VERT, a virtual clinical environment, enhances understanding of radiation therapy planning concepts

The application of virtual environment radiotherapy for RTT training: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Virtual Environment Radiotherapy Training (VERT) is a virtual tool used in radiotherapy with a dual purpose: patient education and student training. This scoping review aims to identify the applications of VERT to acquire new skills in specific activities of Radiation Therapists (RTTs) clinical practice and education as reported in the literature. This scoping review will identify any gaps in this field and provide suggestions for future research.

METHODS

In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and Arskey and O'Malley framework, an electronic search was conducted to retrieve complete original studies, reporting the use and implementation of VERT for teaching skills to RTTs. Studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases and included retrieved articles if they investigated the use of VERT for RTTs training.

RESULTS

Of 251 titles, 16 articles fulfilled the selection criteria and most of the studies were qualitative evaluation studies (n=5) and pilot studies (n=4). The specific use of VERT for RTTs training was grouped into four categories (Planning CT, Set-up, IGRT, and TPS).

CONCLUSION

The use of VERT was described for each category by examining the interaction of the students or trainee RTTs in performing each phase within the virtual environment and describing their perceptions. This system Virtual Reality (VR) enables the development of specific motor skills without interfering and pressurising clinical resources by using clinical equipment in a risk-free offline environment, improving the clinical confidence of students or trainee RTTs. However, even if VR can be integrated into the RTTs training with a great advantage, VERT has still not been embraced. This mainly due to the presence of significant issues and limitations, such as inadequate coverage within the current literature, software and hardware costs.

Radiotherapy plan evaluation tool in a resource-limited setting: Comparison of VERT and treatment planning software

INTRODUCTION

Simulation is becoming increasingly popular in clinical education due to a shortage of resources. The Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) assists students in developing their skills by providing realistic simulations of clinical radiation oncology treatments. It has also been used to help students around the world learn how to evaluate treatment plans.

AIM

The aim of this research is to evaluate version 5 of the VERT as a radiation therapy teaching tool for evaluating 3D treatment plans compared with treatment planning software tools in a limited resource setting.

METHODS

A quantitative design using an adapted online questionnaire was used for the study. All students registered for a bachelor's degree in a radiation therapy programme at the university's Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences were invited to a 90 min treatment planning session to evaluate two plans. First to fourth year students were evenly divided among eight groups. Four groups used the ECLIPSE TPS software (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto), and the other four groups used VERT version 5.0 (Virtual Ltd, Hull) to evaluate the same plans.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated that VERT version 5.0 has the potential to improve the training of radiation therapy students in environments with limited resources as a plan evaluation tool alongside the treatment planning software tools. All respondents found the session useful, with 55% of students indicating that the session was extremely useful.

CONCLUSION

Insights into the value of VERT as a teaching tool could contribute to improving training efficacy in contexts with resource limitations that are present in many clinical settings.

Development and validation of a cost-effective virtual reality educational tool to reduce anxiety and improve set-up accuracy in radiotherapy patients

PURPOSE

This study proposes a cost-effective method for educating radiotherapy patients through an immersive virtual reality (VR) system.

METHODS

The VR educational tool comprises VR glasses, a handheld controller, the scientific knowledge of radiotherapy, radiotherapy demonstration, and an audio introduction. To verify its efficacy, 120 radiotherapy patients with tumors were prospectively enrolled and divided into the control group or VR intervention group. After the first treatment, set-up errors, including three translation errors and three rotation errors, were recorded in six directions. In addition, participants were required to complete a questionnaire before radiotherapy to assess anxiety and understanding degrees. The questionnaire was scored using a five-point Likert Scale. Finally, Spearman's rank correlation test was used to evaluate set-up errors and questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

The set-up errors are significantly reduced in AP, SI, total translation, Roll and total rotation in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). The scores are higher in the intervention group than in the control group in question 1 (2.1 ± 0.58 vs. 3.3 ± 0.55), question 2 (1.3 ± 0.44 vs. 2.5 ± 0.65), question 4 (2.2 ± 0.65 vs. 3.2 ± 0.82), question 5 (1.8 ± 0.59 vs. 3.1 ± 0.79), and all subscales (5.5 ± 1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1.3 and 6.4 ± 1.3 vs. 9.2 ± 1.5). The scores of high, moderate, and low correlation are 47 (74%), 15 (23%), and 2 (3%) for the control group and 44 (69%), 17 (26%), and 3 (5%) for the intervention group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The VR educational tool can significantly improve comprehension and reduce anxiety. There is a strong correlation between set-up errors and questionnaire scores. The VR educational tool may help reduce set-up errors for radiotherapy patients.

Investigating New Zealand radiation therapy student perceptions about their degree curriculum

BACKGROUND

Radiation Therapists (RTs) are a key professional grouping in the delivery of health services for cancer patients. The education of RTs in New Zealand has evolved in response to regulatory and clinical workforce requirements. To date, it has lacked a fundamental underpinning of educational theory. Stakeholders, including students, were canvassed for their perspectives on the drivers behind the current curriculum with a view to developing theory which could shape future curricular development.

METHODS

A focus group was conducted with eight student RTs enrolled at the time of the study. A process driven by Constructivist Grounded Theory principles was adopted for the analysis of the resulting data.

RESULTS

Four themes were established to represent the data: "Being" is prized over "doing", Change is inevitable, A framework for Professional Identity formation and Modelling is key to learning.

CONCLUSIONS

There is utility in exploring the student perspective around curriculum. The data suggest that students on this programme are engaged with the process of preparing for practice and the connected learning experiences. There is a focus on the patient and the personal values and qualities which result from that focus. While specialist knowledge and technical skills are required for delivering patient care, it is fully expected those aspects of the clinical role will significantly change over time. Even at this early stage in their careers, students recognise the development and need for professional identity formation. Role models are perceived to be a vital part of student learning, be they positive or negative. Scrutiny of the study findings provides reason to question some assumptions which are sometimes made about student practitioners based on factors such as age and gender and the assumed universal ability of practitioners to teach the next generation. The perspectives gained inform the next stage of data collection from this group and theory building that will be reported outside the confines of this article.

Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education - A review and expert commentary

The field of radiation oncology is rapidly advancing through technological and biomedical innovation backed by robust research evidence. However, cancer professionals are notoriously time-poor, meaning there is a need for high quality, accessible and tailored oncologic education programs. While traditional teaching methods including lectures and other in-person delivery formats remain important, digital learning (DL) has provided additional teaching options that can be delivered flexibly and on-demand from anywhere in the world. While evidence of this digital migration has been evident for some time now, it has not always been met with the same enthusiasm by the teaching community, in part due to questions about its pedagogical effectiveness. Many of these reservations have been driven by a rudimentary utilisation of the medium and inexperience with digital best-practice. With increasing familiarity and understanding of the medium, increasingly sophisticated and pedagogically-driven learning solutions can be produced. This article will review the application of immersive digital learning tools in radiation oncology education. This includes first and second-generation Virtual Reality (VR) environments and Augmented Reality (AR). It will explore the data behind, and best-practice application of, each of these tools as well as giving practical tips for educators who are looking to implement (or refine) their use of these learning methods. It includes a discussion of how to match the digital learning methods to the content being taught and ends with a horizon scan of where the digital medium may take us in the future. This article is the second in a two-part series, with the companion piece being on Screen-Based Digital Learning Methods in Radiation Oncology. Overall, the digital space is well-placed to cater to the evolving educational needs of oncology learners. Further uptake over the next decade is likely to be driven by the desire for flexible on demand delivery, high-yield products, engaging delivery methods and programs that are tailored to individual learning needs. Educational programs that embrace these principles will have unique opportunities to thrive in this space.

Simulation-based education for medical radiation students: A scoping review

Simulation-based education is a significant aspect of teaching clinical skills in tertiary medical radiation science programmes, allowing students to experience the clinical setting in a safe environment. As an educational tool, simulation exists in many valid forms including role play, interprofessional simulation and virtual reality simulation. This scoping review looks at the current literature in this field to identify the evidence surrounding simulation-based education for medical radiation students. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based guide for educators, identify gaps in the literature and suggest areas of future research. Data extraction was performed on 33 articles where the interventions could be categorised into either role play simulation, virtual simulation, simulation videos or online learning environments. Most studies demonstrated that simulation could improve clinical competence and increase preparedness and confidence for clinical placement. Student satisfaction remained high throughout the studies; however, it is the view of many that although simulation-based education is a valid and effective tool, it is complementary to and not a replacement for clinical placement.

Rapid Adaptation of Cancer Education in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of a Live Virtual Statistics and Research Skills Workshop for Oncology Trainees

Due to COVID-19, an annual interactive statistics and research methodology workshop for radiation oncology trainees was adapted at short notice into a live virtual format. This study aimed to evaluate trainee opinions around the educational value of the workshop, logistical aspects and impact on interactivity. A post-course on-line survey was completed by 26/42 trainee attendees (response rate 62%). For five pre-specified learning outcomes (LO), 58 to 69% of trainees agreed that the LO was completely or largely met (Likert scores 6 and 7 on a scale 1 = not met at all; 7 = completely met). All trainees felt that logistical aspects of the workshop including organisation, accessibility to the platform and sound/image quality were good or excellent. With regard to opportunities for interaction and suitability for small-group 'break-out' sessions, the majority felt that interaction could be adequately maintained whilst just under a quarter felt the delivery method was not fit for the purpose. Networking/social engagement with peers and teachers was the factor most impaired using the live virtual delivery format. Over three-quarters of trainees replied they would favour the current event or other educational sessions being offered (at least as an option) in a virtual format in the future. Cost and convenience were given as the major non-COVID-19-related benefits of virtual on-line learning. These preliminary findings provide valuable feedback to help adapt or develop further on-line educational and training initiatives that will be necessary in the COVID-19 pandemic period and beyond.

Virtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To explore what is currently known about the use of virtual reality (VR) as a patient education tool in healthcare.

METHODS

Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review method and the PRISMA-ScR Checklist were employed. Four peer-reviewed databases were searched (Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, the Cochrane library). Pre-defined selection criteria identified 18 studies for inclusion. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach.

RESULTS

VR as an educational tool in healthcare is feasible and acceptable, and may improve patient's knowledge about their illness and satisfaction with treatment. Most studies used the Oculus VR glasses or headset, educated patients though the use of 3D 360° VR anatomical models, and were conducted with people affected with cancer. Opportunities exist for exploring unintended consequences, and the role of VR in educating populations with lower health literacy.

CONCLUSION

VR could assist in communicating medical information and knowledge to patients, but more research is needed, particularly to identify for whom and in what situations this method is most useful and to improve understanding about the potential unintended consequences.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Health professionals should consider using VR to educate their patients, and researchers can use this as a road map on how to address knowledge gaps in this field.

Virtual Reality-Based Education for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy

We built a virtual reality (VR) application that runs on a commercially available standalone VR headset that allows patients to view a virtual simulation of themselves receiving radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine if this experience can improve patient understanding of radiotherapy and/or reduce patient anxiety. We created software that reads data from our clinical treatment planning system and renders the plan on a life-size "virtual linear accelerator." The patient's CT simulation data is converted into a 3D translucent virtual human shown lying on the treatment table while visible yellow radiation beams are delivered to the target volumes in the patient. We conducted a prospective study to determine if showing patients their radiotherapy plan in VR improves patient education and/or reduces anxiety about treatment. A total of 43 patients were enrolled. The most common plans were 3D breast tangents and intensity-modulated radiotherapy prostate plans. Patients were administered pre- and post-experience questionnaires. Thirty-two patients (74%) indicated that they "strongly agree" that the VR session gave them a better understanding of how radiotherapy will be used to treat their cancer. Of the 21 patients who expressed any anxiety about radiotherapy beforehand, 12 (57%) said that the VR session helped decrease their anxiety about undergoing radiotherapy. In our single-institution, single-arm prospective patient study, we found that the majority of patients reported that the personalized VR experience was educational and can reduce anxiety. VR technology has potential to be a powerful adjunctive educational tool for cancer patients about to undergo radiotherapy.

Becoming virtually real: using the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT™) platform for the summative assessment of performance in a palliative radiotherapy treatment technique

Introduction:

Direct observation in the radiotherapy clinic remains the primary method for the assessment of procedural skills. But with increasing automation and reductions in clinical placement time during the recent pandemic, the role of summative, simulation-based assessment is being revisited. The aim of this article is to share early experiences of using Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) in the assessment of a palliative, parallel pair, external beam treatment delivery technique in a new pre-registration undergraduate programme.

Methods:

Eight first-year students completed a campus-based individual virtual assessment using virtual patient plans representing metastatic disease in the brain and pelvis and late-stage primary lung tumours. Performance was logged on a 25-item checklist for pre and post-procedure checks and treatment delivery tasks.

Results:

All eight students participated in the assessment with seven students (87·5%) achieving a pass grade at first attempt. The course team observed that participants demonstrated a range of skills and abilities and were able to compare and contrast individual approaches to patient positioning. Specific feed-forward action points were also highlighted as areas for students’ to focus on during their second placement. The project also identified logistical benefits for assessment teams.

Conclusions:

While these experiences are a single snapshot, a VERT simulation-based summative assessment is feasible and identified benefits included controlled observation and structured feedback on individual performance and scheduling pressure reductions for clinical teams. However, more work is needed to determine the psychometric qualities and predictability of performance in more complex techniques.

Utilising virtual environments for radiation therapy teaching and learning

INTRODUCTION

Modern radiation therapy undergraduate education comprises the illustration of theoretical, technical concepts in a classroom setting, coupled with the acquisition of practical handling and patient communication skills within the clinical environment. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the application of virtual environments to education, despite ongoing inconclusive evidence on the use of virtual environments for enhancing student educational achievement.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of our research is to evaluate a custom-built 3D virtual radiation oncology department created within Second Life®, an online virtual world, as an alternative to traditional physical classroom-based didactic instruction, in tandem with a Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system, for the peer support and training of junior radiation therapy students in their first and second year of undergraduate studies. To achieve this aim, we investigated learning achievement outcomes, knowledge retention over a 2-week time interval and learner self-perceived confidence post-instruction, using both quantitative and qualitative analysis.

METHODS

Institutional ethics approval was granted for an exempted review. Participants were currently enrolled undergraduate Year 1 and Year 2 students at our institution. Student participants were randomised into two groups; the control group attended a face-to-face classroom session centred on the illustration of theoretical, technical concepts, while the intervention group attended a virtual classroom session online on Second Life®, where similar content was delivered. Both groups then attended a VERT practical session to acquire practical handling and communication skills in radiation therapy. Upon completion of the sessions, confidence surveys, knowledge-based written and practical assessments were administered to the student participants.

RESULTS

We found that the instructional session conducted within the custom-built 3D virtual radiation oncology department in Second Life® compared to the traditional didactic classroom setting increased undergraduate Year 1 radiation therapy students' perceived confidence to a greater extent compared to Year 2 students, in performing radiation therapy treatment procedures. In addition, our findings revealed that overall learning achievement outcomes and knowledge retention scores between Second Life® and non- Second Life® student participants were closely similar and statistically insignificant. Thematic analysis of the confidence survey questionnaires revealed that the students in general desired more clinical hands-on practice.

DISCUSSION

Second Life® is equally effective in disseminating theoretical, technical course content delivery to undergraduate radiation therapy students. The use of virtual environments appears to have increased the perceived confidence of the Year 1 undergraduate students to a greater extent compared to the Year 2 undergraduates, suggesting that the adoption of virtual environments early in the students' educational journey can have a positive effect on students' learning experience.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The development and use of our custom-built Second Life® radiation oncology department provides a novel way of delivering remote, virtual training instruction to undergraduate radiation therapy students over traditional, didactic classroom instructional delivery. We recommend, based on the results of this pilot study, that future research can involve a larger study sample of undergraduate RT students, to explore both the short-term and long-term impact of virtual environments on student learning outcomes across their enrolled years of study. This would in turn mean progressive attempts to revamp our existing curricula structure, to deliberately incorporate the use of virtual environments, especially during early undergraduate years, towards enhanced modern RT education.

The Role of Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) in Medical Dosimetry Education

Medical dosimetry is an important component in training of radiation therapist, yet it is not easy for student to understand the principle of treatment planning and to be familiar with the relationship of the clinical target volume (CTV), planned target volume (PTV), and the nearby organs at risk (OARs) by just imagination. This study is conducted to evaluate whether using VERT in teaching medical dosimetry can help student to improve their learning experience. Students of cohort 2015 and 2016 were taught under TPS mode and TPS + VERT mode respectively. Direct comparison was conducted through self-evaluation survey, between two groups of students, in terms of their understanding of the concept of medical dosimetry and their level of confidence in completing different types of plans after the course. Both groups of students were able to understand the concept of medical dosimetry and able to complete 3D conformal plans after taking the course. Though, the students received TPS mode reported that they had lower level of confidence in completing the planning and required longer time for self-study and practice compared to the students who received the TPS + VERT mode. This study demonstrated that including VERT into medical dosimetry education can improve students' learning experience, by improving their self-confidence, as well as reducing time required for their self-study and practice.

The opportunities of computer simulation training in radiation therapy

The use of computer simulation is arguably more widespread in other industries than in medicine. However, it has filtered into mainstream use in radiation therapy via a commercial product born from collaborative research partnership based in a radiation therapy department .The benefits and potentials of simulation training is discussed in this editorial from the perspective of an experienced radiation therapy physicist.

Simulation-based education: A narrative review of the use of VERT in radiation therapy education

Simulation has a long history in medical and health science training and education. The literature describing this history is extensive. The role simulation plays in many health disciplines has evolved, as has the focus of the literature around it. The Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system is a relative newcomer to radiation therapy education and, similar to the literature around radiation therapy (RT) education, is still in its infancy. This narrative review sets the scene of simulation-based education within the health sciences and considers the lessons learned from published work on VERT to date. The evidence suggests that future inquiry involving VERT should explore different ways in which VERT can be used to contribute to the skillset required by the radiation therapist of tomorrow.