Cytotoxic cardenolides from Acokanthera longiflora Stapf. and related species

Cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of a hot water and methanol extract of Acokanthera oppositifolia in HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Herb-induced liver injury is poorly described for African herbal remedies, such as Acokanthera oppositifolia. Although a commonly used treatment for pain, snake bites and anthrax, it is also a well-known arrow poison, thus toxicity is to be expected.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The cytotoxicity and preliminary mechanisms of toxicity in HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of hot water and methanol extracts were on cell density, oxidative status, mitochondrial membrane potential, fatty acids, caspase-3/7 activity, adenosine triphosphate levels, cell cycling and viability was assessed. Phytochemicals were tentatively identified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The hot water extract displayed an IC₅₀ of 24.26 μg/mL, and reduced proliferation (S- and G2/M-phase arrest) and viability (by 30.71%) as early as 24 h after incubation. The methanol extract had a comparable IC₅₀ of 26.16 μg/mL, and arrested cells in the G2/M-phase (by 18.87%) and induced necrosis (by 13.21%). The hot water and methanol extracts depolarised the mitochondrial membrane (up to 0.84- and 0.74-fold), though did not generate reactive oxygen species. The hot water and methanol extracts decreased glutathione (0.42- and 0.62-fold) and adenosine triphosphate (0.08- and 0.26-fold) levels, while fatty acids (2.00- and 4.61-fold) and caspase-3/7 activity (1.98- and 5.82-fold) were increased.

CONCLUSION

Extracts were both cytostatic and cytotoxic in HepG2 cells. Mitochondrial toxicity was evident and contributed to reducing adenosine triphosphate production and fatty acid accumulation. Altered redox status perturbed proliferation and promoted necrosis. Extracts of A. oppositifolia may thus promote necrotic cell death, which poses a risk for inflammatory hepatotoxicity with associated steatosis.

Beetle and plant arrow poisons of the Ju|'hoan and Hai||om San peoples of Namibia (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae; Plantae, Anacardiaceae, Apocynaceae, Burseraceae)

The use of archery to hunt appears relatively late in human history. It is poorly understood but the application of poisons to arrows to increase lethality must have occurred shortly after developing bow hunting methods; these early multi-stage transitions represent cognitive shifts in human evolution. This paper is a synthesis of widely-scattered literature in anthropology, entomology, and chemistry, dealing with San ("Bushmen") arrow poisons. The term San (or Khoisan) covers many indigenous groups using so-called 'click languages' in southern Africa. Beetles are used for arrow poison by at least eight San groups and one non-San group. Fieldwork and interviews with Ju|'hoan and Hai||om hunters in Namibia revealed major differences in the nature and preparation of arrow poisons, bow and arrow construction, and poison antidote. Ju|'hoan hunters use leaf-beetle larvae of Diamphidia Gerstaecker and Polyclada Chevrolat (Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) collected from soil around the host plants Commiphora africana (A. Rich.) Engl. and Commiphora angolensis Engl. (Burseracaeae). In the Nyae Nyae area of Namibia, Ju|'hoan hunters use larvae of Diamphidia nigroornata Ståhl. Larvae and adults live above-ground on the plants and eat leaves, but the San collect the underground cocoons to extract the mature larvae. Larval hemolymph is mixed with saliva and applied to arrows. Hai||om hunters boil the milky plant sap of Adenium bohemianum Schinz (Apocynaceae) to reduce it to a thick paste that is applied to their arrows. The socio-cultural, historical, and ecological contexts of the various San groups may determine differences in the sources and preparation of poisons, bow and arrow technology, hunting behaviors, poison potency, and perhaps antidotes.