Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as Imaging Biomarker for Identifying IDH Mutation, 1p19q Codeletion, and MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Patients With Glioma

Epigenetic dysregulation in cancers by isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2)

Recent advances in genome-wide studies have revealed numerous epigenetic regulations brought about by genes involved in cellular metabolism. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), an essential enzyme, that converts isocitrate into -ketoglutarate (KG) predominantly in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, has gained particular importance due to its cardinal role in the metabolic pathway in cells. IDH1, IDH2, and IDH3 are the three isomeric IDH enzymes that have been shown to regulate cellular metabolism. Of particular importance, IDH2 genes are associated with several cancers, including gliomas, oligodendroglioma, and astrocytomas. These mutations lead to the production of oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), which accumulates in cells promoting tumor growth. The enhanced levels of D-2-HG competitively inhibit α-KG dependent enzymes, inhibiting cell TCA cycle, upregulating the cell growth and survival relevant HIF-1α pathway, promoting DNA hypermethylation related epigenetic activity, all of which synergistically contribute to carcinogenesis. The present review discusses epigenetic mechanisms inIDH2 regulation in cells and further its clinical implications.

Computational pathology-based weakly supervised prediction model for MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma

Introduction

The methylation status of oxygen 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is closely related to the treatment and prognosis of glioblastoma. However, there are currently some challenges in detecting the methylation status of MGMT promoters. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological slides have always been the gold standard for tumor diagnosis.

Methods

In this study, based on the TCGA database and H&E-stained Whole slide images (WSI) of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, we constructed a weakly supervised prediction model of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma by using two Transformer structure models.

Results

The accuracy scores of this model in the TCGA dataset and our independent dataset were 0.79 (AUC = 0.86) and 0.76 (AUC = 0.83), respectively.

Conclusion

The model demonstrates effective prediction of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma and exhibits some degree of generalization capability. At the same time, our study also shows that adding Patches automatic screening module to the computational pathology research framework of glioma can significantly improve the model effect.

Advancing noninvasive glioma classification with diffusion radiomics: Exploring the impact of signal intensity normalization

Background

This study investigates the influence of diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWI-MRI) on radiomic-based prediction of glioma types according to molecular status and assesses the impact of DWI intensity normalization on model generalizability.

Methods

Radiomic features, compliant with image biomarker standardization initiative standards, were extracted from preoperative MRI of 549 patients with diffuse glioma, known IDH, and 1p19q-status. Anatomical sequences (T1, T1c, T2, FLAIR) underwent N4-Bias Field Correction (N4) and WhiteStripe normalization (N4/WS). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were normalized using N4 or N4/z-score. Nine machine-learning algorithms were trained for multiclass prediction of glioma types (IDH-mutant 1p/19q codeleted, IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted, IDH-wild type). Four approaches were compared: Anatomical, anatomical + ADC naive, anatomical + ADC N4, and anatomical + ADC N4/z-score. The University of California San Francisco (UCSF)-glioma dataset (n = 409) was used for external validation.

Results

Naïve-Bayes algorithms yielded overall the best performance on the internal test set. Adding ADC radiomics significantly improved AUC from 0.79 to 0.86 (P = .011) for the IDH-wild-type subgroup, but not for the other 2 glioma subgroups (P > .05). In the external UCSF dataset, the addition of ADC radiomics yielded a significantly higher AUC for the IDH-wild-type subgroup (P ≤ .001): 0.80 (N4/WS anatomical alone), 0.81 (anatomical + ADC naive), 0.81 (anatomical + ADC N4), and 0.88 (anatomical + ADC N4/z-score) as well as for the IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted subgroup (P < .012 each).

Conclusions

ADC radiomics can enhance the performance of conventional MRI-based radiomic models, particularly for IDH-wild-type glioma. The benefit of intensity normalization of ADC maps depends on the type and context of the used data.

Identification of IDH and TERTp mutations using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with deep learning in 162 gliomas

PURPOSE

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and telomerase reverse transcriptase gene promoter (TERTp) mutations play crucial roles in glioma biology. Such genetic information is typically obtained invasively from excised tumor tissue; however, these mutations need to be identified preoperatively for better treatment planning. The relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) information derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) has been demonstrated to correlate with tumor vascularity, functionality, and biology, and might provide some information about the genetic alterations in gliomas before surgery. Therefore, this study aims to predict IDH and TERTp mutational subgroups in gliomas using deep learning applied to rCBV images.

METHOD

After the generation of rCBV images from DSC-MRI data, classical machine learning algorithms were applied to the features obtained from the segmented tumor volumes to classify IDH and TERTp mutation subgroups. Furthermore, pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and CNNs enhanced with attention gates were trained using rCBV images or a combination of rCBV and anatomical images to classify the mutational subgroups.

RESULTS

The best accuracies obtained with classical machine learning algorithms were 83 %, 68 %, and 76 % for the identification of IDH mutational, TERTp mutational, and TERTp-only subgroups, respectively. On the other hand, the best-performing CNN model achieved 88 % accuracy (86 % sensitivity, 91 % specificity) for the IDH-mutational subgroups, 70 % accuracy (73 % sensitivity and 67 % specificity) for the TERTp-mutational subgroups, and 84 % accuracy (86 % sensitivity, 81 % specificity) for the TERTp-only subgroup using attention gates.

CONCLUSIONS

DSC-MRI can be utilized to noninvasively classify IDH- and TERTp-based molecular subgroups of gliomas, facilitating preoperative identification of these genetic alterations.

Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas

BACKGROUND

The fifth version of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in 2021 brought substantial changes. Driven by the enhanced implementation of molecular characterization, some diagnoses were adapted while others were newly introduced. How these changes are reflected in imaging features remains scarcely investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 226 treatment-naive primary brain tumor patients from our institution who received extensive molecular characterization by epigenome-wide methylation microarray and were diagnosed according to the 2021 WHO brain tumor classification. From multimodal preoperative 3T MRI scans, we extracted imaging metrics via a fully automated, AI-based image segmentation and processing pipeline. Subsequently, we examined differences in imaging features between the three main glioma entities (glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma) and particularly investigated new entities such as astrocytoma, WHO grade 4.

RESULTS

Our results confirm prior studies that found significantly higher median CBV (p = 0.00003, ANOVA) and lower median ADC in contrast-enhancing areas of glioblastomas, compared to astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas (p = 0.41333, ANOVA). Interestingly, molecularly defined glioblastoma, which usually does not contain contrast-enhancing areas, also shows significantly higher CBV values in the non-enhancing tumor than common glioblastoma and astrocytoma grade 4 (p = 0.01309, ANOVA).

CONCLUSIONS

This work provides extensive insights into the imaging features of gliomas in light of the new 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification. Advanced imaging shows promise in visualizing tumor biology and improving the diagnosis of brain tumor patients.