Diagnostic thresholds and performance of noninvasive fibrosis scores are limited by age in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy for noninvasive liver disease assessment in chronic liver disease. Our aims for this systematic review were to evaluate the diagnostic utility of selected blood-based tests either alone, or in combination, for identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), and cirrhosis (F4), as compared to biopsy in chronic liver disease.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We included a comprehensive search of databases including Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Scopus through to April 2022. Two independent reviewers selected 286 studies with 103,162 patients. The most frequently identified studies included the simple aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and fibrosis (FIB)-4 markers (with low-to-moderate risk of bias) in HBV and HCV, HIV-HCV/HBV coinfection, and NAFLD. Positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios across direct and indirect biomarker tests for HCV and HBV for F2-4, F3-4, or F4 were 1.66-6.25 and 0.23-0.80, 1.89-5.24 and 0.12-0.64, and 1.32-7.15 and 0.15-0.86, respectively; LR+ and LR- for NAFLD F2-4, F3-4, and F4 were 2.65-3.37 and 0.37-0.39, 2.25-6.76 and 0.07-0.87, and 3.90 and 0.15, respectively. Overall, the proportional odds ratio indicated FIB-4 <1.45 was better than aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index <0.5 for F2-4. FIB-4 >3.25 was also better than aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index >1.5 for F3-4 and F4. There was limited data for combined tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood-based biomarkers are associated with small-to-moderate change in pretest probability for diagnosing F2-4, F3-4, and F4 in viral hepatitis, HIV-HCV coinfection, and NAFLD, with limited comparative or combination studies for other chronic liver diseases.

Serum dithiothreitol-oxidizing capacity (DOC) is a promising biomarker for excluding significant liver fibrosis: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

APRI and FIB-4 scores are used to exclude clinically significant fibrosis (defined as stage ≥ F2) in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. However, the cut-offs for these scores (generated by Youden indices) vary between different patient cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate whether serum dithiothreitol-oxidizing capacity (DOC), i.e., a surrogate test of quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase-1, which is a matrix remodeling enzyme, could be used to non-invasively identify significant fibrosis in patients with various chronic liver diseases (CLDs).

METHODS

Diagnostic performance of DOC was compared with APRI and FIB-4 for identifying significant fibrosis. ROC curve analyses were undertaken in: a) two chronic hepatitis B (CHB) cohorts, independently established from hospitals in Wenzhou (n = 208) and Hefei (n = 120); b) a MASLD cohort from Wenzhou hospital (n = 122); and c) a cohort with multiple CLD etiologies (except CHB and MASLD; n = 102), which was identified from patients in both hospitals. Cut-offs were calculated using the Youden index. All CLD patients (n = 552) were then stratified by age for ROC curve analyses and cut-off calculations.

RESULTS

Stratified by CLD etiology or age, ROC curve analyses consistently showed that the DOC test was superior to APRI and FIB-4 for discriminating between clinically significant fibrosis and no fibrosis, when APRI and FIB-4 showed poor/modest diagnostic performance (P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 in 3, 1 and 3 cohort comparisons, respectively). Conversely, the DOC test was equivalent to APRI and FIB-4 when all tests showed moderate/adequate diagnostic performances (P > 0.05 in 11 cohort comparisons). DOC had a significant advantage over APRI or FIB-4 scores for establishing a uniform cut-off independently of age and CLD etiology (coefficients of variation of DOC, APRI and FIB-4 cut-offs were 1.7%, 22.9% and 47.6% in cohorts stratified by CLD etiology, 2.0%, 26.7% and 29.5% in cohorts stratified by age, respectively). The uniform cut-off was 2.13, yielded from all patients examined. Surprisingly, the uniform cut-off was the same as the DOC upper limit of normal with a specificity of 99%, estimated from 275 healthy control individuals. Hence, the uniform cut-off should possess a high negative predictive value for excluding significant fibrosis in primary care settings. A high DOC cut-off with 97.5% specificity could be used for detecting significant fibrosis (≥ F2) with an acceptable positive predictive value (87.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This proof-of-concept study suggests that the DOC test may efficiently rule out and rule in significant liver fibrosis, thereby reducing the numbers of unnecessary liver biopsies. Moreover, the DOC test may be helpful for clinicians to exclude significant liver fibrosis in the general population.

The Portal Venous Pulsatility Index and Main Portal Vein Diameter as Surrogate Markers for Liver Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

(1) Background: Despite numerous noninvasive methods for assessing liver fibrosis, effective ultrasound parameters remain limited. We aimed to identify easily measurable ultrasound parameters capable of predicting liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD); (2) Methods: The data of 994 patients diagnosed with NAFLD via ultrasound at the Armed Forces Goyang Hospital were retrospectively collected from June 2022 to July 2023. A liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥ 8.2 kPa was classified as significant fibrosis. Liver steatosis with cardiometabolic risk factors was defined as MASLD. Two ultrasound variables, the portal venous pulsatility index (VPI) and main portal vein diameter (MPVD), were measured; (3) Results: Of 994 patients, 68 had significant fibrosis. Significant differences in VPI (0.27 vs. 0.34, p < 0.001) and MPVD (10.16 mm vs. 8.98 mm, p < 0.001) were observed between the fibrotic and non-fibrotic groups. A logistic analysis adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) revealed that only VPI (OR of 0.955, p = 0.022, VPI on a 0.01 scale) and MPVD (OR of 1.501, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with significant liver fibrosis. In the MASLD cohort (n = 939), VPI and MPVD were associated with significant fibrosis. To achieve better accuracy in predicting liver fibrosis, we established a nomogram that incorporated MPVD and VPI. The established nomogram was validated in the test cohort, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.821 for detecting significant liver fibrosis; (4) Conclusions: VPI and MPVD, as possible surrogate markers, are useful in predicting significant fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and MASLD.

Assessment of liver fibrosis by transient elastography and multi-parameters model in young children with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of the single or combined applications of transient elastography (TE) and multivariate indicators with biopsy for the detection of liver fibrosis in children caused by chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

This study included 148 CHB children treated at Hunan Children's Hospital from January 1st 2015 to December 31st 2018, aged from 0.83 to 14.58 years old. All patients underwent liver biopsy (LB), of which 43 patients underwent TE. Multiple clinical data, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Platelet (PLT), and HBV-deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) of all patients were collected. The diagnostic values for CHB of TE and its combinations with these indicators were measured. The patients were classified in two ways: no hepatic fibrosis group (F0) versus fibrosis group (F ≥ 1), and no significant hepatic fibrosis group (F < 2) versus significant hepatic fibrosis group (F ≥ 2). The statistical assessment was performed between groups within each classification to compare the diagnostic value of different parameters.

RESULTS

The operating characteristic area under curve (AUC) of liver fibrosis diagnosed by liver stiffness measurement (LSM) which obtained by TE, AST-to-PLT ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) were 0.740, 0.701, and 0.651, while the corresponding cut-off values were 5.9 kPa, 0.50, and 0.10, respectively. The AUC of significant liver fibrosis diagnosed by LSM, APRI and FIB-4 were 0.849, 0.701, and 0.509, while the corresponding cut-off values were 8.4 kPa, 0.76, and 0.08, respectively. While with the combinations of LSM and APRI, LSM and FIB-4, LSM and APRI and FIB-4, APRI and FIB-4, the AUC of significant liver fibrosis were 0.866, 0.855, 0.869, and 0.684, respectively. The AUC of significant liver fibrosis diagnosed by the LSM was significantly higher than APRI and FIB-4.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic value of transient elastography was better than that of APRI and FIB-4 for CHB children with significant liver fibrosis. In addition, TE also has relatively high application values on the diagnosis of patients with different degrees of liver fibrosis caused by CHB.

Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center

Low cut-off of FIB-4 is a widely used formula to exclude advanced liver fibrosis in primary care centers. However, the range of reported threshold of FIB-4 to rule in advanced fibrosis is too broad across etiologies, and no consensus has been reached. In the present study, we investigated the role of FIB-4 for a reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in a referral center. We compared the diagnostic performance of FIB-4 among patients with liver disease of various causes and tried to find an optimal cut-off value for predicting advanced fibrosis. Among 1068 patients, the AUROC of FIB-4 to diagnose advanced fibrosis showed no significant difference among the various etiologies of liver disease, ranging from 0.783 to 0.821. The optimal cut-off value obtained by maximizing Youden's index was 2.68, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting advanced fibrosis were 70.7%, 79.1%, 43.5%, and 92.2%, respectively. The PPV was low in patients with autoimmune disease (6.67%). When we incorporated the new cut-off of FIB-4 into abdominal ultrasound findings, 81% of unnecessary work-ups would be appropriately avoided. In conclusion, the cut-off value of 2.68 showed an acceptable PPV while maintaining a high NPV to predict advanced fibrosis, most etiology except for autoimmune diseases. This result could assist in establishing an appropriate timing to reassess the hepatic fibrosis burden during monitoring in the referral center.

Identification and external validation of the optimal FIB-4 and APRI thresholds for ruling in chronic hepatitis B related liver fibrosis in tertiary care settings

BACKGROUND

With the initially defined thresholds, the most widely used serum biomarkers for staging liver fibrosis (ie, APRI and FIB-4 scores) proved to be ineffective among patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHB). Whether optimizing the FIB-4 and APRI thresholds could improve their diagnostic accuracy requires further research.

METHODS

Using data of treat-naïve CHB patients from three tertiary hospitals, we explored the optimal FIB-4 and APRI thresholds to rule in liver fibrosis accurately. Subsequently, we validated the applicability of the newly defined thresholds to the CHB patients from another two tertiary hospitals.

RESULTS

The fibrosis stages between discovery cohort (n = 433) and the external validation cohort (n = 568) were statistically different (P < .001). When ruling in significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis by the newly defined FIB-4 thresholds (2.25 and 3.00, respectively), 24.0% and 14.3% of patients, respectively, could be classified with excellent accuracy (PPVs of 91.3% and 80.6%, respectively; misdiagnosis rates of 6.0% and 5.4%, respectively), supported by the internal and external validation tests. Regrettably, the more accurate and robust thresholds of APRI score for ruling in significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis could not be found. Besides, the FIB-4 and APRI scores should not be recommended for ruling in cirrhosis because of poor clinical diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSION

The newly defined FIB-4 thresholds for ruling in significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis showed superior and reproducible clinical diagnostic accuracy. The well-validated threshold (≥2.25) of FIB-4 score could aid in antiviral treatment decisions for treat-naïve adult CHB patients by accurately ruling in significant fibrosis in tertiary care settings.

Review of Serum Biomarkers and Models Derived from Them in HBV-Related Liver Diseases

A series of predictive scoring systems is available for stratifying the severity of conditions and assessing the prognosis in patients with HBV-related liver diseases. We show nine of the most popular serum biomarkers and their models (i.e., serum cystatin C, homocysteine, C-reactive protein, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index based on four factors, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio, albumin-bilirubin score, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to albumin ratio) that have gained great interest from clinicians. Compared with traditional scoring systems, these serum biomarkers and their models are easily acquired, simple, and relatively inexpensive. In the present review, we summarize the latest studies focused on these serum biomarkers and their models as diagnostic and prognostic indexes in HBV-related liver diseases.