Correlation between the left atrial low-voltage area and the cardiac function improvement after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Ripple map guided catheter ablation targeting abnormal atrial potentials during sinus rhythm for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Abnormal atrial potential (AAP) during sinus rhythm may be a critical ablation target for atrial fibrillation. However, the assessment of local electrograms throughout the left atrium is difficult. Thus, we sought to investigate the effectiveness of Ripple map guided AAP ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AAP areas were determined by Ripple mapping on the CARTO system in 35 patients (Ripple group) by marking the area where small deflections persisted after the first deflection wavefront had passed. Following pulmonary vein isolation, AAP areas were ablated. If AAP areas were located on the left atrial posterior wall, the posterior wall was isolated. The outcome of this approach was compared with that of 66 patients who underwent an empirical linear ablation approach (control group). There were no differences in patient characteristics between the groups. The total radiofrequency application time and procedure time were shorter in the Ripple group than in the control group (radiofrequency application time, 48 ± 14 minutes vs 61 ± 13 minutes, P < .001; procedure time, 205 ± 30 minutes vs 221 ± 27 minutes, P = .013). Gastroparesis occurred in one patient in each group (P = .645), but in both cases this was relieved with conservative therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that rate of freedom from atrial arrhythmia was higher in the Ripple group than in the control group (91% vs 74% during the 12 months' follow up; P = .040).

CONCLUSION

Ripple map guided AAP ablation effectively suppressed atrial arrhythmia in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

P-wave vector magnitude predicts the left atrial low-voltage area in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

P-wave amplitude (PWA) parameters can be the surrogate measures of the left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs).

METHODS

We measured PWAs using an automated system in 50 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the relationships between left atrial LVAs and PWA parameters, including P-wave vector magnitude, calculated as the square root of the sum of lead II PWA squared, lead V6 PWA squared, and a one-half lead V2 PWA squared.

RESULTS

Lead I PWA was most strongly correlated with LVAs in the anterior wall and appendage (anterior wall, R = -0.391, P = 0.006; appendage, R = -0.342, P = 0.016), whereas lead II PWA was most strongly correlated with LVAs in the septum, posterior wall, and bottom wall (septum, R = -0.413, P = 0.003; posterior wall, R = -0.297, P = 0.039; bottom wall; R = -0.288, P = 0.045). Although maximum, minimum, mean, and lead I PWAs were not correlated with total LVA, P-wave vector magnitude and lead II PWA were significantly correlated with total LVA (P-wave vector magnitude, R = -0.430, P = 0.002; lead II PWA, R = -0.323, P = 0.023). P-wave vector magnitude achieved the highest accuracy for predicting significant LVA (total LVA > 10%) with an area under the curve of 0.772; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 64%, 88%, 85%, and 69%, respectively, for the cutoff value of 0.130 mV.

CONCLUSION

P-wave vector magnitude is a useful electrocardiographic predictor of left atrial LVAs.