1
|
Austin RR, Lu SC, Jantraporn R, Park S, Geiger-Simpson E, Koithan M, Kreitzer M, Delaney CW. Documentation of Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies in the Electronic Health Record: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE 2023; 29:483-491. [PMID: 36897742 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies refers to massage therapy, acupuncture, aromatherapy, and guided imagery. These therapies have gained increased attention in recent years, particularly for their potential to help manage chronic pain and other conditions. National organizations not only recommend the use of CIH therapies but also the documentation of these therapies within electronic health records (EHRs). Yet, how CIH therapies are documented in the EHR is not well understood. The purpose of this scoping review of the literature was to examine and describe research that focused on CIH therapy clinical documentation in the EHR. Methods: The authors conducted a literature search using six electronic databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, and PubMed. Predefined search terms included "informatics," "documentation," "complementary and integrative health therapies," "non-pharmacological approaches," and "electronic health records" using AND/OR statements. No restrictions were placed on publication date. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Original peer-reviewed full article in English, (2) focus on CIH therapies, and (3) CIH therapy documentation practice used in the research. Results: The authors identified 1684 articles, of which 33 met the criteria for a full review. A majority of the studies were conducted in the United States (20) and hospitals (19). The most common study design was retrospective (9), and 26 studies used EHR data as a data source for analysis. Documentation practices varied widely across all studies, ranging from the feasibility of documenting integrative therapies (i.e., homeopathy) to create changes in the EHR to support documentation (i.e., flowsheet). Discussion: This scoping review identified varying EHR clinical documentation trends for CIH therapies. Pain was the most frequent reason for use of CIH therapies across all included studies and a broad range of CIH therapies were used. Data standards and templates were suggested as informatics methods to support CIH documentation. A systems approach is needed to enhance and support the current technology infrastructure that will enable consistent CIH therapy documentation in EHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin R Austin
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sheng-Chieh Lu
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Suhyun Park
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Mary Koithan
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA
| | - MaryJo Kreitzer
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Connie W Delaney
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keene MR, Heslop IM, Sabesan SS, Glass BD. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Australian oncology health professionals on complementary medicines. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R. Keene
- College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Australia
- Albury Base Hospital East Albury Australia
| | - Ian M. Heslop
- College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Australia
| | - Sabe S. Sabesan
- College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Australia
| | - Beverley D. Glass
- College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A pre-post evaluation of oncology healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices following the implementation of a complementary medicine practice guideline. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7487-7495. [PMID: 34100136 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06318-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complementary medicine (CM) use is prevalent among cancer patients, yet it is often not assessed by oncology healthcare providers (HCPs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate oncology HCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding CM use before and after the implementation of a practice guideline focusing on standardizing assessment and documentation of CM. METHODS Oncology HCPs across a provincial cancer agency were invited to participate in the study. The implementation strategy included an initial education session for HCPs and standardized CM assessment forms. Pre-post surveys assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to CM were completed by HCPs prior to attending the education session and following the 4-month implementation period. Paired t-tests were conducted to determine differences between baseline and follow-up surveys. RESULTS A total of 31 oncology HCPs completed both baseline and follow-up surveys, with over 3700 patient CM assessment forms being completed during the 4-month study period. At the end of the study, HCPs reported greater CM knowledge (p < 0.001), readiness to support cancer patients' CM decisions (p = 0.002), and willingness to consult with another HCP about CM (p = 0.004). No significant change in HCPs' reported attitudes towards CM, or other clinical practices related to CM were observed. CONCLUSION Implementing a practice guideline, including a CM education session and a standardized assessment form, was found to improve oncology HCPs' self-reported CM knowledge and readiness to answer cancer patients' questions about CM. The findings provide support for future knowledge translation research aimed at standardizing how CM is addressed within cancer care settings.
Collapse
|