In Vivo Pelvic and Hip Joint Kinematics in Patients With Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Dual Fluoroscopy Study

Sex-Based Differences and Asymmetry in Hip Kinematics During Unilateral Extension From Deep Hip Flexion

The purpose of this study was to identify side-to-side and sex-based differences in hip kinematics during a unilateral step-up from deep flexion. Twelve (eight men, four women) asymptomatic young adults performed a step ascent motion while synchronized biplane radiographs of the hip were collected at 50 images per second. Femur and pelvis position were determined using a validated volumetric model-based tracking technique that matched digitally reconstructed radiographs created from subject-specific computed tomography (CT) bone models to each pair of synchronized radiographs. Hip kinematics and side-to-side differences were calculated and a linear mixed effects model evaluated sex-based differences. Women were on average 10.2 deg more abducted and 0.2 mm more medially translated than men across the step up motion (p < 0.001). Asymmetry between hips was up to 14.1 ± 12.1 deg in internal rotation and 1.3 ± 1.4 mm in translation. This dataset demonstrates the inherent asymmetry during movements involving unilateral hip extension from deep flexion and may be used provide context for observed kinematics differences following surgery or rehabilitation. Previously reported kinematic differences between total hip arthroplasty and contralateral hips may be well within the natural side-to-side differences that exist in asymptomatic native hips.

The Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Patient Population and Its Prevalence of Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology generating lower back pain is increasing, often requiring SI joint fusion in refractory cases. Similarly, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasing procedure in the older growing population. Prior SIJ fusion in patients undergoing THA has increased hip dislocation. This study aims to determine the prevalence of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we completed a retrospective review of consecutive SIJ fusion cases performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeons between October 2019 and June 2022. The senior surgeon reviewed pelvis radiographs to determine whether a THA was present. Patient demographics, surgical history, SIJ fusion date, and laterality information from study participants' medical records were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We screened 157 consecutive cases and excluded 45 not meeting the inclusion criteria. One hundred twelve radiographs were reviewed, with seven additional patients excluded. The final analysis consisted of 105 patients (33M:72F). The mean age was 50.4 ± 13.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 6.1 kg/m 2 . SIJ fusion laterality included 51 right (48.6%), 44 left (41.9%), and 10 bilateral (9.5%). One patient (0.95%) had a preexisting right THA, and two patients (1.9%) underwent ipsilateral THA after SIJ fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a low prevalence (0.95%) of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution, similar to the THA prevalence of the total US population. Additional research is needed to determine the outcomes of patients with preexisting THA undergoing SIJ fusion.

Pre-operative gait kinematics and kinetics do not change following surgery in adolescent patients with femoroacetabular impingement

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a condition where the femoral head-neck junction collides with the acetabulum. Open or arthroscopic treatment of FAI aims to increase hip motion while reducing impingement during passive or dynamic movements.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the biomechanical characteristics of the hip and pelvis in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with FAI syndrome 1) pre-operatively compared to controls and 2) pre- to post-operatively?

METHODS

43 patients with FAI and 43 controls were included in the study. All patients with FAI had cam deformities and underwent unilateral hip preservation surgery (either open or arthroscopic). Pre- and post-operative imaging, patient-reported outcomes, and gait analysis were performed. Joint angles and internal joint moments were evaluated with an emphasis on the pelvis and hip. A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the gait patterns before and after surgical treatment, as well as to compare pre-operative gait patterns to a control group.

RESULTS

43 patients with FAI (28 female, 16.5 ± 1.5 yrs) and 43 controls (28 female, 16.0 ± 1.5 yrs) were included. Pre-operative patients with FAI had decreased stride length and walking speed compared to controls, with no significant change following surgery. There were no differences in sagittal and coronal plane hip and pelvis kinematics comparing pre- to post-operative and pre-operative to controls. Pre-operatively, differences in internal hip rotation angle (pre: 3.3˚, post: 3.9˚, controls: 7.7˚) and hip extensor moment (pre: 0.121, post: 0.090, controls: 0.334 Nm/kg) were observed compared to controls with no significant changes observed following surgery.

SIGNIFICANCE

Compensatory movement strategies in pelvic and hip motion are evident during gait in patients with FAI, particularly in the sagittal and transverse planes. These strategies remained consistent two years post-surgery. While surgery improved radiographic measures and patient-reported outcomes, gait did not elicit biomechanical changes following surgical treatment.

Hip and Pelvis Movement Patterns in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Differ From Controls and Change After Hip Arthroscopy During a Step-Down Pivot-Turn Task

Background

Alterations in hip kinematics during functional tasks occur in positions that cause anterior impingement in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. However, tasks that do not promote motions of symptomatic hip impingement remain understudied.

Purpose

To compare movement patterns of the hip and pelvis during a step-down pivot-turn task between patients with FAI and controls as well as in patients with FAI before and after hip arthroscopy.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Three-dimensional motion capture was acquired in 32 patients with FAI and 27 controls during a step-down pivot-turn task. An FAI subsample (n = 14) completed testing 9.2 ± 2.0 months (mean ± SD; range, 5.8-13.1 months) after hip arthroscopy. Statistical parametric mapping analysis was used to analyze hip and pelvis time series waveforms (1) between the FAI and control groups, (2) in the FAI group before versus after hip arthroscopy, and (3) in the FAI group after hip arthroscopy versus the control group. Continuous parametric variables were analyzed by paired t test and nonparametric variables by chi-square test.

Results

There were no significant differences in demographics between the FAI and control groups. Before hip arthroscopy, patients with FAI demonstrated reduced hip flexion (P = .041) and external rotation (P = .027), as well as decreased anterior pelvic tilt (P = .049) and forward rotation (P = .043), when compared with controls. After hip arthroscopy, patients demonstrated greater hip flexion (P < .001) and external rotation of the operative hip (P < .001), in addition to increased anterior pelvic tilt (P≤ .036) and pelvic rise (P≤ .049), as compared with preoperative values. Postoperatively, the FAI group demonstrated greater hip flexion (P≤ .047) and lower forward pelvic rotation (P = .003) as compared with the control group.

Conclusion

Movement pattern differences between the FAI and control groups during the nonimpingement-related step-down pivot-turn task were characterized by differences in the sagittal and transverse planes of the hip and pelvis. After hip arthroscopy, patients exhibited greater hip flexion and external rotation and increased pelvic anterior tilt and pelvic rise as compared with presurgery. When compared with controls, patients with FAI demonstrated greater hip flexion and lower pelvic forward rotation postoperatively.

Clinical Relevance

These findings indicate that hip and pelvis biomechanics are altered even during tasks that do not reproduce the anterior impingement position.

A Smartphone App Shows Patients Return to Preoperative Gait Metrics 6 Weeks After Hip Arthroscopy, and Gait Metrics Have Low to Moderate Correlations With a Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to use a smartphone app to collect gait metrics in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and determine when gait metrics return to preoperative levels and if gait metrics correlate with postoperative hip-specific patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS from August 2021 to December 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients downloaded the iPhone app, rHip, at ∼6 months postoperatively, enabling retroactive access to Apple Health data. Gait metrics included step count, step length, and walking speed. Each patient's preoperative baseline was compared to that individual's successive postoperative week metrics. All patients underwent a standard 4-stage rehabilitation protocol. We compared metrics from beginning to end of each phase (i.e., week 1 to 6 for phase 1) and evaluated correlations with patient outcomes.

Results

Fifty patients (40 women; age: 31.9 ± 14.5 years) were included. Patients had significantly reduced step count from postoperative weeks 1 to 5 and improved upon baseline at weeks 13 and 16 to 26. Patients had significantly reduced step length from postoperative weeks 1 to 4 and improved upon baseline at weeks 16 and 20. Patients had significantly lower walking speed from postoperative weeks 1 to 6 and improved upon baseline at week 20 (P < .05). Step count significantly improved over phase 1 rehabilitation (P < .05). Step length and walking speed significantly improved over each of phases 1 to 3 (P < .05 for all). Preoperatively, weak correlations were noted between step length and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Physical Function (PF)/Pain, as well as walking speed and Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL)/PROMIS-Pain. At 3 months, moderate correlations were noted between step count and HOS-ADL/12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), step length and HOS-ADL/PROMIS-PF, and walking speed and HOS-ADL/iHOT-12/PROMIS-PF/PROMIS-Pain. At 6 months, weak to moderate correlations were noted between all 3 gait metrics and HOS-ADL.

Conclusions

A smartphone app was capable of capturing health data gait metrics. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS returned to baseline levels in step count, step length, and walking speed after phase 1 (6 weeks) of rehabilitation. The most consistent correlations between gait metrics and step count were seen at 3 months, although only weak to moderate. Gait metrics similarly had weak to moderate correlations with HOS-ADL at 6 months.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Posterior Hip Impingement at Maximal Hip Extension in Female Patients With Increased Femoral Version or Increased McKibbin Index and Its Effect on Sports Performance

Background

The location of posterior hip impingement at maximal extension in patients with posterior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is unclear.

Purpose

To investigate the frequency and area of impingement at maximal hip extension and at 10° and 20° of extension in female patients with increased femoral version (FV) and posterior hip pain.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Osseous patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D) models were generated of 50 hips (37 female patients, 3D computed tomography) with a positive posterior impingement test and increased FV (defined as >35°). The McKibbin index (combined version) was calculated as the sum of FV and acetabular version (AV). Subgroups of patients with an increased McKibbin index >70° (24 hips) and FV >50° (20 hips) were analyzed. A control group of female participants (10 hips) had normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus deformity (neck-shaft angle, <139°). Validated 3D collision detection software was used for simulation of osseous impingement-free hip extension (no rotation).

Results

The mean impingement-free maximal hip extension was significantly lower in patients with FV >35° compared with the control group (15° ± 15° vs 55° ± 19°; P < .001). At maximal hip extension, 78% of patients with FV >35° had osseous posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral hip impingement. At 20° of extension, the frequency of posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral impingement was significantly higher for patients with a McKibbin index >70° (83%) and for patients with FV >35° (76%) than for controls (0%) (P < .001 for both). There was a significant correlation between maximal extension (no rotation) and FV (r = 0.46; P < .001) as well as between impingement area at 20° of extension (external rotation [ER], 0°) and McKibbin index (0.61; P < .001). Impingement area at 20° of extension (ER, 0°) was significantly larger for patients with McKibbin index >70° versus <70° (251 vs 44 mm²; P = .001).

Conclusion

The limited hip extension found in our study could theoretically affect the performance of sports activities such as running, ballet dancing, or lunges. Therefore, although not examined directly in this study, these activities are not advisable for these patients. Preoperative evaluation of FV and the McKibbin index is important in female patients with posterior hip pain before hip preservation surgery (eg, hip arthroscopy).

Large Hip Impingement Area and Subspine Hip Impingement in Patients With Absolute Femoral Retroversion or Decreased Combined Version

Background

It remains unclear if femoral retroversion is a contraindication for hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Purpose

To compare the area and location of hip impingement at maximal flexion and during the FADIR test (flexion, adduction, internal rotation) in FAI hips with femoral retroversion, hips with decreased combined version, and asymptomatic controls.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Twenty-four symptomatic patients (37 hips) with anterior FAI were evaluated. All patients had femoral version (FV) <5° according to the Murphy method. Two subgroups were analyzed: 13 hips with absolute femoral retroversion (FV <0°) and 29 hips with decreased combined version (McKibbin index <20°). All patients were symptomatic and had anterior groin pain and a positive anterior impingement test ; all had undergone pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans to measure FV. The asymptomatic control group consisted of 26 hips. Dynamic impingement simulation of maximal flexion and FADIR test at 90° of flexion was performed with patient-specific CT-based 3-dimensional models. Extra- or intra-articular hip impingement area and location were compared between the subgroups and with control hips using nonparametric tests.

Results

Impingement area was significantly larger for hips with decreased combined version (<20°) versus combined version (≥20°) (mean ± SD; 171 ± 140 vs 78 ± 55 mm²; P = .012) and was significantly larger for hips with FV <0° (absolute femoral retroversion) vs FV >0° (P = .025). Hips with absolute femoral retroversion had a significantly higher frequency of extra-articular subspine impingement versus controls (92% vs 0%; P < .001), compared to 84% of patients with decreased combined version. Intra-articular femoral impingement location was most often (95%) anterosuperior and anterior (2-3 o'clock). Anteroinferior femoral impingement location was significantly different at maximal flexion (anteroinferior [4-5 o'clock]) versus the FADIR test (anterosuperior and anterior [2-3 o'clock]) (P < .001).

Conclusion

Patients with absolute femoral retroversion (FV <0°) had a larger hip impingement area, and most exhibited extra-articular subspine impingement. Preoperative FV assessment with advanced imaging (CT/magnetic resonance imaging) could help to identify these patients (without 3-dimensional modeling). Femoral impingement was located anteroinferiorly at maximal flexion and anterosuperiorly and anteriorly during the FADIR test.

Femoral impingement in maximal hip flexion is anterior-inferior distal to the cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement patients with femoral retroversion : implications for hip arthroscopy

AIMS

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients report exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion. However, the exact impingement location in deep flexion is unknown. The aim was to investigate impingement-free maximal flexion, impingement location, and if cam deformity causes hip impingement in flexion in FAI patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study involving 24 patients (37 hips) with FAI and femoral retroversion (femoral version (FV) < 5° per Murphy method) was performed. All patients were symptomatic (mean age 28 years (SD 9)) and had anterior hip/groin pain and a positive anterior impingement test. Cam- and pincer-type subgroups were analyzed. Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (26 hips). All patients underwent pelvic CT scans to generate personalized CT-based 3D models and validated software for patient-specific impingement simulation (equidistant method).

RESULTS

Mean impingement-free flexion of patients with mixed-type FAI (110° (SD 8°)) and patients with pincer-type FAI (112° (SD 8°)) was significantly (p < 0.001) lower compared to the control group (125° (SD 13°)). The frequency of extra-articular subspine impingement was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in patients with pincer-type FAI (57%) compared to cam-type FAI (22%) in 125° flexion. Bony impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior-inferior at femoral four and five o'clock position in patients with cam-type FAI (63% (10 of 16 hips) and 37% (6 of 10 hips)), and did not involve the cam deformity. The cam deformity did not cause impingement in maximal flexion.

CONCLUSION

Femoral impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior-inferior distal to the cam deformity. This differs to previous studies, a finding which could be important for FAI patients in order to avoid exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion (e.g. during squats) and for hip arthroscopy (hip-preservation surgery) for planning of bone resection. Hip impingement in flexion has implications for daily activities (e.g. putting on shoes), sports, and sex.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):22-32.

Patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement demonstrate increased change in bone-to-bone distance during walking: A dual fluoroscopy study

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is a painful, structural hip disorder. Herein, we investigated hip joint mechanics through in vivo, dynamic measurement of the bone-to-bone distance between the femoral head and acetabulum in patients with cam FAI syndrome and morphologically screened controls. We hypothesized that individuals with cam FAI syndrome would have larger changes in bone-to-bone distance compared to the control group, which we would interpret as altered joint mechanics as signified by greater movement of the femoral head as it articulates within the acetabulum. Seven patients with cam FAI syndrome and 11 asymptomatic individuals with typical morphology underwent dual fluoroscopy imaging during level and inclined walking (upward slope). The change in bone-to-bone distance between femoral and acetabular bone surfaces was evaluated for five anatomical regions of the acetabulum at each timepoint of gait. Linear regression analysis of the bone-to-bone distance considered two within-subject factors (activity and region) and one between-subjects factor (group). Across activities, the change in minimum bone-to-bone distance was 1.38-2.54 mm for the cam FAI group and 1.16-1.84 mm for controls. In all regions except the anterior-superior region, the change in bone-to-bone distance was larger in the cam group than the control group (p ≤ 0.024). An effect of activity was detected only in the posterior-superior region where larger changes were noted during level walking than incline walking. Statement of clinical significance: Patients with cam FAI syndrome exhibit altered hip joint mechanics during the low-demand activity of walking; these alterations could affect load transmission, and contribute to pain, tissue damage, and osteoarthritis.

A new marker cluster anchored to the iliotibial band improves tracking of hip and thigh axial rotations

Tracking hip and thigh axial rotation has limited accuracy due to the large soft tissue artifact. We proposed a tracking-markers cluster anchored to the prominent distal part of the iliotibial band (ITB) to improve thigh tracking. We investigated if the ITB cluster improves accuracy compared with a traditionally used thigh cluster. We also compared the hip kinematics obtained with these clusters during walking and step-down. Hip and thigh kinematics were assessed during a task of active internal-external rotation with the knee extended, in which the shank rotation is a reference due to smaller soft-tissue artifact. Errors of the hip and thigh axial rotations obtained with the thigh clusters compared to the shank cluster were computed as root-mean-square errors, which were compared by paired t-tests. The angular waveforms of this task were compared using the statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Additionally, the hip waveforms in all planes obtained with the thigh clusters were compared during walking and step-down, using Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) and SPM (α = 0.05 for all analyses). The ITB cluster errors were approximately 25 % smaller than the traditional cluster error (p < 0.001). ITB cluster errors were smaller at external rotation angles while the traditional cluster error was smaller at internal rotation angles (p < 0.001), although the clusters' waveforms were not significantly different (p ≥ 0.005). During walking and step-down, both clusters provided similar hip kinematics (CMC ≥ 0.75), but differences were observed in parts of the cycles (p ≤ 0.04). The findings suggest that the ITB cluster may be used in studies focused on hip axial rotation.

Present and future of gait assessment in clinical practice: Towards the application of novel trends and technologies

Background

Despite being available for more than three decades, quantitative gait analysis remains largely associated with research institutions and not well leveraged in clinical settings. This is mostly due to the high cost/cumbersome equipment and complex protocols and data management/analysis associated with traditional gait labs, as well as the diverse training/experience and preference of clinical teams. Observational gait and qualitative scales continue to be predominantly used in clinics despite evidence of less efficacy of quantifying gait.

Research objective

This study provides a scoping review of the status of clinical gait assessment, including shedding light on common gait pathologies, clinical parameters, indices, and scales. We also highlight novel state-of-the-art gait characterization and analysis approaches and the integration of commercially available wearable tools and technology and AI-driven computational platforms.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted within PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and ScienceDirect for all articles published until December 2021 using a set of keywords, including normal and pathological gait, gait parameters, gait assessment, gait analysis, wearable systems, inertial measurement units, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, insole sensors, electromyography sensors. Original articles that met the selection criteria were included.

Results and significance

Clinical gait analysis remains highly observational and is hence subjective and largely influenced by the observer's background and experience. Quantitative Instrumented gait analysis (IGA) has the capability of providing clinicians with accurate and reliable gait data for diagnosis and monitoring but is limited in clinical applicability mainly due to logistics. Rapidly emerging smart wearable technology, multi-modality, and sensor fusion approaches, as well as AI-driven computational platforms are increasingly commanding greater attention in gait assessment. These tools promise a paradigm shift in the quantification of gait in the clinic and beyond. On the other hand, standardization of clinical protocols and ensuring their feasibility to map the complex features of human gait and represent them meaningfully remain critical challenges.

Comparison of Walking Biomechanics After Physical Therapist-Led Care or Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is characterized by chondrolabral damage and hip pain. The specific biomechanics used by people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome during daily activities may exacerbate their symptoms. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome can be treated nonoperatively or surgically; however, differential treatment effects on walking biomechanics have not been examined.

PURPOSE

To compare the 12-month effects of physical therapist-led care or arthroscopy on trunk, pelvis, and hip kinematics as well as hip moments during walking.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm superiority randomized controlled trial subsample; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A subsample of 43 participants from the Australian Full randomised controlled trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Hip Impingement versus best cONventional (FASHIoN trial) underwent gait analysis and completed the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) at both baseline and 12 months after random allocation to physical therapist-led care (personalized hip therapy; n = 22; mean age 35; 41% female) or arthroscopy (n = 21; mean age 36; 48% female). Changes in trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanics were compared between treatment groups across the gait cycle using statistical parametric mapping. Associations between changes in iHOT-33 and changes in hip kinematics across 3 planes of motion were examined.

RESULTS

As compared with the arthroscopy group, the personalized hip therapy group increased its peak hip adduction moments (mean difference = 0.35 N·m/body weight·height [%] [95% CI, 0.05-0.65]; effect size = 0.72; P = .02). Hip adduction moments in the arthroscopy group were unchanged in response to treatment. No other between-group differences were detected. Improvements in iHOT-33 were not associated with changes in hip kinematics.

CONCLUSION

Peak hip adduction moments were increased in the personalized hip therapy group and unchanged in the arthroscopy group. No biomechanical changes favoring arthroscopy were detected, suggesting that personalized hip therapy elicits greater changes in hip moments during walking at 12-month follow-up. Twelve-month changes in hip-related quality of life were not associated with changes in hip kinematics.

How Does Chondrolabral Damage and Labral Repair Influence the Mechanics of the Hip in the Setting of Cam Morphology? A Finite-Element Modeling Study

BACKGROUND

Individuals with cam morphology are prone to chondrolabral injuries that may progress to osteoarthritis. The mechanical factors responsible for the initiation and progression of chondrolabral injuries in these individuals are not well understood. Additionally, although labral repair is commonly performed during surgical correction of cam morphology, the isolated mechanical effect of labral repair on the labrum and surrounding cartilage is unknown.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

Using a volunteer-specific finite-element analysis, we asked: (1) How does cam morphology create a deleterious mechanical environment for articular cartilage (as evaluated by shear stress, tensile strain, contact pressure, and fluid pressure) that could increase the risk of cartilage damage compared with a radiographically normal hip? (2) How does chondrolabral damage, specifically delamination, delamination with rupture of the chondrolabral junction, and the presence of a chondral defect, alter the mechanical environment around the damage? (3) How does labral repair affect the mechanical environment in the context of the aforementioned chondrolabral damage scenarios?

METHODS

The mechanical conditions of a representative hip with normal bony morphology (characterized by an alpha angle of 37°) and one with cam morphology (characterized by an alpha angle of 78°) were evaluated using finite-element models that included volunteer-specific anatomy and kinematics. The bone, cartilage, and labrum geometry for the hip models were collected from two volunteers matched by age (25 years with cam morphology and 23 years with normal morphology), BMI (both 24 kg/m2), and sex (both male). Volunteer-specific kinematics for gait were used to drive the finite-element models in combination with joint reaction forces. Constitutive material models were assigned to the cartilage and labrum, which simulate a physiologically realistic material response, including the time-dependent response from fluid flow through the cartilage, and spatially varied response from collagen fibril reinforcement. For the cam hip, three models were created to represent chondrolabral damage conditions: (1) "delamination," with the acetabular cartilage separated from the bone in one region; (2) "delamination with chondrolabral junction (CLJ) rupture," which includes separation of the cartilage from the labrum tissue; and (3) a full-thickness chondral defect, referred to throughout as "defect," where the acetabular cartilage has degraded so there is a void. Each of the three conditions was modeled with a labral tear and with the labrum repaired. The size and location of the damage conditions simulated in the cartilage and labrum were attained from reported clinical prevalence of the location of these injuries. For each damage condition, the contact area, contact pressure, tensile strain, shear stress, and fluid pressure were predicted during gait and compared.

RESULTS

The cartilage in the hip with cam morphology experienced higher stresses and strains than the normal hip. The peak level of tensile strain (25%) and shear stress (11 MPa) experienced by the cam hip may exceed stable conditions and initiate damage or degradation. The cam hip with simulated damage experienced more evenly distributed contact pressure than the intact cam hip, as well as decreased tensile strain, shear stress, and fluid pressure. The peak levels of tensile strain (15% to 16%) and shear stress (2.5 to 2.7 MPa) for cam hips with simulated damage may be at stable magnitudes. Labral repair only marginally affected the overall stress and strain within the cartilage, but it increased local tensile strain in the cartilage near the chondrolabral junction in the hip with delamination and increased the peak tensile strain and shear stress on the labrum.

CONCLUSION

This finite-element modeling pilot study suggests that cam morphology may predispose hip articular cartilage to injury because of high shear stress; however, the presence of simulated damage distributed the loading more evenly and the magnitude of stress and strain decreased throughout the cartilage. The locations of the peak values also shifted posteriorly. Additionally, in hips with cam morphology, isolated labral repair in the hip with a delamination injury increased localized strain in the cartilage near the chondrolabral junction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In a hip with cam morphology, labral repair alone may not protect the cartilage from damage because of mechanical overload during the low-flexion, weightbearing positions experienced during gait. The predicted findings of redistribution of stress and strain from damage in the cam hip may, in some cases, relieve disposition to damage progression. Additional studies should include volunteers with varied acetabular morphology, such as borderline dysplasia with cam morphology or pincer deformity, to analyze the effect on the conclusions presented in the current study. Further, future studies should evaluate the combined effects of osteochondroplasty and chondrolabral treatment.

Effect of Patient Positioning on Measurement of the Anterior Center-Edge Angle on False-Profile Radiographs and Its 3-Dimensional Mapping to the Acetabular Rim

Background:

The anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) is used to quantify anterior coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum. However, its measurement has not been evaluated in a manner consistent with routine use, and the precise 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic location where it measures coverage is not known.

Purpose:

To determine the effect of patient positioning on ACEA measurement reliability, magnitude, and 3D location.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Included were 18 adults; 7 participants had cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and 11 participants had no radiographic evidence of hip abnormalities and no history of hip pain or injuries. Ultimately, 3D femur and pelvis models were generated from computed tomography images. Radiographs were generated with the models in different degrees of pelvic rotation, tilt, and obliquity relative to the standard false-profile view. The ACEA was measured by 2 raters by selecting the location of the bone edge on each radiograph. Selections were projected onto the pelvis model and expressed as a clockface location on the acetabular rim. The clockface was mirrored on left hips to allow a direct comparison of locations between hips. Interrater and intrarater reliability were quantified via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect of position on ACEA measurements and clockface locations was determined via linear regression.

Results:

Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC ≥0.97 for all). For every degree increase in rotation, tilt, and obliquity, the ACEA changed by +0.53°, +0.93°, and –0.04°, respectively. The mean clockface location (hour:minute:second) in the false-profile view was 2:09:32 ± 0:12:00 and changed by +0:02:08, –0:00:35, and –0:00:05 for every degree increase in rotation, tilt, and obliquity, respectively.

Conclusion:

ACEA measurements were reliable even with differences in patient positioning. Rotation and tilt were associated with notable changes in ACEA measurements. ACEA bone edge measurements mapped to the anterosuperior acetabular rim, typically in proximity to the anterior inferior iliac spine. Mapped location was most sensitive to rotation.

Clinical Relevance:

Pelvic rotation and tilt affected ACEA measurements, which could alter the clinical classification and treatment of borderline abnormalities. Rotation in particular must be well controlled during patient imaging to preserve measurement reliability and accuracy and to describe coverage from the intended 3D rim location.

Effect of posture and femoral neck osteochondroplasty on femur-acetabulum clearance in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement

It is not clear whether femoral neck osteochondroplasty achieves its objective of increasing femoroacetabular clearance. We used an upright open magnetic resonance imaging scanner to image the hip joint in multiple postures to explore the effect of posture and femoral neck osteochondroplasty on femur-acetabulum clearance in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. We recruited 13 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic femoral neck osteochondroplasty and completed assessments on 10 patients. We scanned each subject before surgery and at 6 months post-op in supine and 3 other physiological postures: supine 90° flexion with adduction and internal rotation (FADIR), sitting deep (maximal flexion with internal rotation and adduction), and sitting crossed leg (maximal adduction with flexion and internal rotation). We measured the alpha angle, which describes the severity of cam deformity, and the beta angle, which defines joint clearance. We also evaluated hip flexion, internal rotation, and adduction before and after surgery. Femoral neck osteochondroplasty significantly decreased alpha angle by 23.9° ± 4.6° (p = 0.001) and increased beta angle across all postures by 28.1° ± 6.3° (p = 0.002). An increase in beta angle represented a decreased chance of impingement. Femoral neck osteochondroplasty significantly increased flexion by an average of 8.6° in the sitting deep posture after surgery (p = 0.007) which might indicate an improvement of joint function. These findings lend support to the hypothesis that arthroscopic osteochondroplasty accomplishes its stated goals of increasing bone-bone clearance in the hip joint and improving joint mechanics for the static postures assessed.

Biomechanics of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess how biomechanical gait parameters (kinematics, kinetics, and muscle force estimations) differ between patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and healthy controls, through a systematic search.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Medline and EMBASE via OVID SP was undertaken from inception to April 2020 using PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described kinematics, kinetics, and/or estimated muscle forces in cam-type FAI were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 404 articles for evaluation. Removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts resulted in full-text review of 37 articles, with 12 meeting inclusion criteria. The 12 studies reported biomechanical data on a total of 173 cam-FAI (151 cam-specific, 22 mixed-type) patients and 177 healthy age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched controls. Patients with cam FAI had reduced hip sagittal plane range of motion (mean difference -3.00° [-4.10, -1.90], P < .001), reduced hip peak extension angles (mean difference -2.05° [-3.58, -0.53] , P = .008), reduced abduction angles in the terminal phase of stance, and reduced iliacus and psoas muscle force production in the terminal phase of stance compared to the control groups. Cam FAI cohorts walked at a slower speed compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, patients with cam-type FAI exhibit altered sagittal and frontal plane kinematics as well as altered muscle force production during level gait compared to controls. These findings will help guide future research into gait alterations in FAI and how such alterations may contribute to pathologic progression and furthermore, how such alterations can be modified for therapeutic benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Level III studies.

Clinical Measures of Pelvic Tilt in Physical Therapy

Pelvic tilt refers to the spatial position or motion of the pelvis about a frontal horizontal axis on the rest of the body in the sagittal plane. It is relevant for several musculoskeletal conditions commonly seen in physical therapist practice, particularly conditions affecting the hip and groin. Despite the relevance of pelvic tilt identified in biomechanical studies, and the historical precedence for assessing pelvic tilt, there is a lack of clarity regarding the utility of clinical measures that are practical in a rehabilitation setting. There are several options available to assess pelvic tilt which are discussed in detail in this commentary. All of these options come with potential benefits and considerable limitations. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an overview of the relevance of understanding pelvic tilt in the pathology and rehabilitation of conditions affecting the hip joint, with a focus applying evidence towards identifying clinical measures that may be useful in the rehabilitation setting and considerations that are needed with these measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Pre- and postoperative in silico biomechanics in individuals with cam morphology during stair tasks

BACKGROUND

Osteochondroplasty for cam femoroacetabular impingement is a common treatment to improve hip function and prevent joint degeneration. The purpose was to compare in-silico hip biomechanics during stair tasks in pre- and postoperative patients matched with healthy controls.

METHODS

Ten symptomatic cam femoroacetabular impingement patients performed stair ascent and descent pre- and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were age, and body-mass-index matched to controls. Full-body kinematics and kinetics were computed and, muscle and hip contact forces were estimated using musculoskeletal modeling and static optimization. Stance-phases were time-normalized and compared using statistical non-parametric mapping.

FINDINGS

Preoperatives showed lower hip abduction than controls during stairs ascent (76-100%, P = .007). Pre- and postoperative showed lower hip external rotation compared to controls on stair ascent (Pre-op vs controls: 71-100%, P = .005; Post-op vs controls: 72-100%, P = .01) and stair descent (Pre-op vs controls: 0-62%, P = .001; Post-op vs controls: 0-60%, P = .001). Postoperatives showed lower iliacus force compared to preoperative (1-3%, P = .012) and control (3-6%, P = .008), and higher gluteus maximus and piriformis forces compared to controls during stair descent. Lower postoperative anterior hip contact force (0-7%, P = .004) during descent, and superior (33-35%, P = .018) during ascent compared to controls were observed. Postoperative contact forces were medialized compared to preoperative (0-2%, P = .011) and controls (1-2%, P = .016).

INTERPRETATION

Forcing participants to adhere to standardized step length/rise minimized sagittal kinematic differences between conditions and groups. Persistent reduced hip external rotation postoperatively and minor muscle force adaptations led to reduced superior hip contact force during stair ascent and reduced anterior and more medialized contact forces during stair descent.

Hip Muscle Forces and Contact Loading During Squatting After Cam-Type FAI Surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare muscle forces and hip contact forces (HCFs) during squatting in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (cam-FAI) before and after hip corrective surgery and with healthy control participants.

METHODS

Ten symptomatic male patients with cam-FAI performed deep squatting preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Patients were matched by age and body mass index to 10 male control participants. Full-body kinematics and kinetics were computed, and muscle forces and HCFs were estimated using a musculoskeletal model and static optimization. Normalized squat cycle (%SC) trials were compared using statistical nonparametric mapping (SnPM).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, patients with cam-FAI squatted down with higher anterior pelvic tilt, higher hip flexion, and greater hip extension moments than preoperatively. Preoperative patients demonstrated lower anterior pelvic tilt and lower hip flexion compared with the participants in the control group. Postoperative patients showed increased semimembranosus force compared with their preoperative values. Preoperative forces were lower than the control group for the adductor magnus, the psoas major, and the semimembranosus; however, the preoperative patients showed greater inferior gluteus maximus forces than the patients in the control group, whereas the postoperative patients did not differ from the control patients. Higher posterior, superior, and resultant HCF magnitudes were identified postoperatively in comparison with the preoperative values. Preoperative posterior HCF was lower than in the control group, whereas the postoperative posterior HCF did not differ from those in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher postoperative anterior pelvic tilt was associated with an indication of return to closer to normal pelvic motion, which resembled data from the control group. Lower preoperative anterior pelvic tilt was associated with muscle force imbalance, indicated by decreased semimembranosus and increased gluteus maximus forces. The overall increased postoperative muscle forces were associated with improved pelvic mobility and increased HCFs that were comparable with the control-group standards.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Muscle forces and HCFs may be indicative of postoperative joint health restoration and alleviated symptoms.