Evolution of simeprevir-resistant variants in virological non-responders infected with HCV genotype 1b

Efficacy and safety of telaprevir with natural human interferon-β and ribavirin in Japanese chronic hepatitis C patients with depression

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR) when used in combination with natural human interferon-β (IFN-β) and ribavirin (RBV) for genotype 1 patients with depression compared to IFN-β/RBV therapy in Japan. We also examined the efficacy of the TVR/IFN-β/RBV therapy in treatment failure genotype 2 patients with depression.

METHODS

For the genotype 1 patients, 30 patients received TVR (750 mg every 8 h) for 12 weeks combined with IFN-β and RBV for 24 weeks (Group A), and 30 received IFN-β and RBV for 48 weeks (Group B). For the genotype 2 patients, 14 patients were dosed only with the TVR-based regimen.

RESULTS

The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates for Group A and Group B were 63.3% and 20.0%, respectively (P = 0.001, likelihood ratio test). The SVR rate for genotype 2 patients previously treated with pegylated IFN and/or RBV was 71.4%. No patient dropped out due to exacerbation of depression. The trend of platelet counts after the drugs were given was similar in the TVR/IFN-β/RBV therapy group and the IFN-β/RBV therapy group. Common resistance-associated variants of TVR were identified in 4 of the 13 patients who did not achieve SVR.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that an addition of TVR to IFN-β/RBV therapy raised SVR in previously treated and untreated genotype 1 patients and previously treated genotype 2 patients with chronic hepatitis C and depression.

The efficacy and safety of dual oral therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir for genotype 1b in Japanese real-life settings

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is important to investigate the treatment outcomes in patients excluded from clinical trials (CTR). The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 24-week daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1b infection.

METHODS

A total of 651 HCV-1b patients started dual oral therapy with DCV and ASV for 24 weeks in Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo. Among them, 276 patients met phase III CTR inclusion criteria. The sustained virological response (SVR) rate after treatment and the adverse events during therapy were compared between CTR-met (patients who met the inclusion criteria) and CTR-unmet (patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria) groups.

RESULTS

SVR12 was achieved in 87.0% (240/276) and 86.7% (325/375) in CTR-met and CTR-unmet patients respectively. SVR12 rate in simeprevir-experienced patients was 52.9% (9/17). SVR12 rate in patients without resistance-associated variant (RAV) of NS3 or NS5A loci was 93.7% (416/444). However, the SVR12 rates in patients with NS3-D168, NS5A-L31 and Y93 single RAV at baseline were 55.0% (11/20), 73.9% (17/23) and 65.6% (63/96) respectively. The safety profiles in both CTR-met and CTR-unmet patients were similar. The discontinuation rate as a result of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation was only 2.9%. Seven (2.5%) patients in CTR-met group and 20 (5.3%) in CTR-unmet group discontinued therapy because of adverse events other than the ALT elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual oral therapy with DCV and ASV in real-life settings was well tolerated with a similar safety profile and achieved similar SVR12 rates as that of CTR.

Ultra-deep sequencing analysis of resistance-associated variants during retreatment with simeprevir-based triple therapy after failure of telaprevir-based triple therapy in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection

AIM

Simeprevir (SMV)-based triple therapy is an effective retreatment option following failure of telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy. However, it is unclear whether the persistence of resistance-associated variants (RAVs) induced by TVR-based therapy may reduce the treatment effect of SMV-based therapy.

METHODS

The factors associated with the treatment effect, including RAVs in the NS3 region, were examined in 21 patients with genotype 1b HCV infection who were treated with SMV-based therapy after failure of TVR-based therapy. Ultra-deep sequencing was carried out to detect RAVs.

RESULTS

With the exception of one patient who discontinued treatment owing to adverse events, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 50% (10/20). Ultra-deep sequencing at the start of SMV-based therapy revealed that TVR-resistant variants were detected in six patients (29%), and no variants were observed at position 168. Cross-resistance between TVR and SMV with low frequency was detected in only one patient, and this patient achieved SVR. Higher SVRs for SMV-based therapy were attained in patients who discontinued treatment owing to the adverse effects of prior TVR-based therapy (discontinuation 100% vs. non-discontinuation 29%, P = 0.005), and patients who relapsed following prior pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy (relapse 100% vs. non-response 20%, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, ultra-deep sequencing analysis revealed that TVR and/or SMV-resistant variants may have no influence on the effect of SMV-based therapy after failure of TVR-based therapy. Patients who discontinued treatment owing to adverse effects of TVR-based therapy and relapsers to previous pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy would be good candidates for retreatment with SMV-based therapy.

Efficacy and safety of telaprevir with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin in Japanese patients

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) and ribavirin (RBV) for treatment-naïve patients and relapsed patients compared to previous TVR-based triple therapy in Japan.

METHODS

The study group included 35 treatment-naïve (median age, 55 years) and 19 relapsed (median age, 55 years) patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection. Patients received TVR (750 mg every 8 h) for 12 weeks, in combination with PEG-IFNα-2a and RBV.

RESULTS

The sustained virological response (SVR₂₄ ) rates for naïve and relapsed patients were 85.7% (30/35) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The discontinuation rate of all study drugs due to adverse events was 5.6% (3/54). Among the 54 patients, grade 3 skin disorders and grade 3 anemia (<8.0 g/dL) were reported in 2 (3.7%) and 6 patients (11.1%), respectively. Although the overall safety profiles were similar for the TVR/PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV and TVR/PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV regimens (previous study), the proportion of patients discontinuing all study drugs due to adverse events was lower in the patients treated with the TVR/PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV regimen (3/54, 5.6%) than TVR/PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV regimen (44/267, 16.5%).

CONCLUSION

Telaprevir in combination with PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV provided a high sustained virological response rate for the treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus in both treatment-naïve and relapsed patients in Japan. Telaprevir-based therapy may provide a useful treatment option for patients who are difficult to treat due to NS5A (Y93, L31) and NS3/4A (D168) variants.