In Vitro Percutaneous Permeation of Betamethasone and Betamethasone 17-Valerate

Evaluation of dermal exposure to phthalates and parabens resulting from the use of hair relaxers

Hair relaxers have been suggested as a source of exposure to parabens and phthalates. However, dermally absorbed doses of these chemicals resulting from consumer use of hair relaxers have yet to be quantified, and results from epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated that there is no increased risk for hormone-sensitive, reproductive cancers associated with use of hair relaxers among Black women. Therefore, dermal absorption of parabens and phthalates associated with hair relaxer use for several commercially available hair relaxer kits was modeled using IH SkinPerm™. The chemicals detected in the hair relaxer kits included methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), butylparaben (BP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and the phthalate substitute bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA). The daily absorbed dose ranges (mg/kg/day), standardized over a year of product use, were as follows: 8.64 × 10-5-0.00116 MP, 2.30 × 10-8-3.07 × 10-6 EP, 3.24 × 10-8-4.33 × 10-6 BP, 8.65 × 10-9-1.15 × 10-6 DEP, and 8.94 × 10-7-0.000119 DEHP for Kit #1; 8.44 × 10-5-0.00113 MP and 7.91 × 10-5-0.00106 DEP for Kit #2; and 2.49 × 10-6-3.33 × 10-5 MP, 1.52 × 10-8-2.03 × 10-6 EP, 3.29 × 10-9-4.39 × 10-7 DEP, and 3.11 × 10-6-4.14 × 10-5 DEHA for Kit #3. These absorbed doses were well below applicable health-based guidance values, indicating consumer exposure from product use is not expected to pose a health risk. These results provide valuable information for health risk evaluations for hair relaxer use.

Molecular size as the main determinant of solute maximum flux across the skin

One of the most important determinants of dermatological and systemic penetration after topical application is the delivery or flux of solutes into or through the skin. The maximum dose of solute able to be delivered over a given period of time and area of application is defined by its maximum flux (J(max), mol per cm(2) per h) from a given vehicle. In this work, J(max) values from aqueous solution across human skin were acquired or estimated from experimental data and correlated with solute physicochemical properties. Whereas epidermal permeability coefficients (k(p)) are optimally correlated to solute octanol-water partition coefficient (K(ow)) and molecular weight (MW) was found to be the dominant determinant of J(max) for this literature data set: log J(max)=-3.90-0.0190MW (n=87, r(2)=0.847, p<0.001). Estimated solubility in octanol (S(oc)) was also a determinant, but improvement in the regression by the addition of log S(oc) was small (r(2) increased to 0.856). Addition of other physicochemical parameters to MW by forward stepwise regression only marginally improved the regression with a melting point (Mpt) term (r(2)=0.879) and then hydrogen bonding acceptor capability (H(a)) (r(2)=0.917) is significant. Validation of the equation above was carried with a number of other data sets: an aqueous vehicle with full- and split-thickness skin (r(2)=0.784, n=56), some pure solutes (r(2)=0.537, n=34), an aqueous vehicle with ionizable solutes (r(2)=0.282, n=54) and solutes from a propylene glycol vehicle (r(2)=0.484, n=36). An analysis of the entire database gave the equation log J(max)=-4.52-0.0141MW (n=278, r(2)=0.688, p<0.001), with inclusion of Mpt and H(a) increasing r(2) to 0.760 (n=269). Separate analysis of full- and split-thickness skin data confirmed that the dermal resistance term had only a marginal effect on overall J(max). Application of the latter model to an in vivo situation where the dermal capillary bed is slightly below the epidermal-dermal junction revealed that the dermal resistance term was unnecessary for in vivo predictions for most solutes.

Physiologically relevant two-compartment pharmacokinetic models for skin

Pharmacokinetic (compartment) models for skin have been used to predict or analyze absorption of chemical into and through skin. For highly lipophilic chemicals, the stratum corneum (sc) and the viable epidermis (v.e.) both contribute a significant resistance to chemical penetration and thus, both should be included in the model. This paper describes two-compartment models that represent the sc and the ve separately by extending the procedures previously developed for one-compartment models. The two-compartment models described here were developed by matching characteristics of a two-membrane model of skin. These compartment models were compared with membrane representations of the s.c. and v.e. for several different dermal exposure scenarios. When valid, which it is for many chemical exposure scenarios, the two-compartment model developed using characteristic times of the membrane model (model B2) more closely represents the two-membrane model than the model developed with equilibrium conditions of the membrane model (model B1). When model B2 is invalid, then model B1 is recommended. Criteria are provided for choosing from the various one- or two-compartment model options.

Simultaneous diffusion and metabolism of betamethasone 17-valerate in the living skin equivalent

Simultaneous diffusion and metabolism of betamethasone 17-valerate was studied using betamethasone 17-valerate, betamethasone 21-valerate, and betamethasone as permeants. These corticosteroids were suspended in silicone adhesive and applied to an artificial living skin equivalent (LSE) for 72 h. When betamethasone was applied, no metabolites were detected in the receptor medium. Conversely, with betamethasone 21-valerate application, only betamethasone but no betamethasone 21-valerate was detected in the receptor medium indicating the metabolism of the latter by skin esterases. When tested with the theory for simultaneous diffusion and metabolism, the result is consistent with the enzyme rate constant in the LSE homogenate measured in a previous study. When betamethasone 17-valerate was applied to the LSE, more than half of the total amount of corticosteroids detected in the receptor medium was unchanged, consistent with the previously reported chemical (as opposed to enzymatic) degradation half-life of about 8 h. This result also indicated that very little metabolism of betamethasone 17-valerate occurred in the skin.

Significance of viable skin layers in percutaneous permeation and its implication in mathematical models: theoretical consideration based on parameters for betamethasone 17-valerate

The role of viable skin layers (viable epidermis and dermis) is examined by the three-layer model using parameter values for betamethasone 17-valerate. The mathematical three-layer diffusion model indicates that the lag time and half-life after vehicle removal in epidermis and split-thickness skin are longer than those in stratum corneum without viable layers, even if drug flux at steady-state is minimally altered. The theoretical values of the lag time and half-life predicted for epidermis and split-thickness-skin samples are compatible with the values observed in another in vitro study. The results predicted by the three-layer model indicate that the simplified model (single-layer or compartment model), which regards the whole skin as one diffusion layer or one compartment, may be warranted because all three skin layers have the same half-life after vehicle removal. The parameters used in the simplified model are estimated from some of the following values directly obtainable in the experiment: flux from skin and amount in the whole skin at steady-state, lag time, and drug concentration or amount maintained to be unchanged in the donor site. However, the simplified model often cannot resolve some discrepancy between the data and model (e.g., the ratio of the half-life to lag time) even if the data may be explained by the three-layer model.