1
|
Breazeale A, Rahmani R, Gallagher K, Nabavizadeh N. Liver stereotactic body radiation therapy without fiducial or retained ethiodized oil guidance warrants greater than 5 mm planning target volumes. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71:110-113. [PMID: 37712320 PMCID: PMC10920930 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), the placement of fiducial markers or retained ethiodized oil by transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) provides a landmark for consistent target localisation. TACE and fiducial markers are invasive procedures that harbour additional risks. We hypothesise that liver SBRT can be accurately delivered without the use of these invasive surrogate markers. METHODS We retrospectively identified 50 consecutive patients who underwent liver SBRT with respiratory motion management to a single lesion which exhibited retained ethiodized oil per prior TACE delivery. For each SBRT fraction, two manual rigid image registrations were performed by the treating physician. One using the liver contour as a surrogate for the target and second aligning only to the radio-opaque retained ethiodized oil of the treated lesion. The magnitude of the displacement vector between the two registration methods was used to assess the accuracy of target localisation if ethiodized oil was not present. RESULTS For the 50 patients, a total of 244 analysable cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) were included (six CBCTs excluded due to poor ethiodized oil visualisation). Respiratory motion management techniques consisted of active breathing control for 13 and abdominal compression for 37 patients. Forty-two patients had peripheral lesions and eight had central lesions (<2 cm from left and right portal veins). The average target localisation offset between the two registration methods (i.e. liver contour vs. retained ethiodized oil alignment) for patients with a single peripheral or central liver lesion was 5.8 and 5.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Across all patients, the average change in target position exceeded 5 mm for image registration methods based on the liver contour alone versus the retained ethiodized oil region. This suggests that margins greater than 5 mm may be required for respiratory motion-managed liver SBRT treatments in patients who do not undergo prior TACE or fiducial placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Breazeale
- Department of Radiation MedicineOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Ramtin Rahmani
- Department of Radiation MedicineOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Kyle Gallagher
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Nima Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiation MedicineOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaksic N, Modesto A, Meillan N, Bordron A, Michalet M, Riou O, Lisbona A, Huguet F. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:75-82. [PMID: 37865603 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Jaksic
- Institut de cancérologie et radiothérapie Brétillien, 35400 Saint-Malo, France.
| | - A Modesto
- Département de radiothérapie, institut régional du cancer, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - N Meillan
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier d'Argenteuil, 95107 Argenteuil, France
| | - A Bordron
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Brest, 29200 Brest, France
| | - M Michalet
- Département de radiothérapie, institut régional du cancer, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - O Riou
- Département de radiothérapie, institut régional du cancer, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - A Lisbona
- Département de radiothérapie, institut régional du cancer, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu B, Shi C, Prakash M, Gonzalez B, Kassardjian A, Kim J, Mandelin P, Williams T, Liu A. Comparison of baseline drifts using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block for the calibration of wall-mounted Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC) camera integrated with a CT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14199. [PMID: 37961991 PMCID: PMC10691618 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The calibration of the Respiratory Gating for SCanner (RGSC) system is critical to achieve better and more stable accuracy. The current procedure for a wall-mounted RGSC system has a relatively large residual error. PURPOSE To compare the baseline drifts in the image acquisition of DIBH using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block in the calibration of a wall-mounted RGSC camera system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Varian provides a calibration plate with three rows of calibration points: each row is separated by 15 cm longitudinally and by 10 cm laterally. In Varian's single-block calibration method, the reflector block was first placed on the center point of the calibration plate and aligned with the scanner isocenter. The calibration took a picture of the block, then placed the block on the other eight points sequentially. In the proposed three-block method, we placed three reflector blocks on the center row, with the center block aligned with the isocenter, and we took a picture of the center block by manually blocking the other two blocks in calibration. By moving the couch longitudinally in or out 15 cm, the calibration goes through all nine points. Monte Carlo simulation was done using Matlab to analyze the calibration matrix eigenvalue characteristics. RESULTS For a typical scan length of 40 cm of DIBH, the residual baseline drift in simulated DIBH is 0.02 ± 0.03 versus 0.30 ± 0.12 cm for three-block calibration and single-block calibration, respectively. To achieve 0.5 mm tolerance for the eigenvalue, the laser and reflector box should be within ±3 mm uncertainties based on the eigenvalue simulation. CONCLUSION Three-block calibration method effectively removes baseline drift caused by couch movement in DIBH/4D CT scan for the wall-mounted camera while the single-block calibration method still has significant residual baseline drift.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Liu
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maneesha Prakash
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bryan Gonzalez
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ari Kassardjian
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ji Kim
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Paul Mandelin
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Terence Williams
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - An Liu
- Division of Radiation OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Katano A, Nozawa Y, Minamitani M, Yamashita H, Nakagawa K. Novel breath-hold liver target stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using the intrafraction diaphragm registration of kilovoltage projection streaming image with digitally reconstructed radiography of the planning computed tomography. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100217. [PMID: 37448787 PMCID: PMC10336676 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment option for patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors, particularly for those who are not eligible for surgery or transplantation. SABR is a high-precision radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation to the tumor while minimizing the dose to the surrounding healthy tissues. However, the accurate targeting of the tumor is a crucial aspect of liver SABR, which requires real-time imaging and tracking of the liver and tumor motion during treatment. One of the motion management strategies for liver SABR is the repeated breath-hold technique, which involves the patient holding their breath multiple times during treatment delivery to reduce the movement of the liver and other organs due to breathing. This technique helps to improve the accuracy of the treatment and reduce the radiation dose to the healthy liver. The current study proposes a novel approach for multiple breath-hold volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for liver tumors, which uses the intrafraction diaphragm registration in real time to improve the accuracy and precision of the treatment. The proposed approach is based on real-time comparison of the diaphragmatic surface location between the digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) and intrafraction kilovoltage projection streaming images (kV-PSI) having the same beam angles. The image cross-correlation between the DRR and the intrafraction kV-PSI provides a measure of the similarity between the two images and can be used to identify and track the diaphragm position during VMAT delivery. The proposed methodology consists of several steps, including planning CT and treatment planning, reference image reconstruction, and patient positioning and immobilization. The proposed approach has the potential to improve the accuracy and precision of liver cancer VMAT SABR, thereby increasing the efficacy of the treatment and reducing the risk of radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuto Katano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuki Nozawa
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Masanari Minamitani
- Department of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Keiichi Nakagawa
- Department of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaestner L, Streb L, Hetjens S, Buergy D, Sihono DS, Fleckenstein J, Kalisch I, Eckl M, Giordano FA, Lohr F, Stieler F, Boda-Heggemann J. Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100455. [PMID: 37720462 PMCID: PMC10500027 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections). Materials and methods Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi's test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42). Conclusions Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Kaestner
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lara Streb
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Buergy
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dwi S.K. Sihono
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
- Departemen Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
| | - Jens Fleckenstein
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Iris Kalisch
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Miriam Eckl
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank Lohr
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
- Struttura Complessa di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41122 Modena, Italy
| | - Florian Stieler
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Towell V, Gysen KV, Cross S, KK Low G. Efficacy of preoxygenation administration in volunteers, in extending the end-expiration breath-hold duration for application to abdominal radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100208. [PMID: 37207259 PMCID: PMC10189463 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose End expiration breath hold (EEBH) is the preferred motion management method for abdominal Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) treatments. However, multiple short EEBHs are required to complete a single treatment session. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of preoxygenation with hyperventilation in extending an EEBH duration. Materials and methods We randomised 10 healthy participants into two arms, each included breathing room air and oxygen at a rate of 10 L per minute (l/min) without hyperventilation for four minutes, and normally for four minutes and with hyperventilation for one minute at a rate of 20 breaths/minute for hyperventilation. The type of gas was blinded from the participants for each test. EEBH durations were then recorded, as well as systolic blood pressure, SpO2 and heart rate. A discomfort rating was also recorded after each breath hold. Results A significant increase in duration of almost 50% was observed between normal breathing of room air and breathing oxygen normally followed by hyperventilation. Vital signs remained consistent between the 4 tests. The tests were well tolerated with 75% of participants recording none or minimal discomfort. Conclusion Preoxygenation with hyperventilation could be used to increase the EEBH duration for abdominal SABR patients which would assist in the accuracy of these treatments and possibly resulting in a reduction of overall treatment times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Towell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, Australia
- Corresponding author.
| | - Kirsten Van Gysen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, Australia
- Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shamira Cross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, Australia
- Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gary KK Low
- Research Operations, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hardcastle N, Gaudreault M, Yeo AU, Ungureanu E, Markham C, Barnes R, Chander S, Chu J. Selection of motion management in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy and its impact on treatment time. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 25:100407. [PMID: 36655214 PMCID: PMC9841271 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Reduction of respiratory tumour motion is important in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to reduce side effects and improve tumour control probability. We have assessed the distribution of use of voluntary exhale breath hold (EBH), abdominal compression (AC), free breathing gating (gating) and free breathing (FB), and the impact of these on treatment time. Materials and Methods We assessed all patients treated in a single institution with liver SBRT between September 2017 and September 2021. Data from pre-simulation motion management assessment using fluoroscopic assessment of liver dome position in repeat breath holds, and motion with and without AC, was reviewed to determine liver dome position consistency in EBH and the impact of AC on motion. Treatment time was assessed for all fractions as time from first image acquisition to last treatment beam off. Results Of 136 patients treated with 145 courses of liver SBRT, 68 % were treated in EBH, 20 % with AC, 7 % in gating and 5 % in FB. AC resulted in motion reduction < 1 mm in 9/26 patients assessed. Median treatment time was higher using EBH (39 min) or gating (42 min) compared with AC (30 min) or FB (24 min) treatments. Conclusions Motion management in liver SBRT needs to be assessed per-patient to ensure appropriate techniques are applied. Motion management significantly impacts treatment time therefore patient comfort must also be taken into account when selecting the technique for each patient.
Collapse
Key Words
- AC, Abdominal Compression
- Abdominal compression
- BED, Biologically Effective Dose
- CBCT, Cone Beam Computed Tomography
- EBH, Exhale Breath Hold
- FB, Free Breathing
- FFF, Flattening Filter Free
- GTV, Gross Tumor Volume
- IMRT, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
- ITV, Internal Target Volume
- Liver
- Motion management
- PTV, Planning Target Volume
- SBRT, Stereotactic body radiation thearpy
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy
- VMAT, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
- exhale breath hold. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hardcastle
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Corresponding author.
| | - Mathieu Gaudreault
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam U. Yeo
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elena Ungureanu
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cathy Markham
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rebecca Barnes
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarat Chander
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Chu
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu HYH, Lee YYD, Sridharan S, Choong ES, Le H, Wang W, Khor R, Chu J, Oar A, Mott R, Smart J, Jenkins T, Anderson N, Cross S, Loo KF, Wigg A, Stuart K, Pryor D. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An Australian multi-institutional patterns of practice review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:365-373. [PMID: 33890425 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging, therapeutic option in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A multicentre Liver Ablative Stereotactic Radiation (LASR) database was established to provide a collaborative platform for Australian institutions to define the practice of liver SBRT for HCC. This study explores the patterns of SBRT practice amongst Australian institutions. METHODS This was a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients treated with SBRT for HCC at 10 institutions between January 2013 and December 2019. Patients' demographics, disease characteristics and SBRT details were evaluated. RESULTS Three hundred and seventeen patients were evaluated with a median age of 67 years (range, 32-90). Liver cirrhosis was present in 88.6%, baseline Child-Pugh score was A5/6 in 85.1% and B7/8 in 13.2%. Median size of HCC treated was 30 mm (range, 10-280). 63.1% had early-stage disease (Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A) and 36% had intermediate/advanced-stage disease (BCLC B/C). In 2013/2014, six courses of SBRT were delivered, increasing to 108 in 2019. SBRT was prescribed in five fractions for 71.3% of the cohort. The most common dose fractionation schedule was 40 Gy in five fractions (24.3%). Median biologically effective dose (BED10 ) delivered was 85.5 Gy for early-stage and 60 Gy for intermediate/advanced disease, respectively. The most common prescription range was 100-120 Gy BED10 (32.8%). CONCLUSION SBRT utilisation for HCC is increasing in Australia. There was wide variation in size of tumours and disease stages treated, and prescription patterns. Uniform reporting of clinical and dosimetric details are important in refining the role of liver SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Yu-Hao Liu
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yoo-Young Dominique Lee
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ee Siang Choong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Oar
- Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebekah Mott
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Trish Jenkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shamira Cross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kee Fong Loo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alan Wigg
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Katherine Stuart
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Pryor
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Icon Cancer Centre, Greenslopes Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|