Histopathological Validation of Dark-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Without Additional Magnetization Preparation

Optimal Threshold and Interpatient Variability in Left Atrial Ablation Scar Assessment by Dark-Blood LGE CMR

BACKGROUND

Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has better correlation with bipolar voltage (BiV) to define ablation scar in the left atrium (LA) compared to conventional bright-blood LGE CMR.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the optimal signal intensity threshold of dark-blood LGE CMR to identify LA ablation scar.

METHODS

In 54 patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation, image intensity ratios (IIRs) were derived from preprocedural dark-blood LGE CMR. In 26 patients without previous ablation, the upper limit of normal was derived from the 95th and 98th percentiles of pooled IIR values. In 28 patients with previous atrial fibrillation ablation, BiV was compared with the corresponding IIR. Receiver-operating characteristics analyses were employed to determine the optimal IIR threshold (ie, the point with the smallest distance to the upper left corner of the receiver-operating characteristics) for LA ablation scar (BiV ≤0.15 mV).

RESULTS

Upper limit of normal corresponded to IIR values 1.16 and 1.21, yielding low sensitivities of 0.32 and 0.09 to detect LA ablation scar. Receiver-operating characteristics analysis of IIR and BiV comparison achieved a median area under the curve of 0.77. Median optimal IIR threshold for LA ablation scar was 1.09, with an average sensitivity of 0.73, specificity of 0.75, and accuracy of 0.71. Median IIR thresholds of 1.00 and 1.10 corresponded to 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, respectively. There was considerable interpatient variability: optimal IIR thresholds per patient ranged from 1.01 to 1.22.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal IIR threshold to identify LA ablation scar by dark-blood LGE CMR is 1.09. Because of interpatient variability, the investigators recommend using a lower (1.00) and upper (1.10) threshold to prevent over- or underestimation of ablation scar.

Quantification of myocardial scar of different etiology using dark- and bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) has been shown to improve the visualization and quantification of areas of ischemic scar compared to standard bright-blood LGE. Recently, the performance of various semi-automated quantification methods has been evaluated for the assessment of infarct size using both dark-blood LGE and conventional bright-blood LGE with histopathology as a reference standard. However, the impact of this sequence on different quantification strategies in vivo remains uncertain. In this study, various semi-automated scar quantification methods were evaluated for a range of different ischemic and non-ischemic pathologies encountered in clinical practice. A total of 62 patients referred for clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were retrospectively included. All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of either ischemic heart disease (IHD; n = 21), dilated/non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM; n = 21), or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM; n = 20) and underwent CMR on a 1.5 T scanner including both bright- and dark-blood LGE using a standard PSIR sequence. Both methods used identical sequence settings as per clinical protocol, apart from the inversion time parameter, which was set differently. All short-axis LGE images with scar were manually segmented for epicardial and endocardial borders. The extent of LGE was then measured visually by manual signal thresholding, and semi-automatically by signal thresholding using the standard deviation (SD) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) methods. For all quantification methods in the IHD group, except the 6 SD method, dark-blood LGE detected significantly more enhancement compared to bright-blood LGE (p < 0.05 for all methods). For both bright-blood and dark-blood LGE, the 6 SD method correlated best with manual thresholding (16.9% vs. 17.1% and 20.1% vs. 20.4%, respectively). For the NICM group, no significant differences between LGE methods were found. For bright-blood LGE, the 5 SD method agreed best with manual thresholding (9.3% vs. 11.0%), while for dark-blood LGE the 4 SD method agreed best (12.6% vs. 11.5%). Similarly, for the HCM group no significant differences between LGE methods were found. For bright-blood LGE, the 6 SD method agreed best with manual thresholding (10.9% vs. 12.2%), while for dark-blood LGE the 5 SD method agreed best (13.2% vs. 11.5%). Semi-automated LGE quantification using dark-blood LGE images is feasible in both patients with ischemic and non-ischemic scar patterns. Given the advantage in detecting scar in patients with ischemic heart disease and no disadvantage in patients with non-ischemic scar, dark-blood LGE can be readily and widely adopted into clinical practice without compromising on quantification.

Feasibility of gray-blood late gadolinium enhancement evaluation in young patients with congenital and acquired heart disease

Background

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences have become common in pediatric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess for myocardial fibrosis. Bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement (BB-LGE) by conventional phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) is commonly utilized, but similar inversion time (TI) value of fibrosis and left ventricular (LV) blood pool can make subendocardial areas difficult to assess. A gray-blood LGE (GB-LGE) technique has been described, targeting nulling of the LV blood pool and demonstrating improvement in ischemic scar detection over BB-LGE in adult patients. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of the GB-LGE technique in a young population with congenital and acquired heart disease and compare its ability to detect subendocardial scar to conventional BB-LGE.

Methods

Seventy-six consecutive patients referred for clinical CMR underwent both BB-LGE and GB-LGE on 1.5 T and 3 T scanners. Conventional PSIR sequences were obtained with TI to null the myocardium (BB-LGE) in short-axis and horizontal long-axis stacks. Same PSIR stacks were immediately repeated with TI to null the blood pool (GB-LGE). Both sequences were reviewed separately a week apart by two readers, blinded to the initial clinical interpretation. Studies were analyzed for overall image quality, confidence in scar detection, confidence in detection of LGE, LGE class, inter- and intra-observer agreement for the presence of scar, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for total scar burden.

Results

Overall confidence in myocardial scar detection by BB-LGE or GB-LGE as well as grading of image quality were not statistically different [(p = 1 and p = 1) and (p = 0.53, p = 0.18), respectively]. There was very good inter-observer agreement for the presence of scar on BB-LGE (K = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99) and GB-LGE (K = 0.84, 95% CI 0.7-0.96), as well as excellent intra-observer agreement for both readers (K = 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99; and K = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95). Interclass correlation coefficient for total scar burden was excellent for BB-LGE (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and GB-LGE (ICC = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97).

Conclusions

The GB-LGE technique is feasible in the pediatric population with congenital and acquired heart disease. It can detect subendocardial/ischemic scar similar to conventional bright-blood PSIR sequences in the pediatric population.

Detection of Myocardial Ischemia Using Cardiovascular MRI Stress T1 Mapping: A Miniature-Swine Validation Study

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of cardiac MRI stress T1 mapping in detecting ischemic and infarcted myocardium in a miniature-swine model, using pathologic findings as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods

Ten adult male Chinese miniature swine, with coronary artery stenosis induced by an ameroid constrictor, and two healthy control swine were studied. Cardiac 3-T MRI rest and adenosine triphosphate stress T1 mapping and perfusion images, along with resting and late gadolinium enhancement images, were acquired at baseline and weekly up to 4 weeks after surgery or until humanely killed. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to analyze the performance of T1 mapping in the detection of myocardial ischemia.

Results

In the experimental group, both the infarcted myocardium (ΔT1 = 10 msec ± 2 [SD]; ΔT1 percentage = 0.7% ± 0.1) and ischemic myocardium (ΔT1 = 10 msec ± 2; ΔT1 percentage = 0.9% ± 0.2) exhibited reduced T1 reactivity compared with the remote myocardium (ΔT1 = 53 msec ± 7; ΔT1 percentage = 4.7% ± 0.6) and normal myocardium (ΔT1 = 56 msec ± 11; ΔT1 percentage = 4.9% ± 1.1). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated high diagnostic performance of ΔT1 in detecting ischemic myocardium, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (P < .001). Rest T1 displayed high diagnostic performance in detecting infarcted myocardium (AUC = 0.95; P < .001). When rest T1 and ΔT1 were combined, the diagnostic performance for both ischemic and infarcted myocardium were improved (AUCs, 0.89 and 0.97, respectively; all P < .001). The collagen volume fraction correlated with ΔT1, ΔT1 percentage, and Δ extracellular volume percentage (r = -0.70, -0.70, and -0.50, respectively; P = .001, .001, and .03, respectively).

Conclusion

Using histopathologic validation in a swine model, noninvasive cardiac MRI stress T1 mapping demonstrated high performance in detecting ischemic and infarcted myocardium without the need for contrast agents.Keywords: Coronary Artery Disease, MRI, Myocardial Ischemia, Rest T1 Mapping, Stress T1 Mapping, Swine Model Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023See also commentary by Burrage and Ferreira in this issue.

Dark-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Is Noninferior to Bright-Blood LGE in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathies

(1) Background and Objectives: Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement has been shown to be a reliable cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) method for assessing viability and depicting myocardial scarring in ischemic cardiomyopathy. The aim of this study was to evaluate dark-blood LGE imaging compared with conventional bright-blood LGE for the detection of myocardial scarring in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. (2) Materials and Methods: Patients with suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were prospectively enrolled in this single-centre study from January 2020 to March 2023. All patients underwent 1.5 T CMR with both dark-blood and conventional bright-blood LGE imaging. Corresponding short-axis stacks of both techniques were analysed for the presence, distribution, pattern, and localisation of LGE, as well as the quantitative scar size (%). (3) Results: 343 patients (age 44 ± 17 years; 124 women) with suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were examined. LGE was detected in 123 of 343 cases (36%) with excellent inter-reader agreement (κ 0.97-0.99) for both LGE techniques. Dark-blood LGE showed a sensitivity of 99% (CI 98-100), specificity of 99% (CI 98-100), and an accuracy of 99% (CI 99-100) for the detection of non-ischemic scarring. No significant difference in total scar size (%) was observed. Dark-blood imaging with mean 5.35 ± 4.32% enhanced volume of total myocardial volume, bright-blood with 5.24 ± 4.28%, p = 0.84. (4) Conclusions: Dark-blood LGE imaging is non-inferior to conventional bright-blood LGE imaging in detecting non-ischemic scarring. Therefore, dark-blood LGE imaging may become an equivalent method for the detection of both ischemic and non-ischemic scars.

High-resolution structural-functional substrate-trigger characterization: Future roadmap for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia

Introduction

Patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) are at high risk of sudden cardiac death. When appropriate, catheter ablation is modestly effective, with relatively high VT recurrence and complication rates. Personalized models that incorporate imaging and computational approaches have advanced VT management. However, 3D patient-specific functional electrical information is typically not considered. We hypothesize that incorporating non-invasive 3D electrical and structural characterization in a patient-specific model improves VT-substrate recognition and ablation targeting.

Materials and methods

In a 53-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent monomorphic VT, we built a structural-functional model based on high-resolution 3D late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3D-LGE CMR), multi-detector computed tomography (CT), and electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). Invasive data from high-density contact and pace mapping obtained during endocardial VT-substrate modification were also incorporated. The integrated 3D electro-anatomic model was analyzed off-line.

Results

Merging the invasive voltage maps and 3D-LGE CMR endocardial geometry led to a mean Euclidean node-to-node distance of 5 ± 2 mm. Inferolateral and apical areas of low bipolar voltage (<1.5 mV) were associated with high 3D-LGE CMR signal intensity (>0.4) and with higher transmurality of fibrosis. Areas of functional conduction delay or block (evoked delayed potentials, EDPs) were in close proximity to 3D-LGE CMR-derived heterogeneous tissue corridors. ECGI pinpointed the epicardial VT exit at ∼10 mm from the endocardial site of origin, both juxtaposed to the distal ends of two heterogeneous tissue corridors in the inferobasal left ventricle. Radiofrequency ablation at the entrances of these corridors, eliminating all EDPs, and at the VT site of origin rendered the patient non-inducible and arrhythmia-free until the present day (20 months follow-up). Off-line analysis in our model uncovered dynamic electrical instability of the LV inferolateral heterogeneous scar region which set the stage for an evolving VT circuit.

Discussion and conclusion

We developed a personalized 3D model that integrates high-resolution structural and electrical information and allows the investigation of their dynamic interaction during arrhythmia formation. This model enhances our mechanistic understanding of scar-related VT and provides an advanced, non-invasive roadmap for catheter ablation.

Histopathological validation of semi-automated myocardial scar quantification techniques for dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging

AIMS

To evaluate the performance of various semi-automated techniques for quantification of myocardial infarct size on both conventional bright-blood and novel dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images using histopathology as reference standard.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 13 Yorkshire pigs, reperfused myocardial infarction was experimentally induced. At 7 weeks post-infarction, both bright-blood and dark-blood LGE imaging were performed on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanner. Following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the animals were sacrificed, and histopathology was obtained. The percentage of infarcted myocardium was assessed per slice using various semi-automated scar quantification techniques, including the signal threshold vs. reference mean (STRM, using 3 to 8 SDs as threshold) and full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) methods, as well as manual contouring, for both LGE methods. Infarct size obtained by histopathology was used as reference. In total, 24 paired LGE MRI slices and histopathology samples were available for analysis. For both bright-blood and dark-blood LGE, the STRM method with a threshold of 5 SDs led to the best agreement to histopathology without significant bias (-0.23%, 95% CI [-2.99, 2.52%], P = 0.862 and -0.20%, 95% CI [-2.12, 1.72%], P = 0.831, respectively). Manual contouring significantly underestimated infarct size on bright-blood LGE (-1.57%, 95% CI [-2.96, -0.18%], P = 0.029), while manual contouring on dark-blood LGE outperformed semi-automated quantification and demonstrated the most accurate quantification in this study (-0.03%, 95% CI [-0.22, 0.16%], P = 0.760).

CONCLUSION

The signal threshold vs. reference mean method with a threshold of 5 SDs demonstrated the most accurate semi-automated quantification of infarcted myocardium, without significant bias compared to histopathology, for both conventional bright-blood and novel dark-blood LGE.

Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Basic Concepts to Emerging Methods

BACKGROUND

 Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is a widely used cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique to diagnose a broad range of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Since its development and validation against histology already more than two decades ago, the clinical utility of LGE and its span of applications have increased considerably.

METHODS

 In this review we will present the basic concepts of LGE imaging and its diagnostic and prognostic value, elaborate on recent developments and emerging methods, and finally discuss future prospects.

RESULTS

 Continuous developments in 3 D imaging methods, motion correction techniques, water/fat-separated imaging, dark-blood methods, and scar quantification improved the performance and further expanded the clinical utility of LGE imaging.

CONCLUSION

 LGE imaging is the current noninvasive reference standard for the assessment of myocardial viability. Improvements in spatial resolution, scar-to-blood contrast, and water/fat-separated imaging further strengthened its position.

KEY POINTS

  · LGE MRI is the reference standard for the noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability. · LGE MRI is used to diagnose a broad range of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies in everyday clinical practice.. · Improvements in spatial resolution and scar-to-blood contrast further strengthened its position. · Continuous developments improve its performance and further expand its clinical utility.

CITATION FORMAT

· Holtackers RJ, Emrich T, Botnar RM et al. Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Basic Concepts to Emerging Methods. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1718-4355.

Dark-blood late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial scar detection based on simplified timing scheme: single-center experience in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Background

This study aims to examine scar detectability using dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with simplified timing scheme and fixed parameters comparing to two conventional bright-blood approaches in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Methods

Three LGE techniques were performed in all patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease at 3 T: dark blood two-dimensional (2D) phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) preceded with a T2-preparation pulse (DB-LGE), conventional three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo inversion recovery (3D-IR) and conventional 2D PSIR. Timing parameters in DB-LGE were tested in five clinically confirmed coronary artery disease patients with scars and fixed for the rest of the study. Two independent readers evaluated images at both patient and segment levels. Image quality and contrast ratio between scar and adjacent tissues were assessed. Concordance between the three techniques and detection rate based on expert consensus were reported.

Results

Forty-six patients were recruited in the study (average age 66.8 years, 69.6% male). DB-LGE demonstrated superior image quality (P=0.001 vs. 3D-IR) and scar-to-blood contrast ratio (P<0.001 vs. 3D-IR and PSIR). Among 41 patients with suspected coronary artery disease, myocardial scar was present in 30 patients (73.2%), all detected by DB-LGE, yielding a detection rate of 100% compared to 93.3% and 96.7% for bright-blood 3D-IR and PSIR. For subendocardial scar detection among 656 segments, DB-LGE had a detection rate of 99.4% compared to 57.8% for 3D-IR and 61.0% for PSIR (both P<0.001).

Conclusions

DB-LGE improves detection of myocardial scar compared with conventional bright-blood LGE techniques, particularly of subendocardial scar.

Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement CMR improves detection of papillary muscle fibrosis in patients with mitral valve prolapse

PURPOSE

Papillary muscle fibrosis may act as an arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Previous studies used conventional bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE CMR) imaging to assess papillary muscle fibrosis, although this technique suffers from poor scar-to-blood contrast which may limit its sensitivity, in contrast to dark-blood LGE. This study sought to compare bright-blood and dark-blood LGE for the detection of papillary muscle fibrosis in patients with MVP.

METHOD

60 patients with known isolated MVP referred for CMR were prospectively recruited. A routine CMR protocol was used to obtain cine imaging, dark-blood LGE and bright-blood LGE in three long-axis views and a stack of short-axis views. Flow mapping of the proximal aorta was performed to calculate mitral regurgitant volume. Images were analysed for cardiac volumes, ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation severity, MVP characteristics (mitral annular disjunction, prolapse volume) and presence of LGE at the papillary muscles and myocardium.

RESULTS

Dark-blood LGE detected significantly more subjects with LGE at the papillary muscles than bright-blood LGE (35% vs 15%, p = 0.002). There was no difference between LGE techniques regarding myocardial (non-papillary muscle) fibrosis (present in 25% each). No statistical differences were observed between patients with or without LGE at the papillary muscles regarding demographics, clinical data (including ventricular arrhythmia) and MVP characteristics. Furthermore, no association was found between LGE at the papillary muscles and at the myocardium.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to bright-blood LGE, dark-blood LGE CMR improves the detection of LGE at the papillary muscles in patients with MVP.

The impact of dark-blood versus conventional bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement on the myocardial ischemic burden

PURPOSE

In perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), ischemic burden predicts adverse prognosis and is often used to guide revascularization. Ischemic scar tissue can cause stress perfusion defects that do not represent myocardial ischemia. Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) methods detect more scar than conventional bright-blood LGE, however, the impact on the myocardial ischemic burden estimation is unknown and evaluated in this study.

METHODS

Forty patients with CMR stress perfusion defects and ischemic scar on both dark-blood and bright-blood LGE were included. For dark-blood LGE, phase sensitive inversion recovery imaging with left ventricular blood pool nulling was used. Ischemic scar burden was quantified for both methods using >5 standard deviations above remote myocardium. Perfusion defects were manually contoured, and the myocardial ischemic burden was calculated by subtracting the ischemic scar burden from the perfusion defect burden.

RESULTS

Ischemic scar burden by dark-blood LGE was higher than bright-blood LGE (13.3 ± 7.4% vs. 10.3 ± 7.1%, p < 0.001). Dark-blood LGE derived myocardial ischemic burden was lower compared with bright-blood LGE (15.6% (IQR: 10.3 to 22.0) vs. 19.3 (10.9 to 25.5), median difference -2.0%, p < 0.001) with a mean bias of -2.8% (95% confidence intervals: -4.0 to -1.6%) and a large effect size (r = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

Stress perfusion defects are associated with higher ischemic scar burden using dark-blood LGE compared with bright-blood LGE, which leads to a lower estimation of the myocardial ischemic burden. The prognostic value of using a dark-blood LGE derived ischemic burden to guide revascularization is unknown and warrants further investigation.

Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance for improved detection of subendocardial scar: a review of current techniques

For almost 20 years, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been the reference standard for the non-invasive assessment of myocardial viability. Since the blood pool often appears equally bright as the enhanced scar regions, detection of subendocardial scar patterns can be challenging. Various novel LGE methods have been proposed that null or suppress the blood signal by employing additional magnetization preparation mechanisms. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of these dark-blood LGE methods, discussing the magnetization preparation schemes and findings in phantom, preclinical, and clinical studies. Finally, conclusions on the current evidence and limitations are drawn and new avenues for future research are discussed. Dark-blood LGE methods are a promising new tool for non-invasive assessment of myocardial viability. For a mainstream adoption of dark-blood LGE, however, clinical availability and ease of use are crucial.