Labetalol absorption kinetics: Rat small intestine and colon studies

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Multiple Oral Administration Labetalol in Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND

Labetalol has an irreplaceable role in treating Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), a common disease during pregnancy with a prevalence of 5.2-8.2%. However, there were big differences in dosage regimens between various guidelines.

PURPOSE

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) model was established and validated to evaluate the existing oral dosage regimens, and to compare the difference in plasma concentration between pregnant and non-pregnant women.

METHODS

First, non-pregnant woman models with specific plasma clearance or enzymatic metabolism (UGT1A1, UGT2B7, CYP2C19) were established and validated. For CYP2C19, slow, intermediate, and rapid metabolic phenotypes were considered. Then, a pregnant model with proper structure and parameters adjustment was established and validated against the multiple oral administration data.

RESULTS

The predicted labetalol exposure captured the experimental data well. The following simulations with criteria lowering 15 mmHg blood pressure (corresponding to around 108 ng/ml plasma labetalol) found that the maximum daily dosage in the Chinese guideline may be insufficient for some severe HDP patients. Moreover, similar predicted steady-state trough plasma concentration was found between the maximum daily dosage in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guideline, 800 mg Q8h and a regimen of 200 mg Q6h. Simulations comparing non-pregnant and pregnant women found that the difference in labetalol exposure highly depended on the CYP2C19 metabolic phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this work initially established a PBPK model for multiple oral administration of labetalol for pregnant women. This PBPK model may lead to personalized labetalol medication in the future.

[Pharmacokinetic risk factors of beta-blockers overdose in the elderly: Case report and pharmacology approach]

Beta-blockers are widely prescribed in elderly patients and may induce severe adverse drug reactions. We report a case of bisoprolol-induced bradycardia in an elderly patient with impaired renal function and use of cytochrome P450 inhibitors. A literature review has been performed in order to analyze pharmacokinetic risk factors of beta-blockers overdosing in geriatrics. Various mechanisms can result in decreased elimination of beta-blockers. These mechanisms vary according to the beta-blocker agent and may be combined in some individuals, especially elderly patients. This can lead to unexpected overexposure. Knowledge about drug interactions and pharmacokinetic elimination pathways is important for preventing overexposure and adverse drug reactions when using beta-blockers.

The low/high BCS permeability class boundary: physicochemical comparison of metoprolol and labetalol

Although recognized as overly conservative, metoprolol is currently the common low/high BCS permeability class boundary reference compound, while labetalol was suggested as a potential alternative. The purpose of this study was to identify the various characteristics that the optimal marker should exhibit, and to investigate the suitability of labetalol as the permeability class reference drug. Labetalol's BCS solubility class was determined, and its physicochemical properties and intestinal permeability were thoroughly investigated, both in vitro and in vivo in rats, considering the complexity of the whole of the small intestine. Labetalol was found to be unequivocally a high-solubility compound. In the pH range throughout the small intestine (6.5-7.5), labetalol exhibited pH-dependent permeability, with higher permeability at higher pH values. While in vitro octanol-buffer partitioning (Log D) values of labetalol were significantly higher than those of metoprolol, the opposite was evident in the in vitro PAMPA permeability assay. The results of the in vivo perfusion studies in rats lay between the two contradictory in vitro studies; metoprolol was shown to have moderately higher rat intestinal permeability than labetalol. Theoretical distribution of the ionic species of the drugs was in corroboration with the experimental in vitro and the in vivo data. We propose three characteristics that the optimal permeability class reference drug should exhibit: (1) fraction dose absorbed in the range of 90%; (2) the optimal marker drug should be absorbed largely via passive transcellular permeability, with no/negligible carrier-mediated active intestinal transport (influx or efflux); and (3) the optimal marker drug should preferably be nonionizable. The data presented in this paper demonstrate that neither metoprolol nor labetalol can be regarded as optimal low/high-permeability class boundary standard. While metoprolol is too conservative due to its complete absorption, labetalol has been shown to be a substrate for P-gp-mediated efflux transport, and both drugs exhibit significant segmental-dependent permeability along the gastrointestinal tract. Nevertheless, the use of metoprolol as the marker compound does not carry a risk of bioinequivalence: Peff value similar to or higher than metoprolol safely indicates high-permeability classification. On the other hand, a more careful data analysis is needed if labetalol is used as the reference compound.

Comparison of the permeability of metoprolol and labetalol in rat, mouse, and Caco-2 cells: use as a reference standard for BCS classification

The purpose of this study was to investigate labetalol as a potential high permeability reference standard for the application of Biopharmaceutics Classification Systems (BCS). Permeabilities of labetalol and metoprolol were investigated in animal intestinal perfusion models and Caco-2 cell monolayers. After isolating specific intestinal segments, in situ single-pass intestinal perfusions (SPIP) were performed in rats and mice. The effective permeabilities (Peff) of labetalol and metoprolol, an FDA standard for the low/high Peff class boundary, were investigated in two different segments of rat intestine (proximal jejunum and distal ileum) and in the proximal jejunum of mouse. No significant difference was found between Peff of metoprolol and labetalol in the jejunum and ileum of rat (0.33 ± 0.11 × 10(-4) vs 0.38 ± 0.06 × 10(-4) and 0.57 ± 0.17 × 10(-4) vs 0.64 ± 0.30 × 10(-4) cm/s, respectively) and in the jejunum of mouse (0.55 ± 0.05 × 10(-4) vs 0.59 ± 0.13 × 10(-4) cm/s). However, Peff of metoprolol and labetalol were 1.7 and 1.6 times higher in the jejunum of mouse, compared to the jejunum of rat, respectively. Metoprolol and labetalol showed segmental-dependent permeability through the rat intestine, with increased Peff in the distal ileum in comparison to the proximal jejunum. Most significantly, Peff of labetalol was found to be concentration-dependent. Decreasing concentrations of labetalol in the perfusate resulted in decreased Peff compared to Peff of metoprolol. The intestinal epithelial permeability of labetalol was lower than that of metoprolol in Caco-2 cells at both apical pH 6.5 and 7.5 (5.96 ± 1.96 × 10(-6) vs 9.44 ± 3.44 × 10(-6) and 15.9 ± 2.2 × 10(-6) vs 23.2 ± 7.1 × 10(-6) cm/s, respectively). Labetalol exhibited higher permeability in basolateral to apical (BL-AP) compared to AP-BL direction in Caco-2 cells at 0.1 times the highest dose strength (HDS) (46.7 ± 6.5 × 10(-6) vs 14.2 ± 1.5 × 10(-6) cm/s). The P-gp inhibitor, verapamil, significantly increased AP-BL and decreased BL-AP direction transport of labetalol. Overall, labetalol showed high Peff in rat and mouse intestinal perfusion models similar to metoprolol at a concentration based on HDS. However, the concentration-dependent permeability of labetalol in mice due to P-gp and the inhibition study with verapamil in Caco-2 cells indicated that labetalol is not an ideal reference standard for BCS classification.

CYP2C19 genotype has a major influence on labetalol pharmacokinetics in healthy male Chinese subjects

PURPOSE

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of labetalol show wide inter-subject variability, but the genetic causes for this are largely undetermined. This study was performed to examine whether common polymorphisms in UGT1A1, UGT2B7, CYP2C19 and ABCB1 affect the PK of labetalol.

METHODS

The PK of labetalol were determined in 37 Chinese healthy male subjects who took a single oral dose of 200 mg labetalol. Plasma concentrations of labetalol were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Subjects were genotyped for the CYP2C19 2 and 3, UGT1A1 6, 28 and 60, UGT2B7 2 and ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Subjects with the CYP2C19 2/ 2 genotype had a higher peak concentration (255.5 ± 80.1 vs. 156.0  ±  66.3 ng/mL; P < 0.05) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞; 1,473.7 ± 493.6 vs. 502.8 ± 176.1 ng[Symbol: see text]h/mL; P < 0.001) than subjects with 60 or 28, and UGT2B7 2 did not result in a significant effect. Subjects with ABCB1 2677TA or TT or ABCB1 3435TT genotypes had higher AUC0-∞ and lower total clearance than the wild-types (P < 0.05), but this appeared to be related to the distribution of CYP2C19 genotypes. The CYP2C19 genotype appeared to be the only predictor of labetalol concentrations, accounting for approximately 60 % of the total variance in the AUC0-∞.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the PK of labetalol are significantly affected by the common CYP2C19 polymorphisms in individuals of Chinese ethnicity. Future larger studies are needed to evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 and UGT1A1 polymorphisms on the PK of labetalol stereoisomers and the pharmacodynamic effects.