Q-Dixon and GRAPPATINI T2 Mapping Parameters: A Whole Spinal Assessment of the Relationship Between Osteoporosis and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Physiological gradient in lumbar spine fat fraction and R2* and its impact on osteoporosis diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow adiposity and R2* have been explored as an imaging biomarker for osteoporosis. Chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) is a method that allows for relatively accurate measurement of adiposity and R2* in bone marrow in a simple manner. Additionally, there are reports of a physiological gradient of fat distribution in the lumbar spine. This physiological gradient of fat distribution can potentially impact the prediction of osteoporosis. Furthermore, the distribution of R2* is not well understood.

PURPOSE

This study examined how lumbar spine fat fraction (FF) and R2* change with different levels of the lumbar spine, how they influence osteoporosis prediction, and how they change according to measurement methods.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study included patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and lumbar spine CSE-MRI within one-month intervals between 2017 and 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reproducibility of FF and R2* based on measurement techniques, changes in FF and R2* according to vertebral level and osteoporosis status, and diagnostic power of osteoporosis based on vertebral level.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into the normal bone density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups based on bone mineral density. The relationship between groups and spine level before and after BMD adjustment was investigated using generalized estimating equations. Comparisons between the three groups and various measures of reliability were conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performance for predicting osteoporosis was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Comparing the three groups, FF increased with osteoporosis severity, while R2* decreased (p<.001). The intra/inter-rater agreement for FF and R2* was excellent. A physiological gradient within individuals was observed, where FF increased towards the lower lumbar spine (p=.002). R2* tended to decrease, but it was not statistically significant (p=.218). There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of osteoporosis based on FF or R2* across different lumbar spine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increase in FF and a decrease in R2* from T12 to L5. However, the predictive power of osteoporosis did not significantly differ between each level.

Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Bone Mineral Density: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and intervertebral disk degeneration (IVDD) using a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis. Summary-level data from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) were used. Instrumental variables (IVs) for IVDD were selected from the large-scale Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) (20,001 cases and 164,682 controls). Bone mineral density (BMD) at five different sites (heel (n = 426,824), total body (TB) (n = 56,284), forearm (FA) (n = 8143), femoral neck (FN) (n = 32,735), and lumbar spine (LS) (n = 28,498)) was used as a phenotype for OP. Bidirectional causality between IVDD and BMD was assessed using inverse variance weighting (IVW) and other methods. Related sensitivity analyses were performed. Myopia was also analyzed as a negative control result to ensure the validity of IVs. Heel bone mineral density (heel BMD), total body bone mineral density (TB-BMD), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN-BMD), and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) have a direct causal relationship on intervertebral disk degeneration (IVDD) [heel BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.06, p = 0.03; TB-BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.18, p = 8.72E-08; FN-BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.15, p = 4.89E-03; LS-BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.16, p = 1.43E-04]. There was no evidence of a significant causal effect of IVDD on BMD. In conclusion, our study found a significant positive causal effect of lower BMD on IVDD, and we identified significant causal effects of heel, TB-, FN-, and LS-BMD on IVDD, but there was no evidence of a significant causal effect of IVDD on BMD.

Impact of Running Exercise on Intervertebral Disc: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Running is one of the most popular sports worldwide. However, controversies exist regarding how running affects runner's intervertebral discs (IVD).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review studies that evaluated IVD morphology or composition changes in response to running exercise, to determine the impact of running exercise on IVD.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was performed for 4 major databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) healthy people without known IVD disease or major complications such as tuberculosis (IVD degeneration or low back pain are considered as minor complications); (2) subjects performed 1-time or regular running exercises; (3) pre and post comparison of runners or comparison between runners and healthy control subjects; (4) direct or indirect IVD morphology or composition measured; (5) IVD assessed before and after either acute or chronic running exercise, or compared cross-sectionally between runners and controls. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) reviews, editorials, letters or abstracts only; (2) animal studies; (3) subjects performed exercise other than running.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

DATA EXTRACTION

The extracted data included study design and primary outcomes of the included studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate study quality and risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies with 632 participants were included in the final analysis; 4 studies measured IVD changes using stature or spinal height, and the other 9 measured IVD changes using magnetic resonance imaging; 6 studies found that running acutely and negatively impacts IVD; 3 out of 5 cross-sectional studies found that IVD parameters are better for runners than controls; 1 longitudinal study found no significant difference in IVD before and after training for marathon in runners; 1 longitudinal study found no significant difference in changes of IVD between runners and controls after 15 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Negative changes in IVD exist for a short period of time after running, which may be due to the temporary compression pushing water content out of the disc. Cross-sectional studies suggest that long-term running exerts a mild positive effect on IVD; however, this inference has not been confirmed by high-quality longitudinal studies.

Does vertebral osteoporosis delay or accelerate lumbar disc degeneration? A systematic review

The effect of vertebral osteoporosis on disc degeneration is still debated. The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic review of studies in this area to further reveal the relationship between the two. Relevant studies were searched in electronic databases, and studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, basic information of the included studies was extracted and summarized. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 34 publications spanning 24 years were included in our study. There were 19 clinical studies, including 12 prospective studies and 7 retrospective studies. Of these, 7 considered vertebral osteoporosis to be positively correlated with disc degeneration, 8 considered them to be negatively correlated, and 4 considered them to be uncorrelated. Two cadaveric studies were included, one considered the two to be negatively correlated and one considered them not to be correlated. Seven animal studies were included, of which five considered a positive correlation between vertebral osteoporosis and disc degeneration and two considered a negative correlation between the two. There were also 6 studies that used anti-osteoporosis drugs for intervention, all of them were animal studies. Five of them concluded that vertebral osteoporosis was positively associated with disc degeneration, and the remaining one concluded that there was no correlation between the two. Our systematic review shows that the majority of studies currently consider an association between vertebral osteoporosis and disc degeneration, but there is still a huge disagreement whether this association is positive or negative. Differences in observation time and follow-up time may be one of the reasons for the disagreement. A large number of clinical and basic studies are still needed in the future to further explore the relationship between the two.

Immune exposure: how macrophages interact with the nucleus pulposus

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a primary contributor to low back pain. Immune cells play an extremely important role in modulating the progression of IDD by interacting with disc nucleus pulposus (NP) cells and extracellular matrix (ECM). Encased within the annulus fibrosus, healthy NP is an avascular and immune-privileged tissue that does not normally interact with macrophages. However, under pathological conditions in which neovascularization is established in the damaged disc, NP establishes extensive crosstalk with macrophages, leading to different outcomes depending on the different microenvironmental stimuli. M1 macrophages are a class of immune cells that are predominantly pro-inflammatory and promote inflammation and ECM degradation in the NP, creating a vicious cycle of matrix catabolism that drives IDD. In contrast, NP cells interacting with M2 macrophages promote disc tissue ECM remodeling and repair as M2 macrophages are primarily involved in anti-inflammatory cellular responses. Hence, depending on the crosstalk between NP and the type of immune cells (M1 vs. M2), the overall effects on IDD could be detrimental or regenerative. Drug or surgical treatment of IDD can modulate this crosstalk and hence the different treatment outcomes. This review comprehensively summarizes the interaction between macrophages and NP, aiming to highlight the important role of immunology in disc degeneration.

T1ρ, T2 and T2* mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a comparison study

BACKGROUND

Early and accurate assessment of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is very important to therapeutic strategy. This study aims to correlate and compare the performances of T1ρ, T2 and T2* mapping for Pfirrmann grades and morphologic changes in the IVDD.

METHODS

This prospective study included 39 subjects with 195 lumbar discs. T1ρ, T2 and T2* mapping were performed, and T1ρ, T2 and T2* values of nucleus pulposus (NP), and anterior and posterior annulus fibrosus were measured. IVDD was assessed with Pfirrmann grading and morphologic changes (normal, bulging, herniation and annular fissure). The performances of T1ρ, T2 and T2* relaxation times were compared for detecting early (Pfirrmann grade II-III) and advanced degeneration (Pfirrmann grade IV-V), as well as for morphologic changes.

RESULTS

T2 relaxation times was strongly corelated with T1ρ and T2* relaxation times. Areas under the curves (AUCs) of T1ρ, T2 and T2* relaxation times of NP were 0.70, 0.87 and 0.80 for early degeneration, and 0.91, 0.95 and 0.82 for advanced degeneration, respectively. AUCs of T1ρ, T2 and T2* relaxation times of NP were 0.78, 0.83 and 0.64 for bulging discs, 0.87, 0.89 and 0.69 for herniated discs, and 0.79, 0.82 and 0.69 for annular tearing, respectively. The AUC of T2 relaxation time was significantly higher than those of T1ρ relaxation times (both P < 0.01) for early IVDD, and the AUCs of T1ρ and T2 relaxation times for assessing advanced degeneration and morphologic changes were similar (P > 0.05) but significantly higher than that of T2*relaxation time (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

T2 mapping performed better than T1ρ mapping for the detection of early IVDD. T1ρ and T2 mapping performed similarly but better than T2* mapping for advanced degeneration and morphologic changes of IVDD.