Change in the local impedance and electrograms recorded by a micro-electrode tip catheter during initial atrial fibrillation ablation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Symmetrical recovery time course between impedance and intramyocardial temperature after bipolar radiofrequency ablation; Role of impedance monitoring to estimate temperature rise

INTRODUCTION

During radiofrequency (RF) ablation, impedance monitoring has been used to avoid steam-pop caused by excessive intramyocardial temperature (IMT) rise. However, it is uncertain why the impedance decline is related to steam-pop and whether the impedance decline is correlated to IMT.

METHODS

Twenty-one bipolar ablations (40 W, 30-g contact, 120 s) were attempted for seven perfused porcine myocardium. Immediately after ablation, a temperature electrode was inserted into the mid-myocardial portion, and the recovery process of impedance and its correlation to IMT were assessed.

RESULTS

Transmural lesion was created in all 21 applications but steam-pop occurred in 5/21 applications with large impedance decline. In the 16 applications without steam-pop, impedance and IMT soon after ablation were 97.2 ± 4.0 Ω and 66.1 ± 4.8 °C, respectively. Reasonably high linear correlation was demonstrated between the maximum IMT after ablation and impedance differences before and after ablation. Recovery processes of the decreased impedance and the elevated IMT fit well to each equation of the single exponential decay function and showed symmetric shapes with no statistical difference of time constant (100.1 ± 34.5 s in impedance vs. 108.7 ± 27.3 s in IMT) and half-time of recovery (144.5 ± 49.8 s in impedance vs. 156.9 ± 39.4 s in IMT). Recovered impedance after ablation (104.8 ± 3.9 Ω) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Ω smaller than that before ablation (109.9 ± 2.7 Ω), suggesting several factors other than IMT rise participate in impedance decline in RF ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery of impedance and IMT after ablation well correlated, which supports the usefulness of impedance monitoring for safe RF ablation.

Optimal local impedance parameters for successful pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Local impedance (LI) parameters of IntellaNav STABLEPOINT for successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to seek LI data achieving successful PVI.

METHODS

Consecutive AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with STABLEPOINT were prospectively enrolled in two centers. PVI was performed under a constant 35-or 40-watt power, 20-s duration, and >5-g contact force. The operators were blinded to the LI data. The characteristics of all ablation points with/without conduction gaps (Unsuccess or Success tags) after the first-attempt PVI were evaluated for the right/left PVs and anterior/posterior wall (RPV/LPV and AW/PW, respectively), and cutoff values of LI data were calculated for successful lesion formation.

RESULTS

A total of 5257 ablation points in 102 patients (65 [58-72] years old, 65.7% male) were evaluated. The LI drop values were higher in the Success tags than Unsuccess tags on the LPV-AW and RPV-AW/PW (p < .001), except for the LPV-PW (p = .105). The %LI drop values (LI drop/initial LI) were higher for the Success tags in all areas (15.8 [12.2%-19.6%] vs. 11.6 [9.7%-15.6%] in LPV-AW: p < .001, 15.0 [11.5%-19.3%] vs. 11.4 [8.7%-17.3%] in LPV-PW: p = .035, 15.3 [11.5%-19.4%] vs. 9.9 [8.1%-13.7%] in RPV-AW: p < .001, and 13.3 [10.1%-17.4%] vs. 8.1 [6.3%-9.5%] in RPV-PW, p < .001). The LI drop and %LI drop cutoff values were 20.0 ohms and 11.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An insufficient LI drop with STABLEPOINT was associated with a gap formation during PVI, and the best cutoff values for the LI drop and %LI drop were 20.0 ohms and 11.6%, respectively.

Local impedance for the optimization of radiofrequency lesion delivery: A review of bench and clinical data

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a cornerstone of treatment for many cardiac arrhythmias. Progression in three-dimensional mapping and contact-force sensing technologies have improved our capability to achieve success, but challenges still remain.

METHODS

In this article, we discuss the importance of overall circuit impedance in radiofrequency lesion formation. This is followed by a review of the literature regarding recently developed "local impedance" technology and its current and future potential applications and limitations, in the context of established surrogate markers currently used to infer effective ablation.

RESULTS

We discuss the role of local impedance in assessing myocardial substrate, as well as its role in clinical studies of ablation. We also discuss safety considerations, limitations and ongoing research.

CONCLUSION

Local impedance is a novel tool which has the potential to tailor ablation in a manner distinct from other established metrics.