Automated Detection of Brain Metastases on T1-Weighted MRI Using a Convolutional Neural Network: Impact of Volume Aware Loss and Sampling Strategy

A novel metastatic tumor segmentation method with a new evaluation metric in clinic study

Background

Brain metastases are the most common brain malignancies. Automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases provide significant assistance for radiologists in discovering the location of the lesion and making accurate clinical decisions on brain tumor type for precise treatment.

Objectives

However, due to the small size of the brain metastases, existing brain metastases segmentation produces unsatisfactory results and has not been evaluated on clinic datasets.

Methodology

In this work, we propose a new metastasis segmentation method DRAU-Net, which integrates a new attention mechanism multi-branch weighted attention module and DResConv module, making the extraction of tumor boundaries more complete. To enhance the evaluation of both the segmentation quality and the number of targets, we propose a novel medical image segmentation evaluation metric: multi-objective segmentation integrity metric, which effectively improves the evaluation results on multiple brain metastases with small size.

Results

Experimental results evaluated on the BraTS2023 dataset and collected clinical data show that the proposed method has achieved excellent performance with an average dice coefficient of 0.6858 and multi-objective segmentation integrity metric of 0.5582.

Conclusion

Compared with other methods, our proposed method achieved the best performance in the task of segmenting metastatic tumors.

A 3D Convolutional Neural Network Based on Non-enhanced Brain CT to Identify Patients with Brain Metastases

Dedicated brain imaging for cancer patients is seldom recommended in the absence of symptoms. There is increasing availability of non-enhanced CT (NE-CT) of the brain, mainly owing to a wider utilization of Positron Emission Tomography-CT (PET-CT) in cancer staging. Brain metastases (BM) are often hard to diagnose on NE-CT. This work aims to develop a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (3D-CNN) based on brain NE-CT to distinguish patients with and without BM. We retrospectively included NE-CT scans for 100 patients with single or multiple BM and 100 patients without brain imaging abnormalities. Patients whose largest lesion was < 5 mm were excluded. The largest tumor was manually segmented on a matched contrast-enhanced T1 weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and shape radiomics were extracted to determine the size and volume of the lesion. The brain was automatically segmented, and masked images were normalized and resampled. The dataset was split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Multiple versions of a 3D-CNN were developed, and the best model was selected based on accuracy (ACC) on the validation set. The median largest tumor Maximum-3D-Diameter was 2.29 cm, and its median volume was 2.81 cc. Solitary BM were found in 27% of the patients, while 49% had > 5 BMs. The best model consisted of 4 convolutional layers with 3D average pooling layers, dropout layers of 50%, and a sigmoid activation function. Mean validation ACC was 0.983 (SD: 0.020) and mean area under receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.983 (SD: 0.023). Sensitivity was 0.983 (SD: 0.020). We developed an accurate 3D-CNN based on brain NE-CT to differentiate between patients with and without BM. The model merits further external validation.

Deep learning-based metastasis detection in patients with lung cancer to enhance reproducibility and reduce workload in brain metastasis screening with MRI: a multi-center study

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether a deep learning-based system (DLS) with black-blood imaging for brain metastasis (BM) improves the diagnostic workflow in a multi-center setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, a DLS was developed in 101 patients and validated on 264 consecutive patients (with lung cancer) having newly developed BM from two tertiary university hospitals, which performed black-blood imaging between January 2020 and April 2021. Four neuroradiologists independently evaluated BM either with segmented masks and BM counts provided (with DLS) or not provided (without DLS) on a clinical trial imaging management system (CTIMS). To assess reading reproducibility, BM count agreement between the readers and the reference standard were calculated using limits of agreement (LoA). Readers' workload was assessed with reading time, which was automatically measured on CTIMS, and were compared between with and without DLS using linear mixed models considering the imaging center.

RESULTS

In the validation cohort, the detection sensitivity and positive predictive value of the DLS were 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.1-92.2) and 88.2% (95% CI: 85.7-90.4), respectively. The difference between the readers and the reference counts was larger without DLS (LoA: -0.281, 95% CI: -2.888, 2.325) than with DLS (LoA: -0.163, 95% CI: -2.692, 2.367). The reading time was reduced from mean 66.9 s (interquartile range: 43.2-90.6) to 57.3 s (interquartile range: 33.6-81.0) (P <.001) in the with DLS group, regardless of the imaging center.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning-based BM detection and counting with black-blood imaging improved reproducibility and reduced reading time, on multi-center validation.

Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review

Recent advances in MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) and deep learning techniques encourage fully adaptive radiation therapy (ART), real-time MRI monitoring, and the MRI-only treatment planning workflow. Given the rapid growth and emergence of new state-of-the-art methods in these fields, we systematically review 197 studies written on or before December 31, 2022, and categorize the studies into the areas of image segmentation, image synthesis, radiomics, and real time MRI. Building from the underlying deep learning methods, we discuss their clinical importance and current challenges in facilitating small tumor segmentation, accurate x-ray attenuation information from MRI, tumor characterization and prognosis, and tumor motion tracking. In particular, we highlight the recent trends in deep learning such as the emergence of multi-modal, visual transformer, and diffusion models.

Brain metastasis tumor segmentation and detection using deep learning algorithms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Manual detection of brain metastases is both laborious and inconsistent, driving the need for more efficient solutions. Accordingly, our systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of deep learning algorithms in detecting and segmenting brain metastases from various primary origins in MRI images.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 24, 2023, which yielded 42 relevant studies for our analysis. We assessed the quality of these studies using the QUADAS-2 and CLAIM tools. Using a random-effect model, we calculated the pooled lesion-wise dice score as well as patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivity. We performed subgroup analyses to investigate the influence of factors such as publication year, study design, training center of the model, validation methods, slice thickness, model input dimensions, MRI sequences fed to the model, and the specific deep learning algorithms employed. Additionally, meta-regression analyses were carried out considering the number of patients in the studies, count of MRI manufacturers, count of MRI models, training sample size, and lesion number.

RESULTS

Our analysis highlighted that deep learning models, particularly the U-Net and its variants, demonstrated superior segmentation accuracy. Enhanced detection sensitivity was observed with an increased diversity in MRI hardware, both in terms of manufacturer and model variety. Furthermore, slice thickness was identified as a significant factor influencing lesion-wise detection sensitivity. Overall, the pooled results indicated a lesion-wise dice score of 79%, with patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities at 86% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores the potential of deep learning in improving brain metastasis diagnostics and treatment planning. Still, more extensive cohorts and larger meta-analysis are needed for more practical and generalizable algorithms. Future research should prioritize these areas to advance the field. This study was funded by the Gen. & Mrs. M.C. Peng Fellowship and registered under PROSPERO (CRD42023427776).

Automatically tracking brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery

Background and purpose

Patients with brain metastases (BMs) are surviving longer and returning for multiple courses of stereotactic radiosurgery. BMs are monitored after radiation with follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging every 2-3 months. This study investigated whether it is possible to automatically track BMs on longitudinal imaging and quantify the tumor response after radiotherapy.

Methods

The METRO process (MEtastasis Tracking with Repeated Observations was developed to automatically process patient data and track BMs. A longitudinal intrapatient registration method for T1 MR post-Gd was conceived and validated on 20 patients. Detections and volumetric measurements of BMs were obtained from a deep learning model. BM tracking was validated on 32 separate patients by comparing results with manual measurements of BM response and radiologists' assessments of new BMs. Linear regression and residual analysis were used to assess accuracy in determining tumor response and size change.

Results

A total of 123 irradiated BMs and 38 new BMs were successfully tracked. 66 irradiated BMs were visible on follow-up imaging 3-9 months after radiotherapy. Comparing their longest diameter changes measured manually vs. METRO, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.88 (p < 0.001); the mean residual error was -8 ± 17%. The mean registration error was 1.5 ± 0.2 mm.

Conclusions

Automatic, longitudinal tracking of BMs using deep learning methods is feasible. In particular, the software system METRO fulfills a need to automatically track and quantify volumetric changes of BMs prior to, and in response to, radiation therapy.

Application of artificial intelligence to stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial lesions: detection, segmentation, and outcome prediction

BACKGROUND

Rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) prompted its wide application in healthcare systems. Stereotactic radiosurgery served as a good candidate for AI model development and achieved encouraging result in recent years. This article aimed at demonstrating current AI application in radiosurgery.

METHODS

Literatures published in PubMed during 2010-2022, discussing AI application in stereotactic radiosurgery were reviewed.

RESULTS

AI algorithms, especially machine learning/deep learning models, have been administered to different aspect of stereotactic radiosurgery. Spontaneous tumor detection and automated lesion delineation or segmentation were two of the promising application, which could be further extended to longitudinal treatment follow-up. Outcome prediction utilized machine learning algorithms with radiomic-based analysis was another well-established application.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery has taken a lead role in AI development. Current achievement, limitation, and further investigation was summarized in this article.

Deep Learning for Detecting Brain Metastases on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Since manual detection of brain metastases (BMs) is time consuming, studies have been conducted to automate this process using deep learning. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of deep learning models that use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect BMs in cancer patients. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted until 30 September 2022. Inclusion criteria were: patients with BMs; deep learning using MRI images was applied to detect the BMs; sufficient data were present in terms of detective performance; original research articles. Exclusion criteria were: reviews, letters, guidelines, editorials, or errata; case reports or series with less than 20 patients; studies with overlapping cohorts; insufficient data in terms of detective performance; machine learning was used to detect BMs; articles not written in English. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging was used to assess the quality. Finally, 24 eligible studies were identified for the quantitative analysis. The pooled proportion of patient-wise and lesion-wise detectability was 89%. Articles should adhere to the checklists more strictly. Deep learning algorithms effectively detect BMs. Pooled analysis of false positive rates could not be estimated due to reporting differences.