Location of the tibial tunnel aperture affects extrusion of the lateral meniscus following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Graft Suturing Method Affects on Graft Diameter in Hamstring-Based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

 Various benefits of needleless suture loop techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preparation have been discussed, yet their impact on graft diameter remains unexplored. We hypothesized that the suture loop technique would reduce the graft diameter compared to the conventional locking suture technique.

METHODS

 Fifty-seven patients whose grafts were made with the Krackow stitch (group K) and 54 patients with the suture loop (group SL) were analyzed retrospectively. (1) The distal (sutured side) diameter of each anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle was compared to the proximal (non-sutured side) diameter, and (2) the average of the proximal and distal graft diameters in each group was calculated.

RESULTS

 In group K, 78.9% of anteromedial bundles and 40.3% of posterolateral bundles exhibited a larger distal diameter than the proximal, while in group SL, 42.6% of anteromedial bundles and 3.7% of posterolateral bundles showed a larger distal diameter. In both bundles, there were significantly fewer grafts with larger distal diameters in group SL (p < 0.001). The mean distal diameter of anteromedial bundles was smaller in group SL (6.33 ± 0.43 mm vs. 6.07 ± 0.43 mm, p < 0.005). Consequently, the distal cross-sectional area of anteromedial bundles in group SL was 8% smaller than that in group K.

CONCLUSION

 The use of the suture loop technique resulted in a significantly smaller distal diameter of the anteromedial bundle. This reduces the size of the tibial tunnel and may contribute to a reduction in potential damage to adjacent structures.

Improved tibiofemoral contact restoration after transtibial reinsertion of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus compared to in situ repair: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

To compare biomechanical behaviour of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus (ARLM) after a transtibial repair (TTR) and after an in situ repair (ISR), discussing the reasons for the efficacy of the more advantageous technique.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric human knees were tested at flexion angles from 0° to 90° in four conditions of their ARLM: intact, detached, reinserted using TTR, and reinserted using ISR. Specimens were subjected to 1000 N of compression, and the contact area (CA), mean pressure (MP), and peak pressure (PP) on the tibial cartilage were computed. For the TTR, traction force on the sutures was registered.

RESULTS

ARLM detachment significantly altered contact biomechanics, mainly at shallow flexion. After ISR, differences compared to the healthy group persisted (extension, CA 22% smaller (p = 0.012); at 30°, CA 30% smaller (p = 0.012), MP 21%, and PP 32% higher (both p = 0.017); at 60°, CA 28% smaller (p = 0.012), MP 32%, and PP 49% higher (both p = 0.025). With TTR, alterations significantly decreased compared to the injured group, with no statistical differences from the intact ones observed, except for CA at extension (15% decrease, p = 0.012) and at 30° (12% decrease, p = 0.017). The suture tension after TTR, given as mean(SD), was 36.46(11.75)N, 44.32(11.71)N, 40.38(14.93)N, and 43.18(14.89)N for the four tested flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Alterations caused by ARLM detachment were partially restored with both ISR and TTR, with TTR showing better results on recovering CA, MP, and PP in the immediate postoperative period. The tensile force was far below the value reported to cause meniscal cut-out in porcine models.

Accuracy of the newly developed Zimmer Biomet Root Aiming guide in tibial tunnel creation compared with that of conventional guides

Background/objective

Accurate tibial tunnel creation is crucial for successful transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the newly developed Zimmer Biomet Root Aiming (ZeBRA) guide for transtibial pullout repair of MMPRTs.

Methods

This study included 50 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repair using the Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) (n = 25) and ZeBRA (n = 25) guides. The expected anatomic centre (AC) and tibial tunnel centre (TC) were assessed using three-dimensional postoperative computed tomography (CT) images. The expected AC was defined as the centre of the circle tangent to the triangular footprint of the MM posterior root. The expected AC and TC on the tibial surface were assessed using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The absolute distance between the AC and TC (mm) was evaluated.

Results

The mean AC location was 76.1% ± 3.1% posterior and 40.8% ± 2.1% lateral, whereas the mean TC location was 76.7% ± 5.3% posterior and 37.2% ± 3.6% lateral using the UMR guide and 75.8% ± 3.1% posterior and 36.5% ± 2.4% lateral using the ZeBRA guide. No significant difference was observed in the absolute distance between the UMR and ZeBRA guides (3.9 ± 1.4 and 3.8 ± 1.3 mm, respectively; p = 0.617).

Conclusions

The newly developed ZeBRA guide allows accurate tibial tunnel creation, and its accuracy is comparable to that of the conventional UMR guide. Tibial tunnels were created at optimal positions using both guides, and the choice of the guide would depend on the surgeon's preference.

A balance between native footprint coverage and overlap of the anterolateral meniscal root in tibial tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 3D MRI study

BACKGROUND

Tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is situated close to the anterior lateral meniscal root (ALMR) attachment.

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the size and location of the tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction on the ACL footprint coverage and overlap to the ALMR.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty knee MRI scans from twenty healthy subjects were recruited, and three-dimensional (3D) tibia models were created to show the tibial attachment sites of ACL and ALMR. Surgical simulation of the tibial tunnel drilling was performed on each 3D model, entering the joint at an angle set at 60 degrees from the tibial plateau plane and 55 degrees from the posterior tibial condylar axis, with analysis for six different drill sizes; 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5 and 10 mm; and nine locations; the center of the ACL attachment and eight locations 2% of the tibial width apart surrounding it. The width of the tibial plateau, the distance between ACL and ALMR attachment centers, and the size and location of the potential tibial tunnel were evaluated to determine association with the area of the ACL footprint coverage and ALMR overlap using a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

A large tunnel (p <.001), a central and anterior location (p <.029), and small tibial width (p =.015) were all associated with larger coverage of the ACL footprint. A large tunnel (p <.001), posteriorly and laterally located (p ≤ 0.001), and a small distance between the ACL and ALMR centers (p =.001) were significantly associated with a larger ALMR overlap. The association of the tunnel size to ALMR overlap reduced with a medial tunnel location.

CONCLUSIONS

The short distance between the centers of the ALMR attachment and native ACL footprint suggests that the ALMR will always be susceptible to overlap when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction. Small alterations in tunnel location can lead to a statistically significant alteration with the amount of ALMR overlap. To minimize this overlap, whilst maintaining acceptable coverage of the ACL footprint, a tibial tunnel positioned in a medial or anteromedial location from the center of the ACL footprint is recommended.

Clinical significance and management of meniscal extrusion in different knee pathologies: a comprehensive review of the literature and treatment algorithm

The menisci are crescent-shaped, fibrocartilaginous structures that play a crucial role in the load transition and distribution of the contact forces along the tibiofemoral articulation. Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a radiological finding, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, for which there has been growing interest in recent years. ME, in the coronary plane, is defined as the maximum distance of the most distal end of the meniscus from the border of the tibial plateau, where the tibial eminences are the most prominent, without taking into account the osteophytes. Although there is still controversy in the literature in respect of the optimal cutoff value, a threshold of 3 mm is considered significant. ME has no specific clinical finding or sign and it is encountered in many knee pathologies. It is associated with either rapidly progressive knee osteoarthritis or early onset of knee osteoarthritis and increased morbidity. In this review, we delineate the clinical significance of ME in various knee pathologies, as well as when, why and how it should be managed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elaborate on these topics.

A newly-developed guide can create tibial tunnel at an optimal position during medial meniscus posterior root repairs

BACKGROUND

During transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs), accurate tibial tunnel creation within the anatomic MM posterior root attachment seems critical. This study aimed to evaluate the tibial tunnel position created by a newly-developed Precision guide during pullout repair of MMPRTs.

METHODS

In 40 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repairs, the tibial tunnel was created using the Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) (n = 20) or Precision guide (n = 20). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated postoperatively, using Tsukada's measurement method. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines corresponding to anatomic bony landmarks. The expected anatomic center (AC) and the tibial tunnel center (TC) were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The difference in the mediolateral and anteroposterior percentage distance between the AC and TC was calculated, as was the absolute distance between the AC and TC.

RESULTS

The mean AC was located 77.4% posterior and 40.1% lateral. The mean TC was similar in the UMR and Precision guide groups. There was no significant difference in the mediolateral percentage distance (UMR 3.9% vs. Precision 3.6%, p = 0.405), but a significant difference was observed in the anteroposterior percentage distance (UMR 3.5% vs. Precision 2.6%, p = 0.031). The mean absolute distance between the AC and TC was 3.9 mm and 3.5 mm (UMR and Precision guide groups, respectively) (p = 0.364).

CONCLUSIONS

The new Precision guide can create tibial tunnel in an optimal and stable position during pullout repair of MMPRTs.

Accuracy of the Arthroscopic Location of the Center of the Anterior Horn During Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

Background

Anatomic placement of the meniscal allograft is imperative to achieve satisfactory outcomes after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Few studies have reported on the accuracy of the provisional location of the center of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM).

Hypothesis

The authors hypothesized that the provisional center would not coincide with the anatomic center of the AHLM.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

Tibial plateaus were retrieved from 93 consecutive patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. A complete radial cut was made 2 cm lateral to the insertion of the AHLM on the retrieved tibial plateau. While moving the stump of the anterior horn with forceps, the center of the insertion was determined, and a Kirschner wire (provisional wire) was drilled into the location. The insertion area of the AHLM was dissected carefully, and the periphery of the insertion area of the anterior horn was marked. Another Kirschner wire (anatomic wire) was drilled into the center of the dissected anterior horn. The resected tibial plateau was positioned so that the longitudinal line of the tibial plateau was aligned on a plastic ruler. The distance between the provisional and anatomic wires was measured by a digital caliper along the longitudinal and vertical axes.

Results

The mean distance between the provisional and anatomic wires was 2.5 ± 1.2 mm. The provisional wire in 14 patients (15%) was placed at the anatomic center. In 36 patients (39%), the provisional wire was drilled anterolateral to the anatomic center, and in 18 patients (19%), the wire was drilled anteromedial to the anatomic center. In 21 patients (23%), the provisional wire was located within 2 mm of the anatomic center, and in 62 patients (67%), the wire was located within 3 mm of the anatomic center.

Conclusion

The provisional wire was located a mean of 2.5 mm from the anatomic center, and only 23% of patients had wires that were located within 2 mm of the anatomic center. In 39% of patients, the provisional wire was drilled anterolateral to the anatomic center. This finding needs to be considered during lateral MAT.

Clinical Relevance

Without dissection of the AHLM, the determination of the anatomic center of the anterior horn is not accurate during lateral MAT.

Significance of the broad non-bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament on the tibial side

Knowledge of the anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is important to understand the function and pathology of the knee joint. However, on the tibial side of ACL, its structural relationships with the articular cartilage and lateral meniscus remain unclear. Furthermore, conventional research methods are limited to analyzing the bone attachments. We provide a comprehensive, three-dimensional anatomical description of the tibial side of the ACL that questions the principle that “a ligament is necessarily a structure connecting a bone to another bone.” In our study, 11 knees from 6 cadavers were used for macroscopic anatomical examinations, serial-section histological analyses, and three-dimensional reconstructions. The attachments of the tibial side of ACL consisted of attachments to the bone (102.6 ± 27.5 mm²), articular cartilage (40.9 ± 13.6 mm²), and lateral meniscus (6.5 ± 4.6 mm²), suggesting that the ACL has close structural relationships with the articular cartilage and lateral meniscus. Our study demonstrates that the tibial side of the ACL is not attached to the bone surface only and provides new perspectives on ligamentous attachments. Considering its attachment to the articular cartilage would enable more accurate functional evaluations of the mechanical tensioning of the ACL.

Better Coverage of the ACL Tibial Footprint and Less Injury to the Anterior Root of the Lateral Meniscus Using a Rounded-Rectangular Tibial Tunnel in ACL Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

Background

To better restore the anatomy of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachment and fiber arrangement, researchers have developed techniques for changing the shape of the ACL bone tunnel during ACL reconstruction.

Purpose

To compare the coverage of the ACL tibial footprint and influence on the anterior root of lateral meniscus (ARLM) between a rounded-rectangular tibial tunnel and a conventional round tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 16 (8 matched-paired) fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were distributed randomly into 2 groups: a rounded-rectangular tunnel (RRT) group and a round tunnel (RT) group. One of the knees from each pair was reamed with rounded-rectangular tibial tunnel, whereas the other was reamed with round tibial tunnel. Coverage of the ACL tibial footprint and areas of ARLM attachment before and after reaming were measured using 3-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

In the RRT group, the average percentage of ACL tibial footprint covered by the tunnel was 70.8% ± 2.5%, which was significantly higher than that in the RT group (48.2% ± 6.4%) (P = .012). As for the ARLM attachment area, in the RT group, there was a significant decrease (22.5% ± 5.9%) in ARLM attachment area after tibial tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P < .001). Conversely, in the RRT group, the ARLM attachment area was not significantly affected by tibial tunnel reaming.

Conclusion

Rounded-rectangular tibial tunnel was able to better cover the native ACL tibial footprint and significantly lower the risk of iatrogenic injury to the ARLM attachment than round tibial tunnel during ACL reconstruction.

Intraarticular lengths of double-bundle grafts can change during knee flexion: Intraoperative measurements in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

BACKGROUND

The lengths of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) change during knee motion in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the actual intraarticular graft length would be affected by the bone tunnel position and tunnel creation angle during ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the intraarticular length change of the AMB and PLB in patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the PLB would show a more dynamic length change pattern than the AMB during knee flexion at ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (16 men and 16 women) who had isolated ACL injuries with intact menisci were investigated. Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstructions were performed using semitendinosus tendon autografts at a mean age of 30.6 years. The graft and tunnel lengths were measured intraoperatively. Intraarticular graft lengths and length changes were calculated at 0° and 90° of knee flexion during ACL reconstruction. Intraoperative data were collected prospectively, and analyses were performed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The intraarticular length of the AMB at 0° of knee flexion was 28.1±5.5mm. At 90° of knee flexion, the AMB intraarticular length decreased to 25.6±4.8mm. The intraarticular length of the PLB decreased to 17.7±4.6mm at 90° of knee flexion compared to 22.0±4.2mm at 0° of knee flexion. Changes in the intraarticular graft length during knee flexion were detected more in the PLB (4.1mm) than in the AMB (2.0mm, p=0.01).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that the intraarticular length change of the PLB during knee motion was larger than that of the AMB in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstructions with semitendinosus tendon autografts and suspensory femoral fixation devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

Partial lateral meniscus anterior root injuries during anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are likely to occur in women with small skeletons

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and characteristics of lateral meniscus anterior root injuries during anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2018, 70 women who had ACL injuries without lateral meniscal tears underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Using computed tomography, the anatomical relationship between the predicted lateral meniscus anterior root insertion and the tibial tunnel was retrospectively assessed, and the patients were divided into partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury and intact groups. The demographic characteristics, the distances between bony landmarks, the tibial tunnel sizes, and lateral meniscal extrusion assessed by magnetic resonance imaging were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 70 patients had suspected partial lateral meniscus anterior root injuries. Patient height was significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group (157.7 ± 6.4 vs. 161.4 ± 5.4 cm: p = 0.03); the distance from the apex to the bottom of the slope of the medial intercondylar ridge was significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group (15.1 ± 1.9 vs. 16.7 ± 1.4 mm: p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury during anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction was suspected in 18% of cases. Patient height and the distance between bony landmarks were significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group. Surgeons should understand that even a slight deviation of the tibial tunnel position can lead to partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury in patients with small skeletons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effects of the tibial tunnel position on knee joint stability and meniscal contact pressure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of the tibial tunnel position on knee stability and the maximum contact area and peak contact pressure on the menisci after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Ten human knee specimens (mean age: 74.1 ± 15.8 years) were used in this study. The anterior tibial loading test was conducted using a material testing machine at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion, with the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the maximum contact area and peak contact pressure on the menisci measured. Outcome measures were compared between the following groups: 1) intact ACL (intact group); 2) anatomical tibial tunnel position (anatomical group) and 3) posterior tibial tunnel position (posterior group) with double-bundle reconstruction, and 4) ACL-deficient (deficient group).

RESULTS

In response to a 100 N anterior tibial load, the ATT was greater for the posterior and ACL-deficient groups compared to that in the intact group. The normalized maximum contact area of the medial meniscus significantly decreased for the posterior group compared to that in the intact group. The normalized peak contact pressure on the medial meniscus increased in all groups compared to that in the intact group, but with no between-group differences in pressure applied to the lateral meniscus.

CONCLUSIONS

ATT and contact pressure on the medial meniscus increased, concomitant with a decrease in contact area of the medial meniscus, as the position of the tibial tunnel position moved towards a posterior position.

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of transtibial pull-out repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear: Two simple stitches versus modified Mason-Allen suture

BACKGROUND

Transtibial pullout repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is a commonly used procedure, and several techniques have been reported. We hypothesised that pull-out repairs using two simple stitches (TSS) would have similar postoperative outcomes as those using the modified Mason-Allen suture with FasT-Fix (F-MMA). We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of these techniques, including the meniscal healing status and osteoarthritic change.

METHODS

The data of 68 patients who underwent transtibial pull-out repair were retrospectively investigated. The patients were divided into two groups of 41 and 27 patients using F-MMA and TSS, respectively. The clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at second-look arthroscopy (the mean period from surgery was one year) using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The meniscal healing status, evaluated at second-look arthroscopy, was compared between the two groups. The cartilage damage was graded as per the classification of the International Cartilage Repair Society and compared at the primary surgery and second-look arthroscopy.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant improvement in each clinical score. No significant difference was seen in the clinical outcome scores and the meniscal healing status between the two groups at second-look arthroscopy. Moreover, no significant progression of cartilage damage was observed in both groups. Fourteen patients in the F-MMA group developed a complication of suture bar failures postoperatively; however, there were no complications in the TSS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The TSS and F-MMA techniques showed favourable clinical outcomes and would be established as clinically useful techniques for the MMPRT treatment.

The distance between the tibial tunnel aperture and meniscal root attachment is correlated with meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear

BACKGROUND

To investigate the relationship between tibial tunnel aperture location and postoperative meniscal healing.

METHODS

We enrolled 25 patients (20 women and five men, mean age: 62.5 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus (MM) posterior root repair. The expected MM posterior root attachment center (AC) and tibial tunnel center (TC) were identified using three-dimensional computed tomography, and the minimum AC-TC distance was calculated. The meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair was assessed by second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period: 15 months) using a previously reported scoring system (meniscal healing score; range: 0-10). The association between AC-TC distance and meniscal healing score was investigated using univariate linear regression models. The optimal AC-TC distance cut-off for improved MM healing score (≥7) was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The AC-TC distance and meniscal healing score were significantly associated (y = -0.42x + 9.48, R² = 0.342; P = 0.002), with the optimum AC-TC distance being 5.8 mm. This cut-off had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 53%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that AC-TC distance is significantly correlated with postoperative meniscal healing. Anatomical repair within 5.8 mm of the AC may result in improved meniscal healing.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy shows better agreement and interchangeability in tibial tunnel location during single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography compared with an intraoperative image-free navigation system

BACKGROUND

Fluoroscopy and navigation systems provide an accurate and reproducible method of guiding anatomical tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The aim was to evaluate the differences in tibial tunnel location assessed by both an intraoperative navigation system and fluoroscopy, validated using a one-week postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).

METHODS

The tibial tunnel location in a consecutive series of 35 patients who received a single-bundle ACLR was evaluated by intraoperative navigation system, fluoroscopic image and compared with postoperative 3DCT position. The location to the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) direction were compared between all three methods.

RESULTS

The tibial tunnel locations were 46.7 ± 4.5%, 44.5 ± 1.9%, and 43.6 ± 2.4% in ML direction, and 42.8 ± 7.6%, 37.9 ± 3.8%, and 37.9 ± 3.7% in AP direction using an intraoperative navigation system, fluoroscopic image and postoperative 3DCT, respectively. Significant differences between the navigation system and fluoroscopic image (ML, P = 0.001; AP, P = 0.006), and the navigation system and 3DCT (ML, P = 0.001; AP, P < 0.001) were seen. However, there was no significant difference between fluoroscopy and 3DCT (ML, P = 0.315; AP, P = 0.999). There was a significant lack of agreement for analyses measured using a navigation system and 3DCT. Fluoroscopy and 3DCT demonstrated an acceptable agreement (ML, r_pt = -0.21, P = 0.232; AP, r_pt = 0.04, P = 0.826).

CONCLUSIONS

A tibial tunnel location assessed by intraoperative fluoroscopy shows better agreement and interchangeability with one-week postoperative 3DCT validation during single-bundle ACLR compared with an intraoperative image-free navigation system.

Posttraumatic cartilage degradation progresses following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A second-look arthroscopic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis progresses even after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Few reports described zone-specific cartilaginous damages after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the status of articular cartilage at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with that at second-look arthroscopy.

METHODS

This study included 20 patients (20 knees, 10 males and 10 females, mean age 22.4 years, Body mass index 24.4 kg/m²) that underwent arthroscopic anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and second-look arthroscopy. Mean periods from injury to reconstruction and from reconstruction to second-look arthroscopy were 3.4 and 15.3 months, respectively. Cartilage lesions were evaluated arthroscopically in the 6 articular surfaces and 40 articular subcompartments independently, and these features were graded with the International Cartilage Repair Society articular cartilage injury classification; comparisons were made between the grades at reconstruction and at second-look arthroscopy. Furthermore, clinical outcomes were assessed at reconstruction and at second-look arthroscopy, using the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, side-to-side difference of the KT-2000 arthrometer, and pivot shift test.

RESULTS

Each compartment showed a deteriorated condition at second-look arthroscopy compared with the pre-reconstruction period. A significant worsening of the articular cartilage was noted in all compartments except the lateral tibial plateau and was also observed in the central region of the medial femoral condyle and trochlea after reconstruction. However, each clinical outcome was significantly improved postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Good cartilage conditions were restored in most subcompartments at second-look arthroscopy. Furthermore, posttraumatic osteoarthritic changes in the patellofemoral and medial compartments progressed even in the early postoperative period, although good knee stability and clinical outcomes were obtained. Care is necessary regarding the progression of osteoarthritis and the appearance of knee symptoms in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The interrelationship between anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint and anterolateral meniscal root insertions: Quantitative, morphological and positional analyses using three-dimensional computed tomography images

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitative, morphological and positional differences between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial footprint and anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) insertion and investigate an intraoperative landmark to estimate their boundaries.

METHODS

Thirty-three fixed human cadaveric knees were evaluated. After resecting the components, the anterior fiber (AF) and posterior fiber (PF) of ALMR, the tibial center of ACL bundles (anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles) and ACL were marked. Insertion morphology was classified into three categories, and the distance and relative positional relationship between AF/PF insertions and the center of each attachment were measured on three-dimensional computed tomography images.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the AF of AM and ACL (P = 0.16), but both were significantly shorter than the AF of PL (both P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the PF of ACL and PL (P = 0.99), which were significantly shorter than PF of AM (both P < 0.001). Morphology of the ACL tibial insertion was classified as follows: triangular, 15 knees (45.5%); oval, 18 knees (54.5%); none, C-shape. Quantitative and positional analyses showed that the AF insertion was significantly closer to AM and ACL centers in the oval type than in the triangular type. Excluding two cases, the AF/PF insertion was located laterally to the ML center of the medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles.

CONCLUSION

Proximity of ACL tibial footprint and ALMR varies by their footprint morphology. The medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles were useful landmarks for ALMR injury prevention.

The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides

Purpose

Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides.

Materials and methods

Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated.

Results

The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455).

Conclusions

The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs.

Level of evidence

IV

Anatomical rectangular tunnels identified with the arthroscopic landmarks result in excellent outcomes in ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft

PURPOSE

To elucidate tunnel locations and clinical outcomes after anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with a primary unilateral ACL injury were included. Tunnels were created inside the ACL attachment areas after carefully removing the ACL remnant and clearly identifying the bony landmarks. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3-D CT) images, the proportion of the tunnel apertures to the anatomical attachment areas was evaluated at 3 weeks. The clinical outcomes were evaluated at 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Geographically, the 3-D CT evaluation showed the entire femoral tunnel aperture; at least 75% of the entire tibial tunnel aperture area was consistently located inside the anatomical attachment areas surrounded by the bony landmarks. In the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective assessment, all patients were classified as 'normal' or 'nearly normal'. The Lachman test and pivot-shift test were negative in 98.4% and 95.1% of patients, respectively. The mean side-to-side difference of the anterior laxity at the maximum manual force with a KT- 1000 Knee Arthrometer was 0.2 ± 0.9 mm, with 95.1% of patients ranging from - 1 to + 2 mm.

CONCLUSION

By identifying arthroscopic landmarks, the entire femoral tunnel aperture and at least 75% of the entire tibial tunnel aperture area were consistently located inside the anatomical attachment areas. With properly created tunnels inside the anatomical attachment areas, the ART ACLR using a BTB graft could provide satisfactory outcomes both subjectively and objectively in more than 95% of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Relationship between anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral meniscal root bony attachment: High-resolution 3-T MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

The tibial bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) are very close, and drilling the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction may damage the ALMR attachment. This study investigated the relationship between the tibial attachment of the ACL and ALMR using high-resolution 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (35.8 ± 13.0 years) had 20 knees scanned using high resolution 3-T MRI. The tibial bony attachments of ACL, ALMR, and the tibia were segmented and three-dimensional models were created. The shape, area, and location of each attachment were evaluated using this model.

RESULTS

The ACL tibial attachment was elliptical in nine knees (45%), C-shaped in nine knees (45%) and triangle in two knees (10%). The mean values of the ACL vs ALMR tibial attachments were as follows: area, 106.2 ± 21.3 vs 56.2 ± 21.3 mm²; length, 16.8 ± 2.0 vs 11.0 ± 1.8 mm; and width, 6.9 ± 1.3 vs 6.6 ± 1.0 mm. The location of the ACL vs ALMR attachment centres was 46.5 ± 1.7% vs 56.5 ± 1.9% in the medial-lateral direction and 36.3 ± 3.6% vs 36.7 ± 3.5% in the anterior-posterior direction. The distance between the ACL and ALMR centres was 8.1 ± 1.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL and ALMR tibial attachments were individually distinguished using high resolution 3-T MRI. The short distance between both centres of the attachments may suggest that ALMR can be damaged when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction.

Meniscal repair concurrent with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores posterior shift of the medial meniscus in the knee-flexed position

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shape and shift of the medial meniscus before and after meniscal repair concurrent with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 90° of knee flexion.

METHODS

This study included 18 patients with ACL-deficient knees without meniscus tears (group A), 11 patients with medial meniscus tears alone (group M), and 15 patients with ACL-deficient knees complicated with medial meniscus tears (group AM). The posterior segment shape was evaluated using open MRI at 90° of knee flexion preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The length, height, width, and posterior extrusion of the medial meniscus and posterior tibiofemoral distance were measured. These measurements were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

On preoperative MRI, a significant difference was observed in the posterior extrusion of the medial meniscus (group A, 1.2 ± 0.5 mm; group M, 1.7 ± 0.3 mm; group AM, 4.1 ± 1.5 mm, p < 0.001). All parameters did not differ between the three groups on postoperative MRI. In addition, the posterior width and extrusion of the medial meniscus were decreased significantly after meniscal repair concurrent with ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the medial meniscus shifted posteriorly at 90° of knee flexion in ACL-deficient knees complicated with medial meniscus tears. Medial meniscal repair concurrent with ACL reconstruction improved the deformed morphology and posterior extrusion. MRI measurements of the posterior extrusion at the knee-flexed position may be clinically useful to assess the functional improvement of the medial meniscus following meniscal repair combined with ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Minimal Ablation of the Tibial Stump Using Bony Landmarks Improved Stability and Synovial Coverage Following Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical effects of using anatomical bony landmarks (Parsons’ knob and the medial intercondylar ridge) and minimal ablation of the tibial footprint to improve knee anterior instability and synovial graft coverage after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective comparison of outcomes between patients who underwent reconstruction with minimal ablation of the tibial footprint, using an anatomical tibial bony landmark technique, and those who underwent reconstruction with wide ablation of the tibial footprint. Differences between the two groups were evaluated using second-look arthroscopy, radiological assessment of the tunnel position, postoperative anterior knee joint laxity, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Use of the anatomical reference and minimal ablation of the tibial footprint resulted in a more anterior positioning of the tibial tunnel, with greater synovial coverage of the graft postoperatively (p=0.01), and improved anterior stability of the knee on second-look arthroscopy. Both groups had comparable clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Use of anatomical tibial bony landmarks that resulted in a more anteromedial tibial tunnel position improved anterior knee laxity, and minimal ablation improved synovial coverage of the graft; however, it did not significantly improve subjective and functional short-term outcomes.

Thymol turbidity test is associated with the risk of cyclops syndrome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

Cyclops nodule formation is a serious complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether an increase in thymol turbidity test (TTT) values is involved in the development of cyclops nodule formation or cyclopoid scar formation following ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Between 2011 and 2014, 120 cases underwent outside-in ACL reconstruction. Forty-seven patients who had high TTT values were individually matched for age, sex, body mass index, and meniscus injury to a low TTT value group of 47 patients. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cyclops nodule formation or cyclopoid scar formation. All 94 patients were divided into 3 groups using surgical records and intra-operative video to enable a sub-analysis. The groups were a no-cyclops group, a cyclopoid group, and a cyclops group. Blood examinations, including TTT, and knee range of motion evaluations were performed before surgery, 3 months after surgery, and 1 year after surgery.

Results

There were no differences in preoperative demographic data between the two groups. TTT values did not significantly influence cyclopoid scar formation (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.62 to 4.66; p = 0.362). However, patients with cyclops nodule formation showed significantly higher TTT values than the control patients. (OR, 9.34; 95% CI, 1.94 to 90.3; p = 0.002). Knee extension loss was observed in the cyclopoid and cyclops groups 3 months after reconstruction. In the cyclops group, arthroscopic resection of the cyclops nodule was performed 3 months after reconstruction. Eventually, almost full range of motion was restored in all patients.

Conclusions

High TTT values before ACL reconstruction were an indicator of cyclops nodule formation. Furthermore, cyclopoid scar formations may not be the result of an individual’s immune reaction but that of extension loss in the early post-reconstruction phase.

Complete tear of the lateral meniscus posterior root is associated with meniscal extrusion in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative lateral meniscal extrusion (LME) and arthroscopic findings of lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) in knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. Thirty-five knees that had LMPRTs with concomitant ACL tears on arthroscopy were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups, partial and complete root tears, via arthroscopic findings at the time of ACL reconstruction. For comparison, we added two groups, using the same database; 20 normal knees (normal group) and 20 ACL-injured knees without LM injury (intact LM group). We retrospectively measured preoperative LMEs using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-three knees had partial LMPRTs. Complete LMPRTs were observed in 12 knees. The average LME was -0.1 ± 0.4 mm in the normal group, 0.2 ± 0.5 mm in the intact LM group, 0.4 ± 0.8 mm in the partial LMPRT group, and 2.0 ± 0.6 mm in the complete LMPRT group. A significant difference in preoperative LMEs was observed between the complete LMPRT group and the other groups (p < 0.001). The receiver operating curve analysis, which distinguishes a partial tear from a complete tear, identified an optimal cut-off point of 1.1 mm for preoperative LME. This LME cut-off had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 83% for complete LMPRT. We found that preoperative LMEs were larger in complete LMPRTs associated with ACL injuries than in partial LMPRTs. Our results suggest that preoperative MRI-detected LME may be a useful indicator for estimating LMPRT severity in ACL-injured knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study level IV. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1894-1900, 2018.

Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques

INTRODUCTION

Accurate anatomic graft tunnel positioning is essential for the successful application of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The accurate insertion of the tibial tunnel (TT) remains challenging. Here, we explored a novel strategy of patient-specific drill template (PDT) for the placement of TT in ACL reconstruction and assessed its efficacy and accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TT placement was randomized and performed by use of the PDT technique in 40 patients (PDT group) and the conventional arthroscopic technique in 38 patients (Arthroscopic group). After surgery, the deviations at the center point of the ACL tibial attachment area and radiological TT positioning were assessed in both groups. The preoperative and follow-up examinations included pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scales were used to compare the knee stability and the functional state.

RESULTS

The ideal center points achieved in the PDT group were more precise than that in the arthroscopic group (p < 0.001). Radiological TT positioning performed by use of the PDT technique was more accurate than that by the arthroscopic technique (p = 0.027). Statistical differences could not be found between the groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, the Lysholm or International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Both groups improved at follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment in terms of the pivot-shift test, the laxity tests, and scoring scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel PDT strategy could provide more accurate TT positioning than the traditional arthroscopic technique in ACL reconstruction. However, functional scales and stability tests gave similar results in the PDT and the standard techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Anterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion site is elliptical or triangular shaped in healthy young adults: high-resolution 3-T MRI analysis

PURPOSE

To clarify the morphology of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial insertion site in healthy young knees using high-resolution 3-T MRI.

METHODS

Subjects were 50 ACL-reconstructed patients with a mean age of 21.4 ± 6.8 years. The contralateral healthy knees were scanned using high-resolution 3-T MRI. The tibial insertion sites of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle fibres, and the ACL attachment on the anterior horn of lateral meniscus (AHLM) were segmented from the MR images, and 3D models were reconstructed to evaluate the morphology. The shape of ACL footprint was qualitatively analysed, and the size of AM and PL attachments and AHLM overlapped area was measured digitally.

RESULTS

Tibial AM and PL bundles were clearly identified in 42 of 50 knees (84.0%). Morphology of the whole ACL tibial insertion site was elliptical in 23 knees (54.8%) and triangular in 19 knees (45.2%), but not classified as C-shape in any knees. However, the AM bundle attachment was of C-shape in 29 knees (69.0%) and band-like in 13 knees (31.0%). Overlap of ACL on AHLM was found in 26 knees (61.9%), and the size of the overlapped area was 4.8 ± 4.7% of the whole ACL insertion site.

CONCLUSION

3D morphology of the intact ACL tibial insertion site analysed by high-resolution 3-T MRI was elliptical or triangular in healthy young knees. However, the AM bundle insertion site was of C-shape or band-like. A small lateral portion of the ACL was overlapped with the AHLM. As for clinical relevance, these findings should be considered in order to reproduce the native ACL insertion site sufficiently.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bony landmark between the attachment of the medial meniscus posterior root and the posterior cruciate ligament: CT and MR imaging assessment

OBJECTIVES

(1) To reveal the prevalence of the bony recess (posterior dimple) and (2) to determine the position of the posterior dimple on the tibial plateau using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, a retrospective review of 112 patients was performed to identify the posterior dimple and to evaluate its position on 3DCT. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were also used to determine the positional relationship among the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial meniscus posterior insertion (MMPI), and posterior dimple.

RESULTS

The posterior dimple was observed in 100 of 112 knees (89.3%) on 3DCT. The center of the posterior dimple was 13.6 ± 0.8 mm from the medial tibial eminence apex. MRI showed that the posterior dimple separated the tibial attachment of the PCL and MMPI.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to discuss the prevalence and position of the bony recess in the posterior intercondylar fossa.