Noninvasive Assessment of Diabetic Kidney Disease With MRI: Hype or Hope?

Utilization of the corticomedullary difference in magnetic resonance imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient for noninvasive assessment of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUNDS

Accumulating data demonstrated that the cortico-medullary difference in apparent diffusion coefficient (ΔADC) of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) was a better correlation with kidney fibrosis, tubular atrophy progression, and a predictor of kidney function evolution in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the value of ΔADC in evaluating disease severity, differential diagnosis, and the prognostic risk stratification for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CKD.

METHODS

Total 119 patients with T2D and CKD who underwent renal MRI were prospectively enrolled. Of them, 89 patients had performed kidney biopsy for pathological examination, including 38 patients with biopsy-proven diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and 51 patients with biopsy-proven non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) and Mix (DKD + NDKD). Clinicopathological characteristics were compared according to different ΔADC levels. Moreover, univariate and multivariate-linear regression analyses were performed to explore whether ΔADC was independently associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR). The diagnostic performance of ΔADC for discriminating DKD from NDKD + Mix was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, an individual's 2- or 5-year risk probability of progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was calculated by the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE). The effect of ΔADC on prognostic risk stratification was assessed. Additionally, net reclassification improvement (NRI) was used to evaluate the model performance.

RESULTS

All enrolled patients had a median ΔADC level of 86 (IQR 28, 155) × 10-6 mm2/s. ΔADC significantly decreased across the increasing staging of CKD (P < 0.001). Moreover, those with pathological-confirmed DKD has a significantly lower level of ΔADC than those with NDKD and Mix (P < 0.001). It showed that ΔADC was independently associated with eGFR (β = 1.058, 95% CI = [1.002,1.118], P = 0.042) and UACR (β = -3.862, 95% CI = [-7.360, -0.365], P = 0.031) at multivariate linear regression analyses. Besides, ΔADC achieved an AUC of 0.707 (71% sensitivity and 75% specificity) and AUC of 0.823 (94% sensitivity and 67% specificity) for discriminating DKD from NDKD + Mix and higher ESKD risk categories (≥50% at 5 years; ≥10% at 2 years) from lower risk categories (<50% at 5 years; <10% at 2 years). Accordingly, the optimal cutoff value of ΔADC for higher ESKD risk categories was 66 × 10-6 mm2/s, and the group with the low-cutoff level of ΔADC group was associated with 1.232 -fold (95% CI 1.086, 1.398) likelihood of higher ESKD risk categories as compared to the high-cutoff level of ΔADC group in the fully-adjusted model. Reclassification analyses confirmed that the final adjusted model improved NRI.

CONCLUSIONS

ΔADC was strongly associated with eGFR and UACR in patients with T2D and CKD. More importantly, baseline ΔADC was predictive of higher ESKD risk, independently of significant clinical confounding. Specifically, ΔADC <78 × 10-6 mm2/s and <66 × 10-6 mm2/s would help to identify T2D patients with the diagnosis of DKD and higher ESKD risk categories, respectively.

Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis of Kidney Injury in Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) can provide quantitative parameters that show promise for evaluation of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The combination of radiomics with DTI and DKI may hold potential clinical value in detecting DKD.

PURPOSE

To investigate radiomics models of DKI and DTI for predicting DKD in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and evaluate their performance in automated renal parenchyma segmentation.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

One hundred and sixty-three T2DM patients (87 DKD; 63 females; 27-80 years), randomly divided into training cohort (N = 114) and validation cohort (N = 49).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5-T, diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) with 9 different b-values.

ASSESSMENT

The images of DSI were processed to generate DKI and DTI parameter maps, including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). The Swin UNETR model was trained with 5-fold cross-validation using 100 samples for renal parenchyma segmentation. Subsequently, radiomics features were automatically extracted from each parameter map. The performance of the radiomics models on the validation cohort was evaluated by utilizing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, Pearson correlation coefficient, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), decision curve analysis (DCA), area under the curve (AUC), and DeLong's test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The DKI_MD achieved the best segmentation performance (DSC, 0.925 ± 0.011). A combined radiomics model (DTI_FA, DTI_MD, DKI_FA, DKI_MD, and DKI_RD) showed the best performance (AUC, 0.918; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.820-0.991). When the threshold probability was greater than 20%, the combined model provided the greatest net benefit. Among the single parameter maps, the DTI_FA exhibited superior diagnostic performance (AUC, 887; 95% CI: 0.779-0.972).

DATA CONCLUSION

The radiomics signature constructed based on DKI and DTI may be used as an accurate and non-invasive tool to identify T2DM and DKD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Probing Renal Microstructure and Function with Advanced Diffusion MRI: Concepts, Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Diffusion measurements in the kidney are affected not only by renal microstructure but also by physiological processes (i.e., glomerular filtration, water reabsorption, and urine formation). Because of the superposition of passive tissue diffusion, blood perfusion, and tubular pre-urine flow, the limitations of the monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model in assessing pathophysiological changes in renal tissue are becoming apparent and motivate the development of more advanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) variants. These approaches take advantage of the fact that the length scale probed in DWI measurements can be adjusted by experimental parameters, including diffusion-weighting, diffusion gradient directions and diffusion time. This forms the basis by which advanced DWI models can be used to capture not only passive diffusion effects, but also microcirculation, compartmentalization, tissue anisotropy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of renal DWI. Following a short introduction on renal structure and physiology, we present the key methodological approaches for the acquisition and analysis of renal DWI data, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), non-Gaussian diffusion, and hybrid IVIM-DTI. We then briefly summarize the applications of these methods in chronic kidney disease and renal allograft dysfunction. Finally, we discuss the challenges and potential avenues for further development of renal DWI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.