1
|
Schreihofer DA, Dalwadi D, Kim S, Metzger D, Oppong-Gyebi A, Das-Earl P, Schetz JA. Treatment of Stroke at a Delayed Timepoint with a Repurposed Drug Targeting Sigma 1 Receptors. Transl Stroke Res 2024; 15:1035-1049. [PMID: 37704905 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-023-01193-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Sigma 1 receptors are intracellular chaperone proteins that have been explored as a subacute treatment to enhance post-stroke recovery. We recently identified the antitussive oxeladin as a selective sigma 1 receptor agonist with the ability to stimulate the release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor from neurons in vitro. In this study, we hypothesized that oral oxeladin citrate would stimulate BDNF secretion and improve stroke outcomes when administered to male rats starting 48 h after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Oxeladin did not alter blood clotting and crossed the blood brain barrier within 30 min of oral administration. Rats underwent 90 min of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Forty-eight hours later rats began receiving daily oxeladin (135 mg/kg) for 11 days. Oxeladin significantly improved neurological function on days 3, 7, and 14 following MCAO. Infarct size was not altered by a single dose, but the final extent of infarct after 14 days was decreased. However, there was no significant reduction in astrogliosis or microgliosis compared to vehicle-treated control rats. In agreement with in vitro studies, oxeladin increased the amount of mature BDNF in the cerebral cortex 2, 6, and 24 h after single oral dose. However, the increase in BDNF did not result in increases in cellular proliferation in the subventricular zone or dentate gyrus when compared to vehicle-treated controls. These results suggest that oxeladin may reduce the extent of infarct expansion in the subacute phase of stroke, although this action does not appear to involve a reduction in inflammation or increased cell proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek A Schreihofer
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Helath Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, USA.
| | | | - Seongcheol Kim
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Daniel Metzger
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Helath Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, USA
| | - Anthony Oppong-Gyebi
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Helath Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, USA
- Cognizant Technology Solutions, 300 Frank W. Burr Blvd, Teaneck, NJ, 07666, USA
| | - Paromita Das-Earl
- Department of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, USA
| | - John A Schetz
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Helath Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oppong-Gyebi A, Metzger D, Vann PH, Yockey RA, Sumien N, Schreihofer DA. Dietary genistein and 17β-estradiol implants differentially influence locomotor and cognitive functions following transient focal ischemia in middle-aged ovariectomized rats at different lengths of estrogen deprivation. Horm Behav 2022; 144:105201. [PMID: 35653830 DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Genistein possesses estrogenic activity and has been considered a potential replacement for estrogen replacement therapy after menopause. In the current study, we investigated the neuroprotective effects of dietary genistein at varied lengths of estrogen deprivation in middle-aged ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats under ischemic conditions. Two weeks of treatment with dietary genistein at 42 mg/kg but not 17β-estradiol implants improved cognitive flexibility (Morris water maze test) after short-term estrogen deprivation (2 weeks) but not long-term estrogen deprivation (12 weeks). 17β-estradiol implants but not dietary genistein improved locomotor asymmetry (cylinder test) after long-term but not short-term estrogen deprivation. Dietary genistein but not 17β-estradiol implant improved early phase motor learning (rotarod test) after long-term estrogen deprivation. Neither 17β-estradiol implant nor dietary genistein reduced infarct size after either short-term or long-term estrogen deprivation. Genistein, however, reduced ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1 (Iba1) expression, a marker of brain inflammation, at the ipsilateral side of stroke injury after short-term but not long-term estrogen deprivation. This study suggests that the neuroprotective effects of dietary genistein on motor and cognitive functions are distinctly influenced by the length of estrogen deprivation following focal ischemia. SIGNIFICANCE: There is an increasing postmenopausal population opting for homeopathic medicines for the management of menopausal symptoms due to the perceived distrust in estrogen use as hormone replacement. Basic and clinical studies support the notion that early, but not delayed, hormone replacement after menopause is beneficial. Furthermore, evidence suggests that delaying hormone replacement augments the detrimental, rather than the beneficial effects of estrogens. Because of the active consideration of soy isoflavones including genistein as alternatives to estrogen replacement, it is necessary to understand the ramifications of soy isoflavones use when their administration is begun at various times after menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Oppong-Gyebi
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Center for Healthy Aging, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Metzger
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Center for Healthy Aging, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Philip H Vann
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Center for Healthy Aging, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - R Andrew Yockey
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Nathalie Sumien
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Center for Healthy Aging, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Derek A Schreihofer
- Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Center for Healthy Aging, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|