1
|
Recent advances in microbial toxin-related strategies to combat cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2022; 86:753-768. [PMID: 34271147 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
It is a major concern to treat cancer successfully, due to the distinctive pathophysiology of cancer cells and the gradual manifestation of resistance. Specific action, adverse effects and development of resistance has prompted the urgent requirement of exploring alternative anti-tumour treatment therapies. The naturally derived microbial toxins as a therapy against cancer cells are a promisingly new dimension. Various important microbial toxins such as Diphtheria toxin, Vibrio cholera toxin, Aflatoxin, Patulin, Cryptophycin-55, Chlorella are derived from several bacterial, fungal and algal species. These agents act on different biotargets such as inhibition of protein synthesis, reduction in cell growth, regulation of cell cycle and many cellular processes. Bacterial toxins produce actions primarily by targeting protein moieties and some immunomodulation and few acts through DNA. Fungal toxins appear to have more DNA damaging activity and affect the cell cycle. Algal toxins produce alteration in mitochondrial phosphorylation. In conclusion, microbial toxins and their metabolites appear to have a great potential to provide a promising option for the treatment and management to combat cancer.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yadav R, Sukumaran S, Zabka TS, Li J, Oldendorp A, Morrow G, Reyes A, Cheu M, Li J, Wallin JJ, Tsai S, Sun L, Wang P, Ellerman D, Spiess C, Polson A, Stefanich EG, Kamath AV, Ovacik MA. Nonclinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Characterization of Anti-CD79b/CD3 T Cell-Dependent Bispecific Antibody Using a Surrogate Molecule: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for B Cell Malignancies. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14050970. [PMID: 35631556 PMCID: PMC9147001 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14050970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The T cell-dependent bispecific (TDB) antibody, anti-CD79b/CD3, targets CD79b and CD3 cell-surface receptors expressed on B cells and T cells, respectively. Since the anti-CD79b arm of this TDB binds only to human CD79b, a surrogate TDB that binds to cynomolgus monkey CD79b (cyCD79b) was used for preclinical characterization. To evaluate the impact of CD3 binding affinity on the TDB pharmacokinetics (PK), we utilized non-tumor-targeting bispecific anti-gD/CD3 antibodies composed of a low/high CD3 affinity arm along with a monospecific anti-gD arm as controls in monkeys and mice. An integrated PKPD model was developed to characterize PK and pharmacodynamics (PD). This study revealed the impact of CD3 binding affinity on anti-cyCD79b/CD3 PK. The surrogate anti-cyCD79b/CD3 TDB was highly effective in killing CD79b-expressing B cells and exhibited nonlinear PK in monkeys, consistent with target-mediated clearance. A dose-dependent decrease in B cell counts in peripheral blood was observed, as expected. Modeling indicated that anti-cyCD79b/CD3 TDB’s rapid and target-mediated clearance may be attributed to faster internalization of CD79b, in addition to enhanced CD3 binding. The model yielded unbiased and precise curve fits. These findings highlight the complex interaction between TDBs and their targets and may be applicable to the development of other biotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajbharan Yadav
- Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (S.S.); (A.R.); (E.G.S.); (A.V.K.)
- Correspondence: (R.Y.); (M.A.O.); Tel.: +1-650-467-1723 (R.Y.); +1-650-467-3645 (M.A.O.)
| | - Siddharth Sukumaran
- Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (S.S.); (A.R.); (E.G.S.); (A.V.K.)
| | - Tanja S. Zabka
- Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (T.S.Z.); (J.L.); (A.O.); (G.M.)
| | - Jinze Li
- Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (T.S.Z.); (J.L.); (A.O.); (G.M.)
| | - Amy Oldendorp
- Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (T.S.Z.); (J.L.); (A.O.); (G.M.)
| | - Gary Morrow
- Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (T.S.Z.); (J.L.); (A.O.); (G.M.)
| | - Arthur Reyes
- Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (S.S.); (A.R.); (E.G.S.); (A.V.K.)
| | - Melissa Cheu
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA;
| | - Jessica Li
- Oncology Biomarker Development (OBD), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (J.L.); (J.J.W.)
| | - Jeffrey J. Wallin
- Oncology Biomarker Development (OBD), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (J.L.); (J.J.W.)
| | - Siao Tsai
- Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA;
| | - Laura Sun
- Translational Oncology Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (L.S.); (P.W.); (A.P.)
| | - Peiyin Wang
- Translational Oncology Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (L.S.); (P.W.); (A.P.)
| | - Diego Ellerman
- Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (D.E.); (C.S.)
| | - Christoph Spiess
- Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (D.E.); (C.S.)
| | - Andy Polson
- Translational Oncology Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (L.S.); (P.W.); (A.P.)
| | - Eric G. Stefanich
- Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (S.S.); (A.R.); (E.G.S.); (A.V.K.)
| | - Amrita V. Kamath
- Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (S.S.); (A.R.); (E.G.S.); (A.V.K.)
| | - Meric A. Ovacik
- Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; (S.S.); (A.R.); (E.G.S.); (A.V.K.)
- Correspondence: (R.Y.); (M.A.O.); Tel.: +1-650-467-1723 (R.Y.); +1-650-467-3645 (M.A.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deak D, Pop C, Zimta AA, Jurj A, Ghiaur A, Pasca S, Teodorescu P, Dascalescu A, Antohe I, Ionescu B, Constantinescu C, Onaciu A, Munteanu R, Berindan-Neagoe I, Petrushev B, Turcas C, Iluta S, Selicean C, Zdrenghea M, Tanase A, Danaila C, Colita A, Colita A, Dima D, Coriu D, Einsele H, Tomuleasa C. Let's Talk About BiTEs and Other Drugs in the Real-Life Setting for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Front Immunol 2020; 10:2856. [PMID: 31921126 PMCID: PMC6934055 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are currently initially efficient, but even if a high percentage of patients have an initial complete remission (CR), most of them relapse. Recent data shows that immunotherapy with either bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can eliminate residual chemotherapy-resistant B-ALL cells. Objective: The objective of the manuscript is to present improvements in the clinical outcome for chemotherapy-resistant ALL in the real-life setting, by describing Romania's experience with bispecific antibodies for B-cell ALL. Methods: We present the role of novel therapies for relapsed B-cell ALL, including the drugs under investigation in phase I-III clinical trials, as a potential bridge to transplant. Blinatumomab is presented in a critical review, presenting both the advantages of this drug, as well as its limitations. Results: Bispecific antibodies are discussed, describing the clinical trials that resulted in its approval by the FDA and EMA. The real-life setting for relapsed B-cell ALL is described and we present the patients treated with blinatumomab in Romania. Conclusion: In the current manuscript, we present blinatumomab as a therapeutic alternative in the bridge-to-transplant setting for refractory or relapsed ALL, to gain a better understanding of the available therapies and evidence-based data for these patients in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalma Deak
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cristina Pop
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alina-Andreea Zimta
- Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ancuta Jurj
- Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alexandra Ghiaur
- Department of Hematology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Sergiu Pasca
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Patric Teodorescu
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Angela Dascalescu
- Department of Hematology, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania
| | - Ion Antohe
- Department of Hematology, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania
| | - Bogdan Ionescu
- Department of Hematology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catalin Constantinescu
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Anca Onaciu
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Raluca Munteanu
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bobe Petrushev
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cristina Turcas
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Sabina Iluta
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cristina Selicean
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mihnea Zdrenghea
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alina Tanase
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catalin Danaila
- Department of Hematology, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania
| | - Anca Colita
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei Colita
- Department of Hematology, Coltea Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Delia Dima
- Department of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniel Coriu
- Department of Hematology, Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Hematology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Wurzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ciprian Tomuleasa
- Department of Hematology/Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Critical Issues in the Development of Immunotoxins for Anticancer Therapy. J Pharm Sci 2019; 109:104-115. [PMID: 31669121 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Immunotoxins (ITs) are attractive anticancer modalities aimed at cancer-specific delivery of highly potent cytotoxic protein toxins. An IT consists of a targeting domain (an antibody, cytokine, or another cell-binding protein) chemically conjugated or recombinantly fused to a highly cytotoxic payload (a bacterial and plant toxin or human cytotoxic protein). The mode of action of ITs is killing designated cancer cells through the effector function of toxins in the cytosol after cellular internalization via the targeted cell-specific receptor-mediated endocytosis. Although numerous ITs of diverse structures have been tested in the past decades, only 3 ITs-denileukin diftitox, tagraxofusp, and moxetumomab pasudotox-have been clinically approved for treating hematological cancers. No ITs against solid tumors have been approved for clinical use. In this review, we discuss critical research and development issues associated with ITs that limit their clinical success as well as strategies to overcome these obstacles. The issues include off-target and on-target toxicities, immunogenicity, human cytotoxic proteins, antigen target selection, cytosolic delivery efficacy, solid-tumor targeting, and developability. To realize the therapeutic promise of ITs, novel strategies for safe and effective cytosolic delivery into designated tumors, including solid tumors, are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ovacik AM, Li J, Lemper M, Danilenko D, Stagg N, Mathieu M, Ellerman D, Gupta V, Kalia N, Nguy T, Plaks V, David Johnson C, Wang W, Brumm J, Fine B, Junttila T, Lin K, Carter PJ, Prabhu S, Spiess C, Kamath AV. Single cell-produced and in vitro-assembled anti-FcRH5/CD3 T-cell dependent bispecific antibodies have similar in vitro and in vivo properties. MAbs 2018; 11:422-433. [PMID: 30550367 PMCID: PMC6380433 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2018.1551676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Bispecific antibody production using single host cells has been a new advancement in the antibody engineering field. We previously showed comparable in vitro biological activity and in vivo mouse pharmacokinetics (PK) for two novel single cell variants (v10 and v11) and one traditional dual cell in vitro-assembled anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/CD3 T-cell dependent bispecific (TDB) antibodies. Here, we extended our previous work to assess single cell-produced bispecific variants of a novel TDB against FcRH5, a B-cell lineage marker expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) tumor cells. An in vitro-assembled anti- FcRH5/CD3 TDB antibody was previously developed as a potential treatment option for MM. Two bispecific antibody variants (designs v10 and v11) for manufacturing anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB in single cells were compared to in vitro-assembled TDB in a dual-cell process to understand whether differences in antibody design and production led to any major differences in their in vitro biological activity, in vivo mouse PK, and PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) or immunogenicity in cynomolgus monkeys (cynos). The binding, in vitro potencies, in vitro pharmacological activities and in vivo PK in mice and cynos of these single cell TDBs were comparable to those of the in vitro-assembled TDB. In addition, the single cell and in vitro-assembled TDBs exhibited robust PD activity and comparable immunogenicity in cynos. Overall, these studies demonstrate that single cell-produced and in vitro-assembled anti-FcRH5/CD3 T-cell dependent bispecific antibodies have similar in vitro and in vivo properties, and support further development of single-cell production method for anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDBs and other single-cell bispecifics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayse Meric Ovacik
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Ji Li
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Marie Lemper
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Dimitry Danilenko
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Nicola Stagg
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Mary Mathieu
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Diego Ellerman
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Vinita Gupta
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Navdeep Kalia
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Trung Nguy
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Vicki Plaks
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Clarissa David Johnson
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Weiru Wang
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Jochen Brumm
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Bernard Fine
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Teemu Junttila
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Kedan Lin
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Paul J Carter
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Saileta Prabhu
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Christoph Spiess
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Amrita V Kamath
- a Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhuang Y, Chen D, Sharma A, Xu Z. Risk-Based Comparability Assessment for Monoclonal Antibodies During Drug Development: A Clinical Pharmacology Perspective. AAPS JOURNAL 2018; 20:109. [PMID: 30324224 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-018-0268-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Due to complexities in the structure, function, and manufacturing process of antibody-based therapeutic proteins, comparability assessment for supporting manufacturing changes can sometimes be a challenging task. Regulatory guidance recommends a hierarchical risk-based approach, starting with Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) analytical characterizations, followed by non-clinical and/or clinical studies to ensure that any potential changes in quality attributes have no adverse impact on efficacy and safety of the product. This review focuses on the changes in quality attributes which may potentially affect the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) product, and provides general guidelines in designing non-clinical and clinical PK/PD studies to help support comparability assessments. A decision tree for comparability assessment is proposed depending on the nature of the changes in quality attributes, the potential impact of such changes, and the timing of the manufacturing change relative to the development process. Ideally, the optimization of manufacturing process should take place in the early stage of drug development (i.e., preclinical to phase 2a) as more stringent comparability criteria would have to be met if manufacturing changes occur in the late stage of drug development (i.e., phase 2b and after), and consequently, major changes in manufacturing process should be avoided during confirmatory phase 3 studies and post-approval of drug products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanli Zhuang
- Global Clinical Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA
| | - Di Chen
- Statistics and Decision Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA
| | - Amarnath Sharma
- Global Clinical Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA
| | - Zhenhua Xu
- Global Clinical Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xue L, Clements-Egan A, Amaravadi L, Birchler M, Gorovits B, Liang M, Myler H, Purushothama S, Manning MS, Sung C. Recommendations for the Assessment and Management of Pre-existing Drug-Reactive Antibodies During Biotherapeutic Development. AAPS JOURNAL 2017; 19:1576-1586. [DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0153-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
8
|
Recombinant Immunotoxin Therapy of Glioblastoma: Smart Design, Key Findings, and Specific Challenges. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:7929286. [PMID: 28752098 PMCID: PMC5511670 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7929286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Recombinant immunotoxins (RITs) refer to a group of recombinant protein-based therapeutics, which consists of two components: an antibody variable fragment or a specific ligand that allows RITs to bind specifically to target cells and an engineered toxin fragment that kills the target cells upon internalization. To date, over 1,000 RITs have been generated and significant success has been achieved in the therapy of hematological malignancies. However, the immunogenicity and off-target toxicities of RITs remain as significant barriers for their application to solid tumor therapy. A group of RITs have also been generated for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, and some have demonstrated evidence of tumor response and an acceptable profile of toxicity and safety in early clinical trials. Different from other solid tumors, how to efficiently deliver the RITs to intracranial tumors is more critical and needs to be solved urgently. In this article, we first review the design and expression of RITs, then summarize the key findings in the preclinical and clinical development of RIT therapy of glioblastoma multiforme, and lastly discuss the specific issues that still remain to forward RIT therapy to clinical practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang B, Yan L, Yao Z, Roskos LK. Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Benralizumab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Asthma. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY 2017; 6:249-257. [PMID: 28109128 PMCID: PMC5397562 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Benralizumab is a humanized, afucosylated, anti‐interleukin‐5 receptor α, immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1 κ monoclonal antibody. We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model for benralizumab by analyzing PK and blood eosinophil count data from two healthy volunteer studies (N = 48) and four studies in patients with asthma (N = 152). Benralizumab PK was dose‐proportional and adequately described by a two‐compartment model with first‐order elimination from the central compartment and first‐order absorption from the subcutaneous dosing site. The estimated systemic clearance and volume of distribution were typical for human IgG. Body weight and high‐titer antidrug antibodies were identified as relevant covariates influencing the PK of benralizumab. Depletion of blood eosinophil counts was depicted by a modified transit model in which benralizumab induced depletion of eosinophils in each age compartment. Stochastic simulations supported an every‐8‐week dosing schedule of benralizumab for a phase IIb study in patients with uncontrolled asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Wang
- MedImmune LLC, Mountain View, California, USA
| | - L Yan
- MedImmune LLC, Mountain View, California, USA
| | - Z Yao
- MedImmune LLC, Mountain View, California, USA.,Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L K Roskos
- MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vainshtein I, Schneider AK, Sun B, Schwickart M, Roskos LK, Liang M. Multiplexing of receptor occupancy measurements for pharmacodynamic biomarker assessment of biopharmaceuticals. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2015; 90:128-40. [PMID: 26332491 PMCID: PMC5057311 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Revised: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Receptor occupancy (RO) assays measure drug target engagement, and are used as pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers. RO assays are commonly performed by flow cytometry and often require multiplexing for assessment of multiple PD biomarkers when specimen volumes are limited. We present multiplexed RO assays for an IGF1R‐EGFR bispecific antibody (Bs‐Ab) and a CTLA4‐Ig recombinant fusion protein to demonstrate key considerations for accurate RO assessment. Methods RO in cynomolgus monkeys was determined in whole blood using flow cytometry. Free and total receptors were measured using anti‐receptor fluorescence‐labeled detection reagents, competitive and noncompetitive to drug, respectively. Results RO of IGF1R was examined as PD for Bs‐Ab, since IGF1R was expressed on blood cells. Multiplexed measurements of free and total IGF1R showed that IGF1R expression measured by total receptor was highly variable, impacting interpretation of free‐IGF1R. Normalization of free‐over‐total IGF1R measurements compensated for variability of receptor expression allowing for accurate RO assessment. RO of CTLA4‐Ig, a recombinant fusion protein targeting CD80 and CD86 receptors, was multiplexed to simultaneously measure target engagements for both receptors. Both RO methods demonstrated specificity of receptor measurements without cross‐reactivity to each other in multiplexed formats. RO methods were used for evaluation of PD activity of Bs‐Ab and CTLA4‐Ig in cynomolgus monkeys. In both cases, RO results showed dose‐dependent target engagement, corresponding well to the pharmacokinetics. Conclusions Multiplexed RO methods allowed accurate assessment of PD activity for Bs‐Ab and CTLA4‐Ig, facilitating development of these biopharmaceuticals from preclinical to clinical stages. © 2015 The Authors Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Vainshtein
- Clinical Pharmacology & DMPK, Medimmune LLC, Mountain View, California, 94043
| | - Amy K Schneider
- Clinical Pharmacology & DMPK, Medimmune LLC, Mountain View, California, 94043
| | - Bo Sun
- Clinical Pharmacology & DMPK, Medimmune LLC, Mountain View, California, 94043
| | - Martin Schwickart
- Clinical Pharmacology & DMPK, Medimmune LLC, Mountain View, California, 94043
| | - Lorin K Roskos
- Clinical Pharmacology & DMPK, Medimmune LLC, Mountain View, California, 94043
| | - Meina Liang
- Clinical Pharmacology & DMPK, Medimmune LLC, Mountain View, California, 94043
| |
Collapse
|