CT in visualizing typical features of COVID-19 pneumonia. For patients in whom exposure to ionizing radiation should be avoided, particularly pregnant patients and children, pulmonary MRI may represent a suitable alternative to chest CT. Although PET imaging is not typically considered among first-line investigative modalities for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections, numerous reports have noted incidental localization of radiotracer in parenchymal regions of COVID-19-associated pulmonary lesions. These findings are consistent with data from Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-CoV cohorts which suggested an ability for 18F-FDG PET to detect subclinical infection and lymphadenitis in subjects without overt clinical signs of infection. Though highly sensitive, use of PET/CT for primary detection of COVID-19 is constrained by poor specificity, as well as considerations of cost, radiation burden, and prolonged exposure times for imaging staff. Even still, decontamination of scanner bays is a time-consuming process, and proper ventilation of scanner suites may additionally require up to an hour of downtime to allow for sufficient air exchange. Yet, in patients who require nuclear medicine investigations for other clinical indications, PET imaging may yield the earliest detection of nascent infection in otherwise asymptomatic individuals. Especially for patients with concomitant malignancies and other states of immunocompromise, prompt recognition of infection and early initiation of supportive care is crucial to maximizing outcomes and improving survivability.

Imaging in the COVID-19 era: Lessons learned during a pandemic

The first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a year of unprecedented changes, scientific breakthroughs, and controversies. The radiology community has not been spared from the challenges imposed on global healthcare systems. Radiology has played a crucial part in tackling this pandemic, either by demonstrating the manifestations of the virus and guiding patient management, or by safely handling the patients and mitigating transmission within the hospital. Major modifications involving all aspects of daily radiology practice have occurred as a result of the pandemic, including workflow alterations, volume reductions, and strict infection control strategies. Despite the ongoing challenges, considerable knowledge has been gained that will guide future innovations. The aim of this review is to provide the latest evidence on the role of imaging in the diagnosis of the multifaceted manifestations of COVID-19, and to discuss the implications of the pandemic on radiology departments globally, including infection control strategies and delays in cancer screening. Lastly, the promising contribution of artificial intelligence in the COVID-19 pandemic is explored.

COVID-19 imaging: Diagnostic approaches, challenges, and evolving advances

The role of radiology and the radiologist have evolved throughout the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Early on, chest computed tomography was used for screening and diagnosis of COVID-19; however, it is now indicated for high-risk patients, those with severe disease, or in areas where polymerase chain reaction testing is sparsely available. Chest radiography is now utilized mainly for monitoring disease progression in hospitalized patients showing signs of worsening clinical status. Additionally, many challenges at the operational level have been overcome within the field of radiology throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of teleradiology and virtual care clinics greatly enhanced our ability to socially distance and both are likely to remain important mediums for diagnostic imaging delivery and patient care. Opportunities to better utilize of imaging for detection of extrapulmonary manifestations and complications of COVID-19 disease will continue to arise as a more detailed understanding of the pathophysiology of the virus continues to be uncovered and identification of predisposing risk factors for complication development continue to be better understood. Furthermore, unidentified advancements in areas such as standardized imaging reporting, point-of-care ultrasound, and artificial intelligence offer exciting discovery pathways that will inevitably lead to improved care for patients with COVID-19.

Covid-19 imaging: A narrative review

Background

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) imaging data is dispersed in numerous publications. A cohesive literature review is to be assembled.

Objective

To summarize the existing literature on Covid-19 pneumonia imaging including precautionary measures for radiology departments, Chest CT's role in diagnosis and management, imaging findings of Covid-19 patients including children and pregnant women, artificial intelligence applications and practical recommendations.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed/med line electronic databases.

Results

The radiology department's staff is on the front line of the novel coronavirus outbreak. Strict adherence to precautionary measures is the main defense against infection's spread. Although nucleic acid testing is Covid-19's pneumonia diagnosis gold standard; kits shortage and low sensitivity led to the implementation of the highly sensitive chest computed tomography amidst initial diagnostic tools. Initial Covid-19 CT features comprise bilateral, peripheral or posterior, multilobar ground-glass opacities, predominantly in the lower lobes. Consolidations superimposed on ground-glass opacifications are found in few cases, preponderantly in the elderly. In later disease stages, GGO transformation into multifocal consolidations, thickened interlobular and intralobular lines, crazy paving, traction bronchiectasis, pleural thickening, and subpleural bands are reported. Standardized CT reporting is recommended to guide radiologists. While lung ultrasound, pulmonary MRI, and PET CT are not Covid-19 pneumonia's first-line investigative diagnostic modalities, their characteristic findings and clinical value are outlined. Artificial intelligence's role in strengthening available imaging tools is discussed.

Conclusion

This review offers an exhaustive analysis of the current literature on imaging role and findings in COVID-19 pneumonia.

•

Chest computed tomography is a highly sensitive Covid −19 pneumonia's diagnostic tool.

•

Initial Covid-19 CT features are bilateral, multifocal, peripheral or posterior ground-glass opacities, mainly in the lower lobes.

•

Multifocal consolidations, bronchiectasis, pleural thickening, and subpleural bands are late disease stages features.

•

Standardized CT reporting is recommended to guide radiologists.

•

Artificial intelligence could strengthen available imaging tools.

Progress in robotics for combating infectious diseases

The world was unprepared for the COVID-19 pandemic, and recovery is likely to be a long process. Robots have long been heralded to take on dangerous, dull, and dirty jobs, often in environments that are unsuitable for humans. Could robots be used to fight future pandemics? We review the fundamental requirements for robotics for infectious disease management and outline how robotic technologies can be used in different scenarios, including disease prevention and monitoring, clinical care, laboratory automation, logistics, and maintenance of socioeconomic activities. We also address some of the open challenges for developing advanced robots that are application oriented, reliable, safe, and rapidly deployable when needed. Last, we look at the ethical use of robots and call for globally sustained efforts in order for robots to be ready for future outbreaks.

Low Dose Chest CT and Lung Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an opportunity to use low- and non-radiating chest imaging techniques on a large scale in the context of an infectious disease, which has never been done before. Previously, low-dose techniques were rarely used for infectious diseases, despite the recognised danger of ionising radiation.

METHOD

To evaluate the role of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and lung ultrasound (LUS) in managing COVID-19 pneumonia, we performed a review of the literature including our cases.

RESULTS

Chest LDCT is now performed routinely when diagnosing and assessing the severity of COVID-19, allowing patients to be rapidly triaged. The extent of lung involvement assessed by LDCT is accurate in terms of predicting poor clinical outcomes in COVID-19-infected patients. Infectious disease specialists are less familiar with LUS, but this technique is also of great interest for a rapid diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 and is effective at assessing patient prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 is currently accelerating the transition to low-dose and "no-dose" imaging techniques to explore infectious pneumonia and their long-term consequences.

Discrepancies in the clinical and radiological profiles of COVID-19: A case-based discussion and review of literature

The current gold standard for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, on the background of clinical suspicion. However, RT-PCR has its limitations; this includes issues of low sensitivity, sampling errors and appropriate timing of specimen collection. As pulmonary involvement is the most common manifestation of severe COVID-19, early and appropriate lung imaging is important to aid diagnosis. However, gross discrepancies can occur between the clinical and imaging findings in patients with COVID-19, which can mislead clinicians in their decision making. Although chest X-ray (CXR) has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 associated lung disease, especially in the earlier stages, a positive CXR increases the pre-test probability of COVID-19. CXR scoring systems have shown to be useful, such as the COVID-19 opacification rating score which helps to predict the need of tracheal intubation. Furthermore, artificial intelligence-based algorithms have also shown promise in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia on CXR from other lung diseases. Although costlier than CXR, unenhanced computed tomographic (CT) chest scans have a higher sensitivity, but lesser specificity compared to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. A semi-quantitative CT scoring system has been shown to predict short-term mortality. The routine use of CT pulmonary angiography as a first-line imaging modality in patients with suspected COVID-19 is not justifiable due to the risk of contrast nephropathy. Scoring systems similar to those pioneered in CXR and CT can be used to effectively plan and manage hospital resources such as ventilators. Lung ultrasound is useful in the assessment of critically ill COVID-19 patients in the hands of an experienced operator. Moreover, it is a convenient tool to monitor disease progression, as it is cheap, non-invasive, easily accessible and easy to sterilise. Newer lung imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for safe imaging among children, adolescents and pregnant women are rapidly evolving. Imaging modalities are also essential for evaluating the extra-pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19: these include cranial imaging with CT or MRI; cardiac imaging with ultrasonography (US), CT and MRI; and abdominal imaging with US or CT. This review critically analyses the utility of each imaging modality to empower clinicians to use them appropriately in the management of patients with COVID-19 infection.

Evaluation of pulmonary ventilation in COVID-19 patients using oxygen-enhanced three-dimensional ultrashort echo time MRI: a preliminary study

AIM

To evaluate the lung function of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients using oxygen-enhanced (OE) ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with COVID-19 were included in the study. The OE-MRI was based on a respiratory-gated three-dimensional (3D) radial UTE sequence. For each patient, the percent signal enhancement (PSE) map was calculated using the expression PSE = (S_100% – S_21%)/S_21%, where S_21% and S_100% are signals acquired during room air and 100% oxygen inhalation, respectively. Agreement of lesion detectability between UTE-MRI and computed tomography (CT) was performed using the kappa test. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the difference in the mean PSE between mild-type COVID-19 and common-type COVID-19. Spearman's test was used to assess the relationship between lesion mean PSE and lesion size. Furthermore, the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the difference in region of interest (ROI) mean PSE between normal pulmonary parenchyma and lesions. The Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to test the difference in the mean PSE between different lesion types.

RESULTS

CT and UTE-MRI reached good agreement in lesion detectability. Ventilation measures in mild-type patients (5.3 ± 5.5%) were significantly different from those in common-type patients (3 ± 3.9%). Besides, there was no significant correlation between lesion mean PSE and lesion size. The mean PSE of COVID-19 lesions (3.2 ± 4.9%) was significantly lower than that of the pulmonary parenchyma (5.4 ± 3.9%). No significant difference was found among different lesion types.

CONCLUSION

OE-UTE-MRI could serve as a promising method for the assessment of lung function or treatment management of COVID-19 patients.

An Incidental Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. The most common clinical findings related to COVID-19 are fever and cough, with the proportion of patients developing interstitial pneumonia. Other symptoms include dyspnea, expectoration, headache, anosmia, ageusia, myalgia and malaise. To date, the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 include nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the thorax showing signs of interstitial pneumonia are important in the management of respiratory disease and in the evaluation of lung involvement. In the literature, there are few cases of COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis made using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In our report, we describe a case of accidental detection of findings related to interstitial pneumonia in a patient who underwent abdominal MRI for other clinical reasons. A 71-year-old woman was referred to our department for an MRI scan of the abdomen as her oncological follow-up. She was asymptomatic at the time of the examination and had passed the triage carried out on all the patients prior to diagnostic tests during the COVID-19 pandemic. The images acquired in the upper abdomen showed the presence of areas of altered signal intensity involving asymmetrically both pulmonary lower lobes, with a patchy appearance and a preferential peripheral subpleural distribution. We considered these features as highly suspicious for COVID-19 pneumonia. The nasopharyngeal swab later confirmed the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. There are limited reports about MRI features of COVID-19 pneumonia, considering that high-resolution chest CT is the imaging technique of choice to diagnose pneumonia. Nevertheless, this clinical case confirmed that it is possible to detect MRI signs suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia. The imaging features described could help in the evaluation of the lung parenchyma to assess the presence of signs suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in asymptomatic patients during the pandemic phase of the disease.

Radiology indispensable for tracking COVID-19

•

Currently, chest computed tomography is recommended as the first-line imaging test for detecting COVID-19 pneumonia.

•

The most typical CT imaging finding of COVID-19 patients is ground-glass opacity, combined with reticular and/or interlobular septal thickening and consolidation.

•

CT is useful for monitoring patients with COVID-19, identifying associated vascular abnormalities and making differential diagnosis.

With the rapid spread of COVID-19 worldwide, early detection and efficient isolation of suspected patients are especially important to prevent the transmission. Although nucleic acid testing of SARS-CoV-2 is still the gold standard for diagnosis, there are well-recognized early-detection problems including time-consuming in the diagnosis process, noticeable false-negative rate in the early stage and lacking nucleic acid testing kits in some areas. Therefore, effective and rational applications of imaging technologies are critical in aiding the screen and helping the diagnosis of suspected patients. Currently, chest computed tomography is recommended as the first-line imaging test for detecting COVID-19 pneumonia, which could allow not only early detection of the typical chest manifestations, but also timely estimation of the disease severity and therapeutic effects. In addition, other radiological methods including chest X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission computed tomography also show significant advantages in the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia. This review summarizes the applications of radiology and nuclear medicine in detecting and diagnosing COVID-19. It highlights the importance for these technologies to curb the rapid transmission during the pandemic, considering findings from special groups such as children and pregnant women.

High-performance low field MRI enables visualization of persistent pulmonary damage after COVID-19

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with the origin of the spread assumed to be located in Wuhan, China, began in December 2019, and is continuing until now. With the COVID-19 pandemic showing a progressive spread throughout the countries of the world, there is emerging interest for the potential long-term consequences of suffering from a COVID-19 pneumonia. Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 pneumonia, with chest X-ray examinations and computed tomography (CT) being undoubtedly the modalities most widely used, allowing for a fast and sensitive detection of infiltration patterns associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. For a better understanding of underlying pathomechanisms of pulmonary damage, longitudinal imaging series are warranted, for which CT is of limited usability due to repeated exposure of X-rays. Recent advances in MRI suggested that high-performance low-field MRI might represent a valuable method for pulmonary imaging without the need of radiation exposure. However, so far, low-field MRI has not been applied to study pulmonary damage after COVID-19 pneumonia. We present a case report of a patient who suffered from COVID-19 pneumonia using 0.55 T MRI for follow-up examinations three months after initial infection. Low-field MRI enables a precise visualization of persistent pulmonary changes including ground-glass opacities, which are consistent with CT performed on the same day. Low-field MRI seems to be feasible in the detection of pulmonary involvement in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and may have the potential for repetitive lung examinations in monitoring the reconvalescence after pulmonary infections.

Thorax Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)

Rationale and Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the findings found in thorax computed tomography (CT), which is increasingly used in the diagnosis of the important public health problem of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an important diagnostic alternative.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-two patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who underwent thorax CT for COVID pneumonia and MRI for any reason within 24 hours after CT were included in the study. The number of lobes affected, number of lobes containing ground-glass opacities and consolidation, number of nodules, distribution of lesions (central, peripheral, or diffuse), lobes with centrilobular nodular pattern, and the presence of pleural effusion were recorded separately for both imaging methods.

Results

Seventeen of the patients were female (53%) and 15 were male (47%). The mean age of the patients was 60.5 (range, 20–85) years. A total of 31 patients (96%) had signs of pneumonia on CT. The most common finding in CT was ground-glass opacities in 29 patients (90.6%), followed by consolidation in 14 patients (43.75%). Both consolidation and ground-glass opacities were also observed in MRI in all of these patients. Nodules were detected in 12 patients (37.5%) on CT and 11 patients (34.4%) on MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in nodule detection were calculated as 91.67% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

Although thorax CT is widely used in the imaging of COVID-19 infection, due to its advantages, MRI can also be used as an alternative diagnostic tool.