Synovial mesenchymal stem cells promote the meniscus repair in a novel pig meniscus injury model

Bone repair potential of collagen-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-carbon nanotubes scaffold loaded with mesenchymal stem cells for the reconstruction of critical-sized mandibular defects

The poor structural stability of collagen (COL) upon hydration poses a significant challenge in tissue engineering (TE). To overcome this limitation, the incorporation of hydrophobic polymers such as poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), and nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has been explored. In this study, we investigated the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of COL-based scaffolds modified with PHB and CNTs for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications. The tensile strength analysis revealed a substantial improvement in the ultimate tensile strength with the addition of 10 % PHB and 4 % CNTs. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images depicted a denser and more compact structure resulting from the presence of PHB and CNTs, enhancing the scaffold's mechanical properties. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed the successful incorporation of PHB and CNTs into the composite scaffold, maintaining the chemical integrity of COL. Stereological studies also conducted in a rat model with induced critical-sized bone defects in the mandibular bone further emphasize the substantial increase in bone formation and reduction in defect volume achieved by the scaffold loaded with stem cells. These findings underscore the promising approach to enhance bone healing, using COL-based scaffolds loaded with stem cells, and the favorable results obtained in this study can contribute to the advancement of BTE strategies.

Current advances in engineering meniscal tissues: insights into 3D printing, injectable hydrogels and physical stimulation based strategies

The knee meniscus is the cushioning fibro-cartilage tissue present in between the femoral condyles and tibial plateau of the knee joint. It is largely avascular in nature and suffers from a wide range of tears and injuries caused by accidents, trauma, active lifestyle of the populace and old age of individuals. Healing of the meniscus is especially difficult due to its avascularity and hence requires invasive arthroscopic approaches such as surgical resection, suturing or implantation. Though various tissue engineering approaches are proposed for the treatment of meniscus tears, three-dimensional (3D) printing/bioprinting, injectable hydrogels and physical stimulation involving modalities are gaining forefront in the past decade. A plethora of new printing approaches such as direct light photopolymerization and volumetric printing, injectable biomaterials loaded with growth factors and physical stimulation such as low-intensity ultrasound approaches are being added to the treatment portfolio along with the contemporary tear mitigation measures. This review discusses on the necessary design considerations, approaches for 3D modeling and design practices for meniscal tear treatments within the scope of tissue engineering and regeneration. Also, the suitable materials, cell sources, growth factors, fixation and lubrication strategies, mechanical stimulation approaches, 3D printing strategies and injectable hydrogels for meniscal tear management have been elaborated. We have also summarized potential technologies and the potential framework that could be the herald of the future of meniscus tissue engineering and repair approaches.

Custom-made meniscus biofabrication

Reconstructing the meniscus is not currently possible due to its intricate and heterogeneous structure. In this forum, we first discuss the shortcomings of current clinical strategies in meniscus repair. Then, we describe a new promising cell-based, ink-free 3D biofabrication technology to produce tailor-made large-scale functional menisci.

Outcomes of Lateral Meniscal Oblique Radial Tear Repair Compared With Intact Meniscus After ACL Reconstruction: A Cohort Study

Background

Recently, the posterior horn lateral meniscal oblique radial tear (LMORT) was identified in 12% of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, patient-reported outcomes for repair of this relatively common tear have not been reported.

Purpose

To determine the minimum 2-year functional outcomes after LMORT repair at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) compared to a matched cohort of patients who underwent isolated ACLR (iACLR).

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 100 patients (mean age at surgery, 21 years; range, 13-45 years) who underwent primary ACLR between 2010 and 2018. The mean follow-up period was 4.1 ± 2.0 years (range, 2.0-9.2 years). A total of 50 patients with surgically repaired LMORT type 3 or type 4 lesions, defined as partial or complete tears >10 mm from the root (LMORT group) were matched 1:1 based on age, date of surgery, and graft choice with 50 patients who underwent iACLR (iACLR group). The postoperative outcomes were compared between groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score (sIKDC) and the Tegner activity scale. An updated medical history was obtained via the electronic medical record to determine any subsequent complications and reoperations.

Results

There was 1 ACL graft failure in each group as well as 5 (10%) reoperations per group. None of the patients in the LMORT group necessitated a lateral meniscal revision repair or partial meniscectomy. The LMORT and iACLR groups reported comparable sIKDC scores (92.5 ± 6.8 vs 91.9 ± 8.2, respectively; P = .712) as well as Tegner scores (6.7 ± 1.8 vs 6.6 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .910) at final follow-up. No failures of the LMORT repairs were reported.

Conclusion

The study findings demonstrated that reoperations, graft failure rates, patient-reported outcomes, and patient activity levels at ≥2 years after type 3 and 4 LMORT repairs at the time of ACLR compared favorably with those of a matched cohort of patients who underwent iACLR with intact meniscus.

Preclinical Studies and Clinical Trials on Cell-Based Treatments for Meniscus Regeneration

This study aims at performing a thorough review of cell-based treatment strategies for meniscus regeneration in preclinical and clinical studies. The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies (both preclinical and clinical) published from the time of database construction to December 2022. Data related to cell-based therapies for in situ regeneration of the meniscus were extracted independently by two researchers. Assessment of risk of bias was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Statistical analyses based on the classification of different treatment strategies were performed. A total of 5730 articles were retrieved, of which 72 preclinical studies and 6 clinical studies were included in this review. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), especially bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), were the most commonly used cell type. Among preclinical studies, rabbit was the most commonly used animal species, partial meniscectomy was the most commonly adopted injury pattern, and 12 weeks was the most frequently chosen final time point for assessing repair outcomes. A range of natural and synthetic materials were used to aid cell delivery as scaffolds, hydrogels, or other morphologies. In clinical trials, there was large variation in the dose of cells, ranging from 16 × 106 to 150 × 106 cells with an average of 41.52 × 106 cells. The selection of treatment strategy for meniscus repair should be based on the nature of the injury. Cell-based therapies incorporating various "combination" strategies such as co-culture, composite materials, and extra stimulation may offer greater promise than single strategies for effective meniscal tissue regeneration, restoring natural meniscal anisotropy, and eventually achieving clinical translation. Impact Statement This review provides an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of preclinical and clinical studies that tested cell-based treatments for meniscus regeneration. It presents novel perspectives on studies published in the past 30 years, giving consideration to the cell sources and dose selection, delivery methods, extra stimulation, animal models and injury patterns, timing of outcome assessment, and histological and biomechanical outcomes, as well as a summary of findings for individual studies. These unique insights will help to shape future research on the repair of meniscus lesions and inform the clinical translation of new cell-based tissue engineering strategies.

Immunity-and-matrix-regulatory cells enhance cartilage regeneration for meniscus injuries: a phase I dose-escalation trial

Immunity-and-matrix-regulatory cells (IMRCs) derived from human embryonic stem cells have unique abilities in modulating immunity and regulating the extracellular matrix, which could be mass-produced with stable biological properties. Despite resemblance to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in terms of self-renew and tri-lineage differentiation, the ability of IMRCs to repair the meniscus and the underlying mechanism remains undetermined. Here, we showed that IMRCs demonstrated stronger immunomodulatory and pro-regenerative potential than umbilical cord MSCs when stimulated by synovial fluid from patients with meniscus injury. Following injection into the knees of rabbits with meniscal injury, IMRCs enhanced endogenous fibrocartilage regeneration. In the dose-escalating phase I clinical trial (NCT03839238) with eighteen patients recruited, we found that intra-articular IMRCs injection in patients was safe over 12 months post-grafting. Furthermore, the effective results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of meniscus repair and knee functional scores suggested that 5 × 107 cells are optimal for meniscus injury treatment. In summary, we present the first report of a phase I clinical trial using IMRCs to treat meniscus injury. Our results demonstrated that intra-articular injection of IMRCs is a safe and effective therapy by providing a permissive niche for cartilage regeneration.

METTL3 promotes SMSCs chondrogenic differentiation by targeting the MMP3, MMP13, and GATA3

Objective

Synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs) are multipotential non-hematopoietic progenitor cells that can differentiate into various mesenchymal lineages in adipose and bone tissue, especially in chondrogenesis. Post-transcriptional methylation modifications are relative to the various biological development procedures. N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) methylation has been identified as one of the abundant widespread post-transcriptional modifications. However, the connection between the SMSCs differentiation and m⁶A methylation remains unknown and needs further exploration.

Methods

SMSCs were derived from synovial tissues of the knee joint of male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. In the chondrogenesis of SMSCs, m⁶A regulators were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blot (WB). We observed the situation that the knockdown of m⁶A "writer" protein methyltransferase-like (METTL)3 in the chondrogenesis of SMSCs. We also mapped the transcript-wide m⁶A landscape in chondrogenic differentiation of SMSCs and combined RNA-seq and MeRIP-seq in SMSCs by the interference of METTL3.

Results

The expression of m⁶A regulators were regulated in the chondrogenesis of SMSCs, only METTL3 is the most significant factor. In addition, after the knockdown of METTL3, MeRIP-seq and RNA-seq technology were applied to analyze the transcriptome level in SMSCs. 832 DEGs displayed significant changes, consisting of 438 upregulated genes and 394 downregulated genes. DEGs were enriched in signaling pathways regulating the glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis-chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate and ECM-receptor interaction via Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis. The findings of this study indicate a difference in transcripts of MMP3, MMP13, and GATA3 containing consensus m⁶A motifs required for methylation by METTL3. Further, the reduction of METTL3 decreased the expression of MMP3, MMP13, and GATA3.

Conclusion

These findings confirm the molecular mechanisms of METTL3-mediated m⁶A post-transcriptional change in the modulation of SMSCs differentiating into chondrocytes, thus highlighting the potential therapeutic effect of SMSCs for cartilage regeneration.

Bone Marrow-Derived Fibrin Clots Stimulate Healing of a Meniscal Defect in a Rabbit Model

PURPOSE

To determine the in vivo effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate-derived (BMA) fibrin clots for avascular meniscal defect healing in a rabbit model.

METHODS

In 42 Japanese white rabbits, a 2.0-mm cylindrical defect was introduced into the avascular zone of the anterior part of the medial meniscus in the bilateral knees. The rabbits were grouped according to implantation of a BMA fibrin clot (BMA group) or a peripheral blood (PB)-derived clot (PB group) into the defect and nonimplantation (control group). Macroscopic and histological assessments were performed using a scoring system at 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. At 12 weeks after surgery, compressive stress was analyzed biomechanically.

RESULTS

The meniscal score in the BMA group (12.1) was greater than that in the PB group (5.5; P = .031) and control group (4.4; P = .013) at 4 weeks. The meniscal score in the BMA group (13.1) was greater than that in the control group (6.4; BMA = 13.1; P = .0046) at 12 weeks. In the biomechanical analysis, the BMA group demonstrated significantly higher compressive strength than the PB group (6.6 MPa) (BMA = 15.4 MPa; P = .0201) and control group (3.6 MPa; BMA = 15.4 MPa; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of BMA fibrin clots into the meniscal defect of the avascular zone in a rabbit model improved the meniscal score at 4 weeks and strengthened the reparative meniscal tissue at 12 weeks compared with the implantation of PB fibrin clots.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Healing in the avascular zone of the meniscus can be problematic. Approaches to improving this healing response have had variable results. This study provides additional information that may help improve the outcomes in patients with these injuries.

Semi-quantitative arthroscopic scoring system is related to clinical outcomes in patients after medial meniscus posterior root repair

BACKGROUND

Different methods are available to assess the healing status of repaired root for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) using second-look arthroscopy. However, few studies are comparing them or validating their usefulness. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the semi-quantitative arthroscopic score might correlate more with 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with MMPRT than the qualitative evaluation.

METHODS

Data of 61 patients who underwent MMPRT pullout repair and second-look arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. The semi-quantitative arthroscopic scoring system was divided into three evaluation criteria: scores from 0 to 10 points include the width of the bridging tissue, stability of the repaired root, and synovial coverage. The qualitative evaluation was classified into 4 status; complete healing, lax healing, scar tissue healing, and failed healing according to the stability and mobility of the repaired root. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify predictors of 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, Lysholm, or International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between second-look arthroscopic score/qualitative evaluation and 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes. In addition, the optimal cutoff point of semi-quantitative arthroscopic score was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare clinical outcomes between patients with semi-quantitative arthroscopic scores ≥8 and scores <8.

RESULTS

All clinical scores significantly improved at 1 year postoperatively. A good correlation was observed between the semi-quantitative score and clinical scores, but none between qualitative evaluation and clinical scores. The optimal cutoff point of semi-quantitative second-look arthroscopic score was 8 points. Significantly, better clinical outcomes were observed in patients with semi-quantitative scores ≥8 points.

CONCLUSIONS

All 1-year postoperative clinical scores were significantly improved. The semi-quantitative arthroscopic scores correlate more with 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with MMPRT than the qualitative evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV case series study.

Treatment strategies for meniscal lesions: from past to prospective therapeutics

Menisci play an important role in the biomechanics of knee joint function, including loading transmission, joint lubrication, prevention of soft tissue impingement during motion and joint stability. Meniscal repair presents a challenge due to a lack of vascularization that limits the healing capacity of meniscal tissue. In this review, the authors aimed to untangle the available treatment options for repairing meniscal tears. Various surgical procedures have been developed to treat meniscal tears; however, clinical outcomes are limited. Consequently, numerous researchers have focused on different treatments such as the application of exogenous and/or autologous growth factors, scaffolds including tissue-derived matrix, cell-based therapy and miRNA-210. The authors present current and prospective treatment strategies for meniscal lesions.

Regeneration of meniscal avascular zone using autogenous meniscal fragments in a rabbit model

Background

To investigate the effects of autologous meniscus fragment (AMF) implantation on injury in the meniscal avascular zone in mature rabbits.

Methods

Adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. Massive one-piece meniscus tissue was implanted in situ as control. In the experimental group, AMF was used to repair the meniscal injury in the avascular zone. Meniscal damage was assessed by gross observation of the degree of healing and histological semi-quantitative evaluation within 12 weeks postoperatively. The healing of meniscus interface was assessed by gross observation semiquantitative scoring and microscopic examination hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. The expressions of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), collagen type I (COL1A1), and collagen type II (COL2) were detected by immunohistochemical staining.

Results

The degree of healing in the AMF group showed a significant increase over time (P < 0.05); the AMF group showed higher gross scores than the control group at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). The histological scores in the AMF group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). The protein expression of PCNA in the AMF group was greater than that in the control group at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, compared with the control group, the protein levels of COL1A1 and COL2 were significantly upregulated at each time-point. At 2 and 4 weeks after surgery, the expression level of COL1A1 increased in both groups followed by a gradual decrease after 8 weeks (P < 0.05). At 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery, the expression levels of COL2 showed a gradual decrease in both groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the AMF method can promote the repair of rabbit meniscal injury in the avascular zone, and this method may potentially be used for clinical application.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01663-3.

Meniscus repair: up-to-date advances in stem cell-based therapy

The meniscus is a semilunar fibrocartilage between the tibia and femur that is essential for the structural and functional integrity of the keen joint. In addition to pain and knee joint dysfunction, meniscus injuries can also lead to degenerative changes of the knee joint such as osteoarthritis, which further affect patient productivity and quality of life. However, with intrinsic avascular property, the tearing meniscus tends to be nonunion and the augmentation of post-injury meniscus repair has long time been a challenge. Stem cell-based therapy with potent regenerative properties has recently attracted much attention in repairing meniscus injuries, among which mesenchymal stem cells were most explored for their easy availability, trilineage differentiation potential, and immunomodulatory properties. Here, we summarize the advances and achievements in stem cell-based therapy for meniscus repair in the last 5 years. We also highlight the obstacles before their successful clinical translation and propose some perspectives for stem cell-based therapy in meniscus repair.

Demineralized Cortical Bone Matrix Augmented With Peripheral Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Rabbit Medial Meniscal Reconstruction

Tissue engineering is a promising treatment strategy for meniscal regeneration after meniscal injury. However, existing scaffold materials and seed cells still have many disadvantages. The objective of the present study is to explore the feasibility of peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (PBMSCs) augmented with demineralized cortical bone matrix (DCBM) pretreated with TGF-β3 as a tissue-engineered meniscus graft and the repair effect. PBMSCs were collected from rabbit peripheral blood and subjected to three-lineage differentiation and flow cytometry identification. DCBM was prepared by decalcification, decellularization, and cross-linking rabbit cortical bone. Various characteristics such as biomechanical properties, histological characteristics, microstructure and DNA content were characterized. The cytotoxicity and the effects of DCBM on the adhesion and migration of PBMSCs were evaluated separately. The meniscus-forming ability of PBMSCs/DCBM complex in vitro induced by TGF-β3 was also evaluated at the molecular and genetic levels, respectively. Eventually, the present study evaluated the repair effect and cartilage protection effect of PBMSCs/DCBM as a meniscal graft in a rabbit model of medial meniscal reconstruction in 3 and 6 months. The results showed PBMSCs positively express CD29 and CD44, negatively express CD34 and CD45, and have three-lineage differentiation ability, thus can be used as tissue engineering meniscus seed cells. After the sample procedure, the cell and DNA contents of DCBM decreased, the tensile modulus did not decrease significantly, and the DCBM had a pore structure and no obvious cytotoxicity. PBMSCs could adhere and grow on the scaffold. Under induction of TGF-β3, PBMSCs/DCBM composites expressed glycosaminoglycan (GAG), and the related gene expression also increased. The results of the in vivo experiments that the PBMSCs/DCBM group had a better repair effect than the DCBM group and the control group at both 12 and 24 weeks, and the protective effect on cartilage was also better. Therefore, the application of DCBM augmented with PBMSCs for meniscus injury treatment is a preferred option for tissue-engineered meniscus.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Different Sources in Meniscus Repair and Regeneration

Meniscus damage is a common trauma that often arises from sports injuries or menisci tissue degeneration. Current treatment methods focus on the repair, replacement, and regeneration of the meniscus to restore its original function. The advance of tissue engineering provides a novel approach to restore the unique structure of the meniscus. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells found in tissues including bone marrow, peripheral blood, fat, and articular cavity synovium have shown specific advantages in meniscus repair. Although various studies explore the use of stem cells in repairing meniscal injuries from different sources and demonstrate their potential for chondrogenic differentiation, their meniscal cartilage-forming properties are yet to be systematically compared. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and compare different sources of mesenchymal stem cells for meniscal repair and regeneration.

Synovial membrane mesenchymal stem cells for cartilaginous tissues repair

BACKGROUND

The present review is focused on general aspects of the synovial membrane as well as specialized aspects of its cellular constituents, particularly the composition and location of synovial membrane mesenchymal stem cells (S-MSCs). S-MSC multipotency properties are currently at the center of translational medicine for the repair of multiple joint tissues, such as articular cartilage and meniscus lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the results of in vitro and in vivo research on the current clinical applications of S-MSCs, surface markers, cell culture techniques, regenerative properties, and immunomodulatory mechanisms of S-MSCs as well as the practical limitations of the last twenty-five years (1996 to 2021).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the poor interest in the development of new clinical trials for the application of S-MSCs in joint tissue repair, we found evidence to support the clinical use of S-MSCs for cartilage repair. S-MSCs can be considered a valuable therapy for the treatment of repairing joint lesions.

Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Assessment in Emerging and Advanced Pre-Clinical Meniscus Repair Strategies: A Review

Surgical repair of meniscus injury is intended to help alleviate pain, prevent further exacerbation of the injury, restore normal knee function, and inhibit the accelerated development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Meniscus injuries that are treated poorly or left untreated are reported to significantly increase the risk of PTOA in patients. Current surgical approaches for the treatment of meniscus injuries do not eliminate the risk of accelerated PTOA development. Through recent efforts by scientists to develop innovative and more effective meniscus repair strategies, the use of biologics, allografts, and scaffolds have come into the forefront in pre-clinical investigations. However, gauging the extent to which these (and other) approaches inhibit the development of PTOA in the knee joint is often overlooked, yet an important consideration for determining the overall efficacy of potential treatments. In this review, we catalog recent advancements in pre-clinical therapies for meniscus injuries and discuss the assessment methodologies that are used for gauging the success of these treatments based on their effect on PTOA severity. Methodologies include histopathological evaluation of cartilage, radiographic evaluation of the knee, analysis of knee function, and quantification of OA predictive biomarkers. Lastly, we analyze the prevalence of these methodologies using a systemic PubMed® search for original scientific journal articles published in the last 3-years. We indexed 37 meniscus repair/replacement studies conducted in live animal models. Overall, our findings show that approximately 75% of these studies have performed at least one assessment for PTOA following meniscus injury repair. Out of this, 84% studies have reported an improvement in PTOA resulting from treatment.

Advances in the Mechanisms Affecting Meniscal Avascular Zone Repair and Therapies

Injuries to menisci are the most common disease among knee joint-related morbidities and cover a widespread population ranging from children and the general population to the old and athletes. Repair of the injuries in the meniscal avascular zone remains a significant challenge due to the limited intrinsic healing capacity compared to the peripheral vascularized zone. The current surgical strategies for avascular zone injuries remain insufficient to prevent the development of cartilage degeneration and the ultimate emergence of osteoarthritis (OA). Due to the drawbacks of current surgical methods, the research interest has been transferred toward facilitating meniscal avascular zone repair, where it is expected to maintain meniscal tissue integrity, prevent secondary cartilage degeneration and improve knee joint function, which is consistent with the current prevailing management idea to maintain the integrity of meniscal tissue whenever possible. Biological augmentations have emerged as an alternative to current surgical methods for meniscal avascular zone repair. However, understanding the specific biological mechanisms that affect meniscal avascular zone repair is critical for the development of novel and comprehensive biological augmentations. For this reason, this review firstly summarized the current surgical techniques, including meniscectomies and meniscal substitution. We then discuss the state-of-the-art biological mechanisms, including vascularization, inflammation, extracellular matrix degradation and cellular component that were associated with meniscal avascular zone healing and the advances in therapeutic strategies. Finally, perspectives for the future biological augmentations for meniscal avascular zone injuries will be given.

Motorized Shaver Harvest Results in Similar Cell Yield and Characteristics Compared With Rongeur Biopsy During Arthroscopic Synovium-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Harvest

PURPOSE

To compare cell yield and character of synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cell (SDMSC) harvested by 2 different techniques using rongeur and motorized shaver during knee arthroscopy.

METHODS

This study was performed in 15 patients undergoing partial meniscectomy. Two different techniques were used to harvest SDMSCs in each patient from the synovial membrane at 2 different locations overlying the anterior fat pad, each within 1 minute of harvest time. Cell yield and proliferation rates were evaluated. Cell surface marker analysis was done after passage 2 (P2). Trilineage differentiation potential was evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and histology. Statistical analysis between the 2 methods was done using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Wet weight of total harvested tissue was 69.93 (± 20.02) mg versus 378.91 (± 168.87) mg for the rongeur and shaver group, respectively (P < .0001). Mononucleated cell yield was 3.32 (± 0.89) versus 3.18 (± 0.97) × 10³ cells/mg, respectively (P = .67). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed similar SDMSC-related cell surface marker expression levels in both groups, with positive expression for CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105 and decreased expression for CD34 and CD45. Both groups showed similar trilineage differentiation potential in histology. Chondrogenic (SOX9, ACAN, COL2), adipogenic (LPL, PLIN1, PPAR-γ), and osteogenic (OCN, OSX, RUNX2) gene marker expression levels also were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was observed between rongeur biopsy and motorized shaver harvest methods regarding SDMSC yield and cell characteristics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The current study shows that both rongeur and motorized shaver harvest are safe and effective methods for obtaining SDMSCs. Motorized shaver harvest results in higher volume of tissue acquisition per time, thereby leading to higher number of SDMSCs which may be useful during clinical application.

Mesenchymal stem cells for enhancing biological healing after meniscal injuries

The meniscus is a semilunar fibrocartilage structure that plays important roles in maintaining normal knee biomechanics and function. The roles of the meniscus, including load distribution, force transmission, shock absorption, joint stability, lubrication, and proprioception, have been well established. Injury to the meniscus can disrupt overall joint stability and cause various symptoms including pain, swelling, giving-way, and locking. Unless treated properly, it can lead to early degeneration of the knee joint. Because meniscal injuries remain a significant challenge due to its low intrinsic healing potential, most notably in avascular and aneural inner two-thirds of the area, more efficient repair methods are needed. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been investigated for their therapeutic potential in vitro and in vivo. Thus far, the application of MSCs, including bone marrow-derived, synovium-derived, and adipose-derived MSCs, has shown promising results in preclinical studies in different animal models. These preclinical studies could be categorized into intra-articular injection and tissue-engineered construct application according to delivery method. Despite promising results in preclinical studies, there is still a lack of clinical evidence. This review describes the basic knowledge, current treatment, and recent studies regarding the application of MSCs in treating meniscal injuries. Future directions for MSC-based approaches to enhance meniscal healing are suggested.

Autologous meniscus fragments embedded in atelocollagen gel enhance meniscus repair in a rabbit model

Aims

Meniscal injuries are common and often induce knee pain requiring surgical intervention. To develop effective strategies for meniscus regeneration, we hypothesized that a minced meniscus embedded in an atelocollagen gel, a firm gel-like material, may enhance meniscus regeneration through cell migration and proliferation in the gel. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate cell migration and proliferation in atelocollagen gels seeded with autologous meniscus fragments in vitro and examine the therapeutic potential of this combination in an in vivo rabbit model of massive meniscus defect.

Methods

A total of 34 Japanese white rabbits (divided into defect and atelocollagen groups) were used to produce the massive meniscus defect model through a medial patellar approach. Cell migration and proliferation were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, histological evaluation of the sections was performed, and a modified Pauli’s scoring system was used for the quantitative evaluation of the regenerated meniscus.

Results

In vitro immunohistochemistry revealed that the meniscus cells migrated from the minced meniscus and proliferated in the gel. Furthermore, histological analysis suggested that the minced meniscus embedded in the atelocollagen gel produced tissue resembling the native meniscus in vivo. The minced meniscus group also had a higher Pauli’s score compared to the defect and atelocollagen groups.

Conclusion

Our data show that cells in minced meniscus can proliferate, and that implantation of the minced meniscus within atelocollagen induces meniscus regeneration, thus suggesting a novel therapeutic alternative for meniscus tears.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(4):269–276.

Synovial mesenchymal stem cells promote the meniscus repair in a novel pig meniscus injury model

Stem cell therapy has potential for the treatment of degenerative meniscus injuries; however, an optimal animal model has not been established. Basic and clinical research show that synovial mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) promote meniscus repair. The purposes of this study were to create a novel meniscus injury model in microminipigs and to investigate the effectiveness of synovial MSCs on meniscus healing in this model. The posterior portion of the medial meniscus in microminipigs was punctuated 200 times with a 23G needle. Allogenic synovial MSC suspension was placed on the injury site for 10 min for transplantation. The meniscus was evaluated histologically and via sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radial MRI reconstructed in three dimensional, and T2 mapping at 1 and 8 weeks. Proteoglycan content stained with safranin-o disappeared 1 week after treatment in both the MSC and control groups but increased at 8 weeks only in the MSC group. Histological scores at 8 weeks were significantly higher in the MSC group than in the control group (n = 6). At 8 weeks, the T2 values of the MSC group were significantly closer to those of a normal meniscus than were those of the control group. High signal intensity areas of the MRIs and positive areas stained with picrosirius red coincided with meniscal lesions. In conclusion, we created a novel meniscus injury model in microminipigs. Evaluation via histology, MRIs, and polarized microscopy showed that transplantation of synovial MSCs improved meniscus healing.