Differentiating Benign from Malignant Renal Tumors Using T2- and Diffusion-Weighted Images: A Comparison of Deep Learning and Radiomics Models Versus Assessment from Radiologists

An interpretable clinical ultrasound-radiomics combined model for diagnosis of stage I cervical cancer

Objective

The purpose of this retrospective study was to establish a combined model based on ultrasound (US)-radiomics and clinical factors to predict patients with stage I cervical cancer (CC) before surgery.

Materials and methods

A total of 209 CC patients who had cervical lesions found by transvaginal sonography (TVS) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively reviewed, patients were divided into the training set (n = 146) and internal validation set (n = 63), and 52 CC patients from Anhui Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital and Nanchong Central Hospital were taken as the external validation set. The clinical independent predictors were selected by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. US-radiomics features were extracted from US images. After selecting the most significant features by univariate analysis, Spearman's correlation analysis, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, six machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to build the radiomics model. Next, the ability of the clinical, US-radiomics, and clinical US-radiomics combined model was compared to diagnose stage I CC. Finally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was used to explain the contribution of each feature.

Results

Long diameter of the cervical lesion (L) and squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCCa) were independent clinical predictors of stage I CC. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost) model performed the best among the six ML radiomics models, with area under the curve (AUC) values in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets being 0.778, 0.751, and 0.751, respectively. In the final three models, the combined model based on clinical features and rad-score showed good discriminative power, with AUC values in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets being 0.837, 0.828, and 0.839, respectively. The decision curve analysis validated the clinical utility of the combined nomogram. The SHAP algorithm illustrates the contribution of each feature in the combined model.

Conclusion

We established an interpretable combined model to predict stage I CC. This non-invasive prediction method may be used for the preoperative identification of patients with stage I CC.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Renal Lesion Assessment

Radiomics, the extraction and analysis of quantitative features from medical images, has emerged as a promising field in radiology with the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and management of renal lesions. This comprehensive review explores the radiomics workflow, including image acquisition, feature extraction, selection, and classification, and highlights its application in differentiating between benign and malignant renal lesions. The integration of radiomics with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning, can help patients' management and allow the planning of the appropriate treatments. AI models have shown remarkable accuracy in predicting tumor aggressiveness, treatment response, and patient outcomes. This review provides insights into the current state of radiomics and AI in renal lesion assessment and outlines future directions for research in this rapidly evolving field.

Research on texture images and radiomics in urology: a review of urological MR imaging applications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tumor volume and heterogenicity are associated with diagnosis and prognosis of urological cancers, and assessed by conventional imaging. Quantitative imaging, Radiomics, using advanced mathematical analysis may contain information imperceptible to the human eye, and may identify imaging-based biomarkers, a new field of research for individualized medicine. This review summarizes the recent literature on radiomics in kidney and prostate cancers and the future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiomics studies have been developed and showed promising results in diagnosis, in characterization, prognosis, treatment planning and recurrence prediction in kidney tumors and prostate cancer, but its use in guiding clinical decision-making remains limited at present due to several limitations including lack of external validations in most studies, lack of prospective studies and technical standardization.

SUMMARY

Future challenges, besides developing prospective and validated studies, include automated segmentation using artificial intelligence deep learning networks and hybrid radiomics integrating clinical data, combining imaging modalities and genomic features. It is anticipated that these improvements may allow identify these noninvasive, imaging-based biomarkers, to enhance precise diagnosis, improve decision-making and guide tailored treatment.

Preoperative CT-based radiomics combined with tumour spread through air spaces can accurately predict early recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a prediction model for early recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) that combines radiomics features based on preoperative CT with tumour spread through air spaces (STAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The most recent preoperative thin-section chest CT scans and postoperative pathological haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were retrospectively collected from patients with a postoperative pathological diagnosis of stage I LUAD. Regions of interest were manually segmented, and radiomics features were extracted from the tumour and peritumoral regions extended by 3 voxel units, 6 voxel units, and 12 voxel units, and 2D and 3D deep learning image features were extracted by convolutional neural networks. Then, the RAdiomics Integrated with STAS model (RAISm) was constructed. The performance of RAISm was then evaluated in a development cohort and validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients from two medical centres from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively included as the development cohort for the model and were randomly split into a training set (72.6%, n = 164) and a test set (27.4%, n = 62). From June 2019 to December 2019, 51 patients were included in the validation cohort. RAISm had excellent discrimination in predicting the early recurrence of stage I LUAD in the training cohort (AUC = 0.847, 95% CI 0.762-0.932) and validation cohort (AUC = 0.817, 95% CI 0.625-1.000). RAISm outperformed single modality signatures and other combinations of signatures in terms of discrimination and clinical net benefits.

CONCLUSION

We pioneered combining preoperative CT-based radiomics with STAS to predict stage I LUAD recurrence postoperatively and confirmed the superior effect of the model in validation cohorts, showing its potential to assist in postoperative treatment strategies.

The diagnostic value of machine learning for the classification of malignant bone tumor: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

Background

Malignant bone tumors are a type of cancer with varying malignancy and prognosis. Accurate diagnosis and classification are crucial for treatment and prognosis assessment. Machine learning has been introduced for early differential diagnosis of malignant bone tumors, but its performance is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the diagnostic value of machine learning for malignant bone tumors.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for literature on machine learning in the differential diagnosis of malignant bone tumors up to October 31, 2022. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using QUADAS-2. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses by machine learning methods and modeling approaches.

Results

The inclusion comprised 31 publications with 382,371 patients, including 141,315 with malignant bone tumors. Meta-analysis results showed machine learning sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 [95% CI: 0.81,0.91] and 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86,0.94] in the training set, and 0.83 [95% CI: 0.74,0.89] and 0.87 [95% CI: 0.79,0.92] in the validation set. Subgroup analysis revealed MRI-based radiomics was the most common approach, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 [95% CI: 0.74,0.91] and 0.87 [95% CI: 0.81,0.91] in the training set, and 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70,0.86] and 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70,0.86] in the validation set. Convolutional neural networks were the most common model type, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 [95% CI: 0.72,0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI: 0.82,0.97] in the training set, and 0.87 [95% CI: 0.51,0.98] and 0.87 [95% CI: 0.69,0.96] in the validation set.

Conclusion

Machine learning is mainly applied in radiomics for diagnosing malignant bone tumors, showing desirable diagnostic performance. Machine learning can be an early adjunctive diagnostic method but requires further research and validation to determine its practical efficiency and clinical application prospects.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023387057.

The Use of Radiomic Tools in Renal Mass Characterization

The incidence of renal mass detection has increased during recent decades, with an increased diagnosis of small renal masses, and a final benign diagnosis in some cases. To avoid unnecessary surgeries, there is an increasing interest in using radiomics tools to predict histological results, using radiological features. We performed a narrative review to evaluate the use of radiomics in renal mass characterization. Conventional images, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR), are the most common diagnostic tools in renal mass characterization. Distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors in small renal masses can be challenging using conventional methods. To improve subjective evaluation, the interest in using radiomics to obtain quantitative parameters from medical images has increased. Several studies have assessed this novel tool for renal mass characterization, comparing its ability to distinguish benign to malign tumors, the results in differentiating renal cell carcinoma subtypes, or the correlation with prognostic features, with other methods. In several studies, radiomic tools have shown a good accuracy in characterizing renal mass lesions. However, due to the heterogeneity in the radiomic model building, prospective and external validated studies are needed.

Role of AI and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Brief Review

Globally, renal cancer (RC) is the 10th most common cancer among men and women. The new era of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have allowed the development of AI-based computer-aided diagnostic/prediction (AI-based CAD/CAP) systems, which have shown promise for the diagnosis of RC (i.e., subtyping, grading, and staging) and prediction of clinical outcomes at an early stage. This will absolutely help reduce diagnosis time, enhance diagnostic abilities, reduce invasiveness, and provide guidance for appropriate management procedures to avoid the burden of unresponsive treatment plans. This survey mainly has three primary aims. The first aim is to highlight the most recent technical diagnostic studies developed in the last decade, with their findings and limitations, that have taken the advantages of AI and radiomic markers derived from either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images to develop AI-based CAD systems for accurate diagnosis of renal tumors at an early stage. The second aim is to highlight the few studies that have utilized AI and radiomic markers, with their findings and limitations, to predict patients' clinical outcome/treatment response, including possible recurrence after treatment, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with renal tumors. The promising findings of the aforementioned studies motivated us to highlight the optimal AI-based radiomic makers that are correlated with the diagnosis of renal tumors and prediction/assessment of patients' clinical outcomes. Finally, we conclude with a discussion and possible future avenues for improving diagnostic and treatment prediction performance.

A first look into radiomics application in testicular imaging: A systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the state of the art of radiomics in testicular imaging by assessing the quality of radiomic workflow using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). A systematic literature search was performed to find potentially relevant articles on the applications of radiomics in testicular imaging, and 6 final articles were extracted. The mean RQS was 11,33 ± 3,88 resulting in a percentage of 31,48% ± 10,78%. Regarding QUADAS-2 criteria, no relevant biases were found in the included papers in the patient selection, index test, reference standard criteria and flow-and-timing domain. In conclusion, despite the publication of promising studies, radiomic research on testicular imaging is in its very beginning and still hindered by methodological limitations, and the potential applications of radiomics for this field are still largely unexplored.

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Solid Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Biparametric (bp)-MRI and multiparametric (mp)-MRI may improve the diagnostic accuracy of renal mass histology.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of bp-MRI and mp-MRI for solid renal masses in differentiating malignant from benign, aggressive from indolent, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other histology.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review.

POPULATION

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to January 11, 2022 were searched.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 or 3 Tesla.

ASSESSMENT

Eligible studies evaluated the accuracy of MRI (with at least two sequences: T2, T1, dynamic contrast and diffusion-weighted imaging) for diagnosis of solid renal masses in adult patients, using histology as reference standard. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using QUADAS-2.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Meta-analysis using a bivariate logitnormal random effects model.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies (1239 masses from approximately 1200 patients). The risk of bias was high in three studies, unclear in five studies and low in two studies. The diagnostic accuracy of malignant (vs. benign) masses was assessed in five studies (64% [179/281] malignant). The summary estimate of sensitivity was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77%-99%), and specificity was 63% (95% CI: 46%-77%). No study assessed aggressive (vs. indolent) masses. The diagnostic accuracy of ccRCC (vs. other subtypes) was evaluated in six studies (47% [455/971] ccRCC): the summary estimate of sensitivity was 85% (95% CI: 77%-90%) and specificity was 77% (95% CI: 73%-81%).

DATA CONCLUSION

Our study reveals deficits in the available evidence on MRI for diagnosis of renal mass histology. The number of studies was limited, at unclear/high risk of bias, with heterogeneous definitions of solid masses, imaging techniques, diagnostic criteria, and outcome measures.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Radiogenomics in Renal Cancer Management-Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Renal cancer management is challenging from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. In cases of small renal masses and cystic lesions the differential diagnosis of benign or malignant tissues has potential pitfalls when imaging or even renal biopsy is applied. The recent artificial intelligence, imaging techniques, and genomics advancements have the ability to help clinicians set the stratification risk, treatment selection, follow-up strategy, and prognosis of the disease. The combination of radiomics features and genomics data has achieved good results but is currently limited by the retrospective design and the small number of patients included in clinical trials. The road ahead for radiogenomics is open to new, well-designed prospective studies, with large cohorts of patients required to validate previously obtained results and enter clinical practice.

Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images

The aim of this work was to compare the classification of cardiac MR-images of AL versus ATTR amyloidosis by neural networks and by experienced human readers. Cine-MR images and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images of 120 patients were studied (70 AL and 50 TTR). A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained with a 5-fold cross validation process, taking care to strictly distribute images of a given patient in either the training group or the test group. The analysis was performed at the patient level by averaging the predictions obtained for each image. The classification accuracy obtained between AL and ATTR amyloidosis was 0.750 for cine-CNN, 0.611 for Gado-CNN and between 0.617 and 0.675 for human readers. The corresponding AUC of the ROC curve was 0.839 for cine-CNN, 0.679 for gado-CNN (p < 0.004 vs. cine) and 0.714 for the best human reader (p < 0.007 vs. cine). Logistic regression with cine-CNN and gado-CNN, as well as analysis focused on the specific orientation plane, did not change the overall results. We conclude that cine-CNN leads to significantly better discrimination between AL and ATTR amyloidosis as compared to gado-CNN or human readers, but with lower performance than reported in studies where visual diagnosis is easy, and is currently suboptimal for clinical practice.

Clinical radiomics-based machine learning versus three-dimension convolutional neural network analysis for differentiation of thymic epithelial tumors from other prevascular mediastinal tumors on chest computed tomography scan

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of radiomic analysis with machine learning (ML) model with a convolutional neural network (CNN) in differentiating thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) from other prevascular mediastinal tumors (PMTs).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed in patients with PMTs and undergoing surgical resection or biopsy in National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, and Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan between January 2010 and December 2019. Clinical data including age, sex, myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms and pathologic diagnosis were collected. The datasets were divided into UECT (unenhanced computed tomography) and CECT (enhanced computed tomography) for analysis and modelling. Radiomics model and 3D CNN model were used to differentiate TETs from non-TET PMTs (including cyst, malignant germ cell tumor, lymphoma and teratoma). The macro F1-score and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to evaluate the prediction models.

Result

In the UECT dataset, there were 297 patients with TETs and 79 patients with other PMTs. The performance of radiomic analysis with machine learning model using LightGBM with Extra Tree (macro F1-Score = 83.95%, ROC-AUC = 0.9117) had better performance than the 3D CNN model (macro F1-score = 75.54%, ROC-AUC = 0.9015). In the CECT dataset, there were 296 patients with TETs and 77 patients with other PMTs. The performance of radiomic analysis with machine learning model using LightGBM with Extra Tree (macro F1-Score = 85.65%, ROC-AUC = 0.9464) had better performance than the 3D CNN model (macro F1-score = 81.01%, ROC-AUC = 0.9275).

Conclusion

Our study revealed that the individualized prediction model integrating clinical information and radiomic features using machine learning demonstrated better predictive performance in the differentiation of TETs from other PMTs at chest CT scan than 3D CNN model.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in evaluation of kidney lesions: a comprehensive literature review

Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) may increase the differentiation of benign from malignant kidney lesions, differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC, differentiation of different subtypes of RCC, to predict Fuhrman grade, to predict gene mutation through molecular biomarkers and to predict treatment response in metastatic RCC undergoing immunotherapy. Neural networks analyze imaging data. Statistical, geometrical, textural features derived are giving quantitative data of contour, internal heterogeneity and gray zone features of lesions. A comprehensive literature review was performed, until July 2022. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of renal lesions, grade prediction, gene alterations, molecular biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials have been analyzed. The application of AI and radiomics could lead to improved sensitivity, specificity, accuracy in detecting and differentiating between renal lesions. Standardization of scanner protocols will improve preoperative differentiation between benign, low-risk cancers and clinically significant renal cancers and holds the premises to enhance the diagnostic ability of imaging tools to characterize renal lesions.

RESOLVE-DWI-based deep learning nomogram for prediction of normal-sized lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to predict normal-sized lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical cancer clinically. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of using deep learning (DL) nomogram based on readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion weighted imaging (RESOLVE-DWI) and related patient information to preoperatively predict normal-sized LNM in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

A dataset of MR images [RESOLVE-DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] and patient information (age, tumor size, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, ADC value and squamous cell carcinoma antigen level) of 169 patients with cervical cancer between November 2013 and January 2022 were retrospectively collected. The LNM status was determined by final histopathology. The collected studies were randomly divided into a development cohort (n = 126) and a test cohort (n = 43). A single-channel convolutional neural network (CNN) and a multi-channel CNN based on ResNeSt architectures were proposed for predicting normal-sized LNM from single or multi modalities of MR images, respectively. A DL nomogram was constructed by incorporating the clinical information and the multi-channel CNN. These models' performance was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic analysis in the test cohort.

RESULTS

Compared to the single-channel CNN model using RESOLVE-DWI and ADC respectively, the multi-channel CNN model that integrating both two MR modalities showed improved performance in development cohort [AUC 0.848; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.774-0.906] and test cohort (AUC 0.767; 95% CI 0.613-0.882). The DL nomogram showed the best performance in development cohort (AUC 0.890; 95% CI 0.821-0.938) and test cohort (AUC 0.844; 95% CI 0.701-0.936).

CONCLUSION

The DL nomogram incorporating RESOLVE-DWI and clinical information has the potential to preoperatively predict normal-sized LNM of cervical cancer.

Multimodal ultrasound fusion network for differentiating between benign and malignant solid renal tumors

Objective: We aim to establish a deep learning model called multimodal ultrasound fusion network (MUF-Net) based on gray-scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images for classifying benign and malignant solid renal tumors automatically and to compare the model’s performance with the assessments by radiologists with different levels of experience.

Methods: A retrospective study included the CEUS videos of 181 patients with solid renal tumors (81 benign and 100 malignant tumors) from June 2012 to June 2021. A total of 9794 B-mode and CEUS-mode images were cropped from the CEUS videos. The MUF-Net was proposed to combine gray-scale and CEUS images to differentiate benign and malignant solid renal tumors. In this network, two independent branches were designed to extract features from each of the two modalities, and the features were fused using adaptive weights. Finally, the network output a classification score based on the fused features. The model’s performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and compared with the assessments of the two groups of radiologists with different levels of experience.

Results: For the discrimination between benign and malignant solid renal tumors, the junior radiologist group, senior radiologist group, and MUF-Net achieved accuracy of 70.6%, 75.7%, and 80.0%, sensitivity of 89.3%, 95.9%, and 80.4%, specificity of 58.7%, 62.9%, and 79.1%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.740 (95% confidence internal (CI): 0.70–0.75), 0.794 (95% CI: 0.72–0.83), and 0.877 (95% CI: 0.83–0.93), respectively.

Conclusion: The MUF-Net model can accurately classify benign and malignant solid renal tumors and achieve better performance than senior radiologists.

Key points: The CEUS video data contain the entire tumor microcirculation perfusion characteristics. The proposed MUF-Net based on B-mode and CEUS-mode images can accurately distinguish between benign and malignant solid renal tumors with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.877, which surpasses senior radiologists’ assessments by a large margin.

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions with MRI-based radiomics and machine learning

BACKGROUND

Solid renal masses are often indeterminate for benignity versus malignancy on magnetic resonance imaging. Such masses are typically evaluated with either percutaneous biopsy or surgical resection. Percutaneous biopsy can be non-diagnostic and some surgically resected lesions are inadvertently benign.

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of ten machine learning (ML) algorithms trained with MRI-based radiomics features in distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

METHODS

Patients with solid renal masses identified on pre-intervention MRI were curated from our institutional database. Masses with a definitive diagnosis via imaging (for angiomyolipomas) or via biopsy or surgical resection (for oncocytomas or renal cell carcinomas) were selected. Each mass was segmented for both T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images. Radiomics features were derived from the segmented masses for each imaging sequence. Ten ML algorithms were trained with the radiomics features gleaned from each MR sequence, as well as the combination of MR sequences.

RESULTS

In total, 182 renal masses in 160 patients were included in the study. The support vector machine algorithm trained on radiomics features from T2-weighted images performed superiorly, with an accuracy of 0.80 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. Linear discriminant analysis (accuracy = 0.84 and AUC = 0.77) and logistic regression (accuracy = 0.78 and AUC = 0.78) algorithms trained on T2-based radiomics features performed similarly. ML algorithms trained on radiomics features from post-contrast T1-weighted images or the combination of radiomics features from T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images yielded lower performance.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models trained with radiomics features derived from T2-weighted images can provide high accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Machine learning models derived from MRI-based radiomics features may improve the clinical management of solid renal masses and have the potential to reduce the frequency with which benign solid renal masses are biopsied or surgically resected.

MRI-Based Radiomics and Urine Creatinine for the Differentiation of Renal Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

Objectives

Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are different to distinguish minimal fat angiomyolipoma (mf-AML) with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics in the differentiation of fat-poor AMLs from other renal neoplasms.

Methods

A total of 69 patients with solid renal tumors without macroscopic fat and with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC (n=50) or mf-AML (n=19) who underwent conventional MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) were included. Clinical data including age, sex, tumor location, urine creatinine, and urea nitrogen were collected from medical records. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured from renal tumors. We used the ITK-SNAP software to manually delineate the regions of interest on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and IVIM-DWI from the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor. We extracted 396 radiomics features by the Analysis Kit software for each MR sequence. The hand-crafted features were selected by using the Pearson correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared between the models to obtain the optimal model for the differentiation of mf-AML and RCC. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the models.

Results

Clinical model based on urine creatinine achieved an AUC of 0.802 (95%CI: 0.761-0.843). IVIM-based model based on f value achieved an AUC of 0.692 (95%CI: 0.627-0.757). T2WI-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.883 (95%CI: 0.852-0.914). IVIM-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.874 (95%CI: 0.841-0.907). Combined radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.919 (95%CI: 0.894-0.944). Clinical-radiomics model yielded the best performance, with an AUC of 0.931 (95%CI: 0.907-0.955). The calibration curve and DCA confirmed that the clinical-radiomics model had a good consistency and clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

The clinical-radiomics model may be served as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to differentiate mf-AML with RCC, which might facilitate the clinical decision-making process.

Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond

Artificial intelligence (AI) has made considerable progress within the last decade and is the subject of contemporary literature. This trend is driven by improved computational abilities and increasing amounts of complex data that allow for new approaches in analysis and interpretation. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a rising incidence since most tumors are now detected at an earlier stage due to improved imaging. This creates considerable challenges as approximately 10%–17% of kidney tumors are designated as benign in histopathological evaluation; however, certain co-morbid populations (the obese and elderly) have an increased peri-interventional risk. AI offers an alternative solution by helping to optimize precision and guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. The narrative review introduced basic principles and provide a comprehensive overview of current AI techniques for RCC. Currently, AI applications can be found in any aspect of RCC management including diagnostics, perioperative care, pathology, and follow-up. Most commonly applied models include neural networks, random forest, support vector machines, and regression. However, for implementation in daily practice, health care providers need to develop a basic understanding and establish interdisciplinary collaborations in order to standardize datasets, define meaningful endpoints, and unify interpretation.

Deep Learning Supplants Visual Analysis by Experienced Operators for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis by Cine-CMR

Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from cine-CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) alone is not reliable. In this study, we tested if a convolutional neural network (CNN) could outperform the visual diagnosis of experienced operators. Method: 119 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and 122 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of other origins were retrospectively selected. Diastolic and systolic cine-CMR images were preprocessed and labeled. A dual-input visual geometry group (VGG ) model was used for binary image classification. All images belonging to the same patient were distributed in the same set. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated per frame and per patient from a 40% held-out test set. Results were compared to a visual analysis assessed by three experienced operators. Results: frame-based comparisons between humans and a CNN provided an accuracy of 0.605 vs. 0.746 (p < 0.0008) and an AUC of 0.630 vs. 0.824 (p < 0.0001). Patient-based comparisons provided an accuracy of 0.660 vs. 0.825 (p < 0.008) and an AUC of 0.727 vs. 0.895 (p < 0.002). Conclusion: based on cine-CMR images alone, a CNN is able to discriminate cardiac amyloidosis from LVH of other origins better than experienced human operators (15 to 20 points more in absolute value for accuracy and AUC), demonstrating a unique capability to identify what the eyes cannot see through classical radiological analysis.