3
|
Punjani N, Power N, Vanhie JJ, Winquist E. Validation of a prediction model for avoiding post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2016; 10:260-263. [PMID: 27878048 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-chemotherapy residual masses (PCRMs) may contain persistent cancer or teratoma in more than 50% of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (mNSGCTs). Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is curative, but controversy exists about selection criteria for surgery. A validated prediction model by Vergouwe et al (2007) based on over 1000 patients was evaluated at our centre. METHODS mNSGCT patients treated with RPLND for PCRMs were identified from an electronic database. Typographical errors in the model were identified and corrected using their 2003 publication, but retaining the 2007 coefficients. Six clinical variables were included in the model and the calculated probability of benign tissue was compared with pathology. "Benign tissue only" was considered a positive test outcome in patients with a predicted probability of "benign tissue only" greater than 70%. RESULTS Fifty-two (52) mNSGCT patients between 1980 and 2014 were evaluable. Median age was 32 years (range 17-52) and International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) prognostic stages were: good 46.2%, intermediate 32.7%, and poor 21.2%. Most patients received bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy and full bilateral RPLND. Pathology showed residual cancer or teratoma in 31 patients (59.6%) and benign findings in 21 patients (40.6%). Positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 100%, 69%, and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS "Benign tissue only" was found in 100% of patients in whom this was predicted using our pre-determined criteria. This study involved a limited number of patients, but confirms the potential value of the Vergouwe et al model. Routine use of this prediction model in clinical practice should be tested for mNSGCT patients with PCRMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahid Punjani
- Division of Urology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Power
- Division of Urology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - James J Vanhie
- Division of Medical Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Division of Medical Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liang RL, Xu XP, Liu TC, Zhou JW, Wang XG, Ren ZQ, Hao F, Wu YS. Rapid and sensitive lateral flow immunoassay method for determining alpha fetoprotein in serum using europium (III) chelate microparticles-based lateral flow test strips. Anal Chim Acta 2015; 891:277-83. [PMID: 26388387 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.07.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Revised: 07/28/2015] [Accepted: 07/31/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), a primary marker for many diseases including various cancers, is important in clinical tumor diagnosis and antenatal screening. Most immunoassays provide high sensitivity and accuracy for determining AFP, but they are expensive, often complex, time-consuming procedures. A simple and rapid point-of-care system that integrates Eu (III) chelate microparticles with lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) has been developed to determine AFP in serum with an assay time of 15 min. The approach is based on a sandwich immunoassay performed on lateral flow test strips. A fluorescence strip reader was used to measure the fluorescence peak heights of the test line (HT) and the control line (HC); the HT/HC ratio was used for quantitation. The Eu (III) chelate microparticles-based LFIA assay exhibited a wide linear range (1.0-1000 IU mL(-1)) for AFP with a low limit of detection (0.1 IU mL(-1)) based on 5ul of serum. Satisfactory specificity and accuracy were demonstrated and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) for AFP were both <10%. Furthermore, in the analysis of human serum samples, excellent correlation (n = 284, r = 0.9860, p < 0.0001) was obtained between the proposed method and a commercially available CLIA kit. Results indicated that the Eu (III) chelate microparticles-based LFIA system provided a rapid, sensitive and reliable method for determining AFP in serum, indicating that it would be suitable for development in point-of-care testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong-Liang Liang
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Xu-Ping Xu
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Tian-Cai Liu
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Jian-Wei Zhou
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Xian-Guo Wang
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Zhi-Qi Ren
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Fen Hao
- DaAn Gene Co. Ltd. of Sun Yat-sen University, 19 Xiangshan Road, Guangzhou 510515, PR China
| | - Ying-Song Wu
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gilligan TD, Seidenfeld J, Basch EM, Einhorn LH, Fancher T, Smith DC, Stephenson AJ, Vaughn DJ, Cosby R, Hayes DF. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline on Uses of Serum Tumor Markers in Adult Males With Germ Cell Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:3388-404. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.4481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo provide recommendations on appropriate uses for serum markers of germ cell tumors (GCTs).MethodsSearches of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified relevant studies published in English. Primary outcomes included marker accuracy to predict the impact of decisions on outcomes. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients with elevated markers and statistical tests of elevations as prognostic factors. An expert panel developed consensus guidelines based on data from 82 reports.ResultsNo studies directly compared outcomes of decisions with versus without marker assays. The search identified few prospective studies and no randomized controlled trials; most were retrospective series. Lacking data on primary outcomes, most Panel recommendations are based on secondary outcomes (relapse rates and time to relapse).RecommendationsThe Panel recommended against using markers to screen for GCTs, to decide whether orchiectomy is indicated, or to select treatment for patients with cancer of unknown primary. To stage patients with testicular nonseminomas, the Panel recommended measuring three markers (α-fetoprotein [AFP], human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG], and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) before and after orchiectomy and before chemotherapy for those with extragonadal nonseminomas. They also recommended measuring AFP and hCG shortly before retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and at the start of each chemotherapy cycle for nonseminoma, and periodically to monitor for relapse. The Panel recommended measuring postorchiectomy hCG and LDH for patients with seminoma and preorchiectomy elevations. They recommended against using markers to guide or monitor treatment for seminoma or to detect relapse in those treated for stage I. However, they recommended measuring hCG and AFP to monitor for relapse in patients treated for advanced seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D. Gilligan
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Jerome Seidenfeld
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Ethan M. Basch
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Lawrence H. Einhorn
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Timothy Fancher
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - David C. Smith
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Andrew J. Stephenson
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - David J. Vaughn
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Roxanne Cosby
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Daniel F. Hayes
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| |
Collapse
|