Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach

Impact of acetabular roof's angle on precision of cup center of rotation reproduction and placement in total hip arthroplasty

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is nowadays considered as the most effective treatment option for end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA) and one of the most successful orthopedic procedures. Precise reproduction of the center of rotation (COR) is among the most important aspects of recreating native hip biomechanics after THA as it is strictly related to muscle tension and force distribution within the hip joint. Both vertical and horizontal shift in cup positioning and COR restoration are commonly observed radiological signs corresponding with lesser functional outcome. The aim of this study was to assess whether the superior border of the native acetabulum morphology has an impact on cup positioning and COR restoration in patients undergoing THA as treatment of primary OA of the hip.

Material and methods

A cohort of 150 consecutive patients with diagnosis of end-stage primary hip OA who underwent THA via an anterolateral approach with the same implant in 2021 was analyzed retrospectively. Standard standing pelvic X-rays were performed pre- and postoperatively and appropriate measurements were taken. Several radiological parameters on obtained X-rays were assessed. Statistical analysis of all the measurements was performed.

Results

There was a statistically significant positive weak correlation between cup offset and acetabular roof angle (rs = 0.25, p = 0.002). There were statistically insignificant positive correlations between acetabular roof angle and COR restoration (rs = 0.14, p = 0.097), acetabular roof angle and total offset (rs = 0.087, p = 0.29) and a negative correlation between acetabular roof angle and femoral offset (rs = 0.071, p = 0.39).

Conclusions

The present study revealed that preoperative acetabular roof angle influences the positioning of the prosthetic cup in the transverse axis. There also seems to be a correlation between the acetabular roof angle and COR restoration, but its significance needs further evaluation. Surgeons could use this knowledge to preoperatively assess the risk of cup malposition and adjust their technique during the THA procedure with probable improvement of hip function.

Evaluating computed bony range of motion (BROM) by registering in-vitro cadaver-based functional range of motion (FROM) to a hip motion simulation

BACKGROUND

While modern hip replacement planning relies on hip motion simulation (HMS), it lacks the capability to include soft-tissues and ligaments restraints on computed bony range of motion (BROM), often leading to an overestimation of the in-vivo functional range of motion (FROM). Furthermore, there is a lack of literature on BROM assessment in relation to FROM. Therefore, the study aimed to assess computed BROM using in-vitro cadaver-derived FROM measurements, registered to a CT-based in-house HMS, and to further investigate the effect of functional and anatomical hip joint centres (FHJC and AHJC) on BROM.

METHOD

Seven limiting and three non-limiting circumducted passive FROM of four cadaver hips were measured using optical coordinate measuring machine with reference spheres (RSs) affixed to the pelvis and the femur, following CT-scan of the specimen. The RSs' centres were used to register the measured FROM in HMS, enabling its virtual recreation to compute corresponding BROM by detecting nearest bony impingement. FHJC, estimated from non-limiting FROM, was compared with AHJC to examine their positional differences and effect on BROM.

RESULTS

Differences in BROM and FROM were minimal in deep flexion (3.0° ± 4.1°) and maximum internal rotation (IR) at deep flexion (3.0° ± 2.9°), but substantially greater in extension (53.2° ± 9.5°). Bony impingement was observed during flexion, and IR at deep flexion for two hips. The average positional difference between FHJC and AHJC was 3.1 ± 1.2 mm, resulting in BROM differences of 1°-13° across four motions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provided greater insight into the applicability and reliability of computed BROM in pre-surgical planning.

Do hip resurfacing and short hip stem arthroplasties differ from conventional hip stem replacement regarding impingement-free range of motion?

Total hip joint replacement (THR) is clinically well-established. In this context, the resulting range of motion (ROM) is crucial for patient satisfaction when performing joint movements. However, the ROM for THR with different bone preserving strategies (short hip stem and hip resurfacing) raises the question of whether the ROM is comparable with conventional hip stems. Therefore, this computer-based study aimed to investigate the ROM and type of impingement for different implant systems. An established framework with computer-aided design 3D models based on magnetic resonance imaging data of 19 patients with hip osteoarthritis was used to analyse the ROM for three different implant systems (conventional hip stem vs. short hip stem vs. hip resurfacing) during typical joint movements. Our results revealed that all three designs led to mean maximum flexion higher than 110°. However, hip resurfacing showed less ROM (-5% against conventional and -6% against short hip stem). No significant differences were observed between the conventional and short hip stem during maximum flexion and internal rotation. Contrarily, a significant difference was detected between the conventional hip stem and hip resurfacing during internal rotation (p = 0.003). The ROM of the hip resurfacing was lower than the conventional and short hip stem during all three movements. Furthermore, hip resurfacing shifted the impingement type to implant-to-bone impingement compared with the other implant designs. The calculated ROMs of the implant systems achieved physiological levels during maximum flexion and internal rotation. However, bone impingement was more likely during internal rotation with increasing bone preservation. Despite the larger head diameter of hip resurfacing, the ROM examined was substantially lower than that of conventional and short hip stem.

Functional safe zone for THA considering the patient-specific pelvic tilts: An ultrasound-based approach

The usual Lewinnek orientation for cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty is not suitable for all patients as it does not consider the patient mobility. We propose an ultrasound-based approach to compute a Functional Safe Zone (FSZ) considering daily positions. Our goal was to validate it, and to evaluate how the input parameters impact the FSZ size and barycentre. The accuracy of the FSZ was first assessed by comparing the FSZ computed by the proposed approach and the true FSZ determined by 3D modelling. Then, the input parameters' impact on the FSZ was studied using a principal component analysis. The FSZ was estimated with errors below 0.5° for mean anteversion, mean inclination, and at edges. The pelvic tilts and the neck orientation were found correlated to the FSZ mean orientation, and the target ROM and the prosthesis dimensions to the FSZ size. Integrated into the clinical workflow, this non-ionising approach can be used to easily determine an optimal patient-specific cup orientation minimising the risks of dislocation.

The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Dislocation continues to be a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although previous studies of computed simulation analysis investigated the range of motion (ROM), it is unclear whether the ROM before impingement simulated using computed tomography-based 3-dimensional simulation analysis (simulated ROM) is related to dislocation after THA. It is also unclear what angles are required in computed simulation analyses for stable hips after THA. In this study, we compared the simulated ROM in patients with and without dislocation.

METHODS

16 patients with posterior dislocation were compared with 48 matched patients without dislocation. Risk factors including preoperative bone morphology of the hip, implant position, change of femoral offset, change of leg length, anterior aspect of the greater trochanter (GTa) length, and anterior inferior iliac spine length were also compared.

RESULTS

The mean flexion angle, internal-rotation at 90° flexion (IR) angle, cup anteversion based on the anterior pelvic plane (APP), tilt-adjusted cup anteversion and GTa length were significantly different between patients with dislocation and patients without dislocation (p = 0.033, 0.002, 0.010, 0.047, 0.046). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested cutoff points for flexion angle, IR angle, cup anteversion based on the APP, tilt-adjusted cup anteversion and GTa length, of 114.5°, 45.5°, 19.5°, 12.0° and 15.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that preoperative planning to achieve a larger simulated ROM, flexion angle and IR angle, may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation. This study also suggests that fine-tuning of cup anteversion and/or trimming of the overhanging GTa during preoperative planning may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation.

Limited External Rotation and Hip Extension Due to Posterior Extra-articular Ischiofemoral Hip Impingement in Female Patients With Increased Femoral Anteversion: Implications for Sports, Sexual, and Daily Activities

BACKGROUND

Posterior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is poorly understood. Patients with increased femoral anteversion (FV) exhibit posterior hip pain.

PURPOSE

To correlate hip impingement area with FV and with combined version and to investigate frequency of limited external rotation (ER) and hip extension (<40°, <20°, and <0°) due to posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral impingement.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Osseous patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) models based on 3D computed tomography scans were generated of 37 female patients (50 hips) with positive posterior impingement test (100%) and increased FV >35° (Murphy method). Surgery was performed in 50% of patients (mean age, 30 years; 100% female). FV and acetabular version (AV) were added to calculate combined version. Subgroups of patients (24 hips) with increased combined version >70° and patients (9 valgus hips) with increased combined version >50° were analyzed. The control group (20 hips) had normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus. Bone segmentation was performed to generate 3D models of every patient. Validated 3D collision detection software was used for simulation of impingement-free hip motion (equidistant method). Impingement area was evaluated in combined 20° of ER and 20° of extension.

RESULTS

Posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral impingement occurred between the ischium and the lesser trochanter in 92% of patients with FV >35° in combined 20° of ER and 20° of extension. Impingement area in combined 20° of ER and 20° of extension was larger with increasing FV and with higher combined version; correlation was significant (P < .001, r = 0.57, and r = 0.65). Impingement area was significantly (P = .001) larger (681 vs 296 mm2) for patients with combined version >70° (vs <70°, respectively) in combined 20° of ER and 20° of extension. All symptomatic patients with increased FV >35° (100%) had limited ER <40°, and most (88%) had limited extension <40°. The frequency of posterior intra- and extra-articular hip impingement of symptomatic patients (100% and 88%, respectively) was significantly (P < .001) higher compared with the control group (10% and 10%, respectively). The frequency of patients with increased FV >35° with limited extension <20° (70%) and patients with limited ER <20° (54%) was significantly (P < .001) higher compared with the control group (0% and 0%, respectively). The frequency of completely limited extension <0° (no extension) and ER <0° (no ER in extension) was significantly (P < .001) higher for valgus hips (44%) with combined version >50° compared with patients with FV >35° (0%).

CONCLUSION

All patients with increased FV >35° had limited ER <40°, and most of them had limited extension <20° due to posterior intra- or extra-articular hip impingement. This is important for patient counselling, for physical therapy, and for planning of hip-preservation surgery (eg, hip arthroscopy). This finding has implications and could limit daily activities (long-stride walking), sexual activity, ballet dancing, and sports (eg, yoga or skiing), although not studied directly. Good correlation between impingement area and combined version supports evaluation of combined version in female patients with positive posterior impingement test or posterior hip pain.

Reconstructing Articular Cartilage in the Australopithecus afarensis Hip Joint and the Need for Modeling Six Degrees of Freedom

The postcranial skeleton of Australopithecus afarensis (AL 288-1) exhibits clear adaptations for bipedality, although there is some debate as to the efficiency and frequency of such upright movement. Some researchers argue that AL 288-1 walked with an erect limb like modern humans do, whilst others advocate for a "bent-hip bent-knee" (BHBK) gait, although in recent years the general consensus favors erect bipedalism. To date, no quantitative method has addressed the articulation of the AL 288-1 hip joint, nor its range of motion (ROM) with consideration for joint spacing, used as a proxy for the thickness of the articular cartilage present within the joint spacing which can affect how a joint moves. Here, we employed ROM mapping methods to estimate the joint spacing of AL 288-1's hip joint in comparison to a modern human and chimpanzee. Nine simulations assessed different joint spacing and tested the range of joint congruency (i.e., ranging from a closely packed socket to loosely packed). We further evaluated the sphericity of the femoral head and whether three rotational degrees of freedom (DOFs) sufficiently captures the full ROM or if translational DOFs must be included. With both setups, we found that the AL 288-1 hip was unlikely to be highly congruent (as it is in modern humans) because this would severely restrict hip rotational movement and would severely limit the capability for both bipedality and even arboreal locomotion. Rather, the hip was more cartilaginous than it is in the modern humans, permitting the hip to rotate into positions necessitated by both terrestrial and arboreal movements. Rotational-only simulations found that AL 288-1 was unable to extend the hip like modern humans, forcing the specimen to employ a BHBK style of walking, thus contradicting 40+ years of previous research into the locomotory capabilities of AL 288-1. Therefore, we advocate that differences in the sphericity of the AL 288-1 femoral head with that of a modern human necessitates all six DOFs to be included in which AL 288-1 could osteologically extend the hip to facilitate a human-like gait.

Development of bony range of motion (B-ROM) boundary for total hip replacement planning

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pre-operative surgical planning using computer simulation is increasingly standard practice before Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), in order to determine the optimal implant positions, and thereby minimise post-operative complications such as dislocation, wear and leg length discrepancy. One of the limitations of current methods, however, is the lack of information on the subject-specific reference range of motion (ROM) that could be used as targets for surgical planning. Only a limited number of hip motions are considered, which are neither subject-specific, nor representative of all the hip motions associated with all the activities of daily livings (ADLs). In this paper, therefore, a method was developed to calculate subject-specific representative bony range of motion (B-ROM) that would cover all the possible joint motions and presented in terms of pure joint motions.

METHODS

Only 3D bone geometries of femur and pelvis, constructed from personalised CT scan, were used as inputs for healthy hip joint whereas implant geometries and their positions on native bone geometries were required for planned treatment side or replaced side. Hip joint motion simulation was carried out using six different Tait-Bryan intrinsic rotation sequences of three pure joint motions - flexion-extension, abduction-adduction and internal-external rotation, and B-ROM was then identified for any of these six different sequences which caused earliest feasible impingement. The B-ROM could be used as a list of ROM data points or visualised as multiple 2D surface plots or a 3D envelop. Using the developed method, the B-ROM of a contralateral healthy hip joint of a patient can be used to define the subject-specific target ROM values to inform the surgical planning of the arthritic hip side so that the patient's natural ROM could be restored as closely as possible by the planned implant placements. This was demonstrated with a clinical verification study using 'non-dislocating' and 'dislocating' THA patients.

RESULTS

The results supported the study hypothesis that the percentage of intersected volume of the healthy and replaced side B-ROM was higher for the 'Non-Dislocator' patient (95%) compared to 'Dislocator' (78%). Also, the results showed that the only one sequence (first flexion-extension, then abduction-adduction and finally internal-external rotation) was not adequate to identify all the possible limiting B-ROM, and therefore, all the six rotation sequences should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The method encompasses every potential ADL, and as a result, more comprehensive surgical planning is possible, as the implant positions can be optimised in order to maximise impingement-free ROM, and consequently minimise clinical complications.

Model-Based Acetabular Cup Orientation Optimization Based On Minimizing the Risk of Edge-Loading and Implant Impingement Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

In this paper, a computationally-efficient model-based method for determining patient-specific optimal acetabular cup alignment for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is presented. The proposed algorithm minimizes the risk of implant impingement and edge-loading, which are reported as the major causes of hip dislocation following THA. First, by using motion capture data recorded from the patient performing different daily activities, the hip contact force and the relative orientation of the femur and pelvis are calculated by a musculoskeletal model. Then, by defining two quantitative indices i.e., angular impingement distance and angular edge-loading distance, the risk of impingement and edge-loading are assessed for a wide range of cup alignments. And finally, three optimization criteria are introduced to estimate the optimal cup alignment with a tradeoff between the risk of impingement and edge-loading. The results show that patient-specific characteristics such as pelvic tilt could significantly change the optimal cup alignment, especially the value of cup anteversion. Therefore, in some cases, the well-known Lewinnek safe zone may not be optimal, or even safe. Unlike other dynamic model-based methods, in this work, the need for force plate measurements is eliminated by estimating the ground reaction forces and moments, which makes this method more practical and cost-efficient. Furthermore, the low computational complexity due to analytical formulas makes this method suitable for both preoperative and intra-operative planning.

The Patient-Specific Combined Target Zone for Morpho-Functional Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background Relevant criteria for total hip arthroplasty (THA) planning have been introduced in the literature which include the hip range of motion, bony coverage, anterior cup overhang, leg length discrepancy, edge loading risk, and wear. The optimal implant design and alignment depends on the patient’s anatomy and patient-specific functional parameters such as the pelvic tilt. The approaches proposed in literature often consider one or more criteria for THA planning. but to the best of our knowledge none of them follow an integrated approach including all criteria for the definition of a patient-specific combined target zone (PSCTZ). Questions/purposes (1) How can we calculate suitable THA implant and implantation parameters for a specific patient considering all relevant criteria? (2) Are the resulting target zones in the range of conventional safe zones? (3) Do patients who fulfil these combined criteria have a better outcome score? Methods A method is presented that calculates individual target zones based on the morphology, range of motion and load acting on the hip joint and merges them into the PSCTZ. In a retrospective analysis of 198 THA patients, it was calculated whether the patients were inside or outside the Lewinnek safe zone, Dorr combined anteversion range and PSCTZ. The postoperative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) between insiders and outsiders were compared. Results 11 patients were inside the PSCTZ. Patients inside and outside the PSCTZ showed no significant difference in the HHS. However, a significant higher HHS was observed for the insiders of two of the three sub-target zones incorporated in the PSCTZ. By combining the sub-target zones in the PSCTZ, all PSCTZ insiders except one had an HHS higher than 90. Conclusions The results might suggest that, for a prosthesis implanted in the PSCTZ a low outcome score of the patient is less likely than using the conventional safe zones by Lewinnek and Dorr. For future studies, a larger cohort of patients inside the PSCTZ is needed which can only be achieved if the cases are planned prospectively with the method introduced in this paper. Clinical Relevance The method presented in this paper could help the surgeon combining multiple different criteria during THA planning and find the suitable implant design and alignment for a specific patient.

Posterior Extra-articular Ischiofemoral Impingement Can Be Caused by the Lesser and Greater Trochanter in Patients With Increased Femoral Version: Dynamic 3D CT-Based Hip Impingement Simulation of a Modified FABER Test

Background:

Posterior extra-articular hip impingement has been described for valgus hips with increased femoral version (FV). These patients can present clinically with lack of external rotation (ER) and extension and with a positive posterior impingement test. But we do not know the effect of the combination of deformities, and the impingement location in early flexion is unknown.

Purpose:

To evaluate patient-specific 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scans of hips with increased FV and control hips for differences in range of motion, location and prevalence of osseous posterior intra- and extra-articular hip impingement.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Osseous 3D models based on segmentation of 3D CT scans were analyzed for 52 hips (38 symptomatic patients) with positive posterior impingement test and increased FV (>35°). There were 26 hips with an increased McKibbin instability index >70 (unstable hips). Patients were mainly female (96%), with an age range of 18 to 45 years. Of them, 21 hips had isolated increased FV (>35°); 22 hips had increased FV and increased acetabular version (AV; >25°); and 9 valgus hips (caput-collum-diaphyseal angle >139°) had increased FV and increased AV. The control group consisted of 20 hips with normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus (caput-collum-diaphyseal angle <139°). Validated 3D CT–based collision detection software for impingement simulation was used to calculate impingement-free range of motion and location of hip impingement. Surgical treatment was performed after the 3D CT–based impingement simulation in 27 hips (52%).

Results:

Hips with increased FV had significantly (P < .001) decreased extension and ER at 90° of flexion as compared with the control group. Posterior impingement was extra-articular (92%) in hips with increased FV. Valgus hips with increased FV and AV had combined intra- and extra-articular impingement. Posterior hip impingement occurred between the ischium and the lesser trochanter at 20° of extension and 20° of ER. Impingement was located between the ischium and the greater trochanter or intertrochanteric area at 20° of flexion and 40° of ER, with a modification of the flexion-abduction-ER (FABER) test.

Conclusion:

Posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral hip impingement can be caused by the lesser and greater trochanter or the intertrochanteric region. We recommend performing the modified FABER test during clinical examination in addition to the posterior impingement test for female patients with high FV. In addition, 3D CT can help for surgical planning, such as femoral derotation osteotomy and/or hip arthroscopy or resection of the lesser trochanter.

Factors affecting impingement and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty - Computer simulation analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies on the causes and factors affecting dislocation after total hip arthroplasty have revealed conflicting results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting impingement and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, using a 3-dimensional dynamic motion analysis.

METHODS

The CT data of 53 patients (53 hips: anterior dislocation; 11 cases, and posterior dislocation; 42 cases) who experienced hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with posterior approach, and 120 control patients (120 hips) without dislocation were analyzed. Parameters related to implant alignment, offset and leg length were evaluated. The impingement type was also analyzed using a software.

FINDINGS

Considering implant settings affecting dislocation, patients at risk for posterior dislocation had decreased stem anteversion, combined anteversion, femoral offset, and leg length. Nevertheless, patients at risk for anterior dislocation had only lower leg length, and these patients may also be at risk for a higher incidence of recurrent dislocation. Bony impingement occurred in almost half of the cases with posterior dislocation, while implant impingement was associated with anterior dislocation. Importantly, anterior dislocation was not as common as posterior dislocation even in cases with occurrence of posterior impingement.

INTERPRETATION

Bony impingement substantially affects dislocation even in the situation where the implant position and alignment are determined by the so-called "safe zone", especially on the anterior side, while implant impingement affects anterior dislocation. The restoration of anterior offset (i.e., prescribed by the stem anteversion and femoral offset) and combined anteversion is critical for avoidance of posterior dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Bone-to-Bone and Implant-to-Bone Impingement: A Novel Graphical Representation for Hip Replacement Planning

Bone-to-bone impingement (BTBI) and implant-to-bone impingement (ITBI) risk assessment is generally performed intra-operatively by surgeons, which is entirely subjective and qualitative, and therefore, lead to sub-optimal results and recurrent dislocation in some cases. Therefore, a method was developed for identifying subject-specific BTBI and ITBI, and subsequently, visualising the impingement area on native bone anatomy to highlight where prominent bone should be resected. Activity definitions and subject-specific bone geometries, with planned implants were used as inputs for the method. The ITBI and BTBI boundary and area were automatically identified using ray intersection and region growing algorithm respectively to retain the same ‘conical clearance angle’ obtained to avoid prosthetic impingement (PI). The ITBI and BTBI area was then presented with different colours to highlight the risk of impingement, and importance of resection. A clinical study with five patients after 2 years of THA was performed to validate the method. The results supported the study hypothesis, in that the predicted highest risk area (red coloured zone) was completely/majorly resected during the surgery. Therefore, this method could potentially be used to examine the effect of different pre-operative plans and hip motions on BTBI, ITBI, and PI, and to guide bony resection during THA surgery.

The optimal combined anteversion pattern to achieve a favorable impingement-free angle in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There have been no studies on the differences in impingement-free angle that result from different combined anteversion (CA) patterns. The aim of this study was to find the optimal CA pattern for achieving a favorable impingement-free angle, including bony and prosthetic impingement, in total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We evaluated 100 patients with no hip arthritis. We investigated the impingement-free angle (flexion, internal rotation with 90° flexion, extension, and external rotation) after changing the stem and cup anteversions to satisfy several CA patterns [cup anteversion + stem anteversion = 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°; cup anteversion + 0.7 × stem anteversion = 37.3° (:Widmer's theory); and cup anteversion + 0.77 × stem anteversion = 43.3° (:Yoshimine's theory)] using 3-dimensional templating software.

RESULTS

The impingement-free angle changed dramatically among the various CA patterns. The optimal CA was changed by various stem anteversion. Only CA: Widmer with stem anteversion of 20° satisfied daily-life range of motion (ROM) requirements (flexion ≥130°, internal rotation with 90° flexion ≥ 45°, extension ≥ 40°, external rotation ≥ 40°).

CONCLUSION

Good impingement-free angle cannot be obtained with single fixed CA. Different CA patterns should be used, depending on the differences in the stem anteversion. A CA of 30° with 0° ≤ stem anteversion ≤10°; a CA:Widmer with 20° of stem anteversion; a CA of 40° or Widmer with 30° of stem anteversion. When stem anteversion is ≥40°, CA should be decided by each patient's state. Among them, a stem anteversion of 20° with cup anteversion of 23.3° was found to be the best CA pattern.

The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center

BACKGROUND

Reaming of the acetabular cavity and cup implantation directly influence the hip rotation center and contact area between implant and bone. Previous studies have reported on an altered rotation center after total hip arthroplasty, but have not studied the influence of reaming and cup implantation separately. Aim of this study was therefore to analyze the individual influence of acetabular reaming and subsequent cup implantation on the rotation center and how this influences the contact conditions at the bone-implant interface.

METHODS

Acetabular press-fit cups were implanted into the left and right hips of three full cadavers (n = 6). CT scans were performed to calculate the change in hip rotation center after reaming and prior to liner insertion. 3D models of the cups were used to determine the polar gap, the contact conditions and the effective press-fit.

FINDINGS

Reaming the acetabular cavity shifted the rotation center medially (median 5.8 mm, range 4.8-9.1), superiorly (5.3 mm, 3.0-7.0) and posteriorly (2.9 mm, 1.0-5.3). With cup implantation, the rotation center shifted back towards the native position, but no full restoration was observed. The degree of shift increased with the size of polar gap (r_s = 0.829, P = .042), which inversely reduced the contact area (r_s = 0.886, P = .019).

INTERPRETATION

This study reveals that the dominant factor in hip rotation center restoration is the reaming process, while the cup implantation for a given nominal press-fit has only a small influence. Increasing the press-fit would improve the restoration but bares the danger of insufficient bone coverage and periprosthetic fractures due to the high forces needed.

Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Acetabular component orientation, such as high placement and femoral head diameter influence joint stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA), wherein anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) shape could cause femoro-acetabular impingement. Little is known regarding the combined influence of these parameters, particularly in the context of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Therefore we conducted a computer simulation study based on computed tomography (CT) data to determine whether: (1) AIIS shape, (2) high placement of acetabular cups, and (3) ball head diameter influence the range of motion (ROM) after THA.

HYPOTHESIS

The decrease in ROM depends on AIIS shape and the ROM decreases even if the femoral head diameter is increased when high placement of acetabular cups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT data from 14 hips of 14 patients were evaluated. Hips were categorized by Hetsroni classification type I (n=6), type II (n=6), and type III (n=2) depending on AIIS shape. ROM was evaluated using CT-based software. Cups were placed at and 5 and 10mm above the normal hip position. The femoral heads used were 28 (standard simulation), 32, and 36mm in diameter. ROM at impingement was measured under flexion (Flex), internal rotation (IR) at 90° flexion (IR at 90Flex), IR at 45° flexion with a 20° adduction (IR at 45Flex20Add), and external rotation at 10° extension (ER at 10Ext).

RESULTS

The mean ROM standard simulation for Flex, IR at 90Flex, IR at 45Flex20Add and ER at 10Ext were: 119.8±5.4°, 31.0±11.3°, 70.0±11.9°, and 33.0±9.7° for type I; 118.5±5.5°, 31.5±2.9°, 71.3±2.2°, and 33.3±3.3° for type II; and 105.5±13.4°, 21.0±15.6°, 61.0±11.3°, and 34.5±2.1° for type III, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ROMs of each type (Flex, p=0.252; IR at 90Flex, p=0.461; IR at 45Flex20Add, p=0.261; and ER at 10Ext, p=0.655). For the high placement of acetabular cups, ROM increase was restricted despite the femoral head diameter increase.

DISCUSSION

Larger femoral head diameters increased ROM, with a lower increase in type III because of bony impingement. ROM decreased with higher cup placement. Expansion effects were minimal, even with larger ball head diameters, and were further decreased in types II and III. Attention should be paid to AIIS shape because bony impingements occur early with higher acetabular cup placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

VI Simulation study.

What is the tolerated width of periacetabular osteophytes to avoid impingement in cementless THA?: a three-dimensional simulation study

BACKGROUNDS

Impingement is a risk factor for instability and prosthetic failure following total hip arthroplasty (THA). If the periacetabular osteophytes are not removed at surgery, impingement could occur between the osteophytes and the femoral stem following THA. However, excessive removal of the osteophytes could lead to bleeding from the bone. The aim of our study, therefore, was to locate the site of the impingement and to determine the width of tolerable osteophytes, which does not induce impingement during activities of daily living (ADL), using a three-dimensional simulation.

METHODS

On 35 hip models, virtual THA was performed. The acetabular cups were positioned at 45° abduction and 20° anteversion, and the anteversion of femoral stems was 15°. Circular osteophytes with a 30-mm rim were built around the acetabular cup. Fourteen ADL motions were simulated, and the osteophytes were removed until there was no impingement. A clock face was used to map the location and the width of tolerable osteophytes.

RESULTS

The impingement mainly occurred in antero-superior and posterior portions around the acetabular cup. Only 4.2-6.2-mm osteophytes were tolerable at the antero-superior portion (12-3 o'clock) and 6.3-7.2-mm osteophytes at the posterior portion (8-10 o'clock) following a total hip arthroplasty. In antero-inferior and postero-superior portions, over-20-mm osteophytes did not induce any impingement.

CONCLUSION

Osteophytes in the antero-superior and posterior portion of the acetabulum should be excised during a THA to avoid impingement of the femur-stem construct on the acetabular osteophytes during ADLs.

Effect of soft-tissue impingement on range of motion during posterior approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: an in vivo measurement study

PURPOSE

While implant impingement and bony impingement have been recognized as causes of poor outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA), reports of soft-tissue impingement are rare. To clarify the issue, the effect of anterior capsule resection on hip range of motion (ROM) was quantitatively measured in vivo during posterior approach THA using a CT-based hip navigation system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 47 patients (51 hips), hip ROM was measured intraoperatively before and after resection of the anterior hip capsule, and the difference was compared.

RESULTS

Resection of the anterior hip capsule brought about an average 6° increase of ROM in the direction of flexion with internal rotation and did not markedly change ROM in other directions.

CONCLUSIONS

During THA through a posterior approach, soft-tissue impingement by the anterior hip capsule can occur. Clinically, we expect that resection of the anterior hip capsule can reduce the risk of posterior instability without increasing the risk of anterior instability.

Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips

BACKGROUND

Variations in femoral and acetabular version are becoming increasingly recognized as contributing factors to the development of hip pain in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia. It is still unknown what the true prevalence of these rotational abnormalities is in this patient population.

PURPOSE

To determine (1) the prevalence of femoral version abnormalities in symptomatic hips with FAI and hip dysplasia, (2) the prevalence of combined abnormalities of femoral and acetabular version in these patients, and (3) which specific hip morphologies are associated with abnormalities of femoral version.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 462 symptomatic patients (538 hips) were included who had hip pain attributed to FAI or hip dysplasia and who presented to our tertiary referral center for hip preservation surgery between 2011 and 2015. We retrospectively examined femoral and acetabular version among 11 subgroups with predefined hip morphologies and compared findings with a control group. The allocation to each subgroup was based on morphologic reference values for femoral head coverage, lateral center edge angle, alpha angle, and neck-shaft angle calculated on plain radiographs.

RESULTS

Of the 538 hips included, 52% were found to have abnormal femoral version; severe abnormalities were found in 17%. Severely decreased femoral version (<0°) was found in 5%; moderately decreased femoral version (0°-10°), in 17%; moderately increased femoral version (26°-35°), in 18%; and severely increased femoral version (>35°), in 12%. The most frequent abnormal combination was increased femoral version combined with normal acetabular version (22%). We found significantly lower mean femoral version for the cam-type FAI group (15°) and significantly higher mean femoral version for the Perthes hips (32°; ie, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease) as compared with the control group (22°). The mean femoral version of the study group was 19°; for male patients, 15°; and for female patients, 22°.

CONCLUSION

Abnormalities in femoral version are highly prevalent in patients with hip pain who are eligible for hip preservation surgery, and severe abnormalities are prevalent in 1 of 6 patients (17%). Based on these results, the evaluation of young patients with hip pain should always include an assessment of femoral version and acetabular version to best decide what treatment approach should be undertaken to optimize outcomes.

Factors affecting the potential for posterior bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Our aim was to evaluate the radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the potential of posterior bony impingement using CT simulations.

Patients and Methods

Virtual CT data from 112 patients who underwent THA were analysed. There were 40 men and 72 women. Their mean age was 59.1 years (41 to 76). Associations between radiographic characteristics and posterior bony impingement and the range of external rotation of the hip were evaluated. In addition, we investigated the effects of pelvic tilt and the neck/shaft angle and femoral offset on posterior bony impingement.

Results

The range of external rotation and the ischiofemoral length were significantly lower, while femoral anteversion, the ischial ratio, and ischial angle were significantly higher in patients with posterior bony impingement compared with those who had implant impingement (p <  0.05). The range of external rotation positively correlated with ischiofemoral length (r = 0.49, p < 0.05), and negatively correlated with ischial length (r = -0.49, p < 0.05), ischial ratio (r =- 0.49, p < 0.05) and ischial angle (r = -0.55, p < 0.05). The range of external rotation was lower in patients with posterior pelvic tilt (p < 0.05) and in those with a high offset femoral component (p < 0.05) due to posterior bony impingement.

Conclusion

Posterior bony impingement after THA is more likely in patients with a wider ischium and a narrow ischiofemoral space. A high femoral offset and posterior pelvic tilt are also risk factors for this type of impingement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1140–6.

Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Bone Morphology in Hip Dysplasia and Its Effect on Hip Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGOUND

Despite the fact that femoral impingement against the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) is increasingly recognized, there is no description of morphologic features of the AIIS in hip dysplasia and their effect on hip range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose is to evaluate the bone morphology of the AIIS in hip dysplasia and whether its morphology affects hip ROM in THA.

METHODS

Computed tomography-based simulation software was used to create 3-dimensional bone models and perform virtual simulations. Using the computed tomographic data of 85 patients (male: n = 25, female: n = 60, mean age: 60.9) with hip osteoarthritis due to dysplasia, we measured the straight, vertical, and horizontal distances between the anteroinferior edge of the AIIS and the center of rotation in sagittal and axial views. The anterior and lateral versions of the AIIS were also measured. We calculated the ROM of flexion (Flex), and internal rotation (Int-R) in THA in the software, and analyzed the correlations among them.

RESULTS

The AIIS prominence is bigger and extends more anteriorly and laterally in males than in females. Furthermore, the taller the patient, the more the AIIS extends anteriorly and laterally. We found that Flex and Int-R decreased inversely proportional to the size and lateral version of the AIIS.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that the AIIS bone morphology substantially affects the ROM of Flex and Int-R especially in patients with laterally large AIIS bony anatomy in THA. Furthermore, our result indicates that the morphologic features of AIIS in hip dysplasia may be different between males and females.

Does component alignment affect gait symmetry in unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients?

BACKGROUND

Component malposition in total hip arthroplasty patients has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, whether the component alignment influences hip dynamic performance following total hip arthroplasty remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the component alignment and in vivo hip kinematics during gait.

METHODS

Nineteen unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients received CT scan for creation of 3D hip models. The component alignment between the non-implanted and implanted hips were measured and compared. Three-dimensional hip kinematics for both hips of the total hip arthroplasty patients during gait was quantified using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. The differences between the implanted and non-implanted hip kinematics during gait were calculated. A forward stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationships between the changes in implanted hip kinematics and the differences in component alignment with respect to the non-implanted hips.

FINDINGS

An average 5.1° (SD 6.5°; range -11.1° to 18.3°) increase in internal rotation was observed in the implanted hip than the contralateral non-implanted hip and significantly correlated with a linear combination of the increase of cup anteversion, cup medial translation and leg lengthening (R=0.81).

INTERPRETATION

Results suggested that the total hip arthroplasty patients compensated the changes in hip geometry by altering the dynamic movement during gait. Restoration of the native hip geometry, including acetabular cup anteversion, position and leg length could be one of the factors that influence the hip kinematics symmetry in total hip arthroplasty patients during gait.

The envelope of passive motion allowed by the capsular ligaments of the hip

Laboratory data indicate the hip capsular ligaments prevent excessive range of motion, may protect the joint against adverse edge loading and contribute to synovial fluid replenishment at the cartilage surfaces of the joint. However, their repair after joint preserving or arthroplasty surgery is not routine. In order to restore their biomechanical function after hip surgery, the positions of the hip at which the ligaments engage together with their tensions when they engage is required. Nine cadaveric left hips without pathology were skeletonised except for the hip joint capsule and mounted in a six-degrees-of-freedom testing rig. A 5 N m torque was applied to all rotational degrees-of-freedom separately to quantify the passive restraint envelope throughout the available range of motion with the hip functionally loaded. The capsular ligaments allowed the hip to internally/externally rotate with a large range of un-resisted rotation (up to 50±10°) in mid-flexion and mid-ab/adduction but this was reduced towards the limits of flexion/extension and ab/adduction such that there was a near-zero slack region in some positions (p<0.014). The slack region was not symmetrical; the mid-slack point was found with internal rotation in extension and external rotation in flexion (p<0.001). The torsional stiffness of the capsular ligamentous restraint averaged 0.8±0.3 N m/° and was greater in positions where there were large slack regions. These data provide a target for restoration of normal capsular ligament tensions after joint preserving hip surgery. Ligament repair is technically demanding, particularly for arthroscopic procedures, but failing to restore their function may increase the risk of osteoarthritic degeneration.

The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion before component impingement (ROMCI) and bony impingement (ROMBI), and the types of impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Using the computed tomography data of 101 patients who underwent THA, three-dimensional dynamic motion analysis was performed using a modular implant (Kinectiv(®) stem) that enabled adjustment of offset and leg length independently. We defined offset as horizontal offset (HO) and leg length as vertical offset (VO), and measured the ROMCI and ROMBI in flexion (Flex), internal rotation (Int-R) and external rotation (Ext-R) with the configuration of each horizontal/vertical offset.

RESULTS

We found that HO lengthening increased the ROMCI and ROMBI in Flex and Int-R by delaying bony impingement, although excessive lengthening had minimal effect. On the contrary, VO lengthening decreased the ROMCI and ROMBI in Flex and ROMCI in Int-R. As for Ext-R, VO lengthening had positive effects on the ROMCI and ROMBI, whereas lengthening of HO had negative effects on the ROMCI and ROMBI.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the appropriate long offset with a low shaft angle increased the ROM in Flex and Int-R, and a high neck shaft angle increased the ROM in Ext-R. We should use implants properly in accordance with the types of impingement for avoiding dislocations in THA.

Low femoral antetorsion as a risk factor for bony impingement after bipolar hemiarthroplasty

Introduction

Reports of dislocation after bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) abound in literature, and several studies have mentioned the factors that are associated with an increased risk of dislocation. However, there is no report detailing the pattern of impingement in BHA and how femoral antetorsion can affect the range of motion (ROM) after BHA.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern of impingement in BHA and whether femoral antetorsion affects the ROM after BHA using three-dimensional (3D) dynamic motion analysis.

Methods

Using the computed tomography (CT) data of 60 patients (60 hips), including 31 men and 29 women who underwent BHA for the treatment of idiopathic osteonecrosis (ION) of the femoral head, we calculated the antetorsion of the femoral neck, ROM of flexion (Flex), internal rotation (Int-R), and external rotation (Ext-R) using a CT-based 3D simulation software. We evaluated the pattern of impingement and the relationship between femoral antetorsion and ROM in BHA. As for the implant position in the 3D simulation software, the anteversion of the femoral implant was set to be the same as the natural antetorsion of the femoral neck and neck length was set to be the standard neck in all cases.

Results

This study revealed the mechanism of impingement in BHA: (1) bone to bone impingement and (2) implant to bone impingement. We found a significant decrease in the ROM of Flex and Int-R inversely proportional to the femoral antetorsion. In patients with lower femoral antetorsion, the ROM of Flex and Int-R decreased due to bony impingement (the anterior great trochanteric region of the femur impinges on the anteroinferior edge of the anteroinferior iliac spine). Whereas, high anteversion of the femoral implant may decrease the ROM of Ext-R; however, our results also showed that even the lowest ROM of Ext-R with 10° hip extension was over 40°.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that lower femoral antetorsion substantially affects the ROM of Flex and Int-R due to bony impingement. For these patients, there should be consideration given to retaining femoral “anterior offset” in BHA.

The effect of femoral and acetabular version on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery

BACKGROUND

The impact of proximal femoral and combined femoral and acetabular version on patient-reported outcomes after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to identify associations of proximal femoral version as well as combined version (McKibbin index) with disease-specific, validated, patient-reported outcomes following arthroscopic correction of symptomatic FAI.

METHODS

A prospective hip arthroscopy registry was utilized to evaluate 243 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery to correct FAI. Femoral version and the McKibbin index were measured prospectively on preoperative computed tomography scans. Disease-specific, patient-reported outcomes included the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and Sports subscales. Disease impact on quality of life was determined with use of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Comparative analyses were used to evaluate the impact of femoral version on changes in patient-reported outcome scores; multiple regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The patient cohort contained 243 patients (123 female and 120 male) with a mean age of 29.2 years and a mean postoperative follow-up of twenty-one months (range, twelve to forty-two months). The cohort experienced significant improvements (p < 0.001) in all patient-reported outcome measures, with most patients improving by at least the minimal clinically important difference for all of these measures. The mean improvement was 20 points for the mHHS, 15 for the HOS ADL, 23 for the HOS Sports, and 23 for the iHOT-33. When stratified by femoral version, the postoperative improvements in patients with relative femoral retroversion (<5° anteversion) were clinically important but of significantly smaller magnitude than those in the other version groups. We did not find any associations between the McKibbin index and any patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinically important improvements can be expected after arthroscopic FAI surgery in all femoral version groups, patients with relative femoral retroversion (<5° femoral anteversion) may experience less improvement than those with normal or increased version.

Effect of head diameter on passive and active dynamic hip dislocation

Hip dislocation is a major short-term complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). One factor thought to reduce the risk for dislocation is head size. We constructed subject-specific computer models to study the effect of head size on risk for postoperative dislocation. Femoral and acetabular geometry was constructed after segmenting CT scans of nine hips. CAD models of THA components with four head diameters (28, 32, 36, and 44 mm) were virtually implanted. Hip capsular ligaments were simulated using rigid-body ellipsoids connected by non-linear springs. Posterior dislocation was simulated during a rise from a low chair; anterior dislocation was simulated during a pivot activity. Intraoperative stability tests were simulated for anterior or posterior dislocation. While rising from a low chair (posterior dislocation) and during the pivot activity (anterior dislocation), increasing head size significantly increased hip flexion angle at dislocation and generated higher dislocation moments. Larger heads reduced the risk for dislocation. Intraoperative stability tests detected the relative increased resistance to dislocation despite differences in the absolute magnitude of moments. This model can be useful preclinical tool for assessing design changes, the effect of component placement, and the activity-based risk for dislocation.

Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study

PURPOSE

Compared to medial femoral offset (MFO), the role of anterior femoral offset (AFO) on range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been fully examined. We therefore defined AFO as the anterior distance from the centre of the femoral head to the proximal femoral axis in the sagittal plane and determined the optimal AFO required for ROM needed for activities of daily living using a computer-simulated THA model.

METHODS

Various AFOs were obtained by changing stem anteversion (stem-AV) and stem tilt in the sagittal plane (stem-tilt) using a CT-based simulation software. The required ROM was defined as: flexion ≥ 110°, internal rotation at 90° flexion (IR) ≥ 30°, external rotation (ER) ≥ 30°, and extension ≥ 30°, and we determined AFO and MFO to satisfy required ROM.

RESULTS

AFO was positively correlated with stem-AV and anterior stem-tilt. MFO was negatively correlated with stem-AV and not influenced by stem-tilt. Flexion and IR increased with both increased AFO and MFO, whereas extension and ER decreased with increased AFO. A smoothing spline curve showed the optimal AFO and MFO for required ROM to be from 15 mm to 25 mm on average and more than 32.1 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that AFO directly influenced ROM in THA. Optimal AFO as well as MFO should be reconstructed to achieve sufficient ROM.

Anteroinferior acetabular rim damage due to femoroacetabular impingement

BACKGROUND

The most common location of labral tears and chondral damage in the hip is the anterosuperior region of the acetabulum, which is associated with pain in flexion and rotation. We describe a case series of patients with labral tears, ganglion formation, and chondromalacia isolated to the anteroinferior acetabulum. Clinically, patients had pain in extension and internal rotation.

CASE DESCRIPTIONS

Isolated anteroinferior labral hypertrophy and ganglion were first observed in a patient with coxa valga. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic records and identified nine hips in seven patients with isolated anteroinferior damage. One patient with bilateral valgus femoral head tilt after slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) had impingement of the anteromedial metaphysis on the acetabulum from 3 to 6 o'clock. Five of seven had valgus neck-shaft angles and all had acetabular anteversion with damage isolated to the anteroinferior acetabular rim.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Series on the diagnostic efficacy of MR arthrogram have noted anteroinferior damage adjacent to superior acetabular rim lesions. However, these do not describe isolated anteroinferior rim damage. In addition, available case series of patients with valgus SCFE do not describe a location of impingement or intraarticular damage.

PURPOSES AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this small case series of patients with isolated anteroinferior chondrolabral damage, there are two potential causative mechanisms: (1) primary anteroinferior impingement with femoral extension and internal rotation and (2) posterior extraarticular ischiotrochanteric impingement causing secondary anterior instability of the femur. The pathoanatomy appears to be multifactorial, necessitating an individualized treatment approach.

A cementless hip system with a new surface for osseous integration

PURPOSE

The failure of total hip systems caused by wear-particle-induced loosening has focused interest on factors potentially affecting wear rate. Remnants of the blasting material were reported on grit-blasted surfaces for cementless fixation. These particles are believed to cause third-body wear and implant loosening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of a cementless hip system with a new, contamination-free, roughened surface with regard to prosthesis-related failures.

METHODS

Between May 2004 and March 2009, 202 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) (192 patients with a mean age of 62.6 years) were performed using a cementless stem (Hipstar®) and a hemispherical acetabular cup (Trident®).

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of two years, five revisions (2.5%) due to aseptic loosening of the stem and three (1.5%) of the cup were necessary. The cumulative rate of prostheses survival, counting revision of both components and with aseptic failure as end point, was 92.9% at 8.8 years. Radiolucent lines up to three millimetres were evaluated in the proximal part of the femur in 61% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of radiolucent lines was decreased, the revision rate was considerably increased compared to other uncemented hip implants with grit-blasted surfaces in the short- to mid-term follow-up of our study. Subsequent studies are needed to confirm whether these changes in implant material and surface affect the radiological and clinical outcome in the long term.

Hip abduction can prevent posterior edge loading of hip replacements

Edge loading causes clinical problems for hard-on-hard hip replacements, and edge loading wear scars are present on the majority of retrieved components. We asked the question: are the lines of action of hip joint muscles such that edge loading can occur in a well-designed, well-positioned acetabular cup? A musculoskeletal model, based on cadaveric lower limb geometry, was used to calculate for each muscle, in every position within the complete range of motion, whether its contraction would safely pull the femoral head into the cup or contribute to edge loading. The results show that all the muscles that insert into the distal femur, patella, or tibia could cause edge loading of a well-positioned cup when the hip is in deep flexion. Patients frequently use distally inserting muscles for movements requiring deep hip flexion, such as sit-to-stand. Importantly, the results, which are supported by in vivo data and clinical findings, also show that risk of edge loading is dramatically reduced by combining deep hip flexion with hip abduction. Patients, including those with sub-optimally positioned cups, may be able to reduce the prevalence of edge loading by rising from chairs or stooping with the hip abducted.

Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the bone morphology of the hip affects the range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Using the CT data of 63 patients who underwent THA, we calculated the ROM of flexion (Flex), internal rotation (Int-R) and external rotation (Ext-R) using 3D dynamic analysis software. We measured the distance between the anterior surface of the stem and anterior aspect of the greater trochanter (GTa length) at the cutting point and between the tip of the antero-inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and coronal plane of both femoral heads (AIIS length), as a parameter of the femur and pelvis, respectively. The relationship between the ROM, bone anatomy and impingement site was evaluated.

RESULTS

We found a significant decrease in the ROM of Flex and the Int-R to be inversely proportional to the GTa and AIIS length. In Flex and Int-R, the anterior intertrochanteric region often impinges on the AIIS in patients with larger bone anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the bone morphology of the hip substantially affects the ROM of Flex and Int-R, especially in patients with large bone anatomy. For these patients we should consider bony impingement in THA.

Increased range of motion to impingement with large head total hip arthroplasty: point of diminishing returns

Large head total hip arthroplasty (THA) is known to increase range of motion to impingement and decrease risk of dislocation, however, this is dependent on accurate component positioning and patient anatomy. In this study, a computer-aided design model was used to determine the effects of component positioning on range of motion to impingement with increasing head size. Three-dimensional models were made of 7 cadaver CT scans and virtual THA was performed with a conventional implant system. Theoretical range of motion to impingement was tested before and after the components were implanted in flexion, extension, internal/external rotation, abduction, adduction, and flexed internal/external rotation. Range of motion increased non-linearly in every motion except for external rotation and adduction with increasing head size, with gains in ROM limited by osseous impingement. Use of large head THA leads to increased ROM to impingement, but with larger head sizes, benefits are limited by bony anatomy.

Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle

The oscillation angle (OsA), which is the sum of the impingement angles on the two sides when the prosthetic neck sways from the neutral axis of the acetabular cup to the liner rim, is one of the most important factors that can affect the range of motion of an artificial hip joint. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of total hip component design on the impingement angle. Our findings show that an increase in cup depth of the liner restricts the motion of the neck and results in a reduced impingement angle, while an increase in chamfer angle increases the impingement angle until it reaches a critical value when a further increase no longer results in an increase in impingement angle. The impingement angle is not only dependent on the head/neck ratio, but also on the head size itself. For most arbitrarily chosen cup depths and chamfer angles, the neck only impacts at one point on the liner. This study proposes a suitable combination of cup depth and chamfer angle and a preferred impact mode, which, if impingement does occur, enables the neck to impinge on the liner rim over a large area. Cup-neck combinations that have an adequate OsA with maximum femoral head coverage are presented.

Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion

BACKGROUND

Factors affecting risk for impingement and dislocation can be related to the patient, implant design, or surgeon. While these have been studied independently, the impact of each factor relative to the others is not known.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined the effect of three implant design factors, prosthetic placement, and patient anatomy on subject-specific ROM.

METHODS

We virtually implanted hip geometry obtained from 16 CT scans using computer models of hip components with differences in head size, neck diameter, and neck-shaft angle. A contact detection model computed ROM before prosthetic or bony impingement. We correlated anatomic measurements from pelvic radiographs with ROM.

RESULTS

When we implanted the components for best fit to the subject's anatomy or in the recommended orientation of 45° abduction and 20° anteversion, ROM was greater than 110° of flexion, 30° of extension, 45° of adduction-abduction, and 40° of external rotation. Changes in head size, neck diameter, and neck-shaft angle generated small gains (3.6°-6°) in ROM when analyzed individually, but collectively, we noted a more substantial increase (10°-17°). Radiographic measurements correlated only moderately with hip flexion and abduction.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to tailor implant placement to each patient to maximize bony coverage without compromising ROM. Once bony impingement becomes the restricting factor, further changes in implant design may not improve ROM. Radiographic measurements do not appear to have value in predicting ROM.

Dissociation of modular total hip arthroplasty at the neck-stem interface without dislocation

Modular femoral and acetabular components are now widely used, but only a few complications related to the modularity itself have been reported. We describe a case of dissociation of the modular total hip arthroplasty (THA) at the femoral neck–stem interface during walking. The possible causes of this dissociation are discussed. Successful treatment was provided with surgical revision and replacement of the modular neck components. Surgeons who use modular components in hip arthroplasties should be aware of possible early complications in which the modularity of the prostheses is the major factor of failure.

Sandwich type ceramic liner fracture rate with the Atlas III™ socket: A study of 144 primary total hip replacements at a mean 74 months' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Ceramic friction bearings have been proposed as a means of reducing wear in total hip replacement (THR). A "sandwich" composite concept including a ceramic bearing surface has been proposed as simplifying the modularity while matching metal-back cups with a polyethylene liner. It is not precisely known how frequently abnormal noise would occur during functioning of this type of implant, which moreover entails a risk of ceramic liner fracture.

HYPOTHESIS

Results with sandwich type ceramic liners are comparable to those with polyethylene liners, without risk of side effects (noise, fracture).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical and radiological results of 144 cementless Atlas III™ cups containing a 28mm-diameter polyethylene-ceramic sandwich type liner coupled to a ceramic Biolox Forte™ head were retrospectively analyzed at a mean 74 months' follow-up. Mean patient age was 59.4 years. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up. Femoral components comprised 61 ESOP™ anatomic stems and 71 BHS™ Corail stems. The radiologic study used Imagika™ software.

RESULTS

Global function scores were satisfactory: PMA score, 17.2±1.2 (range, 9 to 18); global Harris score, 93.6±3.1 (49 to 100). Global survivorship was 91.6% (95% CI: 86.34-96.9). Radioclinical analysis found seven liner fractures (5.3%) at a mean 32 months; all were non-traumatic and asymptomatic. Clinical risk factors for liner fracture were overweight, advanced age, dislocation, prosthetic impingement, increased postoperative offset was a radiologic risk factor.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Despite these satisfactory radioclinical results, matching those for metal-backed implants containing a polyethylene liner, close surveillance is mandatory with this type of composite implant. The high fracture rate with ceramic-polyethylene sandwich type liners and relative lack of symptoms warrant caution in their use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective or historic series.

Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Implant-related impingement has been reported following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, and reactive osseous patterns associated with implant-bone impingement have been identified. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical implications of radiographic signs of femoral neck-acetabular cup impingement following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

METHODS

Serial anteroposterior and lateral radiographs made five to 12.9 years postoperatively were available for ninety-one of the first 100 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing procedures (in eighty-nine patients) performed by the senior author. These radiographs were reviewed by a single independent observer, who was blinded to the clinical results. Radiographic signs of impingement were assessed and were correlated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty hips (in eighteen patients) had at least one of two reactive osseous signs: a solitary exostosis (six hips, 7%) and an erosive "divot-type" deformity (twenty hips, 22%). Each radiographic sign occurred predominantly at the superior aspect of the femoral neck just distal to the femoral component. None of the patients with such an impingement sign reported any symptoms or discomfort during examination of the range of hip motion. These patients had a greater mean postoperative University of California Los Angeles activity score and a greater mean range of hip motion than the patients without an impingement sign. Based on the numbers available, there was no association between component size, abduction angle and anteversion angle of the socket, femoral stem-femoral shaft angle, or femoral component-femoral neck ratio and the occurrence of repetitive impingement signs on radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

The reactive osseous features identified in this study should facilitate the radiographic assessment of impingement in other patients following hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine whether radiographic signs of impingement are of prognostic consequence.

Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty

Range of motion of the hip joint is a major contributor to dislocation post total hip replacement. Impingement is often treated as a surrogate for dislocation and occurs – prosthetically – when the neck of the femoral component contacts with the rim of the pelvic acetabular cup. This impingement is caused by movement of the leg during activities of daily living. This article analyses hip joint range of motion and its implication for impingement. A systematic literature review was undertaken with the purpose of establishing a range of motion benchmark for total hip replacement. This paper proposes a method by which a three-dimensional range of motion boundary established from the literature can be presented. The nominal boundary is also validated experimentally using a number of configurations of a neutral hip joint coordinate frame.

In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The in vivo kinematics of squatting after total hip arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to determine the range of motion of the hip joint during squatting after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Using fluoroscopy, we investigated 15 primary cementless total hip arthroplasties performed using a computed tomography-based navigation system. An acetabular component with concavities around the rim and a femoral component with reduced neck geometry were used. The motion of the acetabular and femoral components based on the neutral standing position was analyzed using a two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration technique.

FINDINGS

No prosthetic impingement occurred in any hips. The mean maximum hip flexion range of motion was 86.2° (range, 55.1°-117.4°) and was not always consistent with maximum squatting. The mean maximum pelvic posterior tilting angle was 25.7° (range, 5.5°-43.5°). The pelvis began to tilt posteriorly at 50°-70° of the hip flexion range of motion. At maximum squatting, the mean ratio of the pelvic posterior tilting angle to the femoral flexion angle was 23.2% (range, 3.8%-45.7%). The mean minimum angle up to the theoretical prosthetic impingement was 26.2° (range, 11.8°-39.8°).

INTERPRETATION

Although this is a preliminary study, three-dimensional assessment of dynamic squatting motion after total hip arthroplasty using the two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration technique appears to enable elucidation of the range of motion of the hip joint, the contribution of pelvic posterior tilting, and the minimum angle up to theoretical prosthetic impingement during squatting.

Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Reduced range of motion of the hip has a detrimental influence on lower limb function. Large diameter head total hip arthroplasty may theoretically have a greater potential for restoring normal hip range of motion due to greater head-neck diameter ratio, and hence provide better function compared to conventional or hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

METHOD

At minimum one year follow-up, range of motion of the operated and contra lateral hips was clinically assessed using digital photographs and bony landmarks in a clinical comparative study. We assessed if 1) large diameter head total hip arthroplasty (55 patients) restores better hip range of motion compared to 28 mm total hip arthroplasty (50 patients) or hip resurfacing (60 patients) 2) large diameter head total hip arthroplasty achieves same hip range of motion as contra lateral normal hips and 3) hip range of motion correlates with the WOMAC score.

FINDINGS

The large diameter head total hip arthroplasty group had significantly greater total arcs of motion (approximately 20°), mostly due to an increase of hip flexion and external rotation, but did not reach normal hip motion. The hip range of motion showed significant correlation with the WOMAC score, especially the flexion arc.

INTERPRETATION

The better hip range of motion of large diameter head total hip arthroplasty is likely due to the greater head to neck diameter ratio and hence seems to be the best option to optimize range of hip motion and improve function after hip arthroplasty.

Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty

Computer modeling of 10 patients' computed tomographic scans was used to study the variables affecting hip arthroplasty range of motion before bony impingement (ROMBI) including acetabular offset and height, femoral offset, height and anteversion, and osteophyte removal. The ROMBI was compared with the ROM before component impingement and the native hip ROM. The ROMBI decreased with decreased total offset and limb shortening. Acetabular offset and height had a greater effect on ROMBI than femoral offset and height. The ROMBI lost with decreased acetabular offset was not fully recoverable with an increase in femoral offset or osteophyte removal. Bony impingement increased and component impingement decreased with decreased acetabular offset and increased head diameter.

Using two palpable measurements improves the subject-specific femoral modeling

Subject-specific musculoskeletal models are essential to biomedical research and clinical applications, such as customized joint replacement, computer-aided surgical planning, gait analysis and automated segmentation. Generating these models from CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is time and resource intensive, requiring special skills. Therefore, in many studies individual bone models are approximated by scaling a generic template. Thus, the primary goal of this study was to determine a set of clinically available parameters (palpable measures and demographic data) that could improve the prediction of femoral dimensions, as compared to predicting these variables using uniform scaling based on palpable length. Similar to previous non-homogenous anthropometric scaling methods, the non-homogenous scaling method proposed in this study improved the prediction over uniform scaling of five key femoral measures. Homogenous scaling forces all dimensions of an object to be scaled equally, whereas non-homogenous scaling allows the dimensions to be scaled independently. The largest improvement was in femoral depth, where the coefficient of determination (r(2)) improved from 0.22 (homogenous) to 0.60 (non-homogeneous). In general, the major advantage of this non-homogenous scaling method is its ability to support the accurate and rapid generation of subject-specific femoral models since all parameters can be collected clinically, without imaging or invasive methods.

Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion

Dislocation remains a major complication after THA, and range of motion before impingement is important in joint stability. Variability in implant alignment affects resultant range of motion. We used a probabilistic modeling approach to assess the effects of implant alignment variability based on manual and computer-assisted surgical (CAS) techniques on resultant range of motion after THA. We implemented a contact detection algorithm within a probabilistic analysis framework. The normally distributed alignment variables (mean +/- 1 standard deviation) were cup abduction (manual = 45 degrees +/- 7.6 degrees , CAS = 45 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees ), cup anteversion (manual = 20 degrees +/- 9.6 degrees , CAS = 20 degrees +/- 4.5 degrees ), and stem anteversion (manual and CAS = 10 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees ). The outcomes of the probabilistic analysis were range of motion distributions with 1% and 99% bounds. The upper bounds of motion for manual and CAS alignment were similar because bony impingement was the limiting factor. The lower bounds of range of motion were substantially different depending on the type of surgical alignment; manual alignment produced a smaller range of motion in 3% to 5% of cases. CAS implant alignment produced range of motion values above minimum acceptable levels in all cases simulated.

Computational modeling for bedside application

Advances in computer power, novel diagnostic and therapeutic medical technologies, and an increasing knowledge of pathophysiology from gene to organ systems make it increasingly feasible to apply multiscale patient-specific modeling based on proven disease mechanisms. Such models may guide and predict the response to therapy in many areas of medicine. This is an exciting and relatively new approach, for which efficient methods and computational tools are of the utmost importance. Investigators have designed patient-specific models in almost all areas of human physiology. Not only will these models be useful in clinical settings to predict and optimize the outcome from surgery and non-interventional therapy, but they will also provide pathophysiologic insights from the cellular level to the organ system level. Models, therefore, will provide insight as to why specific interventions succeed or fail.