Differences and similarities of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction

Risk of Second Primary Cancer Among Patients with Cardio-Esophageal Cancer in Finland: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Purpose

The occurrence of a second primary cancer (SPC) after primary esophageal carcinoma (EC) or gastric cardia carcinoma(GCC) is well acknowledged. However, previous research on the risk of SPC among these patients has been predominantly conducted in Asian countries. Yet, notable population-dependent variation in histological types and risk profiles exists. This register-based study assesses the histology-specific risk of SPC among individuals initially diagnosed with a first primary EC or GCC.

Patients and Methods

We obtained data on 7197 patients diagnosed with EC/GCC in Finland between 1980 and 2022 from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of SPC were subsequently calculated relatively to the cancer risk of the general population.

Results

The average and median follow-up times were 2.8 years and 10.5 months. Adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas comprised 57.8% (n = 4165) and 36.6% (n = 2631) of all cases, respectively. An increased SIR was noted among EC/GCC patients after 15-20 years of follow-up (SIR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.11). Among adenocarcinoma patients, an increased SIR for SPCs of the digestive organs was seen in the 40-54-year-old group (SIR 9.86, 95% CI: 3.62-21.45). Squamous cell carcinoma patients displayed increased SIRs for cancer of the mouth/pharynx (SIR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.17-6.95) and respiratory organs (1.77, 1.07-2.76).

Conclusion

Healthcare professionals should be aware of the increased risk of SPCs occurring in the mouth/pharynx, respiratory and digestive organs in survivors of EC/GCC. Patients should be advised about this risk and remain alert for symptoms, even beyond the standard 5-year follow-up period.

Feasibility of modified docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine followed by capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (DOC) combination chemotherapy, followed by maintenance capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m (days 1-8), l-OHP 85 mg/m (day 1), and capecitabine 750 mg/m twice daily (days 1-14), every 3 weeks. After six cycles of DOC, patients who did not progress received maintenance treatment with three-weekly capecitabine 1000 mg/m twice daily (days 1-14), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Six-month disease control rate (DCR) was the primary endpoint and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were the secondary endpoints. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate OS and PFS. Between July 2014 and September 2017, 37 patients with metastatic gastric or GEJ cancer were enrolled at our institution. Upon completion of the DOC regimen, 35 patients (94.5%) received capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy for a median of 7 cycles (range, 3-14 cycles). The six-month DCR was 83.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71.8-95.6%], median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-9.8 months), and median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 11.7-18.6 months). During DOC chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29.7%), anemia (10.8%), and diarrhea (10.8%). During maintenance treatment, toxicity was sporadic and mainly of grade 1-2. Modified DOC followed by capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy seems to be an active and well tolerated first-line treatment strategy for patients with metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer.

Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Salvage systemic therapy has become the new standard of care in patients with advanced gastric and oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinoma, following disease progression on first-line fluoropyrimidine and platinum-containing chemotherapy. Pharmacological agents proven to be effective in this setting include both chemotherapy and biological therapy, however, the consensus on the best salvage systemic therapy has not been reached.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of systemic chemotherapy and biological therapy, either alone or in combination, on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced gastric and OGJ adenocarcinoma, whose disease has progressed on, or relapsed after first-line fluoropyrimidine and platinum-containing chemotherapy. Adverse events (AEs), tumour response rate (TRR) and quality of life (QoL) associated with systemic chemotherapy and/or biological therapy were additionally assessed.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, trial registries and proceedings of the major oncology conferences up to October 2020. We additionally handsearched the reference lists of studies. No language restriction was applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing salvage systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or biological therapy) and either another type of salvage systemic therapy, placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment in patients with gastric and OGJ adenocarcinoma refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine and platinum-containing chemotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed selection of eligible studies and the primary author extracted study characteristics and outcome data from included studies. We assessed the quality and risk of bias of eligible studies according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We expressed pooled estimates of effect using hazard ratio (HR) calculated using an inverse variance random-effects model for time-to-event data, and risk ratio (RR) calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model for binary data. The certainty of evidence was graded using GRADEpro.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 17 RCTs with 5110 participants for inclusion in this review. Tweenty-nine studies are ongoing and twenty studies are awaiting classification. No studies examined the following comparisons: chemotherapy combined with biological therapy versus placebo, BSC or no treatment, chemotherapy combined with biological therapy versus biological therapy, biological therapy versus biological therapy and chemotherapy combined with biological therapy versus chemotherapy combined with biological therapy. Chemotherapy versus placebo, best supportive care or no treatment Chemotherapy probably improves OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.83, moderate-certainty evidence) based on two studies involving 547 participants and improves PFS (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.69, high-certainty evidence) based on one study involving 507 participants over placebo and BSC. Chemotherapy probably increases serious AEs (SAEs) (RR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.59, moderate-certainty evidence) based on one study involving 503 participants. Biological therapy versus placebo, best supportive care or no treatment Biological therapy improves OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73, high-certainty evidence) and probably improves PFS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.57, moderate-certainty evidence) over placebo based on three studies involving 781 participants. There is currently insufficient evidence for increased SAEs from biological therapy (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.37, low-certainty evidence) based on two studies involving 638 participants. Chemotherapy versus biological therapy This comparison only considered immunotherapy. There is probably no evidence of a difference for OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.02, moderate-certainty evidence) between chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and immunotherapy probably reduces PFS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.57, moderate-certainty evidence) based on one study involving 395 participants. SAEs may be less frequent with immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.57, low-certainty evidence). Chemotherapy combined with biological therapy versus chemotherapy Addition of biological therapy to chemotherapy probably does not improve OS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.04, moderate-certainty evidence) and we are uncertain whether it improves PFS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.02, very low-certainty evidence) based on seven studies involving 2743 participants. We are similarly uncertain whether combined chemotherapy and biological therapy increases SAEs (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.44, very low-certainty evidence) based on four studies involving 1618 participants. Chemotherapy versus chemotherapy There is no evidence of a difference for OS and PFS between irinotecan and paclitaxel (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.48, low-certainty evidence for OS; HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.48, low-certainty evidence for PFS) based on one study involving 219 participants. Similarly, there is no evidence to indicate improved OS and PFS from addition of another chemotherapy to docetaxel (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.54, low-certainty evidence for OS; HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.09, low-certainty evidence for PFS) based on two studies involving 121 participants. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred commonly with both mono- and poly-chemotherapy except for docetaxel-S1 and EOX chemotherapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Survival outcome of patients with advanced gastric and OGJ adenocarcinoma whose disease progressed on first-line fluoropyrimidine and platinum-containing chemotherapy can be improved by chemotherapy and biological therapy. Biological therapy, in particular, achieves this without clear increase in SAEs or QoL impairment. Whether biological therapy is preferred over chemotherapy is still unclear and there is no evidence of a difference for OS outcome, although immunotherapy may be associated with less SAEs. Addition of biological therapy to chemotherapy and poly-chemotherapy are associated with frequent treatment-related toxicity without clear survival benefit.

Changing Pattern of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction in Recent 10 Years: Experience at a Large Tertiary Medical Center in China

Aims and background

To investigate the changing pattern of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction subtypes and its time trend relationship with that of reflux esophagitis over 10 years at a tertiary medical center in China.

Methods and study design

The medical records of all patients who underwent gastroscopy from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert's classification, gastric non-cardiac adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, reflux esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection were diagnosed according to the results of gastroscopy and mucosal histopathology. All the patients were divided into three cohorts (cohort A [2000–2003], cohort B [2004–2006]), cohort C [2007–2009]), and the proportion of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and its subtypes in all upper gastrointestinal tumors (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, gastric non-cardiac adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma) in each cohort were compared. The annual percentages of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, reflux esophagitis and H pylori in all patients were also compared.

Results

70,073 patients (cohort A, n = 20298, cohort B, n = 20443, cohort C, n = 29332) who underwent gastroscopy were reviewed. Totally there were 279 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (0.398%, M:F = 5.6:1), 794 gastric non-cardiac adenocarcinoma patients (1.133%, M:F = 2:1), 366 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (0.522%, M:F = 3.4:1) and 4681 reflux esophagitis patients. Among the three subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, only type I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in upper GI tumors exhibited increasing trend over time (1.86%, 3.39% and 4.94% for cohort A, B and C, respectively, P = 0.009). According to the WHO classification of histological types, the tubular types of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction have decreased (P = 0.008), whereas papillary type (P = 0.001) increased. The annual detection rate of type I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction appeared to be positively correlated with reflux esophagitis (r = 0.846, P = 0.002) and negatively with H pylori infection (r = -0.785, P = 0.007) in time trend.

Conclusions

Over a recent 10-year period, the three subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction showed different changing trends, suggesting heterogeneous characteristics of the three Siewert types of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Almost half of people with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Chemotherapy and targeted therapies are increasingly used with a palliative intent to control tumor growth, improve quality of life, and prolong survival. To date, and with the exception of ramucirumab, evidence for the efficacy of palliative treatments for esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of cytostatic or targeted therapy for treating esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer with palliative intent.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Web of Science, PubMed Publisher, Google Scholar, and trial registries up to 13 May 2015, and we handsearched the reference lists of studies. We did not restrict the search to publications in English. Additional searches were run in September 2017 prior to publication, and they are listed in the 'Studies awaiting assessment' section.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy versus best supportive care or control in people with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data. We assessed the quality and risk of bias of eligible studies according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We calculated pooled estimates of effect using an inverse variance random-effects model for meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 41 RCTs with 11,853 participants for inclusion in the review as well as 49 ongoing studies. For the main comparison of adding a cytostatic and/or targeted agent to a control arm, we included 11 studies with 1347 participants. This analysis demonstrated an increase in overall survival in favor of the arm with an additional cytostatic or targeted therapeutic agent with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.84, high-quality evidence). The median increased survival time was one month. Five studies in 750 participants contributed data to the comparison of palliative therapy versus best supportive care. We found a benefit in overall survival in favor of the group receiving palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy compared to best supportive care (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92, high-quality evidence). Subcomparisons including only people receiving second-line therapies, chemotherapies, targeted therapies, adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas all showed a similar benefit. The only individual agent that more than one study found to improve both overall survival and progression-free survival was ramucirumab. Palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy increased the frequency of grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicity. However, treatment-related deaths did not occur more frequently. Quality of life often improved in the arm with an additional agent.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

People who receive more chemotherapeutic or targeted therapeutic agents have an increased overall survival compared to people who receive less. These agents, administered as both first-line or second-line treatments, also led to better overall survival than best supportive care. With the exception of ramucirumab, it remains unclear which other individual agents cause the survival benefit. Although treatment-associated toxicities of grade 3 or more occurred more frequently in arms with an additional chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent, there is no evidence that palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy decrease quality of life. Based on this meta-analysis, palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy can be considered standard care for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become accepted as the standard treatment for early gastric cancer. However, comparative outcomes of ESD and surgery have not been evaluated for adenocarcinoma in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). We investigated the long-term outcomes of ESD compared with those of surgery for adenocarcinoma in the EGJ.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ESD or surgery for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2010 and who met the absolute and expanded criteria for endoscopic resection were eligible. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 79 patients included, 40 underwent ESD and 39 underwent surgery. During the median follow-up period of 60.9 months (range, 13.1-125.4 months), the 5-year overall survival rates were 93.9% and 97.3% for the ESD and surgery groups, respectively (p = 0.376). There were no gastric cancer-related deaths in either group. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients (13.9%) overall, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between the two groups (10.0% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.308).

CONCLUSIONS

ESD may be an effective alternative to surgery for the treatment of early gastric cancer in the EGJ based on the comparable long-term outcomes.

Oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma as complication of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell carcinoma occurs as a histological variant of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

AIM

In a cross-sectional study, to pursue the hypothesis that oesophageal signet ring cell cancers constitute a complication of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

In a large national database of histopathology records, we accumulated 91 802 patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BE), 2817 with oesophageal nonsignet ring adenocarcinoma (EAC) and 278 with oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC). The three groups were compared with respect to their clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as socio-economic risk factors (associated with patients' place of residence).

RESULTS

About 9% of all oesophageal adenocarcinomas harboured features of signet ring cell carcinoma. Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma were characterised by almost identical epidemiological patterns. Patients with either cancer type were slightly older than those with Barrett's oesophagus (EAC 68.0, SRC 66.7 vs. BE 63.7 years), and both showed a striking male predominance (EAC and SRC 85% vs. BE 67%). Both cancer types were associated with a similar set of alarm symptoms, such as dysphagia, pain and weight loss. The distribution by race (Whites vs. Blacks) and socio-economic parameters, such as levels of college education and family income, were similar among the three groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare variant of oesophageal adenocarcinoma with similar epidemiological characteristics. The reasons why a minority of reflux patients progress to develop signet ring cell carcinoma, rather than the usual type of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, remain unknown.

Survival for oesophageal, stomach and small intestine cancers in Europe 1999-2007: Results from EUROCARE-5

BACKGROUND

European regional variation in cancer survival was reported in the EUROCARE-4 study for patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Relative survival (RS) estimates are here updated for patients diagnosed with cancer of the oesophagus, stomach and small intestine from 2000 to 2007. Trends in RS from 1999-2001 to 2005-2007 are presented to monitor and discuss improvements in patient survival in Europe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EUROCARE-5 data from 29 countries (87 cancer registries) were used to investigate 1- and 5-year RS. Using registry-specific life-tables stratified by age, gender and calendar year, age-standardised 'complete analysis' RS estimates by country and region were calculated for Northern, Southern, Eastern and Central Europe, and for Ireland and United Kingdom (UK). Survival trends of patients in periods 1999-2001, 2002-2004 and 2005-2007 were investigated using the 'period' RS approach. We computed the 5-year RS conditional on surviving the first year (5-year conditional survival), as the ratio of age-standardised 5-year RS to 1-year RS.

RESULTS

Oesophageal cancer 1- and 5-year RS (40% and 12%, respectively) remained poor in Europe. Patient survival was worst in Eastern (8%), Northern (11%) and Southern Europe (10%). Europe-wide, there was a 3% improvement in oesophageal cancer 5-year survival by 2005-2007, with Ireland and the UK (3%), and Central Europe (4%) showing large improvements. Europe-wide, stomach cancer 5-year RS was 25%. Ireland and UK (17%) and Eastern Europe (19%) had the poorest 5-year patient survival. Southern Europe had the best 5-year survival (30%), though only showing an improvement of 2% by 2005-2007. Small intestine cancer 5-year RS for Europe was 48%, with Central Europe having the best (54%), and Ireland and UK the poorest (37%). Five-year patient survival improvement for Europe was 8% by 2005-2007, with Central, Southern and Eastern Europe showing the greatest increases (⩾9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival for these cancer sites, particularly oesophageal cancer, remains poor in Europe with wide variation. Further investigation into the wide variation, including analysis by histology and anatomical sub-site, will yield insights to better monitor and explain the improvements in survival observed over time.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for resectable esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background

The efficacy and safety of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma are still in question, and the prognosis of these patients is poor.

Methods

We systematically searched electronic databases from January 1990 to July 2014. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were a R0 resection rate, positive rate of lymph node metastasis, postoperative recurrence rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate and perioperative mortality. Overall survival was measured with a hazard ratio (HR), while other secondary outcomes were measured with an odds ratio (OR).

Results

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1085 patients were searched and, of these, 869 had adenocarcinoma. Patients receiving preoperative CRT had a longer overall survival (HR 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.88), higher likelihood of R0 resection and greater chance of pCR, while they had a lower likelihood of lymph node metastasis and postoperative recurrence. The difference of perioperative mortality was non-significant. In addition, the result of the comparison between preoperative CRT and preoperative chemotherapy (CT) in two RCTs was non-significant.

Conclusion

Patients with resectable esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma can gain a survival advantage from preoperative CRT. However, limited to the number of RCTs, the effect of adding radiotherapy to preoperative CT separately is still uncertain and more high-quality prospective trials are needed.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in Hui and Han patients from Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region: Analysis of 1524 cases

AIM: To explore the clinical and pathological characteristics of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) in 1524 cases of Hui and Han patients.

METHODS: A total of 1524 patients confirmed to have AEG by gastroscopy and pathology at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from January 2002 to December 2012 were involved. Relevant data including gender, age, blood type, alcohol addiction, pathological differentiation, and TNM stage were collected and input into Excel spreadsheet. SPSS17.0 software was used to perform statistical analysis.

RESULTS: Among 1524 AEG cases, 273 (17.9%) were Hui patients and 1251 (82.1%) were Han patients. There was no significant difference between Hui and Han patients in age (χ² = 0.668, P = 0.716). Most patients in the two groups were older than 60 years. There was no significant difference between Hui and Han patients in gender (χ² = 0.313, P = 0.622), and most patients in the two groups were males. There were no significant differences between Hui and Han patients in ABO blood type or family medical history (χ² = 2.995, P = 0.392; χ² = 0.222, P = 0.894). There was a significant difference between the two groups in smoking and drinking history (χ² = 32.221, P < 0.0001; χ² = 34.176, P < 0.0001). Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in pathological type or TNM stage (χ² = 8.221, P = 0.084; χ² = 1.162, P = 0.762), the main pathological differentiation type in the two groups was lowly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and TNM stage was mainly Ⅳ.

CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, ABO blood type, family medical history, pathological type, or TNM stage. AEG has a higher incidence in older males who have smoking and drinking history. Main pathological type was lowly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and TNM stage was mainly Ⅳ. Early diagnosis and treatment as well as healthy and rational lifestyle may be helpful in the prevention and treatment of AEG.

Therapeutic approaches to gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas

The following, from the 12th OESO World Conference: Cancers of the Esophagus, includes commentaries on the distinction between adenocarcinomas above, below, or within the gastroesophageal junction; combined modality therapy; tumor markers for use in personalized medicine; PET-CT and endoscopic biopsies in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy; a standardized grading system for tumor regression in squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma; the experimental basis for new approaches to medical treatment; the criteria measuring response in esophageal cancer; and the impact of novel imaging on staging and response assessment.

Tobacco smoking and intestinal metaplasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of specific risk factors for early endpoints in the gastric carcinogenesis pathway may further contribute to the understanding of gastric cancer aetiology.

AIMS

To quantify the relation between smoking and intestinal metaplasia through systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Articles providing data on the association between smoking and intestinal metaplasia were identified in PubMed(®), Scopus(®) and Web of Science™, searched until April 2014, and through backward citation tracking. Summary odds ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals were computed using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Heterogeneity was quantitatively assessed using the I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 32 articles were included in this systematic review and 19 provided data for meta-analysis. Smoking was defined as ever vs. never (crude estimates, six studies, summary odds ratio=1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.12, I(2)=67.4%; adjusted estimates, seven studies, summary odds ratio=1.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.61, I(2)=65.0%) and current vs. non-smokers (crude estimates, seven studies, summary odds ratio=1.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.84, I(2)=73.4%; adjusted estimates, two studies, summary odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-2.25, I(2)=0.0%).

CONCLUSION

The weak and non-statistically significant association found through meta-analysis of the available evidence does not confirm smoking as an independent risk factor for intestinal metaplasia.

Clinical management of gastroesophageal junction tumors: past and recent evidences for the role of radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary approach

Gastroesophageal cancers (such as esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal-junction -GEJ- lesions) are worldwide a leading cause of death being relatively rare but highly aggressive. In the past years, a clear shift in the location of upper gastrointestinal tract tumors has been recorded, both affecting the scientific research and the modern clinical practice. The integration of pre- or peri-operative multimodal approaches, as radiotherapy and chemotherapy (often combined), seems promising to further improve clinical outcome for such presentations. In the past, the definition of GEJ led to controversies and confusion: GEJ tumors have been managed either grouped to gastric or esophageal lesions, following slightly different surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic approaches. Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) changed the staging and classification system of GEJ to harmonize some staging issues for esophageal and gastric cancer. This review discusses the most relevant historical and recent evidences of neoadjuvant treatment involving Radiotherapy for GEJ tumors, and describes the efficacy of such treatment in the frame of multimodal integrated therapies, from the new point of view of the recent classification of such tumors.

Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: systematic review with meta-analysis combining individual patient and aggregate data

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is poor. There is conflicting evidence regarding effects of preoperative chemotherapy on survival and other outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis with aggregate and individual patient data (IPD) to assess the effect of preoperative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma on survival and other outcomes. Two independent reviewers identified eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy+/-radiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. IPD was solicited from all trials. Meta-analyses were performed using the two stage method.

RESULTS

We identified 14 RCTs (2422 patients). For eight RCTs (1049 patients; 43.3%) we obtained IPD. Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.89; p<0.0001). There were larger treatment effects in tumours of the gastroesophageal junction and for chemoradiotherapy compared to chemotherapy, but the tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer disease-free survival, higher likelihood of R0 resection and more favourable post-treatment tumour stage, but not perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemotherapy for locoregional gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma increases survival compared to surgery alone. It should be offered to all eligible patients. There appear to be larger survival advantages in tumours of the gastroesophageal junction and for chemoradiotherapy, but these findings require prospective confirmation.

Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus

BACKGROUND

The outcome of patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, and stomach) is poor. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on survival and other outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of perioperative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma on survival and other clinically relevant outcomes in the overall population of participants in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and in prespecified subgroups.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed computerized searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness (DARE), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to May 2011), EMBASE (1980 to May 2011), and LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud), combining the Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy with specific search terms. Moreover, we handsearched several online databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of retrieved papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs which randomized patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, in the absence of distant metastases, to receive either chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy followed by surgery, or surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors identified eligible trials. We solicited individual patient data (IPD) from all selected trials. We performed meta-analyses based on intention-to-treat populations using the two-stage method to combine IPD with aggregate data from RCTs for which IPD were unavailable. We combined data from all trials providing IPD in a Cox proportional hazards model to assess the effect of several covariables on overall survival.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 RCTs with 2422 eligible patients. For eight RCTs with 1049 patients (43.3%), we were able to obtain IPD. Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.89). This corresponds to a relative survival increase of 19% or an absolute survival increase of 9% at five years. This survival advantage was consistent across most subgroups. There was a trend towards a more pronounced treatment effect for tumors of the GE junction compared to other sites, and for combined chemoradiotherapy as compared to chemotherapy in tumors of the esophagus and GE junction. Resection with negative margins was a strong predictor of survival. Multivariable analysis showed that tumor site, performance status, and age have an independent significant effect on survival. Moreover, there was a significant interaction of the effect of perioperative chemotherapy with age (larger treatment effect in younger patients). Perioperative chemotherapy also showed a significant effect on several secondary outcomes. It was associated with longer disease-free survival, higher rates of R0 resection, and more favorable tumor stage upon resection, while there was no association with perioperative morbidity and mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma increases survival compared to surgery alone. It should thus be offered to all eligible patients. There is a trend to a larger survival advantage for tumors of the GE junction as compared to other sites and for chemoradiotherapy as compared to chemotherapy in esophageal and GE junction tumors. Likewise, there is an interaction between age and treatment effect, with younger patients having a larger survival advantage, and no survival advantage for elderly patients.

Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus

BACKGROUND

The outcome of patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, and stomach) is poor. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on survival and other outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of perioperative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma on survival and other clinically relevant outcomes in the overall population of participants in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and in prespecified subgroups.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed computerized searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness (DARE), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to May 2011), EMBASE (1980 to May 2011), and LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud), combining the Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy with specific search terms. Moreover, we handsearched several online databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of retrieved papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs which randomized patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, in the absence of distant metastases, to receive either chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy followed by surgery, or surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors identified eligible trials. We solicited individual patient data (IPD) from all selected trials. We performed meta-analyses based on intention-to-treat populations using the two-stage method to combine IPD with aggregate data from RCTs for which IPD were unavailable. We combined data from all trials providing IPD in a Cox proportional hazards model to assess the effect of several covariables on overall survival.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 RCTs with 2422 eligible patients. For eight RCTs with 1049 patients (43.3%), we were able to obtain IPD. Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.89). This corresponds to a relative survival increase of 19% or an absolute survival increase of 9% at five years. This survival advantage was consistent across most subgroups. There was a trend towards a more pronounced treatment effect for tumors of the GE junction compared to other sites, and for combined chemoradiotherapy as compared to chemotherapy in tumors of the esophagus and GE junction. Resection with negative margins was a strong predictor of survival. Multivariable analysis showed that tumor site, performance status, and age have an independent significant effect on survival. Moreover, there was a significant interaction of the effect of perioperative chemotherapy with age (larger treatment effect in younger patients). Perioperative chemotherapy also showed a significant effect on several secondary outcomes. It was associated with longer disease-free survival, higher rates of R0 resection, and more favorable tumor stage upon resection, while there was no association with perioperative morbidity and mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma increases survival compared to surgery alone. It should thus be offered to all eligible patients. There is a trend to a larger survival advantage for tumors of the GE junction as compared to other sites and for chemoradiotherapy as compared to chemotherapy in esophageal and GE junction tumors. Likewise, there is an interaction between age and treatment effect, with younger patients having a larger survival advantage, and no survival advantage for elderly patients.

Invasion of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma to the deep muscularis mucosae may be an indicator of lymph node metastasis in Barrett's esophageal cancer

A 48-year-old man underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for a protruding lesion with a preoperative diagnosis of superficial Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen showed invasion of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma to the deep muscularis mucosa, although the predominant histology was differentiated-type and there was no lymphovascular infiltration. Additional esophagectomy with nodal dissection was conducted for possible remnant tumor cells after informed consent was given, and uncovered the presence of a metastatic lymph node. Caution is advised in the treatment of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma with invasion of poorly differentiated tumor cells into the deep muscularis mucosae.

Staging and outcome depending on surgical treatment in adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

Owing to controversial staging and classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction (AOG) before surgery, the choice of appropriate surgical approach remains problematic. In a retrospective study, preoperative staging of AOG and the impact of preoperative misclassification on outcome were analysed.

METHODS

Data from patients with AOG were analysed from a prospectively collected database with regard to surgical treatment, preoperative and postoperative staging, and outcome.

RESULTS

One-hundred and thirty patients with Siewert types I and II AOG who did not have neoadjuvant treatment were included in the study: 41 patients with an AOG type I who underwent oesophagectomy, 51 patients with an AOG staged before surgery as type I who underwent oesophagectomy but in whom the final histology showed a type II tumour, and 38 patients whose tumours were staged as AOG type II before and after operation who underwent gastrectomy. Among patients who had an oesophagectomy, lymph node metastases (P = 0.022), tumour relapse (P = 0.009) and recurrent distant metastases (P = 0.028) were significantly more frequent in patients with AOG type II; those with AOG type II had shorter overall survival than those with type I tumours (P = 0.024). Among those with AOG type II, recurrence-free survival was significantly shorter after oesophagectomy compared with extended gastrectomy (P = 0.019). Thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy had a favourable influence on outcome compared with the transhiatal approach.

CONCLUSION

Accurate preoperative staging of AOG and appropriate surgical therapy are crucial for outcome. AOG type II is a more aggressive tumour with higher recurrence rates than AOG type I. These patients therefore benefit from more radical surgical treatment.

Tobacco smoking increases the risk of high-grade dysplasia and cancer among patients with Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal adenocarcinoma arises from Barrett's esophagus (BE); patients with this cancer have a poor prognosis. Identification of modifiable lifestyle factors that affect the risk of progression from BE to esophageal adenocarcinoma might prevent its development. We investigated associations among body size, smoking, and alcohol use with progression of BE to neoplasia.

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients with BE identified from the population-based Northern Ireland BE register, diagnosed between 1993 and 2005 with specialized intestinal metaplasia (n = 3167). Data on clinical, demographic, and lifestyle factors related to diagnosis of BE were collected from hospital case notes. We used the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry to identify which of these patients later developed esophageal adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia, or esophageal high-grade dysplasia. Cox proportional hazards models were used to associate lifestyle factors with risk of progression.

RESULTS

By December 31, 2008, 117 of the patients with BE developed esophageal high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia. Current tobacco smoking was significantly associated with an increased risk of progression (hazard ratio = 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.17) compared with never smoking, and across all strata of smoking intensity. Alcohol consumption was not related to risk of progression. Measures of body size were infrequently reported in endoscopy reports, and body size was not associated with risk of progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking tobacco increases the risk of progression to cancer or high-grade dysplasia 2-fold among patients with BE, compared with patients with BE that have never smoked. Smoking cessation strategies should be considered for patients with BE.

[The surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: Moroccan experience through a series of 149 cases]

Introduction

L'incidence du cancer de la Jonction oesogastrique (JOG) ne cesse d'augmenter depuis les deux dernières décades aussi bien dans les pays industrialisés que dans les pays en voie de développement notamment le Maroc. Le rapprochement sur le plan étiopathogénique des adénocarcinomes (ADK) du cardia et ceux du bas oesophage reste un sujet de controverse posant le problème du choix thérapeutique chirurgical, notamment l’étendu de la résection. Le but de ce travail est de dresser le profil épidémiologique des patients opérés pour un ADK du cardia et analyser les gestes chirurgicaux réalisés par l’équipe chirurgicale A du centre hospitalier universitaire IBN SINA à Rabat à travers une série de 149 cas.

Méthodes:

Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective ayant intéressé les malades opérés pour un ADK de la JOG sur une période de 15 années (1990-2004) en chirurgie A du CHU IBN SINA à Rabat.

Résultats

149 cas d'ADK de la JOG ont été retenus. L'âge moyen était de 55 ans, 76% étaient de sexe masculin avec un sex-ratio de 3/1. Les signes cliniques les plus fréquemment observés sont la dysphagie (70%), les douleurs épigastriques (67%) et le reflux gastro-oesophagien (15.5%). La notion de tabagisme n’a été rapportée que chez 20% des cas et l'oesophage de barret chez 10% des patients. Le type I de Siewert a concerné 65 cas (43.5%), le type II 40 cas (27 %), et le type III 44 cas (29.5%). Dans le type I une oesophagectomie transhiatale a été proposée, alors que les type II et III ont été traité comme un cancer de l'estomac par une gastrectomie totale. Les suites opératoires étaient simples chez 80 % des patients, la mortalité globale était de 8.5%.

Conclusion

L’oesophagectomie par voie transhiatale chez les patients fragiles avec un ADK de la JOG de type I permet des résultats carcinologiques satisfaisants avec réduction de la morbidité postopératoire par rapport à la voie transthoracique. La gastrectomie totale est le traitement de choix pour les types III, alors que le débat est toujours ouvert quant à la meilleure stratégie chirurgicale pour la prise en charge des tumeurs de type II.

How to classify adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: as esophageal or gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether so-called cardiac adenocarcinomas (adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction type II and III, ie AEG II and III) are better staged as cancers of the esophagus or as cancers of the stomach.

METHODS

A single-center cohort of 1141 patients operated for AEG II and III is staged according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification for cancers of the esophagus and cancers of the stomach. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses are used to evaluate the prognostic performance of these 2 staging schemes.

RESULTS

For so-called cardiac adenocarcinomas, the esophageal T classification is monotone. That is, it defines subgroups with continuous decreasing survival with increasing T stage. And it is distinct. That is, survival of these monotonic subgroups differs significantly. The gastric T classification is monotone but not distinct for pT2 versus pT3 (P=0.641) and for pT4a versus pT4b tumors (P=0.130). The type of infiltrated adjacent structure matters with significant differences in prognosis between the esophageal subgroups T4a and T4b (P<0.001). For the N classification, both the esophageal and gastric schemes are monotone and distinct, with decreasing prognosis with increasing number of lymph node metastases. The subclassification of N3a and N3b disease according to the gastric scheme defines 2 subgroups with significant differences in prognosis (P<0.01). Both the gastric and esophageal schemes include heterogeneous stage groups (2 and 1, respectively) and are not distinctive between several stage groups (4 and 3, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the esophageal nor the gastric scheme proves to be clearly superior over the other, and neither is perfect for AEG II and III. Our analysis includes further hints that so-called cardiac adenocarcinomas have different biological properties compared with genuine gastric and genuine esophageal cancers.

Phase II trial of modified FOLFOX6 and erlotinib in patients with metastatic or advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

There is increased recognition that cancers of the upper GI tract comprise distinct epidemiological and molecular entities. Erlotinib has shown activity in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus/gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ), but not in distal gastric cancer. mFOLFOX6 is one of several active regimens used to treat adenocarcinoma of the Eso/GEJ. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOX6 and erlotinib in patients with metastatic or advanced Eso/GEJ cancers.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic Eso/GEJ adenocarcinoma are treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2), 5-FU 400 mg m(-2), LV 400 mg m(-2) on day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg m(-2) over 48 h and erlotinib 150 mg PO daily. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. The primary objective was response rate (RR), secondary objectives include toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and to correlate clinical outcome with expression patterns and molecular alterations in the epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent pathways.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were treated and evaluable: there were two complete responses, 15 partial responses for an objective RR of 51.5% (95% CI, 34.5-68.6%). Median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.1-7.5 months) and median OS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.0-17.4 months). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were: diarrhoea (24%), nausea/vomiting (11%), skin rash (8%) and peripheral neuropathy (8%). The frequency of alterations was KRAS mutations (8%), EGFR mutations (0%) and HER2 amplification (19%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with Eso/GEJ adenocarcinoma, mFOLFOX6 and erlotinib is active, has an acceptable toxicity profile and FOLFOX ± erlotinib could be considered for further development.

RON (MST1R) is a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

RON (MST1R) is one of two members of the MET receptor tyrosine kinase family, along with parent receptor MET. RON has a putative role in several cancers, but its expression and function is poorly characterized in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. A recognized functional role of MET tyrosine kinase in gastroesophageal cancer has led to early phase clinical trials using MET inhibitors, with unimpressive results. Therefore, the role of RON in gastroesophageal cancer, as well as its role in cooperative signaling with MET and as a mechanism of resistance to MET inhibition, was studied in gastroesophageal tissues and cell lines. By IHC, RON was highly over-expressed in 74% of gastroesophageal samples (n=94), and over-expression was prognostic of poor survival (p=0.008); RON and MET co-expression occurred in 43% of samples and was prognostic of worst survival (p=0.03). High MST1R gene copy number by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or array comparative genomic hybridization, was seen in 35.5% (16/45) of cases. High MST1R gene copy number correlated with poor survival (p=0.01), and was associated with high MET and ERBB2 gene copy number. A novel somatic MST1R juxtamembrane mutation R1018G was found in 11% of samples. RON signaling was functional in cell lines, activating downstream effector STAT3, and resulted in increased viability over controls. RON and MET co-stimulation assays led to enhanced malignant phenotypes over stimulation of either receptor alone. Growth inhibition as evidenced by viability and apoptosis assays was optimal using novel blocking monoclonal antibodies to both RON and MET, versus either alone. SU11274, a classic MET small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blocked signaling of both receptors, and proved synergistic when combined with STAT3 inhibition (combination index < 1). These preclinical studies define RON as an important novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target for gastroesophageal cancer warranting further investigation.

Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus patients: results from a large population-based study

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant lesion that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, the reported incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with BE varies widely. We examined the risk of malignant progression in patients with BE using data from the Northern Ireland Barrett's esophagus Register (NIBR), one of the largest population-based registries of BE worldwide, which includes every adult diagnosed with BE in Northern Ireland between 1993 and 2005.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We followed 8522 patients with BE, defined as columnar lined epithelium of the esophagus with or without specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM), until the end of 2008. Patients with incident adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia or with high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus were identified by matching the NIBR with the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, and deaths were identified by matching with records from the Registrar General's Office. Incidence of cancer outcomes or high-grade dysplasia was calculated as events per 100 person-years (% per year) of follow-up, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine incidence by age, sex, length of BE segment, presence of SIM, macroscopic BE, or low-grade dysplasia. All P values were from two-sided tests.

RESULTS

After a mean of 7.0 years of follow-up, 79 patients were diagnosed with esophageal cancer, 16 with cancer of the gastric cardia, and 36 with high-grade dysplasia. In the entire cohort, incidence of esophageal or gastric cardia cancer or high-grade dysplasia combined was 0.22% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19% to 0.26%). SIM was found in 46.0% of patients. In patients with SIM, the combined incidence was 0.38% per year (95% CI = 0.31 to 0.46%). The risk of cancer was statistically significantly elevated in patients with vs without SIM at index biopsy (0.38% per year vs 0.07% per year; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.54, 95% CI = 2.09 to 6.00, P < .001), in men compared with women (0.28% per year vs 0.13% per year; HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.41 to 3.16, P < .001), and in patients with low-grade dysplasia compared with no dysplasia (1.40% per year vs 0.17% per year; HR = 5.67, 95% CI = 3.77 to 8.53, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We found the risk of malignant progression among patients with BE to be lower than previously reported, suggesting that currently recommended surveillance strategies may not be cost-effective.

Gastric cardiac carcinomas involving the esophagus are more adequately staged as gastric cancers by the 7th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging System

The aim of this study was to compare the 7th with the 6th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging System for prognostic stratification of gastric cardiac carcinomas involving the esophagus. We retrospectively compared differences in pathological stages with patient survival between the 7th and the 6th staging systems in 142 consecutive resection cases of this cancer. Patient median age was 65 years. The male-female ratio was 3.3. The epicenter of all tumors was within 5 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. The median tumor size was 5.0 cm. Most tumors (79%) were typical adenocarcinomas and the rest showed uncommon histology types. Using the guidelines for gastric cancer, this group of cancer was better stratified by the 7th than the 6th edition of the staging system, especially for pathological nodal (pN) and overall stage pIIIC. Patients with celiac axis nodal disease had the 5-year survival rate worse than those staged at pN3A and pIIIA. Patients staged at pT3 and pN3B had the 5-year survival rate worse than those at pM1 and pIV. We showed that the overall stage of gastric cardiac carcinomas was better stratified by gastric than by esophageal cancer grouping. We conclude that these tumors are better stratified with the 7th than the 6th edition of the gastric staging system, especially for pIII cancers, and better staged by the new gastric than esophageal cancer staging system. We propose that the staging of these tumors be reverted to gastric grouping and combine pT3 and pN3B into the overall stage pIV.

Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori infection is the most important risk factor for gastric cancer, but no association with cardia cancer has been recognized. However, a heterogeneous distribution of etiologically distinct types of cardia cancer may contribute to explain conflicting findings between studies in high- and low-risk settings. We aimed to quantify the association between H. pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer through meta-analysis, and to provide an explanation for the expected heterogeneity of results.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed published studies addressing the association between H. pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer (up to June 2009), and extracted relative risk (RR) estimates for the association with cardia and non-cardia cancers. Summary RR estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted, namely according to gastric cancer risk settings.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles were considered for meta-analysis. For cardia cancer, summary RR was 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.40; I (2) = 52.8%), higher in high-risk (RR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.38-2.83; I (2) = 18.4%) than in low-risk settings (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.97; I (2) = 11.6%). For non-cardia cancer, RR estimates were similar in high- (RR = 3.02; 95% CI 1.92-4.74; I (2) = 90.7%) and low-risk settings (RR = 2.56; 95% CI 1.99-3.29; I (2) = 46.6%). These observations were consistent across different inclusion criteria and when accounting for the virulence of the infecting strains.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk settings, a positive association between H. pylori infection and gastric cancer was observed both for cardia and non-cardia cancers. The results support the hypothesis of a heterogeneous distribution of etiologically distinct types of cardia cancer.

Preoperative radiochemotherapy for resectable localised oesophageal cancer: a controversial strategy

Preoperative chemoradiation (P-CRT) remains a controversial strategy in the treatment of squamous cell cancer (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the oesophagus. Until recently, randomised studies mixed the two, often without any distinction. In randomised studies involving exclusively SCC, P-CRT increases the rate of local control, R0 resection, pCR and disease-free survival. The absence of any impact on overall survival may be linked to the toxic effects of this treatment. Meta-analyses have revealed a survival benefit of approximately +13% at 2 years. However, the methodology used was perhaps questionable. Five randomised trials involving ADC patients compared P-CRT with surgery alone. The results were contradictory with insufficient statistical power in selected positive studies to answer this issue once and for all. P-CRT is unsatisfactory as a standard treatment. Although local control rates were increased with P-CRT, it should be considered only for selected patients in selected centres.

Recent incidence trends and sociodemographic features of oesophageal and gastric cancer types in an English region

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal and gastric cancers comprise various common tumour types with possible different aetiology and historically different incidence trends.

AIM

To enhance and update evidence about the descriptive epidemiology of oesophageal and gastric cancers.

METHODS

Population-based information from the East of England was available on 16 319 (65% male) incident cases of oesophago-gastric cancer (ICD-10 C150-169) diagnosed during 1995-2006. Age-standardized incidence trends by gender and deprivation groups and sex ratios were compared for four different tumour types [oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), junctional/cardia adenocarcinoma (JCA), and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (NCGA)].

RESULTS

Between 1995-1997 and 2004-2006, the age-standardized incidence of OAC and JCA increased slightly (by 4% and 6% in men and 17% and 8% in women respectively), with a sex ratio >4 for both. Conversely, OSCC and NCGA incidence decreased (-20% and -32% in men and -15% and -26% in women respectively), with sex ratio of <2 for both. In men, OSCC and NCGA incidence was associated with increasing deprivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the study context, there was a modest rise in OAC and JCA incidence. OAC and JCA share common incidence trends and sociodemographic features (contrasting with those of OSCC and NCGA cancers).

Incidence of carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Changes over time and geographical differences

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus is rising in many western countries including Sweden.

METHODS

We have studied the latest data concerning this as well as trends in the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of gastric cardia. Data was extracted from the Swedish cancer registry and analyzed regarding gender, age, region, histology and location of tumour.

RESULTS

The results show an increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma in both oesophagus and gastric cardia. Squamous cell carcinomas show a more stable development with a slight decrease of incidence. Adenocarcinoma is now the most common histological type of cancer in the oesophageal/cardia region in Sweden. Results also suggest a possible drift in location of adenocarcinoma from gastric cardia towards oesophagus. Overall a higher incidence was found in the male population and no trends in patient age at onset could be found. Squamous cell carcinoma is still slightly more common in urban regions.

The sentinel node concept in adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE

The sentinel node concept is of great value in the treatment of various malignancies. In this study we investigated whether the application of the sentinel node procedure is feasible in esophageal adenocarcinoma and whether it can tailor surgical treatment of the individual patient.

METHODS

In 40 patients with an adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, blue dye was injected around the tumor intraoperatively. Sentinel nodes (blue-stained) and nonsentinel nodes were identified and dissected during transhiatal esophagectomy. In sentinel nodes negative for tumor cells on routine hematoxylin-eosin examination, multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemical staining were performed to search for micrometastases.

RESULTS

The sentinel node procedure was technically successful in 39 of 40 patients (98%). The median number of sentinel nodes identified was 4. Sentinel nodes were present in more than 1 nodal station in 8 patients (21%). In 6 patients in whom the sentinel node was negative for metastasis, nonsentinel nodes were positive for tumor cells (false-negative rate 6/39 = 15%). Micrometastases and isolated tumor cells were detected in 7 of 19 patients (37%) with sentinel nodes, but this finding did not affect the false-negative rate.

CONCLUSION

Detection of sentinel nodes is technically feasible during esophagectomy for cancer. However, given the relatively high false-negative rate of 15% and the high frequency of sentinel nodes in more than 1 nodal station, the clinical relevance of the sentinel node concept (through application of the blue dye technique) in the current treatment of patients with an adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction seems limited.

Surgical results of patients after esophageal resection or extended gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction

Precise classification of cancers of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert may be difficult for the presence of Barrett's esophagus or hiatal hernia, which subsequently leads to a difficult choice of the surgical procedure of esophagectomy or gastrectomy. Ninety-six patients with such cancers were operated on in our department in 7 years. Twenty-nine patients (30.2%), classified as type I (group 1), underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric pull up. Sixty-seven patients (69.8%) classified as type II or III (group 2) underwent an extended gastrectomy. We compared the patients of both groups retrospectively for disease-free survival and postoperative complications. The general performance status of most patients was comparable in both groups and was assigned to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III. Statistically significant differences between the groups were seen for the postoperative reintubation rate [group 1: 31.0% vs. group 2: 9.0% (P = 0.009)], median time for surgery [group 1: 6 (3.5-8.5) hours vs. group 2: 4.7 (2.2-11.5) hours (P = 0.001)], time in the intensive care unit [group 1: 6 (3-85) days vs. group 2: 3 (1-54) days (P = 0.001)], median hospitalization time [group 1: 23 (14-105) days vs. group 2: 18 (10-63) days (P = 0.018)]. No statistical difference was observed for the recurrence-free survival of 40% after 3 years (P = 0.311), the mortality rate, the morbidity rate (P = 0.108), surgical and respiratory complications, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.645). We conclude that in selected cases it may be possible to perform an extended gastrectomy for small type I cancers.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the role of abdominal-transhiatal resection

The surgical strategy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical results of the abdominal-transhiatal approach for 100 consecutively operated type II and III cardia adenocarcinoma, to clarify clinicopathological differences between these tumors, and to define prognostic factors. A prospectively maintained database identified 100 consecutively operated patients with Siewert type II and III cardia adenocarcinoma. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between subgroups and prognostic factors were evaluated by the log rank test and Cox regression. Concerning clinicopathological characteristics, only the incidence of T1-2 stage was significantly higher in Siewert II type (P = .006). A complete (R0) resection was obtained in 74 patients (74%). Overall postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 6% and 28%, respectively. Overall actuarial 5-year survival rate in resected patients was 27.4% (median 27 months), with 20.6% for type II and 34 for type III cancers (P = .07). Considering R0 resections, overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 33.9% (median 33 months), with 26.7% for type II and 40.5 for type III cancer (P = .06). Pathologic T and N stage and R status were independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis, and Siewert type showed a trend toward significance. The abdominal-transhiatal approach is a safe surgical approach, allowing complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy in these patients. True carcinoma of the cardia may be a distinct clinical entity with a more aggressive natural history than subcardial gastric carcinoma.

[Resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction care: which perioperative treatment?]

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction has an ominous prognosis. Until now, oesophageal adenocarcima care was close to the squamous cell cancer one whereas adenocarcinoma of the cardia was mixed with gastric cancers. Results from randomised studies mixed them without making distinctions. Nevertheless, context, natural history and clinical outcome differ. Five-year survival rate is around 40 %, all stages included. Results from several phase-III studies or meta-analysis allowed to define three therapeutic strategies applicable to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and the oesophagogastric junction. In Europe, in the case of a resectable tumour, preoperative chemotherapy became a standard treatment since results from the Magic trial. In the United States, post-operative radiochemotherapy according to the "Macdonald" scheme is used in case of a resected tumour with a R0 surgery. Actually, modern techniques of irradiation could reduce the rate of gastro-intestinal toxicities. The survival benefit from preoperative radiochemotherapy is still very controversial with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. We have performed a review of the literature with a methodological analysis of data with a high level of evidence in order to advise perioperative treatment guidelines for patients with a resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Results from pre- or postoperative strategies and the role of radiotherapy will need to be analysed in the future through a randomised study.

Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether extended transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus improves long-term survival.

BACKGROUND

A randomized trial was performed to compare surgical techniques. Complete 5-year survival data are now available.

METHODS

A total of 220 patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (type I) or gastric cardia involving the distal esophagus (type II) were randomly assigned to limited transhiatal esophagectomy or to extended transthoracic esophagectomy with en bloc lymphadenectomy. Patients with peroperatively irresectable/incurable cancer were excluded from this analysis (n = 15). A total of 95 patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy and 110 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy.

RESULTS

After transhiatal and transthoracic resection, 5-year survival was 34% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.71, per protocol analysis). In a subgroup analysis, based on the location of the primary tumor according to the resection specimen, no overall survival benefit for either surgical approach was seen in 115 patients with a type II tumor (P = 0.81). In 90 patients with a type I tumor, a survival benefit of 14% was seen with the transthoracic approach (51% vs. 37%, P = 0.33). There was evidence that the treatment effect differed depending on the number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen (test for interaction P = 0.06). In patients (n = 55) without positive nodes locoregional disease-free survival after transhiatal esophagectomy was comparable to that after transthoracic esophagectomy (86% and 89%, respectively). The same was true for patients (n = 46) with more than 8 positive nodes (0% in both groups). Patients (n = 104) with 1 to 8 positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen showed a 5-year locoregional disease-free survival advantage if operated via the transthoracic route (23% vs. 64%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

There is no significant overall survival benefit for either approach. However, compared with limited transhiatal resection extended transthoracic esophagectomy for type I esophageal adenocarcinoma shows an ongoing trend towards better 5-year survival. Moreover, patients with a limited number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen seem to benefit from an extended transthoracic esophagectomy.

Clear cell (glycogen rich) gastric adenocarcinoma: a distinct tubulo-papillary variant with a predilection for the cardia/gastro-oesophageal region

AIMS

To explore the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical profile of clear cell gastric cancers with a tubulo-papillary pattern.

METHODS

Twelve cases of clear cell gastric cancer (containing a minimum of 10% of clear cells) were studied. The cases were stained with: CK7, CK20, CEA, AFP, cyclin D1, E-cadherin and CDX-2.

RESULTS

There were nine males and three females with an age range of 62 to 82 years (mean 71.4 years). Ten cases were located in the gastric cardia with extension into the gastro-oesophageal junction and two were in the pylorus/pre-pyloric area. Tumours ranged from 2 to 9 cm (mean 4.5 cm), nine were polypoid, exophytic grossly and all had a tubulo-papillary histological pattern. Five cases contained intracytoplasmic hyaline globules. Lymph node involvement was present in eight cases. Eight cases were CK7 positive, four were CK20 positive and all 12 were CEA, cyclin D1, E-cadherin and CDX-2 positive. All cases were AFP negative. Five patients had recurrence and/or metastasis within 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Clear cell gastric cancers have a predilection for the gastro-oesophageal junction, are polypoid, have a tubulopapillary pattern, and show over-expression of cyclin D1 but normal E-cadherin.

Environmental risk factors in the development of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardia: a cross-sectional study in a Dutch cohort

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus (OAC) and gastric cardia (GCA) are not yet established.

AIM

To compare environmental risk factors between patients with OAC and GCA.

METHODS

One-hundred and twenty-six patients with OAC, 43 with GCA and 57 with squamous cell carcinoma filled out a questionnaire with information on demographic and lifestyle characteristics, physical activity levels, family history, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and medication use.

RESULTS

OAC and GCA patients were similar with regard to male predominance and age, alcohol intake and smoking, use of fruits and vegetables, body posture and occupational activities (P > 0.05). GCA patients less often had heartburn compared with OAC patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.96] and had these symptoms less frequently and for a shorter period (OR 0.3, CI 0.1-1.0 and OR 0.1, CI 0.03-0.6, respectively). Former and current aspirin use was lower among GCA patients than OAC patients (OR 0.2, CI 0.05-0.7 and OR 0.4, CI 0.1-0.9, respectively), whereas no difference in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was detected.

CONCLUSION

Although OAC and GCA share several environmental risk factors, OAC is more frequently associated with a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, suggesting a more important role for gastro-oesophageal reflux in OAC compared with GCA.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction

BACKGROUND

The border between the esophagus and stomach gives rise to many discrepancies in the current literature regarding the etiology, classification and surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising at the esophago-gastric junction. We have consequently used the AEG-criteria (adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction) for classification and have based the selection of the surgical approach on the anatomic topographic subclassification.

METHODS

In the following we report an analysis of a large and homogeneously classified population of 1602 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, with an emphasis on the surgical approach, the pattern of lymphatic spread, the outcome after surgical treatment and the prognostic factors. Demographic data, morphologic and histopathologic tumor characteristics, and long-term survival rates were compared among the three tumor subclassifiations.

RESULTS

The study confirms the marked differences in sex distribution, associated specialized intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus, tumor grading, tumor growth pattern, lymphatic spread, and stage between the three tumor entities. The degree of resection and lymph node status were the dominating independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The data show no significant differences of long-term survival after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy and extended total gastrectomy in these patients.

CONCLUSION

The classification of adenocarcinomas of the esophago-gastric junction in three types, AEG type I, type II and type III shows marked differences between the tumor entities and is recommended for selection of a proper surgical approach. Complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are associated with good long-term prognosis. Better surgical management and standardized procedures will improve the outcome also of patients who need to undergo more radical surgery, i.e. abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy.

The histopathologic spectrum of carcinomas involving the gastroesophageal junction in the Chinese

Carcinomas involving the gastroesophageal junction are common in China. The histopathologic characteristics of these cancers have not been systematically investigated. Reported are 41 such resected cancers from Chinese patients (30 men, 11 women). Their mean age was 62 years. The mean tumor size was 4.4 cm (range, 2 to 9 cm), and 58% were poorly differentiated. An unusual spectrum of tumor differentiation was observed, including adenocarcinomas (83%), adenosquamous (32%), colloid (2%), signet-ring (10%), squamous (5%), oncocytic (7%), pancreatic acinar (12%), and neuroendocrine (5%) carcinomas. Cancers with multiple types of differentiation in the same tumor were identified in 37 cases (90%). The adjacent gastric cardiac mucosa showed hyperplasia, oncocytic, and pancreatic acinar metaplasia, and mild chronic inflammation. Dysplasia was uncommon (n = 6). Barrett esophagus was not identified. Carcinomas involving the gastroesophageal junction in the Chinese are morphologically distinct, heterogeneous, and may be of esophageal origin.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: surgical therapy based on 1602 consecutive resected patients

Because of the borderline location between the esophagus and stomach, many discrepancies exist in the current literature regarding the etiology, classification, and surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising at the esophagogastric junction. The classification of adenocarcinomas into three types, AGE type I, type II, and type III, shows marked differences between the tumor entities and is recommended for selection of a proper surgical approach. Complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are recommended for a good, long-term prognosis. With better surgical management and standardized procedures, even the results in patients with more radical surgical approaches, the abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy improved.

Phase II trial of erlotinib in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinomas: SWOG 0127

PURPOSE

A phase II trial of the oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas stratified according to primary tumor location into two groups: gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)/cardia and distal gastric adenocarcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the GEJ or stomach (ST) that was unresectable or metastatic; presence of measurable disease; no prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer; Zubrod performance status (PS) of 0 to 1; and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function were treated with erlotinib 150 mg/d orally. Patient characteristics were median age, GEJ-63 years, ST-64 years; sex, GEJ-84% male and 16% female, ST-60 male and 40 female; Zubrod PS, GEJ-25 had a PS of 0 and 18 had a PS 1, ST-13 had a PS of 0 and 12 had a PS of 1.

RESULTS

Percentage of common toxicities were skin rash, 86% and 72%; fatigue, 51% and 44%; and AST/ALT elevation, 28% and 28%, respectively for GEJ and ST. There has been one confirmed complete response, three confirmed partial responses (PRs) and one unconfirmed PR for an overall response probability of 9% confirmed (95% CI, 3% to 22%), all occurring in GEJ stratum. No responses were observed in ST stratum. The median survival was 6.7 months in GEJ and 3.5 months in ST stratum. Neither intratumoral EGFR, transforming growth factor-alpha or phosphorylated Akt kinase expression nor plasma proteomic analyses were predictive of clinical outcome. No somatic mutations of the EGFR exons 18, 19, or 21 were detected and there was no gross amplification of EGFR by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib is active in patients with GEJ adenocarcinomas, but appears inactive in gastric cancers. The molecular correlates examined were not predictive of the patient therapeutic response.

New insights in the lymphatic spread of oesophageal cancer and its implications for the extent of surgical resection

In this review new insights in the dissemination pattern of oesophageal tumours and the implications for the (extent of) surgical and endoscopic resection are discussed. Moreover, the sentinel node concept in oesophageal cancer is reconsidered. Three-years survival after a limited resection for cervical-upper thoracic oesophageal cancer was 14-20% after an extended resection. No patients with distant metastases were alive after five years. Therefore, curative surgery for cervical-upper oesophageal cancer with extended lymph node dissection is probably only indicated in patients without distant lymph nodes metastases. Involved coeliac nodes can be found in tumours of the whole oesophagus. Adenocarcinomas of the gastrooesophageal junction do metastasize predominantly to the paracardial and lesser curvature regions. No significant difference was found in a randomized trial comparing two-field transthoracic resection with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastrooesophageal junction.(6) Subgroup analysis for patients with a distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma revealed a 17% survival benefit after transthoracic resection. In several Japanese studies a better five-year survival is claimed after a three-field lymph node dissection than after a conventional two-field lymphadenectomy. In a randomized study, however, no statistically significant difference was found in the short- and long-term survival nor in the recurrence rate. If an early lesion is limited to the mucosa, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) could be considered because of the low chance of lymph node metastases. However, the technique of EMR has not yet been optimized resulting in high numbers of local cancer recurrences and a high need for endoscopic re-resections. Only few studies investigated whether the sentinel node concept is applicable to the oesophagus or gastric cardia. In one study in patients with oesophageal or cardia cancer, the accuracy was 96% and only two false negative sentinel nodes were identified. The sentinel node concept in oesophageal cancers might change future operative strategies.