Intra-articular tibiofemoral injection of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug has no detrimental effects on joint mechanics in a rat model

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Injections versus Steroid Injections in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Orthopedic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although corticosteroid injections are an effective treatment for musculoskeletal pathologies, they may not be suitable for all patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes between patients who received NSAID and corticosteroid injections for various orthopedic conditions.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, and meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model for outcomes presented in three or more studies. Other studies were qualitatively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 28 articles with 2113 patients were included. A meta-analysis of five studies in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) between subacromial NSAID injections and corticosteroid injections at 1 month [weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.244; 95% CI, -1.232 to 0.745; I2, 94.5%]. For patients with knee osteoarthritis, a meta-analysis of three studies demonstrated that there was no significant difference between intraarticular NSAID injections and corticosteroid injections in pain VAS at 1 month (WMD 0.754; 95% CI, -0.413 to 1.921; I2, 90.2%) and 3 months (WMD-0.089; 95% CI, -0.345 to 0.166; I2, 0%). A review of the studies assessing pain outcomes for hip osteoarthritis, adhesive capsulitis, and plantar fasciitis showed no significant differences between the NSAID and corticosteroid groups.

CONCLUSION

NSAID injections may be safe and effective alternatives to steroid injections, especially in shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis.

Magnetically Guided Intracartilaginous Delivery of Kartogenin Improves Stem Cell-Targeted Degenerative Arthritis Therapy

Background

Degenerative joint disease or osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Intra-articular injection is the mainstay nonsurgical treatment for OA. However, dense cartilage and a lack of vasculature often limit the ability of drugs to reach cell or tissue targets at the concentrations necessary to elicit the desired biological response. Kartogenin (KGN), a small molecular compound, possesses a strong capacity to promote chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). However, the rapid clearance of KGN from the intra-articular cavity limits its feasibility.

Materials and Methods

We constructed a magnetically guided biodegradable nanocarrier system (MNP) which enabled intracartilaginous delivery of KGN to promote chondrogenic differentiation by MSCs embedded within the articular matrix. Moreover, in preclinical models of OA, KGN-loaded MNPs exhibited increased tissue penetration and retention within the joint matrix under external magnetic guidance.

Results

Histological examination showed that compared with KGN alone, KGN-loaded MNPs enhanced chondrogenic differentiation and improved the structural integrity of both articular cartilage and subchondral bone.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a practical method for intracartilaginous delivery using engineered nanocarriers, thus providing a new strategy to improve the efficacy of molecular therapeutic agents in the treatment of OA.

Comparison of the effect of ketorolac versus triamcinolone acetonide injections for the treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background

De Quervain’s disease is tenosynovitis of the first dorsal compartment causing severely painful radial-side wrist pain and impaired function. Steroids are effective in treating this condition due to their anti-inflammatory properties. However, this drug causes problems such as hypopigmentation, and is contradicted in diabetes mellitus patients. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) which are efficacious in shoulder pathology and not contraindicated in diabetics and can be used to avoid the local effects of steroids could be beneficial for some patients. The present study was a randomized controlled trial to examine the differences in pain scores and functional response to local injections of a corticosteroid and the NSAID ketorolac.

Methods

Sixty-four patients with radial styloid tenosynovitis were randomized using a computer-generated random number table into two groups receiving either a ketorolac injection or a triamcinolone injection. We evaluated post-injection pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS), functional outcomes using the Thai Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale, and evaluated grip and pinch strengths, recorded at baseline and 6 weeks after the injection.

Results

Thirty-one participants in the ketorolac group and 29 participants in the triamcinolone group completed the study and were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the assessments at baseline. At the 6-week conclusion of the study, patients in the triamcinolone group had a statistically lower average pain score than in the ketorolac group (0.7 ± 2.0 vs 5.3 ± 3.2, P < 0.001), higher DASH functional score (4.4 ± 6.5 vs 34.1 ± 20.2, P < 0.001), higher right grip strength (60.8 ± 16.8 vs 49.2 ± 18.6, P < 0.015), and higher left grip strength (59.8 ± 18.1 vs 50.3 ± 18.0, P < 0.04). However, there was no difference in pinch strength.

Conclusions

Our study found that ketorolac injections resulted in inferior pain reduction, functional score and grip improvement than triamcinolone injection in patients with radial styloid tenosynovitis. Future studies are required to examine the effects of ketorolac in larger group and with longer follow-up periods to further elucidate the findings of this study.

Trial registration

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.in.th (TCTR20200909006).

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory and Corticosteroid Injections for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

To determine optimal treatment strategies for shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare subacromial nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory injections (SNIs) and subacromial corticosteroid injections (SCIs) on pain relief and functional improvement in individuals with SIS. Second, to perform a cost analysis of the 2 injections.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched for randomized controlled trials using several keywords.

STUDY SELECTION

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized, and 10 studies comparing changes in pain or function in humans with SIS receiving SNIs or SCIs were included. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

DATA EXTRACTION

Baseline and follow-up scores of the visual analog, Constant-Murley, and University of California Los Angeles shoulder scales were extracted to calculate effect sizes (ESs), represented as Cohen d. Metaregression and publication bias analyses were performed. Procedural and medication costs were extracted from Medicare guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 7 high and 3 good quality studies were included, with a mean score of 21.1. Only 1 study had a high risk of bias. The meta-analyses produced pooled ESs of 0.05 (P = 0.83), 0.12 (P = 0.71), and 0.07 (P = 0.79) for each scale, respectively, with CIs crossing 0. Procedural costs were equal between groups, whereas ketorolac was the least costly medication ($0.47). There was no significant difference in side effects between the 2 injections.

CONCLUSION

SNIs are as effective as SCIs for short-term pain relief and improving function in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. In addition, they are less expensive and cause no major difference in complications, providing a viable, cost-effective alternative for injection therapy in patients with SIS.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in equine orthopaedics

Orthopaedic disorders are commonly encountered in equine veterinary medicine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play an important role in the management of many equine orthopaedic disorders. There are multiple NSAIDs available for use in horses, including both non-selective and selective NSAIDS, and the body of literature evaluating the efficacy of these medications, their effects on normal and inflamed musculoskeletal tissues, and their side effects is broad. This review aims to summarise the current literature on the use of NSAIDs for equine orthopaedic disorders and examines new and future avenues for the management of inflammation in equine orthopaedics.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of intra-articular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A narrative review

What is known and Objective

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of joint disease and activity limitation in adults. Common therapies to treat OA‐related pain are oral and topical non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra‐articular (IA) corticosteroids. However, prolonged courses of oral NSAIDs are associated with systemic adverse effects and repeat IA corticosteroid injections may cause cartilage degeneration. IA NSAIDs may be an alternative therapy possibly minimizing systemic side effects while maintaining efficacy. Therefore, we sought to summarize the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of IA NSAIDs to help providers make a more informed decision on the use of IA NSAIDs.

Methods

We searched the National Library of Medicine Database with terms “intraarticular and nsaid”, yielding 1032 results. Only traditional formulations of NSAIDs were considered for inclusion. Animal studies were included if animals were healthy or if the method of arthritis induction was a reasonable model of osteoarthritis. Human studies were included if humans were healthy or if the primary disease studied was osteoarthritis of a large joint. Of 1032 results, 31 research articles met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in this review.

Results and Discussion

We found that single doses of IA NSAIDs provided far less total systemic and synovial exposure compared to a one week course of oral NSAIDs, but maximum concentrations to the synovium with IA administration were much higher. IA NSAIDs had an excellent safety profile in small animals, large animals and humans, although these injections were associated with non‐specific cartilage inflammation in healthy animals. In animal models, IA NSAIDs had similar efficacy to PO NSAIDs in treating OA‐related pain. In humans, IA NSAIDs had similar efficacy to PO NSAIDS and IA corticosteroids in treating OA‐related pain; however, many trials did not have a placebo control and outcome measures were heterogeneous.

What is new and Conclusion

Overall, single doses of IA NSAIDs appear safe and efficacious across animals and humans. The optimal use of IA NSAIDs is still to be determined and further research is needed. However IA NSAIDs may be an additional beneficial therapy to treat OA‐related pain. Potential uses may be to augment IA corticosteroids injections, to interrupt multiple IA corticosteroid injections or as an alternative in patients that are high risk for corticosteroid‐related adverse events.

Do Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Have a Deleterious Effect on Cartilage Repair? A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the available evidence regarding any plausible deleterious effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on chondrocytes, chondrocyte differentiation, and allograft or autograft incorporation after cartilage repair procedures.

DESIGN

Three databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library) were screened for eligible studies: investigating the effects of NSAIDs on chondrocytes, chondrogenic differentiation, or allograft/autograft incorporation. This evaluation included studies of any level of evidence, written in English, reporting clinical or preclinical results, published in peer review journals and dealing with our topic. All articles evaluating the effects of NSAIDs on either osteoarthritic (OA) chondrocyte samples or OA chondrocyte models were excluded. Moreover, articles about bone healing in which allograft or autograft incorporation was not investigated were also excluded. Methodologic quality assessment was performed for in vivo animal studies according to ARRIVE guidelines, and risk of bias of each included study was identified using the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the review: 4 in vitro studies, 13 animal studies, and 1 human study. According to these studies NSAIDs have no detrimental effect on healthy mature chondrocytes; however, these drugs influence chondrocyte differentiation and graft incorporation and therefore may interfere with chondrogenesis and incorporation after transplantation of chondrocytes or osteochondral grafts.

CONCLUSION

The use of NSAIDs, systemic or local, after cartilage repair procedures should be avoided unless a substantial clinical benefit would otherwise be withheld from the patient. More human studies are needed to analyze the effect of NSAIDs on cartilage repair.

Local Ketorolac Injection vs Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Blockade as an Adjuvant to a Spinal Block in Hindfoot Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Popliteal nerve blocks reduce pain and markedly improve postoperative outcomes during foot and ankle surgery; however, several potential complications may arise from nerve block procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate local infiltration analgesia with ketorolac as a convenient alternative for pain relief.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients scheduled for hindfoot arthrodesis were randomly allocated to one of 2 anesthetic groups: a spinal block augmented with either a popliteal nerve block (n = 40) or local ketorolac and Marcaine infiltration (n = 40). Clinical assessment included postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours, total morphine consumption, time to incision (time in operating room to incision), operative time, length of hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

Despite similar morphine consumption between groups (P = .28), VAS scores were significantly lower at 24 hours (1.6 ± 2.2 cm vs 2.7 ± 3.0 cm, P = .01) and 48 hours (0.2 ± 0.7 cm vs 1.0 ± 1.5 cm, P < .01) after surgery using local ketorolac injection. Although time from entry into the operating room to incision was also reduced after local ketorolac injection (19.0 ± 5.3 minutes vs 31.4 ± 14.6 minutes, P < .001), the length of operative time (P = .38), hospital stay (P = .43), and number of complications (P = .24) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Ketorolac local injection provided effective pain control in hindfoot arthrodesis and markedly reduced VAS pain scores up to 48 hours after surgery compared with popliteal nerve block. In addition, ketorolac local injection also reduced time in the operating room compared with popliteal nerve blockade.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, randomized controlled trial.

Triamcinolone acetonide-loaded PLA/PEG-PDL microparticles for effective intra-articular delivery: synthesis, optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation

Nowadays the use of sustainable polymers as poly-lactic acid (PLA) and poly-δ-decalactone (PDL) in drug delivery is advantageous compared to polymers derived from fossil fuels. The present work aimed to produce microparticles (MPs) derived from novel sustainable polymers, loaded with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis via intra-articular (IA) delivery. PDL was synthesized from green δ-decalactone monomers and co-polymerized with methoxy-polyethylene glycol (mPEG) forming PEG-PDL with different molecular weights. The Hansen's solubility parameters were applied to select the most compatible polymer with the drug. An o/w emulsion/solvent evaporation technique was used for MPs fabrication, using 3 [3] full factorial design. Selection of the optimized MPs was performed using Expert Design® software's desirability function. The optimized formulations were characterized using scanning electron microscope, powder X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, infrared spectroscopy and in vitro release studies. The inhibition percents of inflammation and histopathological studies were assessed in complete Freund's adjuvant-induced rats' knee joints evaluating the effect of IA injections of selected MPs compared to the free drug suspension. Solubility studies revealed high compatibility and miscibility between TA and PEG-PDL₁₇₀₀, which was blended with PLA for convenient MPs formation. The in vitro characterization studies confirmed the formation of drug-copolymer co-crystals. The in vivo studies ensured the superiority of the newly designed composite MPs in inflammation suppression, compared to the free drug suspension and PLA MPs as well. The present study proved the advantage of using sustainable polymers in a novel combination for effective drug delivery and suggesting its usefulness in designing versatile platforms for therapeutic applications.

The effects of intra-articular injection of ibuprofen on knee joint cartilage and synovium in rats

Objective

The aim of this animal study was to investigate the short and long-term local histomorphologic effects and the utility of intra-articular application of ibuprofen.

Methods

Forty-six Wistar Albino rats were used in the study. The rats were randomized into 5 groups of 8 and a sham group of 6. The 40 rats in the study groups were anaesthetised with 60 mg/kg of ketamine, then 0.25 ml ibuprofen (25 mg) was injected to the right knee joint of each rat (ibuprofen group) and 0.25 ml 0.9% saline to the left knee joint as the control group. To the 6 rats in the sham group, only puncture was applied to both knee joints. The rats in each of the 5 study groups were sacrificed on days 1, 2, 7, 14 and 21 respectively. The histomorphologic changes were graded on a 6-point scale regarding inflammation of the synovia, cartilage tissue, and subchondral bone. Inflammation scores were compared using the Mann Whitney U-test and comparisons of the sacrifice day and drug used were evaluated with the Kruskal Wallis test. The p values below 0.05 were considered as significant.

Results

Statistically significant difference was found between the ibuprofen injected knees (10/40) and the saline injected (0/40) and sham knees (0/12) in respect of hematoma positivity (p = 0.002). Significantly higher inflammation scores were found in ibuprofen injected knees on the 1st, 2nd, 7th and 14th days compared to controls and sham (p < 0.05). Inflammation scores were similar in ibuprofen injected knees with and without hematoma (p > 0.05). Inflammation of the ibuprofen injected group was most severe on day one and the severity of inflammation reduced gradually throughout the 3 weeks.

Conclusion

Our results show that intra-articular injection of ibuprofen can cause intra-articular hematoma. It also leads to transient inflammation of the synovia that is more severe in the early period, which gradually recovers.

Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid and ketorolac for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: A retrospective comparative study

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used to treat symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) in the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) of the thumb. However, although apparently effective and relatively safe, intra-articular HA injections act relatively slowly. Therefore, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug could be added for more prompt pain relief. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular injection of HA and ketorolac with that of HA alone in patients with OA of the CMCJ of the thumb.Seventy-four patients identified by chart review to have a diagnosis of OA of the CMCJ of the thumb received either a US-guided intra-articular injection of 0.5 mL of sodium hyaluronate and 0.5 mL of ketorolac (n = 38) or 0.5 mL of sodium hyaluronate and 0.5 mL of saline (n = 36). Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and verbal numeric scale (VNS) pain scores were recorded before and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. Univariable analyses (using the chi-squared test) and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the relationship between potential predictors of the outcome (treatment allocation, patient age and sex, duration of pain, and Eaton-Littler classification) and therapeutic effects.The DASH and VNS scores were improved at 1, 3, and 6 months postinjection in both groups. The onset of pain relief was significantly more rapid (at 1 month) after the injection containing HA and ketorolac than after the injection containing HA alone. In 55.3% of cases, pain and function were improved postinjection compared with baseline and remained so for up to 6 months. The success rate was not significantly different between the assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the univariable analyses did not identify any statistically significant potential predictors of the outcome. Multiple logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictors of a successful outcome at midterm follow-up.The onset of analgesic action was more rapid after an injection containing HA and ketorolac than after 1 containing HA alone in patients with OA of the CMCJ of the thumb. There were no serious complications.

Effect of ketorolac in intra-articular injection analgesia for postoperative pain in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy: a pilot-controlled clinical study

Background

To date, a regional approach using local anesthetics has become a popular analgesic method for arthroscopy. The optimal postoperative analgesia method for shoulder arthroscopy is still debated.

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the effect and safety of using ketorolac in combination with a multimodal drug regime (ropivacaine, morphine, and triamcinolone acetonide) after shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

A total of 60 patients were included in a pilot study and patients were randomized into an experimental group (n=30) and a control group (n=30). The following parameters were used to evaluate pain relief levels postoperatively: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption, and initial analgesic desired time. Complications were also recorded.

Results

Except for 1 hour postoperatively, patients in the experimental group experienced lower VAS scores during the first 48 hours postoperatively (P<0.05). The VAS score in both groups increased after 3 hours postoperatively and peaked at 12 hours postoperatively (2.54±0.86 vs 3.25±1.18). The VAS scores on movement in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group at 24 or 48 hours postoperatively (P=0.004, 0.001). A total of 18 (60.0%) patients in the experimental group required no additional analgesia, compared with 10 (33.3 %) in the control group (P=0.035). The mean rescue analgesia was 11.40±5.56 mg in the experiment group, while 16.57±8.48 mg in the control group (P=0.016). The initial analgesic desired time was delayed significantly in the experimental group (16.50±14.57 hours vs 8.9±6.32 hours, P=0.000).

Conclusion

Adding ketorolac to intra-articular injection analgesia is a safe and effective method to improve pain relief after shoulder arthroscopy, and further prospective controlled trials are necessary to allow definite treatment recommendations.

Intra-articular collagenase injection increases range of motion in a rat knee flexion contracture model

Objectives

A knee joint contracture, a loss in passive range of motion (ROM), can be caused by prolonged immobility. In a rat knee immobilization flexion contracture model, the posterior capsule was shown to contribute to an irreversible limitation in ROM, and collagen pathways were identified as differentially expressed over the development of a contracture. Collagenases purified from Clostridium histolyticum are currently prescribed to treat Dupuytren’s and Peyronie’s contractures due to their ability to degrade collagen. The potential application of collagenases to target collagen in the posterior capsule was tested in this model.

Materials and methods

Rats had one hind leg immobilized, developing a knee flexion contracture. After 4 weeks, the immobilization device was removed, and the rats received one 50 µL intra-articular injection of 0.6 mg/mL purified collagenase. Control rats were injected with only the buffer. After 2 weeks of spontaneous remobilization following the injections, ROM was measured with a rat knee arthrometer, and histological sections were immunostained with antibodies against rat collagen types I and III.

Results/conclusion

Compared with buffer-injected control knees, collagenase-treated knees showed increased ROM in extension by 8.0°±3.8° (p-value <0.05). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed an increase in collagen type III staining (p<0.01) in the posterior capsule of collagenase-treated knees indicating an effect on the extracellular matrix due to the collagenase. Collagen I staining was unchanged (p>0.05). The current study provides experimental evidence for the pharmacological treatment of knee flexion contractures with intra-articular collagenase injection, improving the knee ROM.

Electrospun PLGA Nanofiber Scaffolds Release Ibuprofen Faster and Degrade Slower After In Vivo Implantation

While delayed delivery of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been associated with improved tendon healing, early delivery has been associated with impaired healing. Therefore, NSAID use is appropriate only if the dose, timing, and mode of delivery relieves pain but does not impede tissue repair. Because delivery parameters can be controlled using drug-eluting nanofibrous scaffolds, our objective was to develop a scaffold for local controlled release of ibuprofen (IBP), and characterize the release profile and degradation both in vitro and in vivo. We found that when incubated in vitro in saline, scaffolds containing IBP had a linear release profile. However, when implanted subcutaneously in vivo or when incubated in vitro in serum, scaffolds showed a rapid burst release. These data demonstrate that scaffold properties are dependent on the environment in which they are placed and the importance of using serum, rather than saline, for initial in vitro evaluation of biofactor release from biodegradable scaffolds.

Ultrasound guided intra-articular ketorolac versus corticosteroid injection in osteoarthritis of the hip: a retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Intra-articular steroid injection has been widely used in the management of symptomatic osteoarthritis; however, its frequent use is avoided since there is an increase in the incidence of articular infection and several mechanical side effects such as cartilage breakdown and loss of elasticity of the articular cartilage. For these reasons, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs instead of corticosteroids can be considered for intra-articular injection. On this basis, we investigated the effects and safety of ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac versus corticosteroid injection for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 98 patients with diagnoses of hip osteoarthritis who underwent ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac or corticosteroid injection. Fifty patients who received ultrasound-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection were administered a mixture of 0.5% lidocaine and triamcinolone. Forty-eight patients who received ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac injection were administered 0.5% lidocaine and ketorolac. Outcome measurement was assessed using the Harris hip score and verbal numeric pain scale, which were evaluated before the injections and at 1, 3 and 6 months following the injection. Univariate analysis (using the x (2) test) and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the relationship between the possible outcome predictors (injected medications, patients' age, gender, pain duration and Kellgren-Lawrence classification) and the therapeutic effects.

RESULTS

The Harris hip score and verbal numeric pain scale were improved at 1, 3 and 6 months after the injection in both groups. No statistical differences in the Harris hip score and verbal numeric pain scale were observed between the groups. The success rate was also not significantly different among the time periods of 1, 3 and 6 months. Multiple logistic regression and univariate analysis showed that injected medications patients' age, gender, pain duration and Kellgren-Lawrence classification were not independent predictors of successful outcome at midterm follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip with intra-articular ketorolac injection is as effective as that with intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Intra-articular ketorolac injection can be considered useful for patients with contraindications to using corticosteroids.