Effects of tibiofemoral compression on ACL forces and knee kinematics under combined knee loads

Functional knee brace use for 21 h leads to a longer duration to achieve peak vertical ground reaction forces and the removal of the brace after 17.5 h results in faster loading of the knee joint

PURPOSE

To investigate the landing strategies used after discontinuing and continuing the use of a functional knee brace (FKB) while performing a drop jump.

METHODS

Following published methodology and power analysis, 23 uninjured male athletes, mean age of 19.4 ± 3.0 years, performed seven tests, during three test conditions (nonbraced, braced and removed brace or continued brace use), over 6 days of 12 testing sessions (S) for a total of 38.5 h. Each subject was provided with a custom-fitted FKB. This study focuses on the single leg drop jump kinetics during S12 when subjects were randomly selected to remove the FKB after 17.5 h or continued use of FKB. The time to peak vertical ground reaction forces (PVGRF) and PVGRF were recorded on landing in eight trials.

RESULTS

After brace removal, a significantly shorter mean time to PVGRF was recorded (9.4 ± 22.9 msec (3.9%), p = 0.005, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -168.1, 36.1), while continued brace use required a nonsignificant (n.s.) longer mean duration to achieve PVGRF (19.4 ± 53.6 msec (8.9%), n.s., 95% CI: -49.7, 73.4). No significant mean PVGRF difference was found in brace removal (25.3 ± 65.8 N) and continued brace use (25.1 ± 23.0 N).

CONCLUSION

Removal of FKB after 17.5 h of use led to a significantly shorter time to achieve PVGRF, while continued brace use for 21 h required a longer duration to achieve PVGRF, suggesting faster and slower knee joint loading, respectively. Understanding the concerns associated with the use of FKB and the kinetics of the knee joint will assist clinicians in counselling athletes about the risks and benefits of using an FKB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Knee Joint Contact Forces during High-Risk Dynamic Tasks: 90° Change of Direction and Deceleration Movements

Pivoting sports expose athletes to a high risk of knee injuries, mainly due to mechanical overloading of the joint which shatters overall tissue integrity. The present study explored the magnitude of tibiofemoral contact forces (TFCF) in high-risk dynamic tasks. A novel musculoskeletal model with modifiable frontal plane knee alignment was developed to estimate the total, medial, and lateral TFCF developed during vigorous activities. Thirty-one competitive soccer players performing deceleration and 90° sidestepping tasks were assessed via 3D motion analysis by using a marker-based optoelectronic system and TFCF were assessed via OpenSim software. Statistical parametric mapping was used to investigate the effect of frontal plane alignment, compartment laterality, and varus-valgus genu on TFCF. Further, in consideration of specific risk factors, sex influence was also assessed. A strong correlation (R = 0.71 ÷ 0.98, p < 0.001) was found between modification of compartmental forces and changes in frontal plane alignment. Medial and lateral TFCF were similar throughout most of the tasks with the exception of the initial phase, where the lateral compartment had to withstand to higher loadings (1.5 ÷ 3 BW higher, p = 0.010). Significant sex differences emerged in the late phase of the deceleration task. A comprehensive view of factors influencing the mediolateral distribution of TFCF would benefit knee injury prevention and rehabilitation in sport activities.

Loading mechanisms of the anterior cruciate ligament

This review identifies the three-dimensional knee loads that have the highest risk of injuring the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the athlete. It is the combination of the muscular resistance to a large knee flexion moment, an external reaction force generating knee compression, an internal tibial torque, and a knee abduction moment during a single-leg athletic manoeuvre such as landing from a jump, abruptly changing direction, or rapidly decelerating that results in the greatest ACL loads. While there is consensus that an anterior tibial shear force is the primary ACL loading mechanism, controversy exists regarding the secondary order of importance of transverse-plane and frontal-plane loading in ACL injury scenarios. Large knee compression forces combined with a posteriorly and inferiorly sloped tibial plateau, especially the lateral plateau-an important ACL injury risk factor-causes anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation, which increases ACL loading. Furthermore, while the ACL can fail under a single supramaximal loading cycle, recent evidence shows that it can also fail following repeated submaximal loading cycles due to microdamage accumulating in the ligament with each cycle. This challenges the existing dogma that non-contact ACL injuries are predominantly due to a single manoeuvre that catastrophically overloads the ACL.

Changes in knee kinematics from applied external Tibial torque: Implications for stabilizing an anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee

BACKGROUND

Changes in knee kinematics from internal tibial torque under tibiofemoral compression force have been studied, but the potentially stabilizing effects of external tibial torque have not been reported. We hypothesized that for a given knee flexion angle, 1) external torque would significantly reduce anterior tibial translation, internal tibial rotation, and valgus tibial rotation before and after sectioning the anterior cruciate ligament and 2) changes in kinematics from applied external torque would be significantly greater with the cruciate cut.

METHODS

A robotic test system was used to flex intact human knees continuously from 0° to 50° under 200 N compression, without and with 5 Nm external torque. Tests were repeated after cruciate section.

FINDINGS

With the cruciate intact, external torque had no significant effect on anterior translation, and significantly reduced internal and valgus rotations at all flexion angles. With the cruciate cut, external torque significantly reduced anterior translation beyond 25° flexion, significantly reduced internal rotation at all flexion angles, and significantly reduced valgus rotation beyond 15° flexion. Although external torque had no significant effect on anterior translation with the ACL intact, external torque produced relatively large decreases in anterior translation with the cruciate sectioned (-11.6 mm at 50° flexion). Reductions in valgus rotation from applied external torque were significantly greater for cruciate deficient knees beyond 25° flexion.

INTERPRETATION

We conclude that external tibial torque may be important for controlling the abnormal kinematics associated with an anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee, and possibly help stabilize the knee during in vivo activities.

Computational frame of ligament in situ strain in a full knee model

The biomechanical function of connective tissues in a knee joint is to stabilize the kinematics-kinetics of the joint by augmenting its stiffness and limiting excessive coupled motion. The connective tissues are characterized by an in vivo reference configuration (in situ strain) that would significantly contribute to the mechanical response of the knee joint. In this work, a novel iterative method for computing the in situ strain at reference configuration was presented. The framework used an in situ strain gradient approach (deformed reference configuration) and a detailed finite element (FE) model of the knee joint. The effect of the predicted initial configuration on the mechanical response of the joint was then investigated under joint axial compression, passive flexion, and coupled rotations (adduction and internal), and during the stance phase of gait. The inclusion of the reference configuration has a minimal effect on the knee joint mechanics under axial compression, passive flexion, and at two instances (0% and 50%) of the stance phase of gait. However, the presence of the ligaments in situ strains significantly increased the joint stiffness under passive adduction and internal rotations, as well as during the other simulated instances (25%, 75% and 100%) of the stance phase of gait. Also, these parameters substantially altered the local loading state of the ligaments and resulted in better agreement with the literature during joint flexion. Therefore, the proposed computational framework of ligament in situ strain will help to overcome the challenges in considering this crucial biological aspect during knee joint modeling. Besides, the current construct is advantageous for a better understanding of the mechanical behavior of knee ligaments under physiological and pathological states and provide relevant information in the design of reconstructive treatments and artificial grafts.