Cysteamine eye drops in the treatment of cystinosis - an Australian perspective

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Cysteamine in Corneal Cystinosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of topical cysteamine ophthalmic solution for corneal cystinosis.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched (PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov) for relevant studies, using appropriate keywords. Comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing cysteamine with control or other formulations for treatment of corneal or ophthalmic cystinosis were included. Outcome measurements were improvement or response to therapy, change in corneal cystine crystal score (CCCS), in vivo confocal microscopy score (IVCM), cystine crystal depth, contrast sensitivity (CS), photophobia score, and safety.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. Compared to placebo and control, the cysteamine arm was better in terms of improvements and responses to therapy (2 studies showed a risk ratio [RR] of 16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.30-111.37) and crystal density score (1 study showed a mean difference [MD] of -0.80; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.04). No significant differences were observed in terms of improvement in CS (1 study showed an RR of 7.00; 95% CI: 0.47-103.27). Compared to cystamine, cysteamine showed benefits in terms of crystal density score (MD -0.94; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.24). Compared to a newer formulation, the standard formulation (cysteamine [Cystaran]; 0.55% cysteamine hydrochloride + benzalkonium chloride 0.01%) performed better in terms of decreasing CCCS. Another newer, viscous formulation, Cystadrops, performed better than the standard formulation in terms of change in CCCS, IVCM score, corneal crystal depth, and photophobia score; however, local adverse effects and blurring were higher in the group receiving Cystadrops.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional cysteamine (0.1% to 0.3%) performed better than placebo (control) in terms of response to therapy. In terms of decreasing corneal cystine density, cysteamine (0.55%) was better than cystamine (0.55%), and the viscous Cystadrops (0.55%) was better than the standard formulation (0.1%).

Patient safety issues associated with the use of compounded medicines as alternatives to approved pharmaceutical products in Europe and how best practice can improve outcomes

BACKGROUND

Pharmaceutical compounding allows individuals with special requirements access to medicines. Compounding can also be used to provide cheaper alternatives to commercially produced medicines which may be less strictly regulated than those commercially produced as they do not require marketing authorisation.

OBJECTIVE

This review describes the issues and potential risks associated with compounded medicines and equally importantly identifies best practices.

METHODS

To establish reports about lack of effectiveness, adverse events and medication errors occurring with compounded pharmaceuticals, a literature search was conducted of PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE databases for relevant cases in European countries which were published between 2003 and 2018. Case reports/series that described instances of successful use of compounded medicines over the same period were also identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 case reports/case series describing problems associated with compounded medicines in Europe have been identified. Sources of patient risk associated with compounded medicines include lack of quality, safety and efficacy data, preparation and labelling errors, and improper storage and handling practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Several case reports/series describing instances of overdose, medication errors and adverse events associated with compounded medications were reviewed. The number of affected patients was relatively small, but many were children and two adult patients experienced permanent sequelae. The number of incidents associated with compounded medicines is unknown, and so these numbers should be interpreted with caution. When licensed medicines are available, the use of compounded medicines can put patients at unnecessary risk which should be avoided. Stricter regulation is necessary to prevent similar cases from occurring in the future as the European market for compounded medications grows. Pharmacists can promote best practices in compounding through professional organisations. Future recommended actions are: 1. Stricter regulation is necessary to prevent similar cases from occurring in the future as the European market for compounded medications grows. 2. A comprehensive pan-European survey to gain a greater understanding of compounding procedures and techniques. This would provide valuable information to the benefit of hospital systems and their patients. 3. The results of the survey can then be used to improve the knowledge and quality control of compounded medicines for the good of patient safety.

The Ocular Status of Cystinosis Patients Receiving a Hospital Pharmacy-Made Preparation of Cysteamine Eye Drops: A Case Series

Introduction

Infantile nephropathic cystinosis (INC) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal disorder in which patients develop deposits of cystine crystals in their kidneys and corneas from a young age.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of children with INC seen by ophthalmologists at the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital between 2002 and 2018, to evaluate clinical findings, symptoms and treatment.

Results

Twenty-two children diagnosed with INC from age 0 (prenatally) to 11 years were assessed. All evaluable patients had corneal cystine crystal deposits, and 15 had mild to moderate photophobia. Ten patients had other ocular conditions including blepharitis/chalzion (n = 6), swollen optic nerve (n = 3), punctate epitheliopathy (n = 3), corneal scarring (n = 1),and elevated intraocular pressure (n = 2). Confocal imaging identified nerve abnormalities in two patients (enlarged corneal nerve + abnormal-looking tortuous nerves in one patient and beaded nerves in the sub-basal plexus in the other), both of whom had significant crystal deposition in the anterior stroma. Visual acuity was relatively unaffected. All 22 patients were receiving oral cysteamine, and 21 were applying cysteamine eye drops (galenic preparation of 0.55% concentration, compounded by a hospital pharmacy). Recommended application frequency was at least eight times per day in all patients with dosing information available.

Conclusions

This case series of patients with INC highlights the consistent pattern of corneal cystine crystal deposition, which is universally present from a young age in this condition, and the high incidence of photophobia even in young children. Corneal manifestations of INC persisted despite frequent administration of the hospital pharmacy-made eye drop preparation. Reasons for this lack of efficacy may include the lag period between diagnosis and first prescription of cysteamine eye drops and the difficulty in maintaining rigorous compliance with this treatment. In addition, the challenge for patients of maintaining optimal storage conditions may adversely affect the stability and efficacy of cysteamine within this preparation.

Funding

Editorial assistance was funded by Orphan Europe Ltd.

Latest Clinical Approaches in the Ocular Management of Cystinosis: A Review of Current Practice and Opinion from the Ophthalmology Cystinosis Forum

Cystinosis, a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by intracellular cystine accumulation, occurs in an estimated 1/100,000-200,000 live births. Ocular non-nephropathic cystinosis is typically diagnosed during adulthood, when patients present with corneal crystal deposition and no systemic involvement. Due to the rarity of the condition, diagnosis is often delayed and can have a significant impact on the overall prognosis of the disease. Early diagnosis is therefore imperative to ensure successful treatment and improve quality of life, as most of its clinical manifestations can be prevented or delayed. Early detection strategies and practical approaches for the ocular management of cystinosis were discussed during the Ophthalmology Cystinosis Forum, a 1-day meeting held in Berlin, Germany during June 2017. Recommendations for early detection comprise ophthalmic assessment, including self- and clinician-assessed recording of photophobia, and visual acuity, slit-lamp examination and tonometry ophthalmic examinations. In vivo confocal microscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography were highlighted as valuable techniques in evaluating cystine crystals in the cornea, in vivo and non-invasively. The mainstay of ocular cystinosis treatment is the cystine-depleting aminothiol cysteamine. Indeed, early treatment with and strict adherence to cysteamine therapy has a considerable impact on the long-term prognosis of ocular cystinosis. In rare diseases such as ocular cystinosis, standardised guidelines and recommendations for detection, patient care and follow-up assessments are essential. Such guidelines provide a support tool for healthcare professionals caring for ocular cystinosis patients. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are essential for delivering gold standard care and improving quality of life for patients and their families. This review paper highlights current early detection policies, clinical treatment strategies and practical approaches for the ocular management of cystinosis, including implementing a cystinosis MDT. Additionally, discussions of the Ophthalmology Cystinosis Forum held in 2017 are summarised. FUNDING: Orphan Europe. Plain language summary available for this article.

Novel approaches for improving stability of cysteamine formulations

Cystinosis is a genetic disorder that leads to the formation of cystine crystals in many organs in the body including cornea. Ocular manifestation of this disease is treated by eye drops of cysteamine which can easily oxidize into its disulfide cystamine. The rapid oxidation limits the shelf life as well the duration during which the drug can be used after opening the eye drop bottle. We evaluate two approaches of preventing the oxidation of cysteamine with the goal of increasing the time of use after opening the bottle to one month. The first approach integrates antioxidants such as catalase enzyme and vitamins C and E into the aqueous solution. Results show that catalase is the most effective additive as it decreases the oxidation rate by 58%, which on its own is not sufficient to reach targeted one month stability. The second approach focuses on incorporating diffusion barriers to prevent oxygen from reaching the cysteamine solution. This was accomplished by two methods: formulation of a hydrophobic layer which floats on the surface of the aqueous solution and integration of OMAC® oxygen-resistant material into the eye drop bottle. Both methods delay the onset of cysteamine degradation and decrease the rate of degradation. In particular, an eye drop bottle with three layers of OMAC® has less than 10% degradation after one month of opening the bottle and withdrawing a drop each day. By integrating all three methods, we designed a system where >90% of cysteamine remains in the active form for 70 days after opening the bottle. In addition, we examine the use of OMAC® as heat-sealed pouches for storage of cysteamine eye drop bottles during packaging to eliminate the need for the current approach of freezing the formulation during shipping. The results show that such heat-sealed pouches would keep cysteamine stable for over one year at ambient conditions.