dGEMRIC and CECT Comparison of Cationic and Anionic Contrast Agents in Cadaveric Human Metacarpal Cartilage

Comparison of compositional MRI techniques to quantify the regenerative potential of articular cartilage: a preclinical minipig model after osteochondral defect treatments with autologous mesenchymal stromal cells and unseeded scaffolds

Background

The field of orthopedics seeks effective, safer methods for evaluating articular cartilage regeneration. Despite various treatment innovations, non-invasive, contrast-free full quantitative assessments of hyaline articular cartilage's regenerative potential using compositional magnetic resonance (MR) sequences remain challenging. In this context, our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of different MR sequences for quantitative assessment of cartilage and to compare them with the current gold standard delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) measurements.

Methods

We employed ex vivo imaging in a preclinical minipig model to assess knee cartilage regeneration. Standardized osteochondral defects were drilled in the proximal femur of the specimens (n=14), which were divided into four groups. Porcine collagen scaffolds seeded with autologous adipose-derived stromal cells (ASC), autologous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), and unseeded scaffolds (US) were implanted in femoral defects. Furthermore, there was a defect group which received no treatment. After 6 months, the specimens were examined using different compositional MR methods, including the gold standard dGEMRIC as well as T1, T2, T2*, and T1ρ techniques. The statistical evaluation involved comparing the defect region with the uninjured tibia and femur cartilage layers and all measurements were performed on a clinical 3T MR Scanner.

Results

In the untreated defect group, we observed significant differences in the defect region, with dGEMRIC values significantly lower (404.86±64.2 ms, P=0.018) and T2 times significantly higher (44.24±2.75 ms, P<0.001). Contrastingly, in all three treatment groups (ASC, BMSC, US), there were no significant differences among the three regions in the dGEMRIC sequence, suggesting successful cartilage regeneration. However, T1, T2*, and T1ρ sequences failed to detect such differences, highlighting their lower sensitivity for cartilage regeneration.

Conclusions

As expected, dGEMRIC is well suited for monitoring cartilage regeneration. Interestingly, T2 imaging also proved to be a reliable cartilage imaging technique and thus offers a contrast agent-free alternative to the former gold standard for subsequent in vivo studies investigating the cartilage regeneration potential of different treatment modalities.

Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Affecting the Lower Limb

Imaging methods capable of detecting inflammation, such as MR imaging and ultrasound, are of paramount importance in rheumatic disease management, not only for diagnostic purposes but also for monitoring disease activity and treatment response. However, more advanced stages of arthritis, characterized by findings of cumulative structural damage, have traditionally been accomplished by radiographs and computed tomography. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of imaging of some of the most prevalent inflammatory rheumatic diseases affecting the lower limb (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and gout) and up-to-date recommendations regarding imaging diagnostic workup.

Computed Tomography of Cartilage: An Exploration of Novel Cationic Bismuth Contrast Agent

Accurate diagnosis of minor cartilage injuries with delayed contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is challenging as poor diffusion and toxicity issues limit the usage of common CT contrast agents. Hence, the design of safe contrast agents with physiochemical properties suitable for fast, deep cartilage imaging is imminent. Herein, a novel cationic bismuth contrast agent (Bi-DOTAPXD) based on dodecane tetraacetic acid (DOTA) was synthesized and examined for CECT of cartilage. The complex was designed to improve diagnosis by utilising a net-positive charge for enhanced permeability through cartilage, inherent low-toxicity and high X-ray attenuation of bismuth. Osteochondral plugs (n = 12), excised from visually intact porcine articular cartilage were immersed in Bi-DOTAPXD (8 mg/mL) and Gd-DOTAPXD (10 mg/mL) contrast agents and scanned with a high-resolution microcomputed tomography scanner at multiple time-points. The mean Bi-DOTAPXD and Gd-DOTAPXD partitions at 45-min time-point were 85.7 ± 35.1 and 69.8 ± 30.2%, and the partitions correlated with the histopathological analysis of cartilage proteoglycan (PG) content (r) at 0.657 and 0.632, respectively. The time diffusion constants (τ) for Bi-DOTAPXD and Gd-DOTA were 121 and 159 min, respectively. Diffusion Bi-DOTAPXD and Gd-DOTAPXD reflected inter-sample variation in cartilage PG content. Cationic Bi-DOTAPXD may have the potential as a CT agent for the diagnosis of cartilage.

A Cationic Contrast Agent in X-ray Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Pre-Clinical Evaluation of Diffusion and Attenuation Properties

The aim of this study was the preliminary assessment of a new cationic contrast agent, the CA4+, via the analysis of spatial distribution in cartilage of ex vivo bovine samples, at micrometer and millimeter scale. Osteochondral plugs (n = 18) extracted from bovine stifle joints (n = 2) were immersed in CA4+ solution up to 26 h. Planar images were acquired at different time points, using a microCT apparatus. The CA4+ distribution in cartilage and saturation time were evaluated. Tibial plates from bovine stifle joints (n = 3) were imaged with CT, before and after 24 h-CA4+ bath immersion, at different concentrations. Afterward, potential CA4+ washout from cartilage was investigated. From microCT acquisitions, the CA4+ distribution differentiated into three distinct layers inside the cartilage, reflecting the spatial distribution of proteoglycans. After 24 h of diffusion, the iodine concentration reached in cartilage was approximately seven times that of the CA4+ bath. The resulting saturation time was 1.9 ± 0.9 h and 2.6 ± 2.9 h for femoral and tibial samples, respectively. Analysis of clinical CT acquisitions confirmed overall contrast enhancement of cartilage after 24 h immersion, observed for each CA4+ concentration. Distinct contrast enhancement was reached in different cartilage regions, depending on tissue’s local features. Incomplete but remarkable washout of cartilage was observed. CA4+ significantly improved cartilage visualization and its qualitative analysis.

Influence of fixation on CA4+ contrast enhanced microCT of articular cartilage and subsequent feasibility for histological evaluation

CA4+ is a novel cationic iodinated contrast agent utilized for contrast-enhanced microCT (CECT). In this study, we compared CA4+ CECT for cartilage quantification of unfixed and neutral buffered formalin (NBF)-fixed rabbit distal femur cartilage after 8-, 24- and 30-hours of contrast agent diffusion. The stability of CA4+ binding to cartilage after PBS soak and decalcification was also investigated by CECT. We further assessed the feasibility of cartilage histology and immunohistochemistry after CA4+ CECT. Contrast-enhanced CA4+ labeled unfixed and NBF-fixed cartilage tissues facilitate articular cartilage quantification and accurate morphological assessment. The NBF fixed tissues demonstrate higher cartilage intensity and imaging characteristics distinct from subchondral bone than unfixed tissues while maintaining stable binding even after decalcification with 10% EDTA. The unfixed tissues labeled with CA4+, after CECT imaging and decalcification, are amenable to H&E, Alcian blue, and Safranin O staining, as well as Col2 immunohistochemistry. In contrast, only H&E and Alcian blue staining can be accomplished with CA4+ labeled NBF fixed cartilage, and CA4+ labeling interferes with downstream immunohistochemistry and Safranin O staining, likely due to its positive charge. In conclusion, CA4+ CECT of NBF fixed tissues provides high quality microCT cartilage images and allows for convenient quantification along with feasible downstream H&E and Alcian blue staining after decalcification. CA4+ CECT of unfixed tissues enables researchers to obtain both quantitative microCT as well as cartilage histology and immunohistochemistry data from one set of animals in a cost-, time-, and labor-efficient manner.

Molecular Signaling Interactions and Transport at the Osteochondral Interface: A Review

Articular joints are comprised of different tissues, including cartilage and bone, with distinctive structural and mechanical properties. Joint homeostasis depends on mechanical and biological integrity of these components and signaling exchanges between them. Chondrocytes and osteocytes actively sense, integrate, and convert mechanical forces into biochemical signals in cartilage and bone, respectively. The osteochondral interface between the bone and cartilage allows these tissues to communicate with each other and exchange signaling and nutritional molecules, and by that ensure an integrated response to mechanical stimuli. It is currently not well known how molecules are transported between these tissues. Measuring molecular transport in vivo is highly desirable for tracking cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis progression. Since transport of contrast agents, which are used for joint imaging, also depend on diffusion through the cartilage extracellular matrix, contrast agent enhanced imaging may provide a high resolution, non-invasive method for investigating molecular transport in the osteochondral unit. Only a few techniques have been developed to track molecular transport at the osteochondral interface, and there appear opportunities for development in this field. This review will describe current knowledge of the molecular interactions and transport in the osteochondral interface and discuss the potential of using contrast agents for investigating molecular transport and structural changes of the joint.