An objective assessment for bone drilling: A pilot study on vertical drilling

A Data-Driven Methodology to Comprehensively Assess Bone Drilling Using Radar Plots

Background

The study aims to develop a data-driven methodology to assess bone drilling in preparation for future clinical trials in residency training. The existing assessment methods are either subjective or do not consider the interdependence among individual skill factors, such as time and accuracy. This study uses quantitative data and radar plots to visualize the balance of the selected skill factors.

Methods

In the experiment, straight vertical drilling was assessed across 3 skill levels: expert surgeons (N = 10), intermediate residents (postgraduate year-2-5, N = 5), and novice residents (postgraduate year-1, N = 10). Motion and force were measured for each drilling trial, and data from multiple trials were then converted into 5 performance indicators, including overshoot, drilling time, overshoot consistency, time consistency, and force fluctuation. Each indicator was then scored between 0 and 10, with 10 being the best, and plotted into a radar plot.

Results

Statistical difference (p < 0.05) was confirmed among 3 skill levels in force, time, and overshoot data. The radar plots revealed that the novice group exhibited the most distorted pentagons compared with the well-formed pentagons observed in the case of expert participants. The intermediate group showed slight distortion that was between the expert and novice groups.

Conclusion/Clinical Relevance

This research shows the utility of radar plots in drilling assessment in a comprehensive manner and lays the groundwork for a data-driven training scheme to prepare novice residents for clinical practice.

Drill Bone with Both Hands: Plunge Depth and Accuracy with 4 Bracing Positions

Bone drilling is a critical skill honed during orthopaedic surgical education. How a bone drill is held and operated (bracing position) may influence drilling performance.

Methods

A prospective study with randomized crossover was conducted to assess the effect of 4 bracing positions on orthopaedic surgical trainee performance in a simulated bone drilling task. Linear mixed effects models considering participant training level, preferred bracing position, height, weight, and drill hole number were used to estimate pairwise and overall comparisons of the effect of each bracing position on 2 primary outcomes of drilling depth and accuracy.

Results

A total of 42 trainees were screened and 19 were randomized and completed the study. Drill plunge depth with a 1-handed drilling position was significantly greater by pairwise comparison to any of the 3 double handed positions tested: a soft tissue protection sleeve in the other hand (0.41 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.03, p = 0.031), a 2-handed position with the contralateral small finger on bone and the thumb on the drill (0.42 mm, 95% CI 0.06-0.79, p = 0.018), and a 2-handed position with the contralateral elbow braced against the table (0.40 mm, 95% CI 0.02-0.78, p = 0.038). No position afforded a significant accuracy advantage (p = 0.227). Interactions of participant height with plunge depth and accuracy as well between drill hole number and plunge depth were observed.

Conclusion

Orthopaedic surgical educators should discourage trainees from operating a bone drill using only 1 hand to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury due to drill plunging.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level II.