Does sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma alter disease outcome?

Intraparotid Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM) has evolved tremendously since sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the prominent tool of prognosis and staging. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of intraparotid SLNB compared with a more extensive surgery of superficial parotidectomy (SP).

METHODS

The electronic database of PubMed and Scopus were searched for publications until 10 March 2022. In addition, the study included data of patients from our institution who underwent cherry-picking procedures. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 test.

RESULTS

The pooled result regarding the rate of SLNB excision success was 97 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.99; p < 0.0001), and the pooled probability of a positive SLNB result was 16 % (95 % CI 0.12-0.20; p < 0.0001). Failure of SLNB had pooled results of 4 % (95 % CI 0.02-0.06; p < 0.0009). For SP, no study examining N0 HNCM patients has met the authors' inclusion criteria. Cherry-picking SLNB had temporary and permanent facial nerve paralysis relative risks (RRs) of 0.12 (95 % CI 0.06-0.27; p < 0.0001) and 0.46 (95 % CI 0.17-1.22; p < 0.0001), respectively, compared with historical data from four weighted meta-analyses of SP.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this study suggest that intraparotid SLNB performed for N0 HNCM patients is a safe and reliable procedure, with very low complication rates. Failure of the procedure did not exceed 4 %. Therefore, intraparotid SLNB may be superior to an extensive surgery such as SP and should be examined in future prospective trials.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging with Lymphoscintigraphy Improves the Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in melanoma management, there remains room for improvement in the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy. The authors analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy with lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green fluorescence to evaluate the quality and accuracy of this technique.

METHODS

Consecutive primary cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy with radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green fluorescence from 2012 to 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Analysis was performed of melanoma characteristics, means of identifying sentinel lymph nodes, sentinel lymph node status, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-four melanomas and 1827 nodes were analyzed; 1556 nodes (85.2 percent) were identified by radioactivity/fluorescence, 255 (14 percent) by radioactivity only, and 16 (0.9 percent) with indocyanine green only. There were 163 positive sentinel nodes. One hundred forty-seven (90.2 percent) were identified by radioactivity/fluorescence, 13 (8 percent) by radioactivity only, and three (0.6 percent) with fluorescence only. Of the 128 patients with a positive biopsy, eight patients' (6.3 percent) nodes were identified by radioactivity only and four (3.4 percent) with fluorescence only. There were 128 patients with a positive biopsy, 454 with a negative biopsy, and 12 patients who had a negative biopsy with subsequent nodal recurrence. Mean follow-up was 2.8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study of the largest cohort of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy with radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green-based technology, the quality and accuracy of this technique are demonstrated. This has important implications for melanoma patients, as the adoption of this approach with subsequent accurate staging, adjuvant workup, and treatment may improve survival outcomes. .

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, II.

Cranial nerve outcomes in regionally recurrent head & neck melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy

OBJECTIVE

Characterize long-term cranial nerve (CN) outcomes following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based management for head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM).

METHODS

Longitudinal review of HNCM patients undergoing SLNB from 1997-2007.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-six patients were identified, with mean age 53.5 ± 19.0 years, mean Breslow depth 2.52 ± 1.87 mm, and 4.9 years median follow-up. One hundred five (29.4%) patients had SLNB mapping to the parotid basin. Eighteen patients had positive parotid SLNs and underwent immediate parotidectomy / immediate completion lymph node dissection (iCLND), with six possessing positive parotid non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs). Fifty-two of 356 (14.6%) patients developed delayed regional recurrences, including 20 total intraparotid recurrences: five following false negative (FN) parotid SLNB, three following prior immediate superficial parotidectomy, two following iCLND without parotidectomy, and the remaining 12 parotid recurrences had negative extraparotid SLNBs. Parotid recurrences were multiple (4.9 mean recurrent nodes) and advanced (n = 4 extracapsular extension), and all required salvage dissection including parotidectomy. Immediate parotidectomy/iCLND led to no permanent CN injuries. Delayed regional HNCM macrometastasis precipitated 16 total permanent CN injuries in 13 patients: 10 CN VII, five CN XI, and one CN XII deficits. Fifty percent (n = 10) of parotid recurrences caused ≥1 permanent CN deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional HNCM macrometastases and salvage dissection confer marked CN injury risk, whereas early surgical intervention via SLNB ± iCLND ± immediate parotidectomy yielded no CN injuries. Further, superficial parotidectomy performed in parotid-mapping HNCM does not obviate delayed intraparotid recurrences, which increase risk of CN VII injury. Despite lack of a published disease-specific survival advantage in melanoma, early disease control in cervical and parotid basins is paramount to minimize CN complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 (retrospective case series) Laryngoscope, 130:1707-1714, 2020.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Longitudinal review of a 356-patient cohort with HNCM undergoing SLNB from 1997 to 2007.

RESULTS

Descriptive characteristics included the following: age, 53.5 ± 19 years (mean ± SD); sex, 26.8% female; median follow-up, 4.9 years; and Breslow depth, 2.52 ± 1.87 mm. Overall, 75 (21.1%) patients had a positive SLNB. Among patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection following positive SLNB, 20 (27.4%) had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Eighteen patients with local control and negative SLNB developed regional disease, indicating a false omission rate of 6.4%, including 10 recurrences in previously unsampled basins. Ten-year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were significantly greater in the negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) cohort (OS, 61% [95% CI, 0.549-0.677]; MSS, 81.9% [95% CI, 0.769-0.873]) than the positive SLN cohort (OS, 31% [95% CI, 0.162-0.677]; MSS, 60.3% [95% CI, 0.464-0.785]) and positive SLN/positive nonsentinel lymph node cohort (OS, 8.4% [95% CI, 0.015-0.474]; MSS, 9.6% [95% CI, 0.017-0.536]). OS was significantly associated with SLN positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; P < .01), immunosuppression (HR, 2.37; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 1.91; P < .01), and ulceration (HR, 1.86; P < .01). SLN positivity (HR, 3.13; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.19; P < .01), and number of mitoses (P = .0002) were significantly associated with MSS. Immunosuppression (HR, 3.01; P < .01) and SLN status (HR, 2.84; P < .01) were associated with recurrence-free survival, and immunosuppression was the only factor significantly associated with regional recurrence (HR, 6.59; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow up indicates that SLNB showcases durable accuracy, safety, and prognostic importance for cutaneous HNCM.

Melanotic and non-melanotic malignancies of the face and external ear - A review of current treatment concepts and future options

Skin has the highest incidence and variety of tumors of all organs. Its structure is of great complexity, and every component has the potential to originate a skin neoplasm (SN). Because of its exposed nature, skin is vulnerable to carcinogenic stimuli such as UV radiation. Various entities can cause SN. Nonmelanotic skin cancers (NMSC) are the most common of all cancers, with over one million cases diagnosed annually in the US. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) accounts for approximately 80% of all NMSC, most of the remaining 20% being squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The skin of the head and neck is the most common site for tumors, accounting for more than 80% of all NMSC. BCC, SCC, and malignant melanomas (MM) represent 85-90% of all SN. Merkel cell tumors (MCC), lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas of the skin (LELCS), dermato-fibro-sarcomas, leiomyosarkomas, and Kaposi-sarcomas are less frequent in the facial skin region and the external ear. Based on data from the German Federal Cancer Registry (2003/2004), 140,000 people in Germany were affected by SN (100,000 BCC, 22,000 SCC, 22,000 MM). This number increases considerably if malignant precursors, such as actinic keratosis, are included. Each year, the frequency of SN diagnosis rises by 3-7%. Among all known malignant tumors, MM exhibits the highest rate of increase in incidence. In the past, SN was primarily diagnosed in people aged 50 years or older. However, recently, the risk for developing SN has shifted, and younger people are also affected. Early diagnosis is significantly correlated with prognosis. Resection of SN creates defects that must be closed with local or microvascular flaps to avoid functional disturbing scar formation and deflection of the nose, eyelids, or lips. All therapeutic strategies for SN, the current standard for adjuvant and systemic treatment, and the management of the increasing number of patients under permanent blood thinner medication are described with regard to the treatment of SN.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck

From 18% to 35% of cutaneous melanomas are located in the head and neck, and nearly 70% are thin (Breslow thickness ≤ 1 mm). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has an established role in staging of intermediate-thickness melanomas, however its use in thin melanomas remains controversial. In this article, we review the literature regarding risk factors for occult nodal metastasis in thin cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (CMHN). Based on the current literature, we recommend SLNB for all lesions with Breslow thickness ≥ 0.75 mm, particularly when accompanied by adverse features including mitotic rate ≥ 1 per mm(2), ulceration, and extensive regression. SLNB should also be strongly considered in younger patients (e.g. < 40 years old), especially in the presence of additional adverse features. All patients who do not proceed with sentinel lymph node biopsy must be carefully followed to monitor for regional relapse.

The metastatic potential of head and neck cutaneous malignant melanoma: is sentinel node biopsy useful?

Results from a large multicentre trial suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy examination may benefit disease-free survival in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma of intermediate thickness, but this is controversial. We recorded the outcomes of patients with these lesions in the head and neck with specific reference to regional lymph node metastases, to find out whether routine sentinel lymph node biopsy examination would have been beneficial. We reviewed pathology databases, multidisciplinary outcomes, and notes for all patients managed by a regional melanoma service between 2004 and 2009, and recorded key characteristics of the tumours. Details on patients with malignant melanoma of intermediate thickness (1.2-3.5mm) were further analysed for the development of nodal metastases in the neck over a 3-year postoperative period. We compared our data with the rate of predicted nodal metastases generated from the trial. Of 132 patients with malignant melanoma of the head and neck, 33 (25%) had lesions of intermediate thickness, and nodal metastases developed in only one. The remaining 32 remained free of neck disease during the study period. Although trial data predicted that 16% (n=5 in this sample) would show signs of metastasis and require neck dissection, on the basis of our data, practice in our unit will not change. Sentinel node biopsy examination for melanoma remains controversial because the natural history of metastatic spread of disease is not fully understood.

Sentinel lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with melanoma of the scalp

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To compare clinicopathologic and prognostic factors associated with scalp melanomas and nonscalp melanomas of the head and neck (H&N).

STUDY DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the database from a multi-institutional, prospective, randomized study.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic factors were assessed and correlated with survival and recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival and overall survival were performed.

RESULTS

Of 405 patients with H&N melanomas ≥1.0 mm Breslow thickness, 109 patients had melanoma of the scalp. All were Caucasian (100%), with most being male (79.5%) with a mean age of 49.8 years. The mean Breslow thickness was 2.4 mm; 25% had signs of ulceration. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity was seen in 20.9% of scalp melanoma patients, and was more likely in younger patients (44.7 vs. 50.8 years, P = .04) and in those with a Breslow thickness of 2 to 4 mm (P = .005). The incidence of locoregional and distant recurrence were similar. Overall survival for scalp melanoma patients was significantly impacted by SLN positivity (P = .03), whereas Breslow thickness and ulceration status predicted poorer survival in nonscalp melanoma patients (P = .005, P < .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, SLN status was the strongest predictor of overall survival in scalp melanoma. Tumor thickness and ulceration correlated with poorer overall survival in nonscalp H&N melanoma. The prognostic significance of SLN status in the H&N may vary with the melanoma site.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a widely used staging procedure for cutaneous melanoma. However, debate remains around the accuracy and prognostic implications of SLNB for cutaneous melanoma arising in the head and neck, as previous reports have demonstrated inferior results to those in nonhead and neck regions. Through the largest single-institution series of head and neck melanoma patients, the authors set out to demonstrate that SLNB accuracy and prognostic value in the head and neck region are comparable to other sites.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database was queried for cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients who underwent SLNB at the University of Michigan between 1997 and 2007. Primary endpoints included SLNB result, time to recurrence, site of recurrence, and date and cause of death. Multivariate models were constructed for analyses.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-three patients were identified. A sentinel lymph node was identified in 352 of 353 patients (99.7%). Sixty-nine of the 353 (19.6%) patients had a positive SLNB. Seventeen of 68 patients (25%) undergoing completion lymphadenectomy after a positive SLNB result had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Patients with local control and a negative SLNB failed regionally in 4.2% of cases. Multivariate analysis revealed positive SLNB status to be the most prognostic clinicopathologic predictor of poor outcome; hazard ratio was 4.23 for SLNB status and recurrence-free survival (P < .0001) and 3.33 for overall survival (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB is accurate and its results are of prognostic importance for head and neck melanoma patients.

Sentinel Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanoma

Objective. This systematic review was conducted to examine the test performance of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma, including the identification rate and false-negative rate.

Data Sources. PubMed, EMBASE, ASCO, and SSO database searches were conducted to identify studies fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: sentinel node biopsy was performed, lesions were located on the head and neck, and recurrence data for both metastatic and nonmetastatic patients were reported.

Review Methods. Dual-blind data extraction was conducted. Primary outcomes included identification rate and test performance based on completion neck dissection or nodal recurrence.

Results. A total of 3442 patients from 32 studies published between 1990 and 2009 were reviewed. Seventy-eight percent of studies were retrospective and 22% were prospective. Trials varied from 9 to 755 patients (median 55). Mean Breslow depth was 2.53 mm. Median sentinel node biopsy identification rate was 95.2%. More than 1 basin was reported in 33.1% of patients. A median of 2.56 sentinel nodes per patient were excised. Sentinel node biopsy was positive in 15% of patients. Subsequent completion neck dissection was performed in almost all of these patients and revealed additional positive nodes in 13.67%. Median follow-up was 31 months. Across all studies, predictive value positive for nodal recurrence was 13.1% and posttest probability negative was 5%. Median false-negative rate for nodal recurrence was 20.4%.

Conclusion. Sentinel node biopsy of head and neck melanoma is associated with an increased false-negative rate compared with studies of non–head and neck lesions. Positive sentinel node status is highly predictive of recurrence.

Invasive melanoma of the face: Management, outcomes, and the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 260 patients at a single institution

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The face is a common site of melanoma occurrence. The purpose of this study was to examine the management and outcomes of patients with invasive melanoma of the face.

METHODS

Patients with invasive melanoma of the face managed at our institution from 1997 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Details of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB), disease recurrence, and deaths were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty patients were reviewed (mean age 68, mean tumor thickness 0.87 mm). Of 100 patients eligible for SNB (tumor thickness ≥ 1 mm, Clark level ≥ IV, or ulceration) this was performed in only 29 (29%), and those who underwent SNB were younger than those who did not (mean age 59 vs. 79 years, P < 0.0001). SNB was successful in 28 (97%), and no complications occurred. SNB was positive in 3 (11%). After mean follow-up of 30 months, nodal recurrence occurred in 9 (3.5%) and distant recurrence in 20 (7.7%). There were 60 deaths (overall mortality 23%); attributed to melanoma in only 16 cases (disease specific mortality 6.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Facial melanoma is associated with low rates of regional recurrence despite underutilization of SNB. Older patients are less likely to undergo SNB. Due to the advanced age of patients with facial melanoma, most deaths occurring are from unrelated causes.

Tumor location predicts survival in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

Prior studies documented poorer outcomes in patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM) relative to those with melanoma at other sites. We evaluated survival differences attributable to tumor location in patients with CHNM.

METHODS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients undergoing surgery for CHNM from 1988 to 2006, excluding patients without biopsy-proven diagnoses, those diagnosed at autopsy, and patients with distant metastases. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we assessed patient, tumor, and treatment-specific factors on overall survival (OS) and melanoma specific survival (MSS). Cox proportional hazards models assessed the role of tumor location (ear, eyelid, face, lip, scalp/neck) on OS and MSS, while controlling for patient age, gender, race, tumor thickness, tumor ulceration, lymph node status, histologic subtype, type of surgery, and use of radiation. Risks of overall and melanoma-specific mortality were reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 27,097 patients, 10-y rates of OS and MSS were 56.1% and 84.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, scalp/neck primary site was associated with an increased risk of overall (HR 1.20, CI 1.14-1.26; P < 0.001) and melanoma-specific mortality (HR 1.64, CI 1.49-1.80, P < 0.001) relative to melanomas of the face. Tumors of the lip had poorer MSS (HR 1.55; CI 1.05-2.28, P = 0.03) but not OS (HR 1.03, CI 0.80-1.34; P = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with melanomas of the scalp/neck have poorer OS and MSS and those with lip melanomas have poorer MSS. These anatomic areas should not be overlooked when performing skin examinations.

Added value of intraoperative real-time imaging in searches for difficult-to-locate sentinel nodes

Localization of sentinel lymph nodes can be challenging if they are in difficult anatomic locations or near high radiotracer activity. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of intraoperative real-time imaging using a portable gamma-camera in conjunction with a conventional gamma-counting probe when it is difficult to localize the sentinel node.

METHODS

After (99m)Tc-nanocolloid injection, patients with various malignancies underwent presurgical lymphoscintigraphy followed by surgery (usually the next day). We evaluated 20 patients who required sentinel lymph node biopsy and in whom the location or other characteristics of the sentinel node would make intraoperative retrieval difficult. During surgery, the sentinel node was localized using a portable gamma-camera together with a hand-held gamma-probe. A (153)Gd pointer or (125)I seed was used to better depict the sentinel node location in real time.

RESULTS

Using only a conventional hand-held gamma-probe, surgeons were able to definitively localize the sentinel node in 15 of 20 patients. Intraoperatively, the portable gamma-camera showed uptake by the definite sentinel node in 19 of 20 patients and helped to precisely localize the node with the hand-held gamma-probe in 4 patients. In 1 of these patients, the sentinel node was metastatic.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a standard hand-held gamma-probe and real-time imaging provided by a portable gamma-camera offers a high intraoperative detection rate in patients with difficult sentinel node localization as assessed by presurgical lymphoscintigraphy.

Comparison Among Clark's, Breslow's, and TNM classifications for cutaneous head and neck malignant melanoma

This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malignant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admission, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical resection of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark's and Breslow's classifications have lower impact in defining prognosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted between the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.

Current status of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery in breast and gastrointestinal tract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been developed as a new diagnostic and therapeutic modality in melanoma and breast cancer surgery. The purpose of the SLNB include preventing the operative morbidity and improving the pathologic stage by focusing on fewer lymph nodes using immunocytochemic and molecular technology has almost achieved in breast cancer surgery. The prognostic meaning of immunocytochemically detected micrometastases is also evaluating in the SLN and bone marrow aspirates of women with early-stage breast cancer. SLNB using available techniques have suggested that the lymphatic drainage of the gastrointestinal tract is much more complicated than other sites, skip metastasis being rather frequent because of an aberrant lymphatic drainage outside of the basin exist. At the moment, the available data does not justify reduced extent of lymphadenectomy, but provides strong evidence for an improvement in tumor staging on the basis of SLNB. Two large scale prospective multi-center trials concerning feasibility of gamma-probe and dye detection for gastric cancer are ongoing in Japan. Recent studies have shown favorable results for identification of SLN in esophageal cancer. CT lymphography with endoscopic mucosal injection of iopamidol was applicable for SLN navigation of superficial esophageal cancer. The aim of surgical treatment is complete resection of the tumor-infiltrated organ including the regional lymph nodes. Accurate detection of SLN can achieve a selection of a more sophisticated tailor made approach. The patient can make a individualized choice from a broader spectrum of therapeutic options including endoscopic, laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery, modified radical surgery, and typical radical surgery with lymph node dissection. Ultrastaging by detecting micrometastasis at the molecular level and the choice of an adequate treatment improve the postoperative quality of life and survival. However these issues require further investigation.