Interaction of methyl and propyl parabens with selected surose esters

3 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, and Butylparaben

The Parabens are esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (PHBA) and are the most commonly used as preservatives in cosmetic formulations. Data obtained from chronic administration studies indicate that Parabens are rapidly absorbed, metabolized, and excreted.

Acute chronic and subchronic toxicity studies in animals indicate that Parabens are practically nontoxic by various routes of administration. Methylparaben and Ethylparaben at 100 percent concentration were slightly irritating when instilled into the eyes of rabbits.

Numerous in vitro mutagenicity studies indicate that the Parabens are non-mutagenic. Methylparaben was noncarcinogenic when injected in rodents or when administered intravaginally in rats. Cocarcinogenesis studies on Propyl- and Methylparaben were negative. Teratogenic studies on Methyl- and Ethylparaben were also negative.

Parabens are practically nonirritating and nonsensitizing in the human population with normal skin. Paraben sensitization has been reported when Paraben-containing medicaments have been applied to damaged or broken skin. Photo-contact sensitization and phototoxicity tests on product formations of Methyl-, Propyl-, and/or Butylparaben gave no evidence of significant photoreactivity.

It is concluded that Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, and Butylparaben are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use.

Final Amended Report on the Safety Assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in Cosmetic Products

Parabens is the name given to a group of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (PHBA) esters used in over 22,000 cosmetics as preservatives at concentrations up to 0.8% (mixtures of parabens) or up to 0.4% (single paraben). The group includes Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben. Industry estimates of the daily use of cosmetic products that may contain parabens were 17.76 g for adults and 378 mg for infants. Parabens in cosmetic formulations applied to skin penetrate the stratum corneum in inverse relation to the ester chain length. Carboxylesterases hydrolyze parabens in the skin. Parabens do not accumulate in the body. Serum concentrations of parabens, even after intravenous administration, quickly decline and remain low. Acute toxicity studies in animals indicate that parabens are not significantly toxic by various routes of administration. Subchronic and chronic oral studies indicate that parabens are practically nontoxic. Numerous genotoxicity studies, including Ames testing, dominant lethal assay, hostmediated assay, and cytogenic assays, indicate that the Parabens are generally nonmutagenic, although Ethylparaben and Methylparaben did increase chromosomal aberrations in a Chinese Hamster ovary cell assay. Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, and Butylparaben in the diet produced cell proliferation in the forestomach of rats, with the activity directly related to chain length of the alkyl chain, but Isobutylparaben and Butylparaben were noncarcinogenic in a mouse chronic feeding study. Methylparaben was noncarcinogenic when injected subcutaneously in mice or rats, or when administered intravaginally in rats, and was not cocarcinogenic when injected subcutaneously in mice. Propylparaben was noncarcinogenic in a study of transplacental carcinogenesis. Methylparaben was nonteratogenic in rabbits, rats, mice, and hamsters, and Ethylparaben was nonteratogenic in rats. Parabens, even at levels that produce maternal toxicity, do not produce fetal anomalies in animal studies. Parabens have been extensively studied to evaluate male reproductive toxicity. In one in vitro study, sperm were not viabile at concentrations as low as 6 mg/ml Methylparaben, 8 mg/ml Ethylparaben, 3 mg/ml Propylparaben, or 1 mg/ml Butylparaben, but an in vivo study of 0.1% or 1.0% Methylparaben or Ethylparaben in the diet of mice reported no spermatotoxic effects. Propylparaben did affect sperm counts at all levels from 0.01% to 1.0%. Epididymis and seminal vesicle weight decreases were reported in rats given a 1% oral Butylparaben dose; and decreased sperm number and motile activity in F1 offspring of rats maternally exposed to 100 mg/kg day–1 were reported. Decreased sperm numbers and activity were reported in F1 offspring of female rats given Butylparaben (in DMSO) by subcutaneous injection at 100 or 200 mg/kg day–1, but there were no abnormalities in the reproductive organs. Methylparaben was studied using rats at levels in the diet up to an estimated mean dose of 1141.1 mg/kg day–1 with no adverse testicular effects. Butylparaben was studied using rats at levels in the diet up to an estimated mean dose of 1087.6 mg/kg day–1 in a repeat of the study noted above, but using a larger number of animals and a staging analysis of testicular effects—no adverse reproductive effects were found. Butylparaben does bind to estrogen receptors in isolated rat uteri, but with an affinity orders of magnitude less than natural estradiol. Relative binding (diethylstilbesterol binding affinity set at 100) to the human estrogen receptors α and β increases as a function of chain length from not detectable for Methylparaben to 0.267 ± 0.027 for human estrogen receptor α and 0.340 ± 0.031 for human estrogen receptor β for Isobutylparaben. In a study of androgen receptor binding, Propylparaben exhibited weak competitive binding, but Methylparaben had no binding effect at all. PHBA at 5 mg/kg day–1 subcutaneously (s.c.) was reported to produce an estrogenic response in one uterotrophic assay using mice, but there was no response in another study using rats (s.c. up to 5 mg/kg day–1) and mice (s.c. up to 100 mg/kg day–1) and in a study using rats (s.c. up to 100 mg/kg day–1). Methylparaben failed to produce any effect in uterotrophic assays in two laboratories, but did produce an effect in other studies from another laboratory. The potency of Methylparaben was at least 1000 × less when compared to natural estradiol. The same pattern was reported for Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, and Butylparaben when potency was compared to natural estradiol. In two studies, Isobutylparaben did produce an estrogenic response in the uterotrophic assay, but the potency was at least 240,000 × less than estradiol. In one study, Benzylparaben produced an estrogenic response in the uterotrophic assay, but the potency was at least 330,000 × less than estradiol. Estrogenic activity of parabens and PHBA was increased in human breast cancer cells in vitro, but the increases were around 4 orders of magnitude less than that produced by estradiol. Parabens are practically nonirritating and nonsensitizing in the population with normal skin. Paraben sensitization has occurred and continues to be reported in the case literature, but principally when exposure involves damaged or broken skin. Even when patients with chronic dermatitis are patch-tested to a parabens mix, parabens generally induce sensitization in less than 4% of such individuals. Many patients sensitized to paraben-containing medications can wear cosmetics containing these ingredients with no adverse effects. Clinical patch testing data available over the past 20 years demonstrate no significant change in the overall portion of dermatitis patients that test positive for parabens. As reviewed by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel, the available acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicity tests, using a range of exposure routes, demonstrate a low order of parabens' toxicity at concentrations that would be used in cosmetics. Parabens are rarely irritating or sensitizing to normal human skin at concentrations used in cosmetics. Although parabens do penetrate the stratum corneum, metabolism of parabens takes place within viable skin, which is likely to result in only 1% unmetabolized parabens available for absorption into the body. The Expert Panel did consider data in the category of endocrine disruption, including male reproductive toxicity and various estrogenic activity studies. The CIR Expert Panel compared exposures to parabens resulting from use of cosmetic products to a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1000 mg/kg day–1 based on the most statistically powerful and well-conducted study of the effects of Butylparabens on the male reproductive system. The CIR Expert Panel considered exposures to cosmetic products containing a single parabens preservative (use level of 0.4%) separately from products containing multiple parabens (use level of 0.8%) and infant exposures separately from adult exposures in determining margins of safety (MOS). The MOS for infants ranged from ~6000 for single paraben products to ~3000 for multiple paraben products. The MOS for adults ranged from 1690 for single paraben products to 840 for multiple paraben products. The Expert Panel considers that these MOS determinations are conservative and likely represent an overestimate of the possibility of an adverse effect (e.g., use concentrations may be lower, penetration may be less) and support the safety of cosmetic products in which parabens preservatives are used.

Use of an additional hydrophobic binding site, the Z site, in the rational drug design of a new class of stronger trypanothione reductase inhibitor, quaternary alkylammonium phenothiazines

Improved rationally designed lead drug structures against African trypanosomiasis, Chagas disease, and leishmaniasis were obtained against trypanothione reductase from Trypanosoma cruzi. Substituted-benzyl [3-(2-chloro-4a, 10a-dihydrophenothiazin-10-yl)propyl]dimethylammonium salts, synthesized by Menschutkin quaternization of the tertiary alkylamine omega-nitrogen atom of chlorpromazine, were linear, competitive inhibitors of recombinant trypanothione reductase from T. cruzi, with either trypanothione disulfide or N-benzyloxycarbonyl-L-cysteinylglycyl 3-dimethylaminopropylamide disulfide as substrate. The permanent positive charge on the distal nitrogen atom of the tricyclic side chain contribution to binding was estimated as >/=5.6 kcal.mol(-1) by comparison with the analogue with the cationic nitrogen atom of the quaternary replaced by an ether oxygen atom. A further major contribution to improving K(i) values and inhibition strength was the hydrophobic natures and structures of the N-benzyl substituents. The strongest inhibitor, the [3-(2-chloro-4a,10a-dihydrophenothiazin-10-yl)propyl](3, 4-dichlorobenzyl)dimethylammonium derivative (K(i) 0.12 microM), was approximately 2 orders of magnitude more inhibitory than the parent chlorpromazine. Several of these quaternary phenothiazines completely inhibited T. brucei parasite growth in vitro at <1 microM. Antiparasite activity was not solely determined by inhibition strength against trypanothione reductase, there being a strong contribution from hydrophobicity (for example, benzhydryl-quaternized chlorpromazime had ED(50) < 1 microM). Although active against Leishmania donovani, none of the analogues showed major improvement in this activity relative to chlorpromazine or other nonquaternized phenothiazines. The p-tert-butylbenzyl-quaternized analogue very strongly inhibited (ED(50) < 1 microM) growth of the amastigote stage of T. cruzi.

Effect of some syrup constituents on the solubility of sorbic acid

The effects of sucrose, glucose, sorbitol, and saccharin on the aqueous solubility of sorbic acid at 20 and 37 degrees C were determined. Sucrose, glucose, and sorbitol decreased the solubility of sorbic acid with increasing concentrations at both temperatures. Increasing the concentrations of these sweetening agents resulted in decreases in the dielectric constants. Calculation of the free energy and enthalpy changes indicated that the dissolution process for sorbic acid became progressively unfavorable with increasing sugar concentration.