Evaluation of radiographers' knowledge and attitudes of image quality optimisation in paediatric digital radiography in Saudi Arabia and Australia: a survey-based study

Radiographers' perceptions on the quality of managing general radiographic paediatric examinations through the use of a reflective tool

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric patients are a vulnerable population that require additional care by healthcare professionals. Quality managing these examinations ensures that effective and quality care is provided to individual patients, whilst encouraging consistency within the medical imaging department. This study explored radiographers' perspectives on quality management strategies of general radiographic paediatric examinations using a paediatric imaging reflective checklist.

METHODS

A quantitative descriptive research design with qualitative questions was used through a purposive sampling method from both public and private Australian diagnostic imaging qualified radiographers who had experience in paediatric imaging examinations. The paediatric imaging service reflective tool consisted of 65 items in total. Data analysis entailed Microsoft Excel version 16.16.6 and Jamovi version 2.3.21 for the closed-ended questions and for the open-ended responses a thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The participation rate was 13.2% and the most significant findings were: lead shielding was still being used at their organisation, despite recent recommendations to suspend its use; access to paediatric patient related information resources is limited; there was no involvement of families and communities regarding policy development or quality improvement measures as advocated in literature; and there was a need for enhanced specialised paediatric education, training and protocols.

CONCLUSION

Using the paediatric patient-centred imaging reflective checklist, radiographers had an opportunity to identify quality improvement indicators as well as issues that could further enhance best practice principles. Further studies could inform on the validity of this reflective tool.

Clinical indications for plain abdominal radiographs: A survey study among radiographers

Background

Abdominal pain is a common complaint in the Emergency Department. Radiographers' knowledge and practices regarding clinical indications for performing abdominal examinations are crucial in the results radiographs produced.

Aim

To determine the knowledge and practices of radiographers regarding the clinical indications for performing radiographic examinations of the abdomen.

Setting

Four public hospitals in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted, using a convenience, all-inclusive sample of n = 85 radiographers. A hard copy self-administered questionnaire was distributed between February and June 2020. Descriptive (mean and standard deviations) and inferential (chi² test) statistics were generated using IBM® SPSS® version 26.0 software package.

Results

Knowledge of clinical indications had a mean of 59.41. All four demographics (age, years of experience, attended a short course and attended pattern recognition course) were significantly associated with overall knowledge. Additionally, short course attendance was significantly associated with most practice items, and two knowledge items (which views are done for perforation; and which view(s) demonstrate a stab abdomen). Pattern recognition was significantly associated with one knowledge item (which views are regarded as an acute abdomen).

Conclusion

Despite the lack of short courses and pattern recognition courses, radiographers' knowledge of clinical indications was good (>50%). Continuous training, accessible protocols for performing clinical indications for plain abdominal radiographic examinations for radiographers, audit, feedback and reminders to enhance protocol adherence are recommended.

Contribution

The study findings could be used to enhance knowledge and practices regarding clinical indications for plain abdominal radiographic examinations among radiographers.

AWARENESS OF PAEDIATRIC RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION AND IMAGING PARAMETERS AMONG GROUP OF SRI LANKAN RADIOGRAPHERS

The present survey evaluated the level of awareness of radiological protection concepts and imaging parameters among Sri Lankan radiographers for the first time. The data were collected using an electronic questionnaire of 22 questions on demographic data, awareness of radiation protection concepts and imaging parameters. Only 84 out of 122 (68.8%) requested radiographers to return the questionnaire. More than 85% had ≥3 years of experience in the radiography field. The average scores for questions on best practices, imaging parameters and radiation protection were 75, 75.8 and 70.2%, respectively, with an overall score of 73.4%. Significant confusion existed on protective shielding, paediatric consenting capability, use of grids and excess X-ray field during paediatric radiography. Although the overall knowledge and awareness of participants on studied concepts were satisfactory, a continuous professional development credit system and implementation of a code of practice are required to improve the quality of radiography practice.

Australian student radiographers' experiences and perspectives in general paediatric medical imaging examinations

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric patients differ from adult patients with respect to anatomy, examination factors, behaviour, and intellectual development, requiring dedicated specialised knowledge and expertise. In the absence of a formal dedicated paediatric medical imaging subspecialty, this study undertook to understand student radiographers' experiences and perspectives on paediatric medical imaging.

METHODS

The study entailed a descriptive cross-sectional survey design entailed a 51-item closed and open-ended response questionnaire using a total sampling method. Data were collected from both under- and postgraduate student radiographers who undertook clinical placement. Data interpretation and analysis involved statistical analysis of close-ended questions and thematic analysis of open-ended questions.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 70%. Most participants acknowledged the importance of dedicated paediatric content as well as the theory content covered. The shortcoming in pre-placement practical component was overcome through varied approaches like observations and attempting through supervision whilst experiencing uncertainty, anxiety and felt unfair to risk the patient. As reported in literature like their qualified counterparts expressed similar challenges in technique adaptation, styles of interactions in gaining cooperation from both the children and parents. They also felt paediatric content and the practicals should be embedded throughout the course offering to not compromise the day-to-day service delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings iterate the importance paediatric imaging in the service delivery context. The importance of undertaking these examinations reliant on experiential learning is insufficient to bridge the gap of preparation prior to placement.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Collaborative academic and clinical radiography education will ensure that radiography students' dedicated specialised paediatric imaging knowledge and experience are enhanced.

Radiation Protection among South African Diagnostic Radiographers-A Mixed Method Study

ABSTRACT

Worldwide, radiographers' radiation protection practices vary. In South Africa, evidence of diagnostic radiographers' suboptimal radiation protection practices has been reported, but the reasons for these practices and suggestions to improve practices were lacking. Therefore, this study explored radiation protection among South African diagnostic radiographers. This study used an explanatory, sequential, mixed-method approach. Data were collected in three phases. Phase I, the quantitative phase, used an online questionnaire and respondents from Phase I interested in participating in Phase II, the qualitative phase, were interviewed, yielding 13 in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews. In Phase III, eight radiography managers co-constructed change strategies to optimize radiation protection in South Africa in two focus group interviews. Radiation protection was suboptimal despite diagnostic radiographers having a good attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control toward radiation protection and optimal radiation protection knowledge. Varying attitudes to radiation protection, lack of resources, and support from radiography management and healthcare teams contributed to suboptimal radiation protection practices. Radiography managers suggested increasing radiation protection awareness, ameliorating the diminished stature of the radiographer in the healthcare team, and increasing the availability of optimal quality resources. South African diagnostic radiographers' radiation protection knowledge was optimal, but the implementation of radiation protection varied and was influenced by multiple factors. A radiation protection culture supported by management is advocated to optimize radiation protection. However, ultimately radiation protection practices are incumbent on the individual radiographers' choice to practice radiation protection.

Radiation dose reduction for chest radiography of infants in intensive care units using a high peak kilovoltage-technique

BACKGROUND

Chest radiography is an important tool in the care of infants in intensive care units. Image optimization must be monitored to minimize radiation exposure in this susceptible population.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of a high tube peak kilovoltage technique to achieve radiation dose reduction while maintaining adequate image quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. Radiation doses of chest radiographs performed in the pediatric intensive care units in our institution were calculated. The radiographs were divided into two groups based on the value of the peak kilovoltage used: above and below 60 kilovolts (kV). Image quality was blindly assessed by two fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists. Air kerma, effective dose and quality score for the high versus the low peak kilovoltage group were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 376 radiographs. One hundred and seven radiographs were performed using peak kilovoltage values equal to or above 60 kV and 269 radiographs were performed using values under 60 kV. The average air kerma for the lower peak kilovoltage group was 56.6 microgray (µGy) (30.7-81.9) vs. 22.9 µGy (11.8-34.4) for the higher peak kilovoltage group (P<0.0001). The mean difference in effective dose between the groups was 11.68 (P<0.0001). The mean difference for the quality score was 0.06 (±0.03, P=0.10), not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

A high peak kilovoltage technique may enable a statistically significant radiation dose reduction without compromising the diagnostic value of the image.

South African radiographers' radiation protection practices, a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Radiation protection is multifarious, and consequently, a radiographers' application of radiation protection is multifaceted. Studies have shown varying radiation protection practices among radiographers. The first quantitative phase of this explanatory, sequential mixed-method study used the theory of planned behaviour to explore South African radiographers' radiation protection behaviour. Overall, South African radiographers' attitudes to radiation protection, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and radiation protection intention was high. This second phase of the study aimed to explore the reasons for South African radiographers' radiation protection practices.

METHODS

This study used an exploratory and descriptive qualitative approach. Data was collected through 13 in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews. Thematic analysis was used in order to uncover original phenomena. Data saturation was achieved and the study adhered to trustworthiness and ethical measures.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis identified two themes. The participants had the appropriate radiation protection knowledge, but radiation protection compliance remained a personal choice. Impediments such as feeling rushed during imaging of trauma and challenging patients, patients knowledge of radiation protection, resources, imaging referrals, inadequate training when transitioning from analogue to digital radiography and managerial support contributed to radiation protection compliance. Strategies such as further education, research and a change in mindset were suggested to further foster radiation protection compliance.

CONCLUSION

Even though participants' knowledge of radiation protection aligned with the legislated guidelines, limited internalising of the knowledge resulted in compliance being a personal choice. Participants reflected on their insouciant attitude and observed a similar attitude in their radiographer colleagues. Patient and work-related impediments were identified to contribute to radiation protection compliance. Strategies to further foster compliance were suggested.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Understanding the reasons for radiographers' choice in radiation protection will allow the development of strategies that foster optimum application of radiation protection practises. Developing a radiation protection culture that enhances personal compliance supported by education and evidence should be considered.

An assessment of Sri Lankan radiographer's knowledge and awareness of radiation protection and imaging parameters related to patient dose and image quality in computed tomography (CT)

INTRODUCTION

As computed tomography (CT) examinations have considerably risen, safe operation is essential to reduce the patients' dose. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the CT exposure parameters and radiation protection in CT imaging among Sri Lankan radiographers.

METHODS

An online survey-based study was devised and distributed among the Sri Lankan CT radiographers working in 63 CT units. Questions were divided into three subsections that collected data on the participants' demographic features, knowledge of the radiation protection, and imaging parameters.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight radiographers from 32 CT units (out of 63 CT units) distributed across 11 districts (out of 27 districts) participated in this survey.The percentages of correct responses for the questions related to radiation protection, imaging parameters, noise, Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL), and CT dosimetric parameters were 71%, 79%, 87%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. Although the years of experience did not influence any of above aspects, the level of education significantly impacted the knowledge about radiation protection, exposure parameters, and noise.

CONCLUSION

The radiographer's knowledge of radiation protection and most imaging parameters associated with patient safety and image quality is satisfactory. However, findings also show that participants should fill the knowledge gap in radiation-related risks, CT exposure parameters, dosimetric parameters, and DRL.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The study suggests the necessity of initiating continuous education programs for radiographers in line with national radiation protection legislation requirements that can be linked with code of practice.

Diagnostic radiography students' experiences of a practical method demonstrating the effect of milliampere-second in digital X-ray imaging systems

BACKGROUND

The effect of exposure technique factors varies between analogue and digital X-ray imaging systems (DR). Understanding these variations is paramount to optimising radiation protection, yet radiographers are unclear about these effects. A practical method to demonstrate milliampere second (mAs) effect in DR was developed to assist diagnostic radiography students in understanding exposure technique factors in DR.

OBJECTIVES

To explore second-year diagnostic radiography students' experiences of a practical method to demonstrate the effect of mAs in DR.

METHODS

A qualitative research approach employing an open-ended questionnaire explored second-year diagnostic radiography students' experiences of the practical method demonstrating the effect of mAs in DR. Twenty students participated in the study, and the data collected underwent thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Students appreciated working in small groups and provided suggestions to improve the practical method's instruction sheet. Most students' predicted outcome differed from the actual outcome of the demonstration. Seeing and documenting the effect of mAs in DR not only enhanced students' understanding of it but showed the implications of increasing mAs on image quality and radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

Students found that the practical method enhanced their understanding of mAs and exposure technique factors in DR. Additionally, the practical method highlighted exposure creep in DR and radiographers' role in protecting patients from overexposure to ionising radiation in the digital era.

Comparison of treatment position with mask immobilization and standard diagnostic setup in intracranial MRI radiotherapy simulation

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the quality of images resulting from magnetic resonance imaging of patients who underwent intracranial MRI simulation using two different setups (treatment position with mask immobilization and standard diagnostic setup). Due to a larger number of channels and lack of mask immobilization in the standard diagnostic setup, we would like to evaluate whether this is an appropriate technique for MRI treatment planning.

METHODS

In total, 70 patients who underwent MR imaging of the brain at 1.5T were included in the study (48 for 6‑channel flex coil, 22 for 24-channel HNU face bill coil). Contrast-enhanced 3D T1w and T2 FLAIR images were acquired. Images were subjectively compared for artifact appearance and general image quality by three radiographers. Objective comparison of contrast rate, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio was also performed.

RESULTS

FLAIR and contrast-enhanced 3D T1w images showed various artifacts, such as susceptibility and movement artifacts. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the evaluation of movement artifacts between two coils and two different immobilization methods. There were also no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between the 6‑channel flex coil and 24-channel HNU face bill coil regarding qualitative general image quality and objective measures.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences between the occurrence of movement artifacts, overall image quality, and objective image quality in treatment position with mask immobilization and standard diagnostic setup. Based on this result, we can conclude that a standard diagnostic setup is also applicable in intracranial MRI treatment planning with no loss to image quality. Registration of the imaging plans was not performed in this study; therefore, it might still be necessary to perform measurements of tumor delineation matching and geometrical accuracy acceptance in our institution.

Knowledge of radiation protection among radiology professionals and students: A medical college-based study

•

The overall knowledge of radiation protection among radiology professional and students was adequate.

•

The knowledge of radiation protection among diploma graduate was inadequate.

•

Radiation protection law should be promulgated as soon as possible in Nepal.

•

This is the first study to perform principal component analysis in the research study of its kind.

BACKGROUND

Radiation protection is the core of radiography for safe radiation-based imaging practice. This study aims to determine the knowledge of radiation protection among radiology professionals and students in a medical college of Nepal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire survey was carried out among 35 radiology staff and students at Universal College of Medical Sciences (UCMS), Bhairahawa, Nepal. The questionnaire survey consisted of socio-demographic variables and 17 questions, 3 questions were related to general information regarding training, knowledge, and experience and the remaining 14 multiple choice questions (MCQ) were related to radiation protection. Data were analyzed in SPSS Statistics software, version 27. The p-value was set at 5% level of significance. Nonparametric tests were applied since the data did not follow normal distribution. The knowledge score were categorized into lesser than 60 % inadequate, 60–80 % adequate and greater than or equal to 80 % excellent.

RESULTS

Out of total 35 participants, 28 were male and 7 were female with mean age 26.09 ± 7.18 years, range 18–54. The average radiation level of awareness was 9.6 (68.57 %), which was adequate, maximum 13 and minimum 4. There was not statistical significance of knowledge score by gender, age groups, work experience and studentship. Taking academic qualification, the level of knowledge of diploma graduates was inadequate 7.76 (55.42 %), and lower than other higher academic qualifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate radiation protection course materials and training should be introduced for diploma graduates. Continuing professional education (CME) should be organized regularly. Moreover, radiation protection law is a must in Nepal now.